1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40
Quote# 123740

Allah is the god of Islam. He is said to be a continuation of a Mesopotamian moon god that was retained after the conversion of the Arabs to Islam.

Article "Allah", Kings Wiki 18 Comments [1/18/2017 3:06:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123738

Sexual property, under patriarchy, is what wives are recognized as. Adultery is a crime against sexual property.[1] In the Jewish faith, women were seen as man's sexual property, but equal in comradeship, homemaking and parenthood (e.g. Fiddler on the Roof).

Carole Pateman notes, "The patriarchal construction of sexuality, what it means to be a sexual being, is to possess and to have access to sexual property. . . . In modern patriarchy, masculinity provides the paradigm for sexuality; and sexuality means sexual mastery. The 'individual is a man who makes use of a woman's body (sexual property); the converse is much harder to imagine."[2]

Stanford M. Lyman writes, "A nearly unbounded wrath is sometimes aroused by the appropriation of another's sexual property. Treated in the classic sociological essay by Kingsley Davis as jealousy, this emotional state and its attendant response are also understandable as an angry reaction to lost self-esteem. . . . Of all the types of properties over which dominion is sought, sexual property seems to evoke the most intimate connection to self-worth. The bonds of love or affection express not only one's own feelings toward the other, but also an implicit reciprocal image of these feelings toward oneself. . . . Sexual property above all others is likely to engender vanity and pride in, and satisfy a fundamental need of, its possessor. Accordingly, an attack on one's sexual property usually cuts a deep wound in one's self-esteem. . . . A jealous regard for one's own dearly purchased prize in the marketplace of love may arouse the most intense fears, deepest insecurities, and ultimately his most ferocious wrath as a threatened possessor fights to preserve his pride, passion, and property. And precisely because jealousy arises out of the most significant elements of self-esteem, its fury might know no bounds."[3]

Thus, it should come as no surprise that when wives refuse to fulfill their proper roles as sexual property, their husbands sometimes get angry, as she is essentially appropriating herself.

Article "Sexual Property", Kings Wiki 12 Comments [1/18/2017 3:06:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123741

Consent is willingness to engage in an activity.

Informed consent

Feminists often argue that sex with a woman is rape unless she not only consents but is able to give informed consent. Arguably, "informed consent" means being informed enough to be a responsible member of the pussy cartel – a whore who knows her price and who won't undercut other women.

Article "Consent", Kings Wiki 9 Comments [1/18/2017 3:06:54 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123714

Many churchgoers today have been sinfully deceived to worship Israel instead of the God of Israel. Unsaved Jews die in their sins and go to Hell forever and ever! There is no blessing from God to Christ-rejecting Jews. The Bible clearly teaches that there is neither Jew nor Gentile in Christ Jesus (Galatians 3:26-29).

We are all sinners. It is unbiblical and sinful to elevate Jews over Gentiles. God is no respecter of persons (Acts 10:34; Colossians 3:25). God NEVER blesses those who are disobedient, whether they be Jew or Gentile. God blesses those who bless Christians, and curses those who curse Christians (Matthew 25:40, 45). Christians are the “chosen” (1st Peter 2:9).

Pastor Lawson refers to modern Israel as a “miracle,” but it was not a miracle. The holocaust (a massacre) was deliberately caused by world Luciferians powers, to become a pretext for forcing a new nation of Israel in Palestine. Please read the eye-opening book, “Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler.” Arabs were driven out by British troops at gunpoint from their homes, allowed to take only what they could carry with them. That's called stealing! God allowed king Nebuchadnezzar (Babylon) in 586 BC to annihilate Jerusalem, which caused the nation to cease to exist.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 11 Comments [1/18/2017 9:15:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123719

This is how a True Christian Patriarch protects his daughter:

"In 2003, I took my daughter with me on a mission trip to Romania. On the plane, there was a drunken man flirting with her in a very aggressive way.

