1 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 25 30 35 40
Quote# 124422

(Note the Lewis referred to is C S Lewis)

Lewis is probably as honest as you can get since he acknowledges humanities universal condition of falling short of the mark morally.
For many if not all antitheists on here their subtext is either or all the following......that Christians are mentally deficient or abbérant or they are lacking morally and that would go for Jesus himself who led people to believe he was the son of God.......there are multiple sources on that and you have yet to establish that his quotes are made up by others.

I did detect earlier confusion by others between Jesus sayings and his ministry of miracles.

We are very much at the wire here and I'm afraid you either believe they are our Lords words or not.

The wire of antitheism is that Jesuses words are bollocks because we are helpless and hapless bonobos caught in a Darwinian game.ewis is probably as honest as you can get since he acknowledges humanities universal condition of falling short of the mark morally.
For many if not all antitheists on here their subtext is either or all the following......that Christians are mentally deficient or abbérant or they are lacking morally and that would go for Jesus himself who led people to believe he was the son of God.......there are multiple sources on that and you have yet to establish that his quotes are made up by others.

I did detect earlier confusion by others between Jesus sayings and his ministry of miracles.

We are very much at the wire here and I'm afraid you either believe they are our Lords words or not.

The wire of antitheism is that Jesuses words are bollocks because we are helpless and hapless bonobos caught in a Darwinian game.

Emergence - the Musical, Religion and Ethics 6 Comments [2/11/2017 1:45:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Nearly Sane
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124374

An underrated cause of inceldom is having a unique face

Studies have shown that people tend to be attracted to people who look similar to them. If you have a unique face and aren't male model tier in looks, almost no woman will find you attractive. I notice that a lot of incels are very distinct looking as in there aren't many people that look like them. Try observing couples on the street and you'll notice a good portion of them look like they could be related.

Enigmatic93, /r/incels 16 Comments [2/9/2017 12:53:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124387

[Commenting under "Congratulations /r/Physical_Removal on 1000 Helicopter Pilots!"]

We must secure the existence of our helicopters and a future for physical removal

(I think I said it right, correct me if wrong)

fitzdepl, Reddit - r/Physical_Removal 7 Comments [2/10/2017 12:47:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124366

Daily Mail jailbait of the week : Cindy Crawford’s 15 year old daughter –


Meanwhile, British women ‘volunteers’ are flocking to the infamous Calais jungle to suck the big black cocks of low IQ desperate African refugees :


theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 4 Comments [2/9/2017 12:51:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124421

[fundie just basically admitted that Republicanism is his religion]

You don't understand how forgiveness works (Lk 17:4).

You are referring to something over a decade ago when Trump was big time abortion-loving, Bill and Hill embracing, sinful Democrat. He repented of all that and became a Republican. He's been forgiven.

David@YourService, Y! answers 7 Comments [2/11/2017 1:44:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124428

If you follow the comments here at Tet Zoo you’ll already have seen the thread that’s been developing on the ‘Giant killers: macropredation in lions’ article (originally posted back in February, and itself a re-post of a ver 1 article from November 2006). If you don’t follow the comments, the following will be new to you. It seems that philosopher David Pearce is honestly proposing that we should feel ethically compelled to eradicate all suffering and cruelty from the natural world in order to create a sort of global vegan paradise where predators don’t exist. Pearce terms this the Abolitionist Project (for more on Pearce and his ideas see this wikipedia article). His plans are, as discussed in depth on his website, theoretically plausible and involve such things as the use of brain implants, behaviour-modifying drugs, and genetic manipulation. Eventually, the lion will, literally, lie down with the lamb, hyaenas will not feel compelled to eat baby elephants alive, and – I presume – ladybirds will not eat aphids, and so on [adjacent image from Catztours].

I personally feel that the philosophy behind the proposal is completely wrong for many reasons. It imposes sentimental ideas and human moral judgment on other species; it (if carried through to eventuality) would mean an end to a great deal of natural selection; it is fundamentally contrary to the history of life and would result in the ultimate bastardisation of the natural world; and, perhaps most offensive of all, it PROMOTES the extinction and biological modification of thousands (or tens of thousands or more) of species. It would also result in the total collapse of the global ecosystem, but I think that’s a minor detail. I cannot help but feel that these ideas are amoral and utterly, utterly wrong. I might not like the sight of slow, lingering death and of animals being eaten alive by others, but I celebrate such processes as part of the natural world, and as a vivid illustration of evolution and adaptation. Death is part of life; we are surrounded by it. If I were religious I would regard predation, death, brutal selection and so on as part of God’s plan. On that note I initially assumed that Pearce was inspired by some kind of religious fundamentalism; so far as I can tell this is not at all the case – instead he represents a sort of ‘extreme vegan’ movement.

