1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 25 30 35 40
Quote# 6612

[The reason I object to beastiality is] God's law - what is yours?

seer, Theology Web 35 Comments [4/1/2004 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123564

[Note: JohnnyJohnJohn changed his name earlier today AGAIN, he used to be Todd JQB, before that VX3, and the day before, SEDAGIV - he appears to be hiding from someone/something]

"People who are asexual are not normal though. It's normal to have a sex drive."

And people who have sex with the same gender are not normal.

"They would probably reply that you, as a heterosexual, are not "normal". You have to get over these rather nasty attitudes toward folk who are born differently from you."

And they would be idiots to say that, considering how the human race propogates: male with female. You have to get over this rather disgustingly tolerant attitude towards people who choose to engage in abnormal behavior.

"Sure, I'll get over my tolerant attitude! I'll stop tolerating bigots like yourself who hate people merely because they have a different sexuality.
Have these awful people done you any harm, do they impinge on your life in any way, do you lie awake at night worrying that hordes of ravening homosexuals are coming to ravage you and your family.
Get over it mate. Society is changing. Same sex marriage is here to stay. You'll just have to live with it or nurse your little hatred until it eats you up."

Get over it yourself. Society is going down-hill....fast. Same sex marriage and all other deviant and abnormal activities people choose to engage in will be coming to a swift end. You'll just have to deal with your abject terror and realization of being so wrong in your final moments.



JohnnyJohnJohn, Disqus - Religion 18 Comments [1/11/2017 7:07:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2462

But for positive evidence [of a young earth], we have the best of all—a reliable Eye-witness to the event who has provided a written record, which overrules any circumstantial [scientific] evidence!

Socrates, Theology Web 10 Comments [3/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2028

You're damn right I question the views of liberals. In reality, it is you liberals who are the mindless drones. Just look at your arguments, or actually, you know what, I don't even see any arguments for why homos should be allowed to adopt. All you do is bitch about my "racist, homophobic, fundamentalist, asshole with a closed-mind" views. That's an Ad Hominum argument, which is a logical fallacy.

Sambo83, BlizzForums 13 Comments [1/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 13585

Robertson: That guy was a homo - as sure as you're alive.

Off camera: Yeah, you didn't look rattled. [...]

Off camera: This last one is.

Robertson: That last one, yeah, but I didn't get it.

Off camera: I called them up and said who the hell is screening these calls? I had one person call him a bigot. I've had another person call him a zealot. Let's get some balance out there.

Robertson: It's too late. The last one was OK, but the first three were all homosexuals.

Off camera: I know I know.

Robertson: I've had this before.

Off camera: You can answer the question any way you choose to.

Robertson: I hear you.

Off camera: Alright. Remember. Take it where you want it to go, take it where you want it to go. I don't like the producer of this segment.

Robertson: Well, they were trying to set me up.

Pat Robertson, YouTube 17 Comments [8/5/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123533

Hollywood luvvie Meryl Streep has given a speech lambasting President Elect Donald Trump. No suprise there. The Alt-Right, led by paedohysteric Mike Cernovich, has responded by pointing out that Streep gave a standing ovation to Roman Polanski – the director still wanted in the USA for taking a 13 year old girl up the ass, back in the 70s. No surprise there either. His Twitter feed has quickly degenerated into a shouting match as to who are the bigger paedos – Conservatives or Libs – complete with pictures of Trump kissing a very young cutie on a bed (Brooke Shields?) and Obama apparently feeling up his own teen daughter’s ass on the sofa.

This is what political discussion has been reduced to in the death throes of Western civilization – which side is the bigger paedophiles for openly showing attraction to fertile teenage girls. The really creepy thing is, both side’s Twitter armies are full of profiles with anime avatars showing very young pre-pubescent girls. In fact, I believe the alt-right are particularly famous for it and even have a group dedicated to it (anime).

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 15 Comments [1/9/2017 11:53:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Hugo Xavier
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123545

You are wrong. There are news of Western scholars trying to justify pedophilia and of violating the selves and multiple people and animals and robots and oceans. Post-christian is a worse savagery than Pre-christian. Christianity is the only cure for today's secular West's evil mental illness. You guys are not smarter than the Holy Bible. No God = No sanity in the West. When will you admit that fact?