"Unfortunately for him, there were 535 pounds of manhood in our party ready to protect her. Believe me, we were exercising much Christian patience with this man who persisted throughout the entire flight. He did not realize that he was facing deadly force, if he persisted.

"He actually touched her once and was making bold advances. He even continued the pursuit after the plane landed. I am convinced that, if we had not been with her to protect her, she would have been in serious danger.”

Okay, so a drunken man (a) makes lewd remarks, (b) actually puts his hands on the woman, and (c) stalks her after she deplanes.

Wow. It's a good thing for that man he didn't push things far enough to rouse the anger of 535 lbs of malicious idiocy.

Scott Brown (NCFIC), Archived at 'Semper Eadem' 14 Comments [1/18/2017 9:16:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Psycho Tits
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123724

Reminder that normies are heavily inferior to Incels

So we got raided again. This marks my divine duty to refresh the memories of the normies on how inferior they are.

Unlike the majority of Incels, you normies are as average as it gets, with no remarkable qualities, while INcels are gifted with superior intellect, wit and last but not least morality.

Our heightened state of celibacy allows us to transcend human intelligence, which even most of you normies lack. You being here means your life is at a disasterous state.

BeingaHero, /r/incels 43 Comments [1/18/2017 9:16:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123743

Objectification is when someone treats another person like an object. Drexel Scott notes, "Generally, we love and appreciate our tools for helping us to build better things in our grand designs in life. A woman’s role in a man’s life is to provide her sexuality, femininity and childcare duties so that the man’s work in the external world will be supplemented and it brings them both to new heights of happiness and satisfaction."[1] CamelJockey notes, "The only women that against the objectification of women are unattractive women that no one wants to objectify to begin with. Pretty girls love being objectified. The ugly ones are mad they never get any attention. It's not that they're against the objectification, they are jealous of the objectification they're not getting." TrulySovereign notes, "Or has been stated here many times before, they do not like being objectified by men that are below the SMV male they are trying to attract."

Article "Objectification", Kings Wiki 13 Comments [1/18/2017 3:07:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123713

Did you read those awesome Scriptures!!! “THAT IN THE AGES TO COME HE MIGHT SHEW THE EXCEEDING RICHES OF HIS GRACE.” Oh, I see, you'd rather go the other route... “IN FLAMING FIRE TAKING VENGEANCE ON THEM THAT KNOW NOT GOD, AND THAT OBEY NOT THE GOSPEL OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power” (2nd Thessalonians 1:8-9). Are you serious? I hope that is not you my friend. I hope you are one of the “FEW THAT BE SAVED” (Luke 13:23-24).

The world is filled with unbelieving fools, who will spend eternity tormented “IN THE LAKE THAT BURNETH WITH FIRE AND BRIMSTONE: WHICH IS THE SECOND DEATH” (Revelation 21:8).

Atheists Have No Excuse!

The Bible teaches that all atheists are self-made, not natural. Romans 1:20-21, “For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.” Nobody just grows up to be an atheist. There is a progression of departure from the truth, “SO THAT THEY ARE WITHOUT EXCUSE”!

Long before someone declares to be an atheist, there is an ungrateful heart toward God that refuses to glorify (acknowledge) Him. I have heard people express bitterness toward God for bad things that have happened in their life. Don't blame God! Atheists always blame God for the world's problems. But it is men who are to blame!

Psalms 14:1-4, “The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good. The LORD looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God. They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one. Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people as they eat bread, and call not upon the LORD.”

Notice that the Scriptures say, “THEY” (i.e., MEN) are corrupt, have done abominable works, have gone aside and become filthy!!! Is that God's fault? Is God to blame for this spoiled rotten generation of ours? No, He is not! GOD IS A GOOD GOD!!! Americans drive the best of cars, eat themselves fat, live in the best of housing, yet they're unthankful and look down their snooty noses at Jesus (the poor, disabled, imprisoned, misfits and broken-hearted). We don't deserve God's blessings in America.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 12 Comments [1/18/2017 9:15:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123744

The male desire to own women is part of masculine psychology. Ownership of women can include the right to sex on demand and to the woman's faithfulness. Women have a complementary desire to be owned by men.

