Major Admin Announcement
Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Community Log In
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40
Quote# 121764

If GOD tells a man he must marry an unmarried woman that he has raped and support her the rest of her life, and then tells the woman she must marry him and let him support her until the day she dies, I would suggest they do exactly what GOD commands them to do.

Again, when I first saw this law, for an instant it seemed harsh to me. Now that I know GOD and HIS power, I also know that HE is THE BOSS. You know, today’s women rape very easy. They may look like angels, but they’re not. I’ve met many of them that look like angels that I found to be liars and devils.

Tony Alamo, Tony Alamo Christian Ministries 33 Comments [9/26/2016 3:09:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121762

Willingly drinking milk after the age of 5 is a self-drag. Especially if you’re black. Our Afrikan biology is different & was not made to digest the milk of Babylon. No wonder there is homosexuality & feminism among Afrikan peoples.

Angelaslayvis, Tumblr 31 Comments [9/26/2016 3:06:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Ivurm
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121759

No woman in love ever wanted to hear her lover say “Honey, you can hang out at my place as long as you feel like it”

What she wants to hear is “I will keep you forever, and never ever let you go.”

Men want to have sex with women. Women want to submit to a man’s urgent and powerful sexual demands. Sex for women is just not very interesting unless it is an act of submission and obedience.

Moment to moment consent to marriage and moment to moment consent to sex just is not what women want, as every man who has seduced a woman knows. (Some of my progressive commenters claim to married etc, but I really find this hard to believe. Maybe they are married in the sense that they get to sleep on the couch in the garage and are graciously allowed change the sheets on the main bed after their wife fucks her lover, who visits at infrequent intervals, beats her up, beats her kids up, fucks her, drinks all the booze in the fridge, and takes the housekeeping money.)

What women want corresponds to what, in the ancestral environment, was a safe place to raise children, and that was a household where she was firmly and securely in the hand of a strong master. Or, as the Old Testament tells us: “thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.”

Equality requires fences between equals. To raise children together, must be one household, one flesh, and one household can have only one captain. If two captains, no safe place for children. If your household has two captains, your wife will abandon that household.

The vast majority of white converts to traditional Islam are hot fertile age single women. Very few converts from Islam to Christianity, almost none, are fertile age women. Traditional Islam gives women what fertile age women really want. Progressivism gives them what they foolishly ask for and gives it to them good and hard.

Because of hypergamy, a woman will always test you, always rebel. But she does not rebel because she wants to win, instead she wants to be overpowered, she wants to be dominated, she wants to lose. Because of hypergamy, there is no rest for men, no love that is secure and unconditional. We always have to perform, we are always on stage, even though the role we usually have to perform is one of relaxed and confident mastery. We read of emperors with ten thousand concubines, who could have any concubine tortured or executed for any reason or no reason at all, and yet still they had woman troubles. But women don’t want to know this and are not going to give you any sympathy for it. The show must go on! Women have to paint their faces, and men have to be brave and manly, so stop whining.

Women need discipline, supervision, authority, and punishment, and when they do not get it they become distressed, tense, disturbed, and act out disruptive and destructive misbehavior to force those around them to take charge. They start fantasying about men who will take charge of them, fantasying about men who are not the men who are letting them run wild.

Because a woman will always test you, and this testing will always irritate and upset you and likely piss you off, it will often happen that she feels, rightly or wrongly, that her testing has damaged the relationship, whereupon she will likely beg for physical punishment, corporal punishment, to expiate her wrongdoing. Or, if actually ditched, cut herself since you are no longer around to do it for her.

Which brings me to the subject of this post. When should you hit your woman with a stick?

Well firstly, Mohammed, not well known as a blue haired feminist, said that if at all possible you should avoid physically punishing your women. Petruchio, Shakespeare’s parody of a manly man, pick up artist, and natural, found other ways to punish Kate. So in general, most of the time, you should not physically punish women. If other measures can work. But this kind of assumes you are in charge and she is tolerably well behaved, assumes that other measures can work.

Obviously, if it is not broke, don’t fix it. You don’t hit a woman who is always sexually available to you, generally obeys your orders, and runs the household in general accordance with your will, even if she sometimes tries your patience with minor shit tests like backseat driving. I never hit my wife. On the other hand, I am pretty scary guy. That I potentially might have hit my wife if she had been badly behaved might well have had something to do with her good behavior. Or maybe she was just naturally a good woman. Unfortunately good women are rare as rubies. I have needed to hit other women quite often.

Obviously you should never punch a woman in the face. Female faces are quite fragile, you can easily kill them with a punch in the face. A light slap in the face is, however fine. That is a light slap. For heavier slaps, obviously you should smack them on the backside, which can take a very heavy slap with no risk of injury.

