Quote# 136433

When I watched a “Reformed” believer, Doug Wilson, argue that Papists were to be considered our Christian kinsmen, I literally wanted to vomit. I don’t mean that metaphorically; I mean it made me literally sick to my stomach.

Jordan Hall, Jordan Hall 17 Comments [2/4/2018 11:32:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 136259

I use God's word. You use logic. Two different things.

Velma Brooks, Facebook 24 Comments [1/30/2018 4:29:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 136438

[An image reading "You can't just murder all your political rivals and make it look like suicide.", and an image of Hillary Clinton wearing sunglasses and making double finger guns, captioned "that's where you're wrong kiddo".]

hank2247, Imgur 11 Comments [2/5/2018 9:37:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 136337

Let’s be clear. Being leftist does not inoculate you from behaving like a fascist; just as authoritarianism is not the exclusive vice of the right wing. The Nazis, after all, were socialists and lest we forget, Joseph “Dictator” Stalin and Chairman Mao Zedong were communists, while Francisco “Fascist” Franco in Spain was, in fact, a left wing socialist.

The most archetypal examples of totalitarianism in the 20th Century were incarnated by left wing ideologues and simply, using liberal jargon with the aim to appeal to compassion and tolerance in order for you to advance a deeply authoritarian agenda does not make that agenda less offensive.

What makes a movement fascist is the degree, to which it does not accept dissent, its refusal to tolerate other opinions and the outright arrogance in seeking to advance its agenda through force, demonization and denigration of anyone who disagrees with it. And this is quite noticeable among the so-called “progressives;” or what should be more accurately described as the “regressive left.”

The left does not deal magnanimously with anyone who challenges its narratives; in reality, the supporters can be quite malicious.

In Malaysia, human rights NGO, the Centre for Human Rights Research and Advocacy or Centhra, along with a broader coalition of NGOs under the name Macsa (the Malaysian Alliance of Civil Society Organisations in the UPR Process), recently published a statement against the efforts to advance political agenda of the LGBT community in the country against the prevailing sentiments and religious concerns of the general public.

Centhra and Macsa were instantly excoriated online by gay-rights activists and left-wingers as advocates of “selective rights.” Worse off, Centhra and Macsa were brandished as bigots and as religious extremists. Their credentials as human rights defenders were rejected with the allegations that they purportedly did not align with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 (UDHR) in their opposition to, for instance, same-sex marriage.

LGBT defenders’ political game

To begin with, it should be acknowledged that it is a political ideology to regard homosexuality as an identity akin to race or ethnicity. This is neither an objective nor a scientific fact and for all intents and purposes, it remains merely an opinion.

Another opinion, far closer to objective evidence, is that homosexuality is a chosen behaviour. Therefore, the moment we begin to talk about the “rights” of the LGBT community, we are participating in an ideological discussion.

Declaring that LGBT individuals deserve special rights and protections is based on the concept that homosexuality is an identity, and this should not be accepted as an un-debatable fact. A good deal of the progress in the LGBT agenda has derived from their making this concept unquestionable; even though the actual science on the matter is, at best, inconclusive.

It is an entirely valid viewpoint if you do not subscribe to the idea that there should be special rights afforded to LGBT individuals. This viewpoint does not in any way equate to believing that the general rights afforded to all people do not apply to them.

If you choose to believe that homosexuality is a chosen behaviour, which, in the absence of conclusive scientific evidence to the contrary, is the most reasonable assumption to make; then, like everyone else, LGBT individuals are, and should be, subject to laws that regulate public behaviour.

Furthermore, like everyone else, their choices once made, will tend to limit (or at the very least impact) their subsequent available options.

Take for example the right to contract a marriage. The right to marry is upheld by the UDHR, but it is a right upheld for heterosexual couples exclusively, wherein article 16(1) thereof uses the phrase “men and women of full age.”

There is nothing whatsoever that contradicts the UDHR if one does not believe in the right of same-sex couples to marry. Nor is there anything inaccurate about describing the push for gay-rights and same-sex marriage as essentially a political agenda, rather than a human rights concern.