Article "Male desire to own women", Kings Wiki 26 Comments [1/18/2017 3:07:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123676


This shirt features a helicopter and a falling man and the words "training to throw communists out of helicopters" and is perfect for showing your love for heroes like Augusto Pinochet and disdain for leftists of all shades while getting swole at the gym.

[Image changed to link due to size. –shy]

Right Wing Death Squad, Right Wing Death Squad 14 Comments [1/18/2017 9:18:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123712

Get the Popcorn Ready: "Return of the Daughters" has...returned

The Botkin sisters, Anna Sofia and Elizabeth, were raised in (and AFAIK are still part of) a Dominionist cult - and their local chapter, home, where they still live while pushing 30, is run by daddy. (If you watch the linked vid, you'll soon see why their fate is at once tragic, ironic, and...darkly funny, for all the Botkins' collectively egotistical posturing and ridiculously bloated CVs.)

The Botkin Family used to develop various media to consign for sale through a now-defunct parachurch organisation called Vision Forum.

What makes the linked Youtube.com video, Return of the Daughters, so special - aside from the obvious and very fundie insanity - is that one of the interviewed daughters also worked as a nanny for Doug Phillips, then CEO of Vision Forum.

This man lived the high life, travelling the world while "interns" pushed all manner of fundie material to pay for his adventures in dress-up land.

He was a pastor. Now, however, his brand is tarnished for his allegedly having been sexually inappropriate with that nanny (who sued him).

For a long time, this film simply disappeared, reappearing again only after the suit was dropped, settled out of court, and subject to a fucking gag order.

...and so now the film is not only back but, in a first for the Botkins, it's available to watch for free.

Information about the suit and its fallout can be found here:


Anna Sofia and Elizabeth Botkin, Youtube.com  3 Comments [1/18/2017 9:18:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Psycho Tits
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123731

Diverting the most capable women away from reproduction is dysgenic

A large variety of research and common experience has made clear that cognitive and physical sexual dimorphism already exists, hence the tendency of men to outperform in areas necessary for productive labor including physical strength, mathematics, and mechanical or scientific reasoning. It is also apparent in the difference between men and women in cranial capacity. Males average between 100 and 200 cubic centimeter larger capacity depending on the methods used in a given study. This study found an average of 123 cubic centimeter difference favoring males on average, but also found a lot of variation for both genders. Larger cranial capacity correlates well with higher intelligence and as a group men tend to have larger brains.

Income, which is a decent proxy for intelligence, correlates heavily with childlessness. Importantly, the correlation goes in the opposite direction for men than it does for women. High income men are much less likely to be childless, whereas high earning women are with even greater probability much more likely to be childless. In biology, this contradictory relation between intelligence and fertility would be described as a sexually antagonistic trait because it increases reproductive fitness of one sex (males) and decreases it in the other (females). As such, these genes are under conflicting selection pressures as they pass between genders over the course of multiple generations. This creates a large incentive to evolve sexually dimorphic expression patterns which can silence or diminish expression of intelligence genes in females while allowing the same genes to be turned on in males. Intelligence being a sexually dimorphic trait is parsimoniously explained by its divergent consequences to fertility depending on gender.

The lesson here is clear. The huge direct costs, opportunity costs, and the inefficiencies created from reserving jobs for women that they aren’t biologically suited for aren’t just unaffordable. Diverting women away from motherhood disproportionately and negatively impacts the fertility of the the most intelligent women; the most intelligent women being the ones most likely to be capable of successful careers and high incomes. Any policy or culture that prioritizes pushing women into the workforce does so at the expense of motherhood among the natural aristocracy and is by its nature dysgenic. The result in the short term is decreasing the average intelligence of the population and greatly exaggerated sexual dimorphism favoring male intelligence in the long run. Traditional environments (patriarchy) minimized the shredding of intelligence traits that passed through women to some degree by prioritizing reproduction even for capable women. If the current environment doesn’t send humanity back to the stone age first, then it will likely create a version of humanity of very smart men and dumb women as mechanisms evolve to safeguard intelligence genes while they temporarily pass through females. Lameness of mind will be protective against a loss in fertility for women and income potential that can only result from intelligence being indispensable for male fertility will also be preserved. The selection pressures set up by feminists will ironically create a population of feeble minded women. This is of course assuming that civilization is somehow able to maintain itself long enough and the current pattern of abysmal fertility in intelligent women holds. However, it is in no way clear that this is the case. So insidious are the effects of deprioritizing motherhood that any culture who implements them is patently suicidal.