While considering this issue, my assumption has been that so few people (especially those involved in conservation, wildlife management and field biology in general) will take it seriously that it will never go anywhere – even if it does become theoretically possible – and that those of us who find it ridiculous and/or offensive don’t have to worry or even think about it. Furthermore, by the time we do have the ability to do the sorts of things proposed by the Abolisionist Project, I think we will most likely need our funding, resources and technology for other things. And, sorry for repeating myself, but modifying wild creatures to suit our ideals hardly sounds enlightened or ethical. It reminds me of efforts to expunge homosexuality by way of electric shock therapy, or of attempts to westernise aboriginal people by banning their customs, traditional dress and languages.

However, I’m interested to see how representative my views are, or are not. A few readers have already made comments, but now is the chance to voice your concerns. Sockpuppetry will not be tolerated – yes your behaviour has already been noticed.

Darren Naish, scienceblogs.com 4 Comments [2/11/2017 1:47:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124413

"Men just want me for sex"

Most girls have nothing else to offer but their vagina. They expect the guy to do all the work in the relationship - ask her out, pay for the date, think of funny and witty things to say, compliment her, do favors for her, have a car and job while it's acceptable for her to be NEET, etc - while she just has to exist.

She deluded herself into thinking the guy is with her for her amazing, totally non cookie cutter personality. In truth if a guy wanted a good personality he'd just chill with another dude. The only reason why guys put up with all the shit involving dating is the prospect of having sex with a female.

Any guy who pretends otherwise is being dishonest.

incelcuck5555, /r/incels 15 Comments [2/11/2017 2:26:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124304

Mature man in a healthy relationship = CUCK

StAliaHarkonnen, /r/incels 16 Comments [2/7/2017 10:10:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 122987

Don't get too excited Floo...there is a difference between the females who accept Biblical truth and those that don't...likewise the male.

The wife should be subjective to the husband...the husband subjective to Jesus and Jesus subjective to Almighty God. So maybe Paul wasn't so far out...It's outside the faith where this doesn't work so well because domination and bullying seems to be the norm.

This is why, outside Biblical truth there is so much turmoil...because tearing at each others emotional strength to claim dominance leads to a spiritual vacuum...still...who cares about the kids...other than Jesus Christ, that is.

NicholasMarks, Religion and Ethics 47 Comments [12/12/2016 11:33:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Nearly Sane
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124415

I am a major Constitution guy; I firmly believe that it works...but only in a homogeneous society whose culture has a history of utilizing its (the Constitution's) rules and systems fairly. The Founding Fathers specifically claimed that the government that they were establishing was "for themselves and their posterity", which means them and their descendants, specifically white people. The system they crafted was utilized based on the assumption that the people of America would have a common cultural respect for the Constitution since much of it was based off of the old documents and theories of law present in the Old World of Europe.
And as we can see, the clash of cultures that has grown from the fertile ground of immigration (particularly the near-unfettered influx of the last few decades) has resulted in every group in America screeching about how the Constitution (by which term I am also including the laws of the land) needs to change to suit their needs/wants/points-of-view, often at the expense of those whom it was originally meant to serve.
If this country is going to remain culturally-diverse (and I see no end to that in sight; whether that is good or ill, I leave up to you), then the Constitution, based off of the concepts of Liberal Democracy, is rendered ineffective; again, as demographics within the country change, then the laws and mores of the State will as well, which means that the largest group (or the group where the most public sympathy lies, or the group that has the most lobbyists, etc) will be able to craft a bank of laws and lawmakers that will benefit them them most, usually at the cost of everyone else.
A more culturally-diverse society needs something stronger, stricter, more iron-clad than Liberal Democracy...and that is where many on the Right are now looking at Fascism as the ideal way forward.
I do not agree, for the very simple fact that I love my personal freedoms, and I refuse to let my society hang by a single thread.
The old Fascist regimes were very successful economically, militarily, and socially. Italy and Germany were literally yanked into the mid-20th century thanks to the fact that their respective peoples were united in a single cause. The root term of Fascist refers to a bundle of sticks, which is borrowed from a metaphor about a bundle of sticks being stronger and less easy to break than single sticks on their own, and this proved true.
Art, music, architecture, personal health, business...all were boosted thanks to the people being united in their energies and efforts!