The best place for a moderate blow with a stick is probably the palm of the hand. For heavier whacks with a stick, backside, upper back and thighs. Hitting them in the lower back can kill them, women are very fragile and need to be punished with care and love.

A light slap in the face, followed by cold stare works great, though it is more in the stare than the slap. Recently I had a dispute with my girlfriend resulting from her denying me sex. I struck her with a stick on the palm of hand twice, after the style of the punishment of Amy in “Little Women”. Worked great, and inspired this post.

Obviously any behavior that is good reason for hitting your woman with a stick is good reason for dumping her. And in our society that is legally loaded against men, the sensible thing to do, the safe thing to do, the easy thing to do, the sane and obvious thing to do, is to dump her rather than beat her.

But in fact every woman prefers a man who would beat her for misbehavior to a man who would dump her for misbehavior, and every woman prefers both the man who would beat her and the man who would dump her, to the nice guy who politely endures her misbehavior. The laws are set up to empower woman, but revealed preference is that they wind up sleeping with men who disempower them, which revealed preference makes total sense in that the telos of sex is not so much reproduction directly as the creation of an environment suitable for raising children, which requires women to be disempowered. If fucking does not disempower her, she does not really like it.

An environment of no fault divorce results in a hell of a lot of stupid divorces in which everyone gets hurt, everyone loses. And at best, or rather the least bad, one partner benefits a little, and the children and the other partner suffer enormously. Which least bad outcome is readily observed to be mighty uncommon, compared to the usual outcome where everyone loses. But if husbands are socially and legally discouraged from beating their wives, you really have to have no fault divorce. What woman want, what everyone wants, is an environment suitable for raising children. Which no fault divorce fails to provide. And if divorce only for fault, then it needs to be socially and legally acceptable for husbands to beat their wives with a stick in moderate and proportionate punishment for misbehavior.

Jim, Jim's Blog 29 Comments [9/25/2016 4:07:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 18
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121765

What might we be trying to “hide” from God. Download “The Atheist Delusion” now at www.AtheistMovie.com



Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's Facebook page 45 Comments [9/26/2016 3:10:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121766

Yes but the reflected light is a set of events in your brain.
Events as defined here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime


[No, the reflected light triggers a set of events in your brain after it meets your eyes.]


Yes the reflected light triggers a set of events in the brain via eyes etc.

Now these events at any given instant are responsible for the experience of seeing the tree.

This experience of seeing consist of 2 components at every instant
1. "U" The Tree
2. "I" the thing looking at it.

If "I" does not exist then there can be no experience.

For anything to exist it must exist at every instant.

Thus for "I" to exist at all it must exist at every instant.

If "I" exist in an instant then it will essentially be making a connection with the multitude of events making "U" at that instant.

Alternatively if you think its seeing the tree one event at a time, it will never see a whole tree as it can never know more than a single event.

fdesilva, AtheistForums.org 21 Comments [9/26/2016 3:10:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Stimbo
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121717

BrokenIndigoCrayons recently made a thread entitled "95% of female newborns should be blinded by doctors" and I have to confess that I agree with him.

Usually that's the point where normies show up to "debate" us. They want to refute our "arguments" and react surprised when we accuse them of attacking us, "I'm not attacking or belittling you, we're just having a discussion".

But there is no debate to be had:

* I don't want to be laughed at.
* I don't want to be looked at with disgust.
* I don't want to be compared to Chad.
* I don't want to be afraid to go out in public.
* I don't want women to see me.

All of that (and some more) can be summed up in the sentence "Women should be blinded at birth".

These feelings are real. They are not up for discussion. You don't get to tell me what my lived experience is. You don't get to tell me how I am allowed to feel.

Arguing that me not wanting women to see me is not real, that me not wanting women to see me is not true, that me not wanting women to see me makes me a horrible person is not ok. There is no "just having a discussion", you are attacking and belittling me at every step of your stupid "arguments".

Are normies really so delusional that they cannot see how they are reinterpreting an expression of vulnerability and emotion as some kind of proposal for political action that must be debated and stopped? Don't they recognize that every step of these strawman discussions is about denying our incel experience?

Most of the "discussion" on this subreddit involves one person laying out their hurt and feelings while another person does his or her best to invalidate them one by one in the spirit of what he or she either believes or at least pretends to be believe to be a reasoned discussion. That's not how successful communication works.


PorphyriosMalik, Reddit - /r/Incels 86 Comments [9/22/2016 2:44:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 29
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121753

A lesbian attending a concert at Staples Center in Los Angeles claims a security guard removed her from the women’s bathroom after insisting that she was a man.

According to Pink News, Mary Looper wrote on Facebook that she was attending a Carrie Underwood concert with her aunt Wednesday night and that when she went to use the bathroom a female security guard stood outside of her stall and demanded that she get out.