The drop of fertility rates across the west and the concomitant decline in western civilization that will result can be blamed to a significant extent on the misallocation of life priorities among western women by their own poor choices and at the irresponsible prodding of the progressive culture. The future belongs to those who show up. Humanity as a whole will return to traditional gender roles because the groups where women prioritize motherhood will displace the cultures who don’t through demographic increase and eventual subjugation.

The real question is whether or not the west will have a place in that future. The west can either accept that harsh biological reality has allotted motherhood as the primary raison d’etre of women, or it can be displaced by less advanced and less benevolent cultures who haven’t forgotten that reality. Considering that it was the people and culture of the west who almost single-handedly brought humanity into the modern age, the loss of the western races and subsequently western culture would be a very sore blow not only to those people, but to humanity generally. The only morality is civilization, and unfortunately the unpleasant truth is that significant female enfranchisement is dysgenic and destroys civilization. Since prioritizing anything but motherhood for women works against civilization, it is by definition immoral and any sane polity will take every necessary step to minimize women, and especially intelligent women, from making anything other than motherhood the primary devotion of their life.

To preserve western culture, motherhood in a patriarchal context must be reinstated. It is often complained that such an arrangement is more unfair to women. In reality, the demands the patriarchal system makes on men are and always have been much more challenging than those it makes on women, as is evidenced by the 5-7 years shorter life expectancy for men. Men will accept this high price since the patriarchal system is the only way that the legitimacy of their children can be guaranteed. Far from being unfair to women, the advantages to women of sacrificing careers and promiscuity are many and include a guarantee of male attention and provisioning into old age.

Moreover, making motherhood the primary devotion of women’s lives does not mean the only devotion. Modern technology created by men greatly decreases the necessary housekeeping efforts required to maintain a home and advances in robotics will likely continue this trend. As such, Women will be afforded much opportunity and freedom to pursue virtually any interest once the necessary child rearing duties are performed. Some care will need to be taken by neopatriarchs to guarantee that there is ample opportunity for women to find meaning and purpose in their lives once their motherly responsibilities are complete. For the most part this is likely a spiritual question, however aesthetics and culture also seem like especially likely candidates for pursuit. What can’t be neglected or forgotten is that the environment that gave birth to modern dysgenic feminism was a large population of idle housewives and their relatively weak husbands. Women have an innate tendency to organize and then collectively nag and otherwise agitate for various ill-conceived reforms when they have nothing better to do. Feminism is only the most destructive consequence of this tendency. The temperance movement is another example. More productive outlets for this energy will have to be found.

And of course, the least appreciated advantage to women as a population is the partial protection of intelligence traits which prevents run-away increases in sexual dimorphism and further depression of female cognitive ability.

Atavisionary, Atavisionary 12 Comments [1/18/2017 1:41:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123703

The Presidential Transition is coming up and Obama warns President-Elect Trump not to destroy everything he has accomplished the past 8 years. Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

More A.F. Branco Cartoons at Net Right Daily.

A.F.Branco 2017 Calendar <—- Order Here!

Donations/Tips accepted and appreciated – $1.00 – $5.00 – $10 – $100 – it all helps to fund this website and keep

[Self whoring links de-linked. –shy]

A.F. Branco, Comically Incorrect 36 Comments [1/17/2017 12:43:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123728

[From a review of "Smart and SeXy"]

Impartial studies have revealed that HR women often use their influence in the hiring process not to advance the interests of the company but to screen for potential boyfriends and exclude female rivals: better-looking men are more likely to be given job interviews, while better-looking women are less likely.