- -

Now, the problem with multicultural Liberal Democracy is the fact that it automatically assumes that everyone is the same or at least mostly similar, with a similar thought process, similar wants and needs, etc.
However, the sciences (anthropology, evolutionary biology, psychology, etc) tell us a very different story; all of humankind is not the same. You cannot take a native African shaman and have him switch places with a native Chinese Shaolin monk and expect them to thrive; the culture clash, the language barrier, the IQ level, the acclimation to climate, and even more will play a factor in how they survive...if at all.
Essentially, Liberal Democracy assumes that everyone in the world is merely different colors of the same kind of LEGO brick; they look different at first glance, but they still fit together the same way.
This is simply not so, and to assume it would be completely unscientific and unrealistic.
However, if Marxsm (including all of its derivatives) and Fascism (ditto) don't work, and Liberal Democracy only works under certain conditions (and we know that Anarchy doesn't work; everything goes back to a hierarchy eventually), then what would work at least most, if not all the time?
Russian political theorist Aleksandr Dugin advocates for the development of a fourth political theory, one that would take the best from the three previous models and incorporate them into something new, something that would both unite the people under it while preserving the population from what each advocates, which is the abolition of individuality and culture.
Granted, Dugin does not give us an outline of this theory; he merely provides skeleton parameters for the issues it must address and how it might come to be.
That said, one cannot deny the possibilities that a "Fourth Way" might present us with.
Marxism has failed, Fascism is dead, and Liberal Democracy is faltering. What is left to us is either tribal rule, autocracy, or ethnostatism; we don't want to go back to intertribal warfare, having a king would suck just as bad as the first three, and there is no way in hell that the globalist elite would allow any more ethnostates than already exist.
The problem is this; Fascism was beaten by Marxism in 1945. Marxism fell to Liberal Democracy in 1989. Liberal Democracy then spread around what parts of the world that it hadn't yet touched.
Westerners, the longest practitioners of Liberal Democracy, have been utilizing it for so long that now we think everyone either has it or wants it, and anyone who doesn't is either insane or just stupid, leaving it vulnerable to attack from within by those who hate it or want to use it for personal gain.
There are also those who do not want it, those of us who are seeing its failings and wanting to replace the system before it collapses and takes Western Civilization, what may as well be our world, with it. Naturally, we will be seen as evil and/or crazy as well.
Anyways, so while I hate Leftism, dislike Fascism, and am a Constitutionalist, I also realize that perhaps Liberal Democracy has played itself out, and not necessarily for the better. However, I have little clue where to proceed myself, and so I sit and think and research.

Panzer Schreck, FiMFiction 15 Comments [2/11/2017 2:26:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Gabriel LaVedier
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124293

Video games can have tremendous negative effects on children and adolescents. They promote inactivity, and health problems such as obesity. In fact, video game companies such as Nintendo even have warnings on the games that basically say that one should take breaks every hour to stop harm to the eyes, and even seizures due to overexposure. Video games are often paired with a poor diet, which can consist of high-calorie snacks such as potato chips and high-sugar soda such as Mountain Dew. This is very typical in America, especially in cities and suburbs where there is not much for children to do.
It is often safer for parents to keep their children in homes playing these games than going outside due to city crime such as child abuse, gun violence, and bullying. Video games offer a shelter and sanctuary from this. Nonetheless, they cause health problems and can promote anti-social behavior and they may disconnect from parents.
Violent video games such as the Grand Theft Auto series promote violence in young boys, and despite an "M" rating, parents buy these sort of games for young children. These children are exposed to crime, immorality, drug abuse, gun violence, and obscene language at a young age. While the ESRB is doing a good thing placing appropriate ratings on such violent games, parents often do not look at these ratings and will unknowingly buy young children these atrocious titles. One who is aware can surely tremble as a parent buys a child Mortal Kombat for Christmas, and will know that the horrifying content can have a great effect on the well-being of the child! Even Christian churches will have youth group activities where young men will play games like Halo! This ignorance toward game content can promote young men emulating these characters in the violent games they played as children, and has shown links to certain violent behavior promoted recently. The Supreme Court upheld the "free speech" right of an extremely violent and gruesome game as if it were an actual form of speech. Images shown of the game include a beast breaking the body of a woman in half with gore spewing out. Surely one would not want their young child to see this! Nonetheless, this issue is one that will need to be solved by parents to protect the well-being of our children.