On her Facebook page, Looper wrote, “Usually I don’t want to put my drama out there but ignorant people still exist and it breaks my heart… They literally just tried to escort me out of the women’s restroom at the #staplescenter… Shame on them.”

According to Looper, she often is confused for a man but was surprised the guard couldn’t tell the difference by her voice when she responded.

“I get mistaken for a man all the time… It’s no secret. But, for the fact that their woman employee waited outside my stall for proof that I was a woman, didn’t believe me off my voice,” she explained. “That’s what hurt and had me shocked. I didn’t wanna stir anything up but never ever thought I’d be treated like that in a woman’s restroom in L.A., in the Staples Center. Just a bummer it went that far.”

Since writing the post, the Facebook page of Staples Center has been littered with comments criticizing the incident and demanding an explanation.

“Absolutely disappointed about the discrimination my friend experienced last night while at a Carrie Underwood show,” wrote one commenter. “She is a WOMAN who is tall, has short hair and boobs but was somehow escorted out of the women’s restroom by an employee because someone didn’t think she belonged in the women’s restroom. Waiting outside a bathroom stall while demanding she prove she is in fact a woman is vile, humiliating and unacceptable.”

Another added, “You need to get a grip on your policing of restrooms and specifically whether a customer is using the ‘correct’ facility that matches their gender presentation or should we just show our genitalia to be able to use a restroom at all?”

Staples Center security guard, Raw Story 26 Comments [9/25/2016 4:00:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102441

(Commenting on an article about Virginia's gay marriage ban being overturned)

The arrogance of these people is what truly bothers me the most. "I'm entitled to everything you have. I will become you. My behavior is normal if I get enough people to say it is." Charles Manson got 3+ people to think his behavior and thoughts were normal. He preyed on the most vulnerable, stupid people to do his bidding. Politicians are Charles Manson, LGBT are Charles Manson AND his minions, in an analogy. They weren't satisfied with tolerance. So I withdraw my tolerance of them.

I had really hoped I wouldn't have to enact social Scorched Earth.

1. There is no compromise to be had with LGBT.
2. LGBT will not receive conversation, information, advice, services, help, or be associated with by me, in any way.
3. I will verbally confront any who support them and their movement, and really ask hard how fascism, tyranny, and attention who**ng is a good thing for society, and to teach to children.
4. I will not live in, do business with, or seek employment in any state which supports an unconstitutional, fascist movement and then makes unconstitutional rulings about said movement.
5. I will continue to point out how Roe V Wade did the same thing, and how abortion is now overwhelmingly outlawed even as a felony in the majority of states.

Congratulations, LGBT. If I didn't hate you before, I do now.

ancient18, WND 59 Comments [8/1/2014 3:35:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 34
Submitted By: PhillipaFry
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 101430

Wouldn't it be a kinder, more humane world, if instead of old men being crucified in public to satisfy the bitterness of hags and the repressed urges of paedocrites, that teenage girls were taken to retirement homes by their teachers in order to give the lonely coffin dodgers a free suck and fuck? But perhaps it would require the selfish maladaptive sexual psychology of women to be repaired and altered before that was possible.

The Antifeminist, Antifeminist Theory of Men's Rights, Male Sexuality, Feminism 124 Comments [6/10/2014 3:30:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 141
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 38989

I hate science. We haven't been doing it... at all. We did the creation science unit study a few months ago, and nothing since. ETA: talking about science with my oldest, ds9.

The two olders have been attending a science co-op that has been using a water 'curriculum' provided by the city, that tells about our local water supply, clean-up process, conservation, etc etc. In this co-op, they've also been doing physical science experiments.

While it's a good co-op, and cheap, and the kids enjoy it, I really don't feel like it's enough.


We've been, theoretically, doing Considering God's Creation. The notebooking materials look great, but... I really want something I can just HAND to ds9, he can read it, do the notebooking project or whatever, maybe read a library book or two on the subject, and then I don't have to mess with it any more.

IS THIS TOO MUCH TO ASK????

I don't think CGC is going to work for us, at least not in the format that it's meant to be used in. I'd love to be able to use the student pages, though; that's right up ds's alley.

I did like the Media Angels Creation Science unit study, and I do have one now on Astronomy. I just flat don't have money to spend on more curriculum this year, especially when we technically HAVE a science curriculum already.


DS had science on his list today, and *I* am the one literally in tears over having to do it. I don't HAVE anything for science. I don't LIKE science. I don't want to DO science. Just go pull the stupid tab and LEAVE ME ALONE!!!!