Women’s move into the workplace has inevitably been accompanied by demands to remake workplaces so as to be more convenient to women. For example, one obvious consequence of female careerism is that many men are tempted to flirt with female coworkers. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with such behavior. As the author points out, flirting is something men have evolved to do, and “the species could not propagate without this behavior.” But most of these men do not come close to the wealthy movie stars and romance novel heroes with which the modern woman’s imagination has been filled. So women have demanded and gotten an administrative and legal regime which prohibits male flirting wherever it is “unwelcome” (i.e., whenever the man is unattractive). This is not merely unfair to these men. As the author points out, another “problem with criminalizing these men is that their labor and contributions are several orders of magnitude more valuable than the contributions of the women who make allegations.” It is also highly hypocritical on the part of women in view of their own demonstrated tendency, as described above, to use their jobs to advance their own sexual strategies.

Government work, being unconstrained by the need for profitability, is better able to absorb the costs of hiring large numbers of women, and accordingly women are 50 percent more likely to work for the government than men. Almost 60 percent of state and local government workers are women.

The feminists whose demands created our present employment regime want, in effect, for the cost of women’s behavior and decisions to be externalized to employers, customers, fellow employees and tax payers. Indeed, once all these hidden costs are factored out, it is unclear just how many “working” women are actually engaged in any sort of productive labor; the author suggests that the numbers may be as low as 30 percent, and there is little evidence women as a whole could ever become truly independent in the economic sense (although many women in the contemporary West are undoubtedly “independent” in the sense that they do as they please).

The cure for such waste is simply not to have many women in highly demanding positions. If they must work, they can be restricted to positions able to tolerate lower dedication.

The extension of political rights to women also involves high and sometimes hidden costs. Female influence in public life, wherever it exists, always follows a pattern which has been termed “the feminine imperative.” Kaine defines it as a “push to shape the social and legal institutions of society such that they benefit women specifically without much interest in whether those changes are harmful to men and civilization generally.” Thus, in contemporary America, women support the growth of the welfare state because its main beneficiaries are single mothers and the disproportionately female elderly population. Although the author does not discuss this, it has recently been suggested that female enthusiasm for “refugees” is a displacement of the maternal instinct to a domain where it is counterproductive. This whole question of the sources of female political behavior might be a fertile domain for scientific research once ideological controls are eased.

The author notes that

"women have a long history of being the main driving force behind hysterical cultural movements that seek massive top down control of behavior. The temperance movement has a lot of similarity to modern rape and sexual harassment hysteria. In the past, this hysteria was considered a female-specific mental disorder; women seem to be especially susceptible to the combination of highly emotional, frenetic and illogical thinking characteristic of hysteria."

But in recent decades, the very term “hysteria” has been banished from the vocabulary of psychiatry for what may be nothing more than ideological reasons.

Feminists promised that the entry of women into the workforce would unleash enormous reserves of previously untapped human talent and usher in greater prosperity and happiness for all. Instead, it has imposed vast new costs, particularly on men and taxpayers as a whole. And women themselves do not seem particularly happy under the new arrangements either: one in four American women are now on some kind of psychiatric medication just to get through the day.

The sexual consequences of this social revolution have been dire. White birthrates are below replacement across the West, and the most intelligent women are worst affected. As the author states, “the current average age of first birth for highly educated women is 32, and 1 in 4 highly educated women never have any children at all; a deeply dysgenic pattern.”

Kaine is admirably forthright in drawing his conclusions:

"The once symbiotic relationship [between the sexes] has morphed into a parasitic relationship where women depend on the coercive power of the government to extract wealth from men while providing little to men in return. . . . In essence, this is a free rider problem in which women want the benefits of civilization, but do not cooperate with the needs of the group to make civilization possible. . . . Progressively larger amounts of money [are] being taken directly from the pockets of men to pay for a largely ungrateful and ever more demanding population of women. This is wealth that productive men should be spending on their own families and children. . . . Reversing the dire consequences of feminist inspired policies and cultural beliefs thus constitute an urgent and existential imperative for the West if it is going to survive."