Elvis is King (James Wilson), RationalWiki 26 Comments [2/9/2017 12:49:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124296

Fornication is "sexual intercourse between two persons not married to each other" (also for purposes other than procreation even within marriage)[1] or, more broadly, sex other than with someone you can marry, as with incest or adultery.[2]
The Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthian church:
“ Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God.
Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.[3]

James Wilson, Conservapedia 9 Comments [2/6/2017 10:11:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124361

Chads aren't Chads anymore

Women have a serious "grass is greener" syndrome. I think with each generation they try to push the envelope more and more, like a junkie taking stronger and stronger doses to get his fix. Chads are on the decline. Any woman can have a Chad at any time, so that has become too comfortable and boring for them. I think soon women will want average or ugly guys because that would be pushing the envelope for them. I could even see at some point them not even being attracted to humans anymore and will only have sex with animals, insects and plants. Hell, maybe someday they'll only have sex with hand sanitizer.

iamhopeless266, /r/incels 11 Comments [2/9/2017 2:12:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 109008

LONG BEFORE the birth of Christianity, monotheism was an anomaly; Europe and the Near East flourished under the divine guidance of Sophia, the ancient goddess of wisdom. The Earth was venerated as the embodiment of Sophia and thus sacred to the people who sought divine fulfillment in her presence.

This ancient harmonious, nature-based philosophy was threatening to the emerging salvationist, sacrificial creed of Christianity which was based on the patriarchal dominion over the Earth and damanded personal suffering as a path to the afterlife. The old ways could not be tolerated by this alien intruder, and so in the early centuries of the 1st millennium the Christian hordes obliterated every trace of the ancient spiritual traditions, casting Europe into the Dark Ages...

IN THE GNOSTIC GOSPELS of Nag Hammadi, written in the 1st Century, the writers warn us about the god of the Bible. Known as the "Demiurge" or "Yaldabaoth", he is described as an insane, demented imposter deity who works against humanity. He is "a self-deified inorganic phantom, deluded about his own identity."

The word "Demiurge" literally means "half-working" or "half-powered" - so called because he can originate nothing, but must imitate what already exists. The leader of the extraterrestrial Archon race, he is also called Saklas ("fool"), Samael ("blin") - and Yaldabaoth to the Gnostics. This is the biblical father god of the Old Testament, Yahweh or Jehovah - the god still worshiped by millions of Jews, Christians and Muslims today!

YALDABAOTH is a demented pretender god who claims to be the creator of the material world, and demands slavish obedience from his human subjects, while he works to undermine the evolution and destiny of humanity. According to the Gnostic writings, "Yaldabaoth himself chose a certain man named Abraham, and made a covenant with him" - and so began the devastating salvationist, misogynistic religions of monotheism that have so devastated our world.

ARCHONS are predatory cyborgs, lacking creativity, but can imitate with a vengeance. Their expertise is simulation ('HAL', virtual reality), and the Demiurge fashioned a heaven world, copied from the Sophianic original, but completely fake. This Archontic heaven is the afterworld for countless humans who are duped by the simulation presented by messianic, salvationist religion (Christianity).

This fake 'salvation' by superhuman powers, rather than through the divine potential innate to humanity and aligned with the planetary goddess Sophia, is the hallmark of extraterrestrial religion. It is the root cause of most of the problems that currently beset humanity.

MichelleWalling, How to Exit the Matrix 33 Comments [5/29/2015 3:09:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124408

In yet another installment of outrageous news that seems like it should be fake, but is all too real, a popular Russian newspaper — the week before Vladimir Putin signed an amendment decriminalizing domestic violence — ran a column that tells women to be happy about being “smacked around by their husbands.”

The shocking column, titled “From Evil Men Boys Born,” was written by Yaroslav Korobatov and published in the science section of Komsomolskaya Pravda, a longtime tabloid newspaper. Korobatov’s column based its claims on the work of a controversial evolutionary psychologist named Satoshi Kanazawa.