Grace Kim Kwon, Christian News Network 24 Comments [1/10/2017 9:20:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: KingOfRhye
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2256

One more thing that is always said by atheists is "No one has ever been killed because of atheism." I beg to differ..I believe that every death since the beginning of time was due to atheism. Even the crusades...I believe every single solitary sin, even little white lies, even by a Christian, is caused by atheism...

inverter, POD Warrior Forum 15 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2948

It gets a little old seeing so many evolution theologians (it is a religion), say that the parts that cannot be substantiated by empirical evidence [cosmology, stellar formation, abiogenesis] are 'not part of the evolution theory.'

NebraskaMan, Christian Forums 18 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2349

There's always a chance that it could be the case.It has been interesting when I've had to deal with any student in my Christian reform program that was demon possessed.They were the ones who were more willing to be combative and confrontational towards staff as well as towards other students.One of the things that you can do is pray about this situation.

Mongoose60, Rapture Ready 2 Comments [3/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2414

The basic fundamental beliefs (or presuppositions) of the atheistic philosophy claims that we live in a universe that is eternal (meaning, not created), and that the universe operates by randomness and chance. And that all that exists is matter in motion. So, we conclude the following.... 1.There can't be any absolutes (since this contradicts the belief that the universe is random and chance-like (a Darwinion presupposition as well) 2.There can not be anything supernatural or anything non-material. 3.We can't know anything (since knowledge may evolve) A consistent atheist would have to live his life not doing or saying anything, but just waiting. If there are no absolutes or non-material things then laws of science and math can't exist. Neither can the laws of logic exist (thereby stripping the atheist of his capacity to debate or reason about anything, or have any sort of intellectual discourse). Morals don't exist (so the atheist can't throw in the argument that since God is all-good and all-powerful, then He can't exist since evil exists as well. Yet, evil presupposes a standard of good, and that standard is God).

DanTheMan, Rapture Ready 13 Comments [3/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123554

Professor PZ Myers hates Christianity. Nor is he a big fan of my good friend, Ken Ham.

In writing about his hatred, PZ unwittingly showed his hand when he said,

"I reject his notion of sin — the idea that there is some kind of divine law against which we can transgress — but humanists do not deny that we can do wrong and we can do harm. We think we should do better, not to appease some vengeful deity, but because it improves our lives and helps make those around us happier and better able to live up to their potential. We certainly do accept that death is inevitable, but not because we are wicked — the wicked often seem to flourish while the good may die young. Are we to measure the virtue of human beings by their longevity? Charles Manson is 82, and surely destined to join the saints in heaven, while every infant death must open a chute directly to hell for its wicked soul."

His hatred is perfectly in line with the Bible:

"Because the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be" (Romans 8:7).

PZ is unashamedly godless (a state the Bible refers to as "carnal"), and so his mind is at "enmity" against God. That means he is in a continual state of hostility towards his Creator. That certainly is true. Even though he doesn't believe that He exists, but he contemptuously hates the very thought of "a god."

But look at the pinpoint accuracy of the Scriptures:

"...for it [our carnal mind] is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be."

His hatred is directed at the "law of God,"--the moral Law (the Ten Commandments).

PZ is like a criminal who hates the police, not because of who they are individually, but because of what they represent. They stand for the law--that which is right and good, and that is offensive to someone who loves and lives for crime.

PZ's railings about his loved ones dying is tragic, but peripheral. They are not the main reason why he is angry.

His anger is primarily at God and His Law, because he doesn't like being told what to do. Like you and I before we came to Christ, he loves his sin, and he who loves the darkness hates the light.

I'm not sure why PZ called Charles Manson "wicked," when his atheistic worldview doesn't allow for anyone to be "wicked."

Or could it simply be that Manson transgressed the moral Law, which says "You shall not kill," and PZ intuitively knows that, because of his God-given knowledge of right and wrong (see Romans 2:15).

It's actually heartening to see him using his moral compass. If he would put down his weapons and study how God's moral compass is infinitely higher, he may rethink his rejection of "The soul who sins, shall die."

This is because every death is sobering evidence of the truth of that verse.

You can see PZ in action in our movie "Evolution vs God" (over 2 million views) at www.FullyFreeFilms.com

P.S. PZ hates the movie.

Odious Christianity

I woke up to Ken Ham testifying to his faith…and demonstrating why I hate Christianity. Hate is a strong word, but not strong enough for my feelings. Ken Ham might be a decent human being if he wer…

freethoughtblogs.com|By PZ Myers


Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's Facebook page 26 Comments [1/10/2017 9:21:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104546

"Professor" Albert Einstein is the DARLING of the evolutionists and atheists who deny the existence of JEHOVAH....They LOVE to quote him in their books as they seek to overthrown the Genesis account of the creation of the universe!