Does anyone have suggestions? How about a better way to use the CGC guide? Any help is appreciated. I haven't been this upset about something regarding homeschooling in MONTHS. Ugh.

dalynnrmc, Homeschool Spot 69 Comments [5/10/2008 9:50:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121758

A better alternative would be to use containment camps for the (((enemy))) until we figure out a permanent solution.


AsGoodAsSpecter, Reddit - /r/PublicHealthWatch 29 Comments [9/25/2016 4:07:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121694

Sign to Left: A flammable solid placard that is used to identify a hazard warning for substances such as sulfur while being transported and handled.

Interestingly, sulfuric acid is NOT flammable, having no flash point (the temperature at which something ignites). However, pure sulfur is certainly flammable and has a flash point of about 334 to 370 degrees Fahrenheit.[1] If you want to get a small glimpse of what Hell will be like, then carefully read this MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET (.PDF file) all about MOLTEN SULFUR!

The boiling point of sulfur is 444 degrees Fahrenheit. Revelation 21:8 describes Hell as “the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone.” You can use any dictionary to look up the word “brimstone” and it means exactly what it does in the Greek... SULFUR!

It ought to “scare Hell into you” my friend if you are not saved. The Bible describes Hell in literal terms, warning Christ-rejecting humanity exactly what to expect. Hell is a place of molten sulfur, i.e., a “lake of fire” (Revelation 20:15). A boiling pot of water is only 212 degrees Fahrenheit. Be afraid Christ-rejecters... BE VERY AFRAID!

You Need the LITERAL Blood of Jesus Christ, Because There is a LITERAL Hell

Thus, you need a Savior—Jesus Christ!

Let me tell you, as your friend, that you WILL burn in Hellfire for eternity if you DIE IN YOUR SINS.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 35 Comments [9/21/2016 3:20:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121744

Homosexuality practically causes mankind to have sexual lust over everyone and everthing in existence. (Genesis ch.19, Leviticus ch.18-20, Romans ch.1 Jude ch.1) Such immorality hurts children the most. Exposure to homosexuality is a child-abuse, since innocence is children's universal human rights. Jesus cursed those who hurt children. The Westerners got quite lost this century by applying racial equality upon sexual immorality. Racism is an average defect among mankind but the inclination to Sodomy is abnormal even among the pagans. The West should stop forcing Sodomy upon the nations or upon the children; it's so suicidal in every way. Western Liberals are well-dressed savages. The Westerners need to read the Holy Bible to become civilized again and to provide safety to their children. And the Western Church should never submit to the Sodomic atheists. It's a treason against King Jesus. (Revelation ch. 2-3)

Grace Kim Kwon, Christian News Network 23 Comments [9/23/2016 3:59:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Jocasta
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121706

This is a public service announcement after someone today tried to make me feel guilty for laughing about Hillary Clinton's health issues. Is it poor taste to relish the thought that Hillary Clinton has a debilitating medical condition? No. Always remember this about Hillary Clinton:

1) She thinks you are deplorable and unsalvageable anti-American garbage that would love to silence you in any way possible.

2) She wants to flood the country with people that hate your guts and want you to pay for the honor of it all.

3) She advocates for every anti-white, anti-male, and especially every anti-white male policy she can.

4) She destabilized the Middle East resulting in pointless American deaths and flooding Europe with "refugees" that kill, rape, rob, bomb, run over, and destroy European culture and heritage.

5) She leads groups of SJWs to harass and destroy careers of honest people with legitimate concerns about the country.

6) She advocates for the petty grievances of legitimately shot criminal black elements while ignoring rampant black on white violence that happens every day.

7) She brings forward any and all ideas that weaken traditional families and culture that built America into a once great nation.

8) She is a corrupt thief that used her power and influence for pay for play schemes that enriched her at the expense of ordinary American citizens at every turn.

9) She represents the globalist snake that is swallowing the West whole.

Do not feel pity for this woman and, more importantly, don't let anyone make you feel pity for her. She hates your guts and will have no sympathy for anyone that opposes her.

I don't give a s**t about her and it does no good to pretend to. Remember who she is and what she represents. Put the pressure on and keep dropping negative news about Hillary wherever possible. People are affected by it. It's working and in fact it may be making Hillary that much worse by getting into her and her staff's heads as well.

AutisticSubhuman, Reddit - /r/The_Donald 27 Comments [9/21/2016 6:04:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121747

I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully” (I Tim. 5:14). (Preteen and teenage young women who have reached puberty and are having sex without being married do give occasion for the adversary to speak reproachfully about them, and is fornication, sin, which causes fornicators to go to Hell.1 If they get abortions, this is murder. Murderers cannot enter Heaven!2)

What is a young woman? GOD’S commandment, if a woman desires to be married, would be at the age of puberty. Webster’s definition of “puberty” is: “the age when one becomes capable to bear children, which is marked by maturing of the reproductive organs, with the onset of menstruation in the female; the period at which sexual maturity is reached. The age of puberty varies in different climates and environments, being from thirteen to sixteen in boys and from twelve to fourteen in girls, and is commonly designated legally as fourteen for boys and twelve for girls.” Webster’s Dictionary states “childhood” is the “state or time of being a child; state or time from birth or infancy to puberty or maturity.”