I couldn’t have put it better myself. If the West does survive, its future historians will marvel that a relative handful of women were able to turn the most advanced society in the history of the world upside down against the interests of the overwhelming majority of women and men merely to satisfy the imperatives of an ideology based on resentment and without any empirical support.

I was unfamiliar with Roderick Kaine until I came across this book from Arktos. He is clearly a gifted writer with an unusual ability to combine technical mastery of the hard sciences with sound social and political thinking. I hope we shall be hearing more from him in the future.

F. Roger Devlin, Counter Currents 12 Comments [1/18/2017 12:32:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123378

As had been previously explained, America had pretty much for all intents and purposes died by 1920 and the disastrous decision of the 19th Amendment, though some opinions place the beginning of the end even earlier, in 1800s. So in this aspect, which is a crucial one, America will not return to sanity. Trump won’t abolish women’s suffrage, he won’t bring women back into kitchens, none of this will happen. Did the Bush presidency restore the value of American women? Did the Reagan presidency stabilize what was a rapidly plummeting value of American women in the 80s (of course, with certain noble exceptions of women in backwoods areas, exceptions which still exist today) ? No, the battle is lost. The best aspect in terms of women will be, as Roosh says, to make it easier to find a fellow traveler. But even there you need to be careful which traveler to choose.

In terms of feminism, SJWs, alt-right etc, all of these things are kinda irrelevant ultimately if you look at the paragraph above, which outlines the real crux of the issue. Without abolishing women’s suffrage, without a hasty return to strict patriarchy, nothing of real relevance will happen. And we know Trump could never do that

caamib, Caamib blog 30 Comments [1/1/2017 11:14:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 35246

1. How can Evolution possibly explain things like dreams, reason, mathematical accuracy, de ja vu and other mind related phenomena? Not to mention the supernatural such as NDEs, ghost sightings and etc.
2. Jesus is the best way to explain human reasoning and morality at it's core. The fall in Genesis and Jesus as the hope for the future triumphs over all other ideas and beliefs about morality, and not only does it logically make sense, it historically comes together as God's word... with great documentary evidence to support it as being legit (and even greater spiritual evidence regarding it's inspiration).
3. Because the Eastern religions deny love, but yet God is love. So love is either a distraction and a hurt in life, or love is EVERYTHING... the meaning of life. The REASON. Jesus is pure love. Jesus is the only story in history that demonstrates the HIGHEST level of love (God dying for His people... His creation... the whole earth).
You either have to admit that love is the reason for life and believe in God, or believe in Buddhism and deny love and try to do everything in your power not to practice love.

Jesus.Lives, FanFiction.net 48 Comments [2/21/2008 4:25:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123733

I went home and went to bed. That night the Lord visited me in a dream. I saw the spirit he was tall about 7 ft. skinny and resembled an very un-kept man. He used to try and follow me after I left his house. But somehow I’d escape him, I suppose it was because I was always praying on my way home. He turned up outside my house and I remember running in and looking out of my letter hole. There was a man by my gate attending to the rubbish. The spirit said to him, “Where is that boy? Where did he go?” I remember peeking out the letterbox and thinking ‘Don’t you tell him.’ but the man pointed at my house. Strange thing was, I noticed the spirit couldn’t get past the man, and he returned back to my friend’s house. That man was an angel that stood guard outside my home.

I must have woken up and went back to sleep as there was a second part to the dream. In the dream the Lord sent me a letter with instructions on it. I remember the letter, it was A4 paper, outlined and the words were in red ink. This was the first of many of those letters in my life.