If one chooses to exclusively partner with members of one’s own sex, one has implicitly chosen to not marry and to not procreate. It is made with a conscious decision to choose. These are at least two of the obvious ramifications of that choice, and avoiding the consequences of one’s decisions is not a human right.

One cannot invoke their right to food, for example, when they have chosen to spend their income on other things.

Pushing political agenda in the name of human rights

The regressive left are manipulators of the UDHR, not defenders of it. They are not human rights campaigners; they are political extortionists who couch their demands in the language of human rights.

The preamble of the UDHR states that “a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realisation of this pledge,” yet the leftists want to reinterpret the terms of the contract which the UDHR represents after it has been signed; and by this new interpretation, they intend to include things to which the signatories have not agreed; and they call this “defending” the UDHR!

The UDHR provides no special recognition of homosexuality as an identity deserving specific rights or protections; it only states that the general rights outlined in the declaration cannot be denied to any individual on the basis of his or her sex.

That is what the signatories have agreed to; nothing more and nothing less of this. And the term “sex” used herein refers to the biological anatomy of an individual, as opposed to the term “gender” which may refer to the social role based on the sex of the person.

Pushing the political agenda of recognisng homosexuality as an identity rather than a chosen behaviour, has no basis in the UDHR, and opposing that agenda is in no way conflicting with the rights enshrined in it. Every nation is free to legislate behaviour according to their own standards of morality and justice and logic.

The UDHR has always respected each member state’s rights to establish its own human rights laws within the ambit of its national narratives.

One must ask, why are the leftists in Malaysia holding other fellow citizens in such contempt that they believe they are incapable of determining for themselves what is best for our society? Why do they presume, when the people of Malaysia disapprove of homosexuality, and resist the same-sex political project, that they are all religious extremists and ignorant bigots; all the while it is the leftists who are seeking to force average Malaysians to follow their unpopular political opinions?

In short, why are they so fundamentally undemocratic in their pursuit of their “human rights” agenda?

Azril Mohd Amin and Rafidah Hanim Mokhtar, Malay Mail Online 7 Comments [2/5/2018 7:43:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 136414

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Rose McGowan verbally attacked by a man who wants to be a woman, cancels all public appearances"

(Cut-and-pasted Fox News story follows, link here: www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/02/03/rose-mcgowan-gets-into-shouting-match-with-transgender-woman-cancels-all-public-appearances.html)

Lady Checkmate:
I support Rose in this instance.
The man that interrupted her event was wrong, but he was only behaving like most alt-left trolls, with low self-esteem who cannot accept disagreement.
LOL @ the alt-left turning on each other. True feminists will NOT allow men to co-opt the female experience and use it to further their agenda.

AuntiE **TFL**
It reflects poorly on me that I care not a fig about what experiences the transgender person has encountered.

Lady Checkmate:
I care, and I apologize, but I would be lying if I said I don't care. Yes some are hateful Christophobes who voluntarily rebel against God and attack Christians and conservatives for fun, but others are just lost and hurting and have never encountered God. I mean really encountered God. I care about them (and now I'm crying...shucks, AuntiE)! No, I don't like when they troll and use sock accounts (I'm human) to target and harass us bible-believing Christian conservatives, but I still love them and pray they get right with God. I don't want them to waste their lives on sin and pain and then go to hell. I want them to know God, be set free from a life of sin, and spend eternity in heaven, but alas it's their decision to make. This is something that is only reconciled in Christ because most don't understand and at times I don't, but I trust God whose ways are higher than your ways and whose thoughts are higher than our thoughts.
God bless and keep you AuntiE.

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 9 Comments [2/4/2018 1:33:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 136296

Original post:

"The idea of Christianity merging with Islam makes total sense when one thinks about it.

Christians and Muslims both shun rape victims.
Christians and Muslims both want to kill anyone who is LGBTQ.
Christians and Muslims both hate Jews.
Christians and Muslims both want to go to war.
Christians, Muslims and Jews all come from Abraham.
All three are killing each other over the same barren wasteland

How are they different?