Tony Alamo, www.alamoministries.com 21 Comments [9/23/2016 5:20:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 41313

(hey all, back to a pesky question that Ray and his band of followers don't want to answer or just make ignorant comments about: Why are there no modern mammal fossils down in the same rock strata as the dinosaurs? i.e. a fluffy bunny down in the same strata as a t-rex or gorgonopsid.)

Iago...Don't be too quick to pin the winner medal on yourself. Your "fluffy bunny" is just another rabbit trail. Let me answer for my "band of followers." We are too busy to follow you down that worn old trail. Christians have an "abundant life" (see John 10:10). That means we are too busy about our Father's business (and have too much sense) to chase after your non-existent bunnies. Sorry.

Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's blog 59 Comments [6/20/2008 4:18:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121760

The third world migration is encourage to ease the cost of extraction of resources, eradicate Caucasian from the land, and provide a platform for exploitation. To conclude, this mass migration was first enacted by the Spanish settlers in South America or today's Argentina to eradicate the Indian tribes. We are next.

John, Eurocanadian 13 Comments [9/25/2016 4:07:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121742

I am glad you asked that. I am betting that Trump will win by a land slide 370. I am still losing ten cents on that bet, but I look at the primary where Trump was the underdog and he still won by a substantial amount. Right now I am ahead $14.05 on Trump. I am actually ahead 20 cents on Connecticut. People were so sure that he could not win in Conn that I was able to get that for pennys. I could make 10 times on that. For every dollar I could make 10. I attended a high school there in that state for two years. So I thought I would bet for old time sake. Conn is really tied in with New York so it would be almost unheard of that Trump could take that state. If anyone anywhere does not like Trump it is NYC. "A prophet is not without honor except in his own town, among his relatives and in his own home." Mark 6:4

joshua 1 9, Christian Forums 21 Comments [9/23/2016 3:59:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121487

Women Would Rather Be Raped By Invaders Than Stuck With Beta Males

She is dying for you to put her in her place, beneath you. A woman wants to be conquered, she wants to submit to power, she wants to give up control, but first she has to test to see if “it” exists within you. To submit to a lesser man is rape, to submit to a superior man is harmony. Feminism and other female SJW endeavors are societal shit tests. If you fail, they’ll push the boundary again, and again, and again… If you give them an inch, they’ll take a mile.

The female imperative was never supposed to be 100% successful, though. Eventually, some man somewhere is supposed to not put up with her shit and put her in her proper place: beneath him and one half-step back. A woman’s job is to see you fail. For if you fail, you were never “worthy” in the first place. Western culture is now embracing that very failure.

The Beta That Broke The Western Cultures’ Back

Betas occur naturally in the wild, but over the past several decades, governments, corporations, media, and academia have attempted to artificially manufacture them en masse beyond natural levels with the assistance of female nature (stated earlier). They’ve indoctrinated man into believing blue pill sexual strategy that women despise. They’ve stripped fathers from the home and had females infiltrate male spaces containing masculine role models. And they’ve legally restrained a man’s ability to discipline and properly set boundaries in the home, the very same discipline and boundaries that women instinctively seek. All with the proud help of women.

So what’s left? A whole generation of men raised by women and the state, taught to be pussies and supplicate to females and authority.

Now, the feminization of man has hit critical mass and women’s amygdalas notice. Women are unknowingly witnessing their own creation and are left disgusted, wondering, “Where have all the ‘good men’ gone?” Now women are seeking another tribe…

The Invaders

“[…] women actually want strong male authority figures in their life.

But will deny it until the day they die.

If they admitted to it, it would allow non male authority figures (beta men) to emulate alpha qualities.

They want men that just get it. Even if that means takeover of Western European / u.s. Culture by Islamic militants.”


— /u/antariusz (Source)

Europe is currently witnessing female nature being expressed freely on a societal level without a civilized, masculine balancing factor. The truth of the matter is, women have no in-group loyalties. Whoever the powerful are in that moment, women drift their way with their asses bent over, knees quivering, and legs dripping with tingle juice. They want to be conquered, but they don’t care by who. Whether it’s daddy government, her father, a boyfriend, Chad Thundercock, violent criminals, or a horde of rapefugees doesn’t matter.

In times of war, women are constants. Men and boys are killed off, but women are simply transferred and assimilated into the new tribe to be the sperm receptacles of the victors.