Prior to Einstein, all real scientists believed in the existence of the luminiferous ether which carried light waves. One of the greatest proponents of the ether was Nikola Tesla—the man who electrified the world.

The "scientific" community panicked when the Michelson-Morey experiment showed no variation in the speed of light due to the supposed rapid movement of the earth around the sun!

That was the reason for the invention of "Professor" Einstein and his theory of relativity which eliminated the ether!!

There is a reason for everything that happens in the universe, and the Michelson-Morley experiment was the reason why Albert Einstein had to be invented.

Jesuits are always found where the Biblical story of the creation of the universe is under attack!

Jesuit priest Georges Lemaître was the originator of the BIG BANG constantly expanding universe.

This theory made the universe so big that it could not possibly orbit the earth in 24 hours.

Here is a quote about this expanding universe from a book by Jesuit priest Lemaître:

The expansion of the universe is a matter of astronomical FACTS interpreted by the theory of relativity, with the help of assumptions as to the homogeneity of space, without which any theory seems to be impossible. I shall not discuss the legitimacy of this interpretation, as I do not know any definite objection made against it and this is not the place; and it is not necessary to give a new popular version of the leading principles of the theory of relativity. I shall rather try to show that the universe MUST be expanding, or rather that the most necessary processes of evolution are contradictory to the view that space is and has always been static. (Lemaître, The Primeval Atom, p. 81).

Galileo (man from Galilee) demoted the earth to just another a planet orbiting the sun.

Patrick Scrivener, Reformation 43 Comments [11/7/2014 4:42:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 11774

Math Proves Christ's Resurrection?

It is faith, not proof, that makes Christians believe in Jesus Christ's resurrection, the central tenet of the religion. Until now.

Oxford University professor Richard Swinburne, a leading philosopher of religion, has seemingly done the impossible. Using logic and mathematics, he has created a formula that he says shows a 97 percent certainty that Jesus Christ was resurrected by God the Father, report The Age and Catholic News.

This stunning conclusion was made based on a series of complex calculations grounded in the following logic:

1. The probably of God's existence is one in two. That is, God either exists or doesn't.
2. The probability that God became incarnate, that is embodied in human form, is also one in two.
3. The evidence for God's existence is an argument for the resurrection.
4. The chance of Christ's resurrection not being reported by the gospels has a probability of one in 10.
5. Considering all these factors together, there is a one in 1,000 chance that the resurrection is not true.

Richard Swinburne, Netscape News 49 Comments [5/18/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Mandrake
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2406

If evolution were occuring today, we would see the things it predicts. All theories predict what one should see if they are correct. Well, we SHOULD be seeing things changing into different creatures. Somewhere, it ought to be happening. A fly should be turning into a beetle, or an earthworm into a lobster, or a monkey into another type of man. I'd settle for a bacteria turning into a rotifer at this point. We ought to be seeing intermediate animals all over the damn place.

FearlessLeader, Someplace Somewhere 11 Comments [3/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2407

Since everywhere we look, we are not seeing five-assed monkeys falling out trees and being eaten by three-assed dogs, one could speculate that perhaps, just PERHAPS, mutations do not stick around.

FearlessLeader, Someplace Somewhere 15 Comments [3/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123550

Tranmy isnt an insult, these people are just getting triggered

Jamie Lobley, Facebook 18 Comments [1/10/2017 9:20:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2429

No & no, I would never contemplate becoming "friends" with one. They physically repel me. In any case, given that I believe all unrepentant homosexuals over 21 ought to be executed, they are hardly likely to want to be friends with me.

Old Man, Internet Infidels 20 Comments [3/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123552


(In response to being asked what other freedoms racists should lose in addition to not being allowed in any restaurant according to earlier comment on this news story http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38561883)


Their liberty, they should be locked up, in my opinion. The now banned, Paedophile Exchange, used to bang on about their right to have sex with children, should perverts be permitted to air their views?

Floo, Religion and Ethics 17 Comments [1/10/2017 9:21:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Nearly Sane
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123434

Attributes that will not help you get laid even one iota

Instead of just summarizing with, "everything but looks and money," I figured I'd list some things and explain how worthless they are when it comes to attracting women.