There's no difference between them at all.

This has to stop, but I doubt that it will."

(The Disqus channel "Calling all Christians" allowed this to be posted, but with the following disclaimer:)
Sending invites so others will weigh in on this, but remember this is a Christian site. We oppose the false religion of Islam.

Leftists love Islam cuz islam hates Christianity as much as leftists do.

the colosseum is full:
well, that is not true, I am leftist and hate Islam with all my heart...
I hate it mainly because of what it does to Muslims !!! I hate anything that blinds men's eye's to the truth!

You're a leftist? In America that means you support abortion, homosexual "marriage", have no problem with promiscuity, among other things. Are you sure you're a leftist?

WelderChick, Disqus - Calling all Christians 6 Comments [2/5/2018 7:28:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 136304

(Marilyn & James Dean)
From High Above The Beautiful, Milky Way,
In 1861, a few months before the start of the Civil War, there were 4,000,000 slaves in the United States.
Not one of these slaves was owned by a Republican. They were ALL owned by Democrats.
A few years of the most horrible war in American history, and the Republican President who put an end to this horrible evil, was murdered by a pro slavery, actor, John Wilkes Booth.
Fast forward, 153 years later to the cycle of evil, that pervades this country.
Democrats openly advocate, promote, and participate in the daily and ongoing, mass murder of innocent, unborn, children.
Nothing in the history of all humanity, was, is, or ever will be, worse than that.
It is the absolute epitome of pure, evil.

And over 1/2 of those slaves were owned by black slave owners.!!

Indentured servants, which was another form of slavery, vastly outnumbered slave.

Thank you for bringing this up, in many cases they were treated far worse than slaves because of the low investment their holders had.

Slavery was illegal until e slave owner positioned to have it made legal he wanted to keep his slave the rest of his life. that slave owner was a black man.!!

various commenters, Breitbart 9 Comments [2/5/2018 7:36:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 116326

The cause of homosexuality, and all aberrosexuality is DIABOLICAL NARCISSISM.

The further one descends into Diabolical Narcissism, the freakier and freakier the aberrosexuality becomes. Think Charlie Sheen. Think Miley Cyrus and Linsey Lohan. Think all musloid cultures – musloids openly screw blood relatives, children and infants, animals and dead bodies, and islam ratifies this.

Celibacy and chastity have nothing to do with it and are red herrings. Don’t fall for it for a second. There is NOTHING harmful or risky about a psycho-spiritually normal person, fully and normally capable of love and thus BY DEFINITION heterosexual, directing the energy of their sexuality toward a life espoused and in service to Christ and His Holy Church.

Taking a vow of celibacy does not make a man or woman “asexual”. ASEXUALITY IS HIGHLY DISORDERED, AND A RED FLAG SIGNAL OF CEREBRAL DIABOLIC NARCISSISM. Asexuality, or CLAIMS of asexuality – which are frequently a cover for homosexuality – should be a DISQUALIFIER for the priesthood and holy orders.

The one and only normal “sexual orientation” is HETEROSEXUALITY. Period. Everything else is diabolical. There is no such thing as a “benign” homosexuality, asexuality or aberrosexuality of any stripe. ALL are derivatives of Diabolical Narcissism, and thus extremely dangerous to souls, not only of the individual, but also to the people the Diabolical Narcissist comes in contact with.