“For years, women who have been smacked around by their husbands have found solace in the rather hypocritical proverb, ‘If he beats you, it means he loves you!’’ However, a new scientific study is giving women with irascible husbands new grounds to be proud of their bruises, insofar as women who are beaten, biologists confirm, have a valuable advantage: They’re more likely to give birth to boys!”

Parts of that incendiary and offensive passage have since been removed from the online version of the column by the paper since it was first published on February 1. A web archive capture of the article as it appeared on the Komsomolskaya Pravda website on the day it was published shows the piece originally contained the “proud of their bruises” language. This Google translation also shows that the language that originally existed in the first published draft of the article translates from Russian to English in the form that it’s widely being reported. The current form of the piece no longer contains that passage and includes a disclaimer, saying, “Some readers will make a ridiculous conclusion: If you want to [sic] baby boy — let’s pummel his wife!” The passage goes on to warn that the paper is “strongly opposed to any kind of battering” because doing so is “immoral.”

But that certainly wasn’t in the original version of the article, which just began making news and stirring up outrage in Western media late Wednesday into Thursday. According to The Independent, Korobatov drew his conclusions from two studies published by Kanazawa: “Violent men have more sons” and “Why do some battered women stay?” Korobatov also relied on some outdated thinking that suggests parents should value having a boy over welcoming a baby girl to bolster his point.

Yaroslav Korobatov, New York Times 8 Comments [2/11/2017 2:25:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124381

Our courts are infested with human fecal matter wearing black robes trying to get us to submit to Islam. We will not submit to the judicial tyrants or to the Jihadist psychos.

Trumpisourlastchance, Free Republic 21 Comments [2/9/2017 11:40:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Ivurm
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124362

A look inside stacie's life

Stacy wakes up and she checks normiegram, normiebook and her dating sites. She got 400 likes on her photo on Instagram, Chad commented "thick" the beta orbiter commented "Gorgeous" and her friend Katie pm'd her asking if she hooked up with Chad. She replies "yes he was so good" Stacy and Katie blew 2 chads together the night before, they are good friends. She checks her dating site and sees 2 guys who she fucked in her inbox, she rolls her eyes and blocks them. They were attractive, but they were bad in bed. She has 70 new messages and only 3 of them are chads. One says "dtf" the other says "you trying to hangout?" And the last one says "want to grab something to eat" Stacy thinks to herself hmm.. maybe I can fuck all of them today. She puts on some dry shampoo, makeup and she is ready to meet Chad #1 now. She goes over to his house, Chad says she looks nothing like her picture but that's ok. Stacy laughs hehe you're so funny, Chad makes some bullshit small talk and she just laughs and eye fucks him. Chad fucks her in the kitchen and she is off to meet Chad #2. When Chad 2 opens the door she says "omg your so tall hehe" Chad says she is just short and he greets her. After drinking some of chads cheap ass champagne, they get 2 minutes into Netflix and chill and she is trying to suck his dick. While she sucks his dick the door opens, Chad?!?! It's not what it looks like! Says Chad. Stacy runs out of the apartment, the adrenaline feels good. The next day chads girlfriend forgave him because Chad said he will make it up to her; Chad said he will try out bsdm with her. Stacy is off to meet Chad #3. Chad 3 takes her to red lobster, Chad sees her looking at the most expensive meal on the menu and he is thinking "this slut better not fucking order that" he then suggests something cheaper and he says it's phenomenal. She smiles and says okay. Chad is feeling a little spontaneous today, so they go fuck In an empty parking lot. Stacy goes home and writes on Twitter "it was such a long day" and "I'm lonely anyone want to cuddle?" Her ex comes over and they fight and then they fuck. After that they cuddle, watch some normie tv shows and smoke some bowls.

iamhopeless256, /r/incels 20 Comments [2/9/2017 2:12:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124382

Men who are exceptional natural pickup artists don't have those skills magically kick in at the age of consent, you know, like dimwitted feminists believe. The qualities that make some men promiscuous in adulthood obviously also tend to make them more attractive to women and hence sexually active in adolescence. So you should logically expect a boy who is having sex with women at 12 to also get more women than his peers later in life. Only an utter moron or a feminist would conclude that the latter promiscuity was caused by early "abuse," which of course isn't abuse at all but rather an expression of superior fitness, the same alpha traits that make men incredibly successful with women later as well. Blaming promiscuity on early sexual experiences, and pretending it is bad, makes as much sense as saying Bill Gates became a billionaire because of childhood abuse. And that the rest of us should be so glad we weren't abused, because then we would go out and become billionaires, which only someone abused would do, and easily could do just because he was abused...