SENSE OF HUMOR: Women are not attracted to funny. In fact, a sense of humor can actually work against you, as women think of relationships as serious business. Sure, she'll tease Chad and laugh at random shit while she's with him, but it won't be because he's funny. It'll be an instinctive reaction because she finds him attractive. I can make just about any woman laugh with my dry humor. They go, "that little boy is so funnyyyyy. So anyway, Ashley, Chad is picking me up tonight."

Bill Burr: "I was never making enough money. There's something weird about being a stand-up comedian where for the most part you don't have groupies. You still have to work for it. I also think different emotions that, say, singers can bring out in women makes them kind of swoon. Nobody swoons over a comedian."

BEING A MUSICIAN: While Burr was correct about women not being attracted to comedians, he is wrong about women being into musicians solely for the sake of them being musicians. You see, women are into musicians either because they are physically attractive, or because they are rich and famous. A musician who is not rich and famous will not attract a single chick with his music.

My brother is an aspiring musician. He has played tons of shit, including overseas in front of crowds of around 1,000 people. You know how many women have hit on him after shows over the years? You can count it on...NO hands.

He has had a few girlfriends, but not one of them had any idea what it was he did. He met his current girlfriend at a bar, just getting a beer.

You see, when you're 5'5" like my brother, women don't care what kind of guitar player you are.

Women love mediocre talents who are in boy bands a helluva lot more than they love far more talented artists who aren't as popular. The guys in the boy bands are sooooo yummy and so rich and famous.

INTELLIGENCE: Yeah, she's really impressed by your brain. Albert Einstein's picture is on her ceiling and she fingers herself to it.

There are two ways women think of intelligence:

Academic achievements. My Dad has a PhD, so my mom loves to say that this was why she was so attracted to him. But really, what is there about his PhD - which is in the science field - that affects her in any way that isn't financial? My mom majored in linguistics and has no scientific inclination. She has discussed the technical parts of my dad's work with him about one time back in 1982, which was all it took for her to go, "uhhhh, OK, now I know not to bring that up again."

When the guy talks over her head, she thinks to herself, "I love it when he talks all smart and stuff. xD." She doesn't understand it, so this means it's intelligent, and she can brag to her friends about how her possibly pseudo-intellectual SO is sooooooo smart.

TALENT IN GENERAL: When I was a kid, I used to fantasize about "impressing" girls. What naive heterosexual boy doesn't?

The problem is, they're not impressed. They simply don't care. You're a great athlete? A great musician? A great painter? A great writer?

What interests her is in how much money you'll attain from this. She'll want to hitch her ride to a guy who is going places.

If she spots a young LeBron James in the gym, she might get excited about what the future could be like if she were with him and he became an NBA star. The talent itself being something she's attracted to? HA!

Even Roger Federer's wife, who was a fucking tennis player herself, frequently looks bored during his matches.

"Oh, he hit a winner from between his legs? Let's just finish this match, I want to go back to the hotel."

KINDNESS: They say it themselves. "Women are not objects you put kindness tokens into and get sex out of."

Nice guys are a dime a dozen. "You're sweet" is a patronizing remark and means she will never fuck you.

TimRattayGotScrewed, /r/incels 53 Comments [1/4/2017 7:29:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2257

Yes we have similar genetics to animals..but you know what, our genes match rats more then they match apes..and we have similar genes to that of house plants. You call it ancestry. I had no idea my great, great, great, aunt was a cactus. meanwhile.. I have yet for you to find somthing irrational about creationism.

inverter, POD Warrior Forum 11 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 65883

IMHO, it's better to have a conservative retard than a liberal/socialistic tyrant in the Oval Office.

unskilled78, Why, God, Why? 52 Comments [9/22/2009 7:55:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 35
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2437

[Referring to evolution]It will be fascinating how historians of the future will explain how so many educated persons could have been so wrong about the past.

Socratism, Theology Web 21 Comments [3/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2374

If Christianity is true (which it is), then Christians are not brain-washing their children, but those who live in spiritual blindness and death are the ones who brainwash their children or others.

bluetrinity, Christian Forums 10 Comments [3/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2393

The theory is total speculation with no basis in scientifc possibilties. Whereas, we have written accounts of the life of Jesus Christ, and His ressurection, done by either eyewitnesses themselves or written from interviews with eyewitnesses (I'm more inclined to the former), which you claim to not be extraordinary enough evidence.... In a court of law, which theory would be more acceptable as per the full and total evidence, if looked at with no bias?

kerri, Rapture Ready 10 Comments [3/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 25 30 35 40