Ann Barnhardt, Barnhardt.biz 25 Comments [1/26/2016 5:49:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 136442

it doesn't matter what they identify as, the rest of the arabs, and indeed the rest of the world see them as an admixed population of arabs and black africans, which is exactly what they are. thus they won't recreate the exact same type of civilizations or cultures that the arabs, nor the non-mixed black africans, did and do
implement your own advice, and apply proper context, "means very little" in terms of direct genetic effects into the people's behaviors and thus culture, because haplogroup genetic markers are not genes, period
and with regards to the topic at hand, my comments never left that context. the descendants of those melanesians that "become assimilated' into southeast asians, will not stop having the genetic influences of their melanesian ancestors, and will like the sudanese arabs behave as an admixed population, which is precisely how the existing groups of people that have both ancestry behave currently
a group of people choosing to identify as one group over another doesn't change that groups' intrinsic genetics or culture

JCCheapEntertainment, Reddit 3 Comments [2/5/2018 9:46:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 136408

Do you know what witchcraft is? Witchcraft is seeking help or guidance from any spiritual source other than God.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 18 Comments [2/3/2018 2:29:15 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 136424

Izslime can’t produce anything but death. It’s cant feed it’s own pitiful subjects, it cannot produce anything that advances civilization, and it has nothing in that makes it attractive to the longing soul.

All izslime has is murder subterfuge cohersion and terror, to control the miserable creatures trapped in it.

Of course no muzslime nation wants more muzslime they already know they can’t care for their own even without massive help from Western nations, so just send the hoards there and let them become invasion jihadists.

Don Spilman, Bare Naked Islam 13 Comments [2/4/2018 7:04:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 136416

On an article entitled “Gym teacher accused of assaulting student who refused to stand for Pledge of Allegiance”

Kids are whinny unruly morons these days. And of course the parents are no better.

We first of all by “assault” most likely it means; “assisted the moron with choosing to stand.” So much of these issues are caused by the breakdown of what once was the almost complete authority of teachers and school administration over the student body with the full support of the parents.. In a better time, long past (1950s-1970s), teachers and principals were an extension of the involved parents. They were also given virtually the same authority and go-ahead by parents to dole out punishment as necessary. This included attitude adjustment, like in this case. The worse thing that could happen would have been to mouth off to a teacher or principal, because the punishment would then be two-fold; at home and school. AS a smart-ass who attended regular public school, I can tell you that I was not so infrequently slammed up against lockers and slapped around by teachers for my indiscretions. One did not dare whine about this at home this for fear of having to explain about original sin incure another type of punishment at home......

Ralph Langgood, Facebook 25 Comments [2/4/2018 1:34:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 136440

[The tweet linked to article about how people were supposedly tuning away from the Super Bowl. It should also be noted the article in question didn't reference Islam at all.]

Grampa, what's a Super Bowl?

Well, lil Muhammad, back when the kuffar ran things, they stitched up filthy pig skins, moved them around painted lines, and shoved each other. There was secular music and alcohol -
A very haram affair!

Breitbart News, Twitter 2 Comments [2/5/2018 9:41:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Into the Unknown

Quote# 136014

I remain committed to the faith of my teenage years: to authentic human freedom as a precondition for the highest good. I stand against confiscatory taxes, totalitarian collectives, and the ideology of the inevitability of the death of every individual. For all these reasons, I still call myself “libertarian.”

But I must confess that over the last two decades, I have changed radically on the question of how to achieve these goals. [b]Most importantly, I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible. By tracing out the development of my thinking, I hope to frame some of the challenges faced by all classical liberals today.

As a Stanford undergraduate studying philosophy in the late 1980s, I naturally was drawn to the give-and-take of debate and the desire to bring about freedom through political means. I started a student newspaper to challenge the prevailing campus orthodoxies; we scored some limited victories, most notably in undoing speech codes instituted by the university. But in a broader sense we did not achieve all that much for all the effort expended. Much of it felt like trench warfare on the Western Front in World War I; there was a lot of carnage, but we did not move the center of the debate. In hindsight, we were preaching mainly to the choir — even if this had the important side benefit of convincing the choir’s members to continue singing for the rest of their lives.

As a young lawyer and trader in Manhattan in the 1990s, I began to understand why so many become disillusioned after college. The world appears too big a place. Rather than fight the relentless indifference of the universe, many of my saner peers retreated to tending their small gardens. The higher one’s IQ, the more pessimistic one became about free-market politics — capitalism simply is not that popular with the crowd. Among the smartest conservatives, this pessimism often manifested in heroic drinking; the smartest libertarians, by contrast, had fewer hang-ups about positive law and escaped not only to alcohol but beyond it.