Observing the weakness of many European men, women want a different set of male suitors. They call this initiative “diversity” or “multiculturalism.” In plain terms, women want to import men they perceive to be powerful and masculine to replace the weaklings they are stuck with. Women LOVE playing multiple men against each other to battle for her vaginal affections. It’s basically the plot of a every rom-com and romance novel.

Thanks to the 1984 police state, politicians and social media titans like Angela Merkel and Mark Zuckerburg, that new tribe so happens to be the biggest group in history to never reform itself to Western society: Muslims (over 2 billion of them). They give absolutely zero fucks about Western Civilization and their inhabitants. They never back down. These people are not just willing to die and be imprisoned to defend their beliefs, but kill: “There is no law, but that of Allah.”

This is attractive to women. Women LOVE violent males. Women love their conviction. It’s extremely arousing to them. The fact that it’s backed by a mental illness doesn’t matter. These Muslim immigrants are violent, they don’t break frame, and are becoming powerful. That’s seen as masculine. That’s sexy.

Most modern Western man doesn’t stand a chance. Rape and sexual assault has skyrocketed since immigrants have been allowed to settle into Europe, yet women and feminists were silent on the subject. Why? Because they would rather live under the threat of rape by invaders than settle with skinny beta manginas protesting at slut walks and minoring in gender studies. There are even instances where European girls refused to report their immigrant sexual assailants in the name of multiculturalism and fighting Islamophobia or just because they felt bad for them. But that’s bullshit. The power of the rapists gave her tingles and then she tried to rationalize it.

Conclusion

With Open Gates: The forced collective Suicide of European Nations - Watch with Audio below

You see that, betas of Europe? That’s your future.

The only thing saving North America from being Cologne, Sweden, or Britain is that there are two oceans separating us from Africa and the Middle East. But Obama seeks to change that by importing thousands of Syrians into small traditional family towns (view: Roosh’s video). Not to mention the education system, specifically the colleges here, are getting brainwashed to the max with anti-white “diversity.”

Betas of the United States and Canada? Keep it up, and women will encourage the same thing to happen here, embracing the enemy with open legs.

Michael Augustus, Return of Kings 54 Comments [9/6/2016 4:43:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 26
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121735

Stay AWAY from my children Hillary!

You, and all of your body doubles, clones, and whatever other sick conspiracy stuff the government is involved in and seems to be testing out on you as of late; using you as their first human guinea pig.

One of you is one too many. A million of you would cause the planet to immediately implode.

Then to think they might start doing the same DNA clone stuff with Obama, with other leftist loonies, with people like the Kardashian's, Justin Bieber, and Miley Cyrus...

tiffanybw, Rapture Ready 42 Comments [9/22/2016 5:59:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: solomongrundy
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121748

(On the Brock Turner case)

Why can't I blame the victim for showing a complete lack of commonsense? Was he the first man to ever take advantage of a woman's inebriated state? There have been these situations for as long as there has been human beings consuming alcohol. Stop coddling these victims. They do need to take responsibility and not put themselves in vulnerable situations.

That young man's reputation is ruined for the rest of his life. He is now permanently on the sex offenders list. And no matter what he ends up doing for work, he will never get any endorsement deals or become top management for any company. He will be a pariah wherever he goes.

I think that you are jealous of this boy's previous status as a "golden boy". You are jealous that he was smart enough to get into Stanford and could have had the perfect life... shrug.

Had she been my daughter, I would be mad at her for going to a college party and getting so drunk. And when I was going to Brown University in the late 1970's, I knew better than to go to the keg parties at the frat houses. And I also, know that any compliments from a man at a party like that or at a night club was more an effort to get into my pants than actually wanting to get into a relationship with me and become my boyfriend or husband. I was also able to get backstage at many rock concerts in the 1980's. And since I stayed sober and drug-free at these gatherings, and no one ever tried to sexually assault me.

And back to chaperones... well the human brain isn't fully developed until the age of 25. The frontal cortex is the last to develop and that where the decision making process is. And it's why males before the age of 25 have such high auto insurance rates. Young men are prone to making bad impulsive decisions. Add to that, men are just more sexually motivated creatures than women. That's just a fact of life.

Miu, City-Data 37 Comments [9/23/2016 5:20:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 113994

Nazis are commies and commies are progressives.

If you are a Nazi, you think that the rot set in around 1930-1950. If you are a progressive, you think the rot has not set in yet.

So if you are a Nazi, you pretty much want the New Deal, or the New Deal on steroids. Nazis are leftists who have been left behind by the movement ever leftwards.

If you are a Nazi, you think leftism is fine except for Freudian Theory, second wave Feminism, race denialism, and the Frankfurt School’s Cultural Marxism, all of which can be plausibly blamed on Jews.