On the paper it said to return to my friends and cast the demon out.
I STRONGLY don’t believe you have to know names of demons to cast them out, BUT I was told his name of which I have never repeated again, AND to cast him out in the name of Jesus.
I was terrified the next day when I woke up. I had never done anything like this before. I have to admit I felt a bit stupid also. My friend knows me from school before I gave my heart to the Lord, so all the worse thoughts of ridicule was swirling about in my head. I went to another friend’s house to speak to his mother about my dream (They are believers), and his mother said go and do what the Lord is saying and she prayed for me. This was after I had told my own mother. She was scared and said “Don’t get involved! Stay out of it.”

I went to my friend’s house and prayed for him later that day. As I stepped into his house that knowledge came back to me, it was the Lords will I believe, and I told my friend what it was. We giggled and sniggered after I told him my dream and what the Lord has commanded me to do. I said to him the Lord says he will set you free. After I pray for you the demon will leave and your body will be left to recover naturally, within two weeks you will be back outside. I also said the Lord said to tell you, if he helps you and you turn your back on him the spirit will return with more. And you will see that your situation will be worse than now. I asked him if he still wanted me to go ahead with this and he said yes, so I did. It was a normal prayer, the best a new-born Christian could do, lol. There was no shouting, laying on of hands, dancing or heavy poetry, just a few simple words from a shy 17-year-old. Within two weeks, he was back outside and fully recovered. That’s his words not mine.

J.J Sylvester, Kingdom Daughter Blog 5 Comments [1/18/2017 2:27:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123737

[Thread "Is /r/Physical_Removal a hate sub? If so, I really feel we should bring more attention to it"]

From Wardenclyffe56

Of course it's a hate sub. Hate for commies and leftists. What do they think we want to "physically remove"? We adore Pinochet, someone that did it to hundreds. Think McFly, think.

"Helicopter rides are too merciful for the communist scum


From Drapetomania

It's actually a sub about love. Commies reach their full potential by being dropped out of helicopters. We're for what's best for everyone.

Wardenclyffe56 and Drapetomania, Reddit - r/Physical_Removal 8 Comments [1/18/2017 3:06:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123742

Narcissism is the pursuit of gratification from vanity or egotistic admiration of one's own attributes. According to Illimitable Men, "All people with narcissistic personality disorder are narcissists, but not all narcissists have a personality disorder. A healthy dose of narcissism is a performance-enhancer, for it improves one’s effectiveness by amplifying their self-love, confidence and boldness."[1] According to Bonecrker:[2]

women do not ever want to hear anything about you (sad but true). Women always find this offensive and think the guy is narcissistic (a projection of what they actually are) even if his talking about himself is brief and in context to the situation. On the other hand, if you spend all your time asking leading questions about her and then fleshing out the details of her life, only pausing to add various compliments to her, she will think you are the most brilliant conversationalist in the world, even though you have basically said nothing. You can do this for hours and hours and she’ll never even think to ask anything about you. It’s downright bizarre and disturbing, once you’ve experienced it. But not as bizarre and disturbing as the effect it has on how they see you.

Illimitable Men notes that "whilst narcissism is a suit well-worn on a man, it is one ill-fitting for a woman. Whilst women are inherently drawn to male narcissism as overconfidence is the linchpin of good masculine game, female narcissism is unattractive to the majority of men. In women it manifests as bratty, spoiled 'hot girl behaviour' and men, especially top-tier men, don’t want to feel like they’re babysitting an overgrown child."[3]

It also notes, "Being grandiose never hindered a man’s chances of getting laid."[4]

The two types of narcissism are infantile and grandiose.