As one fast-forwards to 2009, the prospects for a libertarian politics appear grim indeed. Exhibit A is a financial crisis caused by too much debt and leverage, facilitated by a government that insured against all sorts of moral hazards — and we know that the response to this crisis involves way more debt and leverage, and way more government. Those who have argued for free markets have been screaming into a hurricane. The events of recent months shatter any remaining hopes of politically minded libertarians. For those of us who are libertarian in 2009, our education culminates with the knowledge that the broader education of the body politic has become a fool’s errand.

Indeed, even more pessimistically, the trend has been going the wrong way for a long time. To return to finance, the last economic depression in the United States that did not result in massive government intervention was the collapse of 1920–21. It was sharp but short, and entailed the sort of Schumpeterian “creative destruction” that could lead to a real boom. The decade that followed — the roaring 1920s — was so strong that historians have forgotten the depression that started it. The 1920s were the last decade in American history during which one could be genuinely optimistic about politics. Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians — have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an oxymoron.

In the face of these realities, one would despair if one limited one’s horizon to the world of politics. I do not despair because I no longer believe that politics encompasses all possible futures of our world. In our time, the great task for libertarians is to find an escape from politics in all its forms — from the totalitarian and fundamentalist catastrophes to the unthinking demos that guides so-called “social democracy.”

The critical question then becomes one of means, of how to escape not via politics but beyond it. Because there are no truly free places left in our world, I suspect that the mode for escape must involve some sort of new and hitherto untried process that leads us to some undiscovered country; and for this reason I have focused my efforts on new technologies that may create a new space for freedom. Let me briefly speak to three such technological frontiers:

(1) Cyberspace. As an entrepreneur and investor, I have focused my efforts on the Internet. In the late 1990s, the founding vision of PayPal centered on the creation of a new world currency, free from all government control and dilution — the end of monetary sovereignty, as it were. In the 2000s, companies like Facebook create the space for new modes of dissent and new ways to form communities not bounded by historical nation-states. By starting a new Internet business, an entrepreneur may create a new world. The hope of the Internet is that these new worlds will impact and force change on the existing social and political order. The limitation of the Internet is that these new worlds are virtual and that any escape may be more imaginary than real. The open question, which will not be resolved for many years, centers on which of these accounts of the Internet proves true.

(2) Outer space. Because the vast reaches of outer space represent a limitless frontier, they also represent a limitless possibility for escape from world politics. But the final frontier still has a barrier to entry: Rocket technologies have seen only modest advances since the 1960s, so that outer space still remains almost impossibly far away. We must redouble the efforts to commercialize space, but we also must be realistic about the time horizons involved. The libertarian future of classic science fiction, à la Heinlein, will not happen before the second half of the 21st century.

(3) Seasteading. Between cyberspace and outer space lies the possibility of settling the oceans. To my mind, the questions about whether people will live there (answer: enough will) are secondary to the questions about whether seasteading technology is imminent. From my vantage point, the technology involved is more tentative than the Internet, but much more realistic than space travel. We may have reached the stage at which it is economically feasible, or where it soon will be feasible. It is a realistic risk, and for this reason I eagerly support this initiative.

The future of technology is not pre-determined, and we must resist the temptation of technological utopianism — the notion that technology has a momentum or will of its own, that it will guarantee a more free future, and therefore that we can ignore the terrible arc of the political in our world.

A better metaphor is that we are in a deadly race between politics and technology. The future will be much better or much worse, but the question of the future remains very open indeed. We do not know exactly how close this race is, but I suspect that it may be very close, even down to the wire. Unlike the world of politics, in the world of technology the choices of individuals may still be paramount. The fate of our world may depend on the effort of a single person who builds or propagates the machinery of freedom that makes the world safe for capitalism.

For this reason, all of us must wish Patri Friedman the very best in his extraordinary experiment.