But when the Supremes hypocritically endorsed “separate but equal”, that was race denialism, with a touch of hypocrisy to make it actually workable.

The Jewish problem is that Jewish conversos to progressivism failed to pick up on the hypocrisy, and started demanding that people actually live according the moral standards that everyone piously endorsed around 1820 or so.

The rot did not set in with cultural Marxism. The rot set in with “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights”. There is your race denialism right there.

As for feminism and the destruction of marriage, the attempted divorce of Queen Caroline in 1820 established the moral principle that women are so naturally pure and virtuous, that it is mere cruelty to enforce the marriage contract on women, it should only be enforced on the naturally wicked and despicable sex, men.

If you want to get out of the trap, say after me: “All men were not created equal, some should command some should obey, some should not merely obey, but are naturally slaves, and should not be allowed to make their own decisions. If found wandering loose causing problems, should be placed under the control of an owner. Women’s sexual choices are apt to be dangerous to society and to themselves, thus fertile age women should always be controlled by husbands or fathers. A women not subject to a man is suffering misfortune, as for example an orphan or widow, or is wicked and needs punishment, as for example a harlot.”

As soon as you denounce the declaration of independence and the emancipation of women the logical case the Jews are a big problem collapses. And the emotional case for hating Jews is the same as that of any market dominant minority, envy and covetousness, which is also at the root of declaration of independence and the emancipation of women.

Getting rid of the Jews will not help you. The problem is inside your head. They are not emitting evil mind control rays at you. You have been emitting evil mind control rays at them. Umpteenth wave feminism is the logical consequence of the failure to divorce Queen Caroline.

Jim, Jim's Blog 42 Comments [10/30/2015 3:10:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 31
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121713

The insidious power of metaphors

Thanks to the hateful campaign to demonize Brock Turner as a rapist, I think I better understand how sexual hysterias work. Firstly, it needs to be pointed out that Brock Turner is not actually a rapist, even by the legal definition in California:

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/stanford-rape-case-brock-turner-victims-statement-a7074246.html

He is guilty of digital penetration, and not even a violent one at that; just taking advantage of the woman's intoxicated state. So why are people so absurdly hysterical about this minor sexual assault? Why do they demand to punish it as if it were rape? I disagree that it should be criminal at all, since the woman got drunk willingly and went along with it, but even if you agree with the law, it was far removed from rape.

I think people react to the metaphor rather than reality. Feminist propaganda has been so successful that "sexual assault" is now synonymous with "rape" in the mind of the mob, and so rape is all they can see in their imagination. It was recently shown that the meaning of words are stored in the same place in the brain across individuals:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v532/n7600/abs/nature17637.html

Feminists have managed to hijack the semantic mapping of "rape" and meld it with "sexual assault," so now all it takes to create mass hysteria is to accuse sexual assault. This is also how statutory rape works, and how feminists have even managed the absurd feat of creating the concept of female rapists and female sex offenders. These are all about metaphors, and metaphors are all you need to create lynch mobs and criminal convictions alike, after legal reforms which are also based on metaphors rather than reality.

Because the meanings of words have so extreme consequences when they are enshrined in criminal law, and even when they aren't, it is important not to let the metaphors get out of hand. One thing we need to make absolutely clear is that rape can only be performed with a penis. A real penis. Brock Turner didn't use his penis -- just his fingers -- and women by definition don't have penises so they can't be rapists. If you don't see this, then you are in thrall of metaphors rather than reality and need to break the spell. And we need to turn back the feminist legal reforms which have already so unreasonably expanded the definition of rape in many jurisdiction.

Eivind Berge, Eivind Berge's blog 28 Comments [9/22/2016 2:42:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121730

Misconception 1: I have an inferiority complex

I’ve gotten this hurled at me so many times that it’s time to address this once and for all. I do not have an inferiority complex with regards to whites. I am their equal, morally and intellectually. I firmly reject racism because I sincerely believe in the equality of all men. This is a composite belief that is comprised of several fundamental beliefs, chief amoung which is the existence of God (The Abrahamic God, ie the only true God). We are all equal in His eyes. Genuine racists believe that certain groups are inherently superior or inferior depending on the group’s contribution to civilization over time. I do not share this belief. I believe all people are inherently equal in worth regardless of how much or how little their respective groups have contributed to the pool of human knowledge. This is my personal belief .

Having said this, I don’t believe that all cultures are equal. God created man, but not culture. Culture is man-made and synthetic works vary in quality. Just because we are all equal doesn’t mean that racially diverse groups can live together in some sort of leftist utopia. Racially diverse societies will only endure within the cultural hegemony of one dominant group. Certain cultural values are so alien to others such that forcing diverse groups who practice these cultures to reside in close proximity constitutes an act of cruelty. Respecting borders is about respecting culture. The act of erecting a border sends a clear message to one’s neighbours that they are free to practice their way of life in their corner of the world, free from persecution and judgement, just as one is entitled to the same prerogatives within one’s own borders.