Heartiste advises, "Be narcissistic. There is no greater divergence than that between a woman’s stated disapproval of male narcissism and the rapidity with which she jumps into bed with a male narcissist."[5]

Article "Narcissism", Kings Wiki 13 Comments [1/18/2017 3:06:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123727

[OP of "Incel is more than just not getting sex"]

It's an ideology, it's a way of life. There are people out there who don't get attention from females, but it doesn't necessarily mean they're Incel. To be Incel they need to follow the Incel ideology, if they don't, then they're just failed normies.

incel_, Reddit - r/IncelPurgatory 20 Comments [1/18/2017 12:32:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123693

The biggest bonus I’m gotta have in my eternal life living with Jesus is I’m gotta be the ultimate immortal beauty that makes nations and cities go falling and crumpling, which means all the kings on the earth are going to slaughter with one another at war just because all of them wanna fight for me. Every single one of the kings on the earth desperately wanna go to war just because of my ultimate immortal beauty. Every single of them wanna make me as the queen in each nation, so they go to war to define who’s the winner that can have me as queen, the ultimate immortal beauty that makes nations and cities go falling and crumpling.
In other words, I’m gotta be the ultimate immortal beauty that triggers World War 3, an all-out global nuclear warfare, because all the world leaders desperately wanna eat me, the ultimate immortal beauty. So, those world leaders go to nuke war for me, because they desperately wanna figure out who’s the luckiest guy that can eat me on the bed and swallow me into his stomach. So, they go to nuke war to figure out who’s the luckiest man. This is the meaning, the ultimate immortal beauty that makes nations and cities go falling and crumpling, because after an all-out global nuclear war the world leaders all die off and die out, their nations and cities falling and crumpling. All doomed.

usachinanukewar, All-out US-China nuclear war, looming, to wipe out one-fourths of the earth. 18 Comments [1/17/2017 12:40:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Denizen
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123699

Here is the truth about university campuses.

The administrators are liberal, the professors are Marxists, and most students are brainwashed sheep who do whatever their Marxist professors command them to do, because let's face it, if you are a young leftist, you are pretty stupid and easily manipulated because nobody enters university a brainwashed leftwing robot.

So what leftists do is go after the last bastion of white male institutions to destroy them.

Liberals can't stand that there are young white men anywhere in this country happy and free and not under the yoke of ballbusting feminist shrews, whose only purpose in life is to make men miserable because they are miserable themselves.

The Serf, Politico 21 Comments [1/17/2017 12:42:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: The Raygun One
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 122738

Hammer therapy and female organ transplant clones

It is known that incels are angry/unstable/depressed/stressed because of inceldom. I came up with a solution to that. Incels should first sleep then bash the heads of brain-dead female clones in for therapeutic purposes. This should be called hammer therapy. This way we would get to release our hate against females without harming other people. The clones would be made braindead so no harm would come to another person and we would get our revenge from the female gender because they doomed us to the incel fate. After the incels bashed the heads of the female clones in with hammers their organs will be used for people who wait for organ transplants. We will be the executioners for organ transplant clones. These braindead female clones would help society and incels way more than actual females. Nothing would get wasted and all problems would get solved.

SaintElliot, /r/IncelHeaven 18 Comments [11/30/2016 6:01:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123706

"Hitler's close boyhood friend from Linz, August Kubizek, wrote Adolf Hitler,
Mein Jugendfreund
(My Youth Friend), 'Adolf did not engage in love affairs
or flirtations. He always rejected the coquettish advances of girls or women.
Women and girls took an interest in him but he always evaded their endeavours'.
During deconstruction, it is customary that the person is sexually abused
in the manner which is most embarrassing to that person. In Hitler's case, he
was sodomised, creating a submissive distant respect for homosexuals like his
bodyguards and some of his highest-placed leaders. His natural bent was developed
into coprophilia (being shat on)...With each deconstruction an embarrassing
addiction is developed and filmed. With Hitler it was sadomasochism, coprophilia
and homosexuality. That is, he liked to be verbally abused and slapped around,
to have his head urinated on, his chest shat on, and to have sex with men".

PHEW! Really, no fucking wonder that sub-lice nazoid pervs adore this
shiteating, pissdrinking, cocksucking freak, huh?

Loose Cannon, Google Forums - soc.culture.israel 14 Comments [1/18/2017 9:13:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: WarGoatHK417
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123683

females turning males faggots because their pussy is simply overpriced as fuck. Welcome to 2017.

xenodit, /r/incels 29 Comments [1/16/2017 10:17:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40