(Emphasis added)

Peter Thiel, Cato Unbound 8 Comments [1/16/2018 12:12:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136300

Drug money is fast money. But it's also cursed money. That's why few drug dealers ever make it out the dope game successfully.

Many of them end up on drugs themselves. Or locked away doing crazy years in prison. Or they die: usually shot up or OD'ing on the same drugs they once sold to others.

Drugs are synonymous in the bible with witchcraft and sorcery. I wonder how many people know that? The Greek word for sorcery used in the New Testament is pharmakeia: where we get the words pharmacy and drugs from.

Why do you think people high on drugs do crazy things like getting buck naked in the middle of the street, walking around clucking like a chicken?

Drug dealers therefore are no different from witch doctors. They're modern day shamans and conjurers, drawing on the dark side of the universe for empowerment and wealth.

That's also something to think about for those of you who still like to get high. Whose power is your mind REALLY under when you're high?

Witchcraft is the spiritual technology that uses demon power to accomplish certain goals. For someone selling drugs, that goal would be fast money and wealth.

Righteous people are forbidden from using demon power for anything because it draws on dark energy for help: not God's energy. And dark energy always comes with a dark price tag attached to it.

Nothing in life is free. Even if you call on devils and dark spirits for help, you still have to pay the piper eventually.

So when you use dark energy and demons to make fast money, don't be surprised when those demons send you their bill. Which comes in the form of addiction, jail or death.

That's the price tag for using their power to get money.

A better method for getting money is to do it God's way. Find out what you're good at, work hard at perfecting it, and find others who can benefit from it. Then charge them accordingly.

It's a simple, unglamorous process that guarantees you a much better life in the long run. You won't have to dodge cops, robbing crews or bullets. Plus, you can proudly tell your kids what you really do for a living instead of hiding it from them.

Listen: I sold drugs before. I'm not some innocent bystander in this conversation. I was right there with the trappers and d-boys getting money too. And when my money got too low I went after other drug dealers for their money. That's the brutality of the dope game.

But if someone had broke it down the way I'm breaking it down for you, maybe I would've reconsidered. I never realized I was basically dabbling with occult energy. That knowledge didn't come until much later.

So if you're still in the dope game seeking fast money the street way, like I did: get out now while you still can. Do it now, before the demons send you their bill, seeking payment.

Once that happens, only God can help you: if it ain't too late by then.

Mack Major, Eden Decoded 4 Comments [2/5/2018 7:33:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 136404

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Mark Of The Beast To Launch From Revived Roman Empire? Mastercard Wants All Buying & Selling Done Via Face And Hand Scanning Starting Next Year... AND ALL BANKS MUST COMPLY"

(Text from wolfstreet.com reproduced here)

By Don Quijones, Spain, UK, & Mexico, editor at WOLF STREET.

Mastercard has set a deadline for widespread use of biometric identification for its services across the whole of the EU: April 2019. Mastercard Identity Check, currently available in 37 countries, enables individuals to use biometric identifiers, such as fingerprint, facial, and iris recognition, to verify their identities when using a mobile device for online shopping and banking. The technology is not mandatory for customers, but from next year it will be vigorously promoted throughout the EU and many consumers will welcome it.

The impact will be felt not just by consumers but also by most European banks, since any bank that issues or accepts Mastercard payments will have to support identification mechanisms for remote transactions, alongside existing PIN and password verification. The deadline will also apply to all contactless transactions made at terminals with a mobile device.

Citing research it carried out with Oxford University, Mastercard says that 92% of banking professionals want to introduce biometric ID. This high number shouldn’t come as much of a surprise given the vast untapped value consumer data holds for banks and corporations as well the preference most banks have for electronic transactions. The study also claims that 93% of consumers would prefer biometric security to passwords, which is a surprise given the array of thorny issues biometrics throws up, including the threat it poses to privacy and anonymity and its deceptively public nature.