Misconception 2: Whites are inherently special

I never said that whites were somehow special on account of their genetics or nature. I’ve always stated that Western culture is unique and ought to be preserved. The only way this can be done is to ensure that they remain a majority in their own nations. If you wish for America and Canada to continue being great, then it is logical to ensure that the people who created these nations continue running them. Why is this view so outlandish? If China is to remain Chinese, then shouldn’t the Chinese be the majority there? So why can’t whites be a majority in the US and Canada?

Misconception 3: Non-whites are incapable of altruism

"All groups are capable of both hospitality and savagery if the conditions are right. I think Dota is really overgeneralizing. There are many parts of the third world where one will be treated with the utmost hospitality and some will will give you the shirt off their back."

I never said that non-whites were completely devoid of altruistic instincts. I have seen individual acts of kindness in South and South East Asia, and even the Middle East. The point I was trying to make is that Western society is humane. The compassion one encounters in the West is collectively organized. You won’t see things like homeless shelters and soup kitchens in non western countries. You’ll never see an Indian or Chinese equivalent of the YMCA and other organizations that exist solely to improve quality of life. This is insaniyat on a scale that is unimaginable in the non-western world.

The second point I wish to make is that while while many non-westerners are kind and hospitable to tourists, how hospitable would they be if those tourists remained and became citizens? I’ve read numerous accounts by Black tourists who have spoken glowingly about Korean courtesy. How courteous would these Koreans be if blacks were 20% of their population? How would they react when Blacks made a move on their women?

Bay Area Guy is essentially correct when he says that kindness to tourists comes easily since they are merely passing through. The US and Canada allow non-whites to settle in their nations and even grant them access to their highest institutions. Yet despite these gestures, they get nothing but grievance mongering and endless whining from minorities.

Misconception 4: White values will survive white extinction

"Also many non-whites born and raised in America have the same sort of outlook on hospitality and civility that whites do."

What Tulio writes is true, but he underestimates the power of tribalism on non-whites and I don’t blame him. Liberalism provides a most effective cover for tribalism as the Jews have demonstrated and as non-whites have themselves discovered. It allows them to cloak their group interests under universalist terms like “egalitarianism” and “tolerance” knowing fully well the effect that moral universalism has on whites. The true test of a group’s liberalism lies in how they behave not when they are a minority, but when they are a majority. So while the Jew and Indian eloquently argue for tolerance and inclusion in North America, they seldom practice those virtues in India and Israel where they are in charge.

Tulio also fails to realize that democracy and and tribalism are incompatible on the most fundamental level. That tribal interests reduce democracy to nothing but vote bank politics. It is completely ludicrous to think that Indians, Chinese, Koreans, Blacks, and Hispanics will somehow see beyond their racial identities and embrace each other as fellow Americans. Hell, every university in North America has a plethora of ethnic and religious associations that that reflect the demographic composition of their student body.

Would Indians, who so fiercely resist affirmative action favouring Dalits back home, somehow show blacks more compassion? Would Hispanics overlook racial identity when fiercely competing with blacks for blue collar jobs? A racially diverse America where groups compete fiercely for scarce resources (thanks to a declining economy) will not produce a very humane society. This has been said before but it needs to be said again: A first world nation cannot be sustained by a third world population.

Dota, Occident invicta 17 Comments [9/22/2016 3:24:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121750



[...]

Various media reported that Nye had a great concern that the Ark Encounter (and the Creation Museum and Answers in Genesis ministry) will adversely influence children.

Isn’t it amazing, 1) considering all the ardently evolutionary museums across America and around the world, 2) recognizing that evolution is taught as fact to millions of students in the public schools (in the United States and across the globe), and 3) noting all the evolutionary programs on TV and articles in magazines and so on, that secularists like Bill Nye are greatly fearing one Creation Museum and now one Ark?

The secular arguments about origins and earth history are easily demolished. Thus secularists have to censor creation science beliefs from our schools. They fear they may easily lose people to creationist arguments.

Watch some of the most captivating and eye-opening video segments of my Ark tour with Mr. Nye in this recent blog post.

We have been blessed to have received many great testimonies from guests visiting the Ark Encounter in just its first week. Here is one that greatly encouraged me, and it came from a pastor: "[T]he Holy Spirit was strong in that place. I stayed choked up for the first two levels. The longer I stayed and the more I saw, the more I thought on the Word of God and what Christ did for us—I could hardly talk!"

Ken Ham, Answers in Genesis 37 Comments [9/23/2016 5:33:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40