The notion that superior fitness can be caused by "abuse," and statutory abuse at that, arbitrarily defined into existence by feminist legislators, is mind-bogglingly insane. Yet this is what feminists literally claim. Please try to do some independent thinking before accepting their harebrained theories.

Eivind Berge, Eivind Berge's Blog 15 Comments [2/10/2017 12:46:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: holly
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 6705

No, it is not irrelevant, given that according the scriptures, 'the wages of sin is death'. Therefore, God was meteing out justice on the Canaanites, Amelekites and Egyptians. Meteing out justice on evildoers is moral especially if you are the judge of the universe.

Ed, Internet Infidels 7 Comments [4/1/2004 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 4079

Mr. Hill has commited a criminal act in the eyes of the law of man and will pay the ultimate price with his life -- but he feels it is worth it because there is a war against abortion and he has picked up arms. If what he has done is 'morally' wrong, then so was the Revolutionary War for it was fought over much less than the killing of innocent children.

cbk, Christian Forums 3 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 4082

CBK, at least your here showing some reason... if abortion is murder then violence is justified, legal or not...

Saint Philip, Christian Forums 7 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124385

In another example of attempts to legitimize murder for apostasy, an Islamist Cleric of the Kurdistan Islamic Group (KIG) declared in an interview with the BBC that Kurds who leave Islam to convert to Zoroastrianism are to be murdered; or in his words “Killed and Executed.”

The cleric extended his hand of mercy by allowing those converts three days to regret their decision but thereafter are to be executed.

In an almost brutal irony, Mulla Hassib from Sulaimani said that Islamic religious tenets permit such executions, but ISIS’ practice of killing apostates is partially correct but he criticizes the terrorist organization for spreading the religion by means of “violence”.


The intolerant actions by a few Islamist leaders is likely in part due to a rise in Zoroastrianism within the Iraqi Kurdistan region. Zoroastrianism predates Christianity and Islam by centuries and is regarded as a precursor by some to these religions. Its decline began with the Islamic conquest of Persia from 633 to the mid 650s. While today the religious faithful are estimated in the low 100,000s worldwide, a resurgence of the faith is showing marked gains in Iraqi Kurdistan. A movement exists to gain official recognition status by the Kurdistan Regional Government. Culturally Kurds have a strong interweaving with the religion and the Kurdish language is derived from the Avesta, the religion’s sacred book.

Mulla Hassib, Jonathan Turley 13 Comments [2/10/2017 6:35:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124389

When I have negative thoughts arise toward others, I immediately pray for them, for God's will to be done in their life, whether good or bad. Sometimes bad things have to happen for people to get right with God.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 8 Comments [2/10/2017 5:26:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124310

Trump has pledged to eradicate the menace that is pornography, and has stated that it ruins American families. Lust has ruined this great nation, and hopefully he also makes godless seductress heathens like the vile liberal Taylor Swift put some clothes on.

Economically, Trump will allow the American economy to grow without all of these burdensome regulations like the communist plot of ObamaCare that forces people to buy subpar health insurance and is a trojan horse for such vile policies as Crazy Bernie's single payer garbage.

Trump, I believe, will show the sound judgement to create the best foreign policy ever seen in this nation, because he values security over whiny liberal pleas of political correctness.

Centrally, the border wall must be built regardless of whether Mexico is going to foot the bill. The border is wide open and drugs, criminals, rapists, thieves, murderers, and even terrorists can sneak in to the United States due to the lack of border security and you simply cannot have a country without borders.

Hopefully, you will come to your senses and vote Donald J. Trump in November so that America can be a safe, God fearing nation that is righteous and not obsessed with sex, homosexuality, "equality" and "fairness," and all of this other politically correct drivel.

Elvis is King, RationalWiki 32 Comments [2/7/2017 1:25:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124414

How is the concept of a "nice guy" insulting to the female?

I'm certainly not one, I'd personally rather die than validate a cunt.

But we are talking about someone doing you favors (+) because they want to have sex with you (+).

Can't get much better than that. I get that the female might not what to actually have sex in return but it what sick twisted universe is this insulting? Fucking retards.

StAliaHarkonnen, /r/incels 10 Comments [2/11/2017 2:26:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh
1 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 25 30 35 40