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified. Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

I sure was happy for biometrics when my lost puppy was returned to me because he had a chip inserted. I think it will be a good thing. I would feel safer knowing where my children are at anytime. And they could find me as well.

So, you would sell your soul? There are other ways to keep up with your children, but what does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul?

Revelation 13:16-18 (KJV)
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

Revelation 14:9-11 (KJV)
9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

Please seek Jesus Christ.

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 19 Comments [2/3/2018 11:41:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 97819

It all heating up for all of us, there 800 FEMA CAMPS in operation right now, that can hold 100,000 people each. The 9 Harbingers and the 4 blood moons will go into effect in April 15, 2014 to Sept. 29, 2015, I believe our storms and earthquakes will continue to get bigger and more worse starting in 2014, the Philippines Storm will be just considered a small storm than the ones coming next year. If your not saved by Jesus Christ redemption of His salvation, stop fooling around turn your life over to Jesus Christ, right away.

stl, Now The End Begins 34 Comments [11/23/2013 3:28:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 136405

Business as Usual

Robin Egg:
The twilight zone is what it felt like looking at the dems at SOTU. They are so filled with hate they cannot see their own folly. Not one ounce of humanity left in them.

Mick Williams:
It's scary to think about the power wielded by those pretty faces.

Mick Williams, Disqus - Faith & Religion 18 Comments [2/3/2018 11:41:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 136163

In the USSR, University programs were created for such a number of people that the economy was predicted to require. Therefore, specialized studies were very competitive. You'd never have a situation like the western world today, where tens of thousands of new psychology BAs are made every year. The economy simply does not need that many. People would be incentivized to choose studies that aren't really that interesting or fun to fill those spots, as well.

However, if you flunked your classes, you got kicked out and drafted into compulsory military service, or had no choice but to go work construction/other menial labour.

Imo, the west needs this type of "planning". The reason we have an SJW problem is because there are so many entitled people with useless degrees feeling like they're owed the world because they studied some joke subject for 4 years.

DoodieDialogueDeputy, r/CringeAnarchy 8 Comments [1/24/2018 8:37:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 136402

If you've ever had or funded an abortion before: THIS is who you gave your baby to! It's name is Moloch. And it's an ancient demon from the infernal world that people sacrifice babies to in order to gain personal power, prosperity and favor.

Jesus Christ enacted a death warrant against this demon and all others when He died on the cross and rose again. (Colossians 2:15) It's day of ultimate doom is soon coming.

But why are Christians still empowering this beast by voting for Democrats who promote abortion as one of the main platforms of the Democrat Party??? How will you stand judged before the God of all the Universe when you must give an account of your time spent here on Earth? Will you stand guilty of supporting demonic ideologies; or exonerated?

Repent Christian! Beg God's forgiveness for your sin of demonic sacrifice! And make no mistake about it: if you're still voting as a Democrat and supporting its political viewpoints as a Christian, you're voting for demons. And GOD WILL JUDGE YOU JUST LIKE HE WILL JUDGE THEM!

"But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars--they will be consigned to the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death." Revelation 21:8

Mack Major, Facebook 27 Comments [2/3/2018 11:40:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 136427

Whenever I’m depressed I start googling for stories of beautiful women being acid attack victims. That always cheers me up! No more chad cock for them!

Acid attacks will turn a Stacy into an incel overnight. It’s pure divine justice.

MayorOfKekville, incels.me 24 Comments [2/4/2018 7:07:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 110885

In the Bible, we find God using a wide variety of methods to kill people. He bludgeons them with hailstones, He throws them into a crack in the earth, He drowns them in water, He has them mauled by wild animals, He torches them in fire, He chops off their heads—and that’s just for starters. In the Bible, God’s victims range from the elderly to the infant. He orders women to be raped and men to be castrated. He has pregnant women’s stomachs ripped open with swords. He drives people into cannibalism by starving them to death. He has babies heads bashed open on rocks. He oversees the barbecuing of countless infants, children, and young adults who are ritually sacrificed to demonic idols. Don’t like it? Of course you don’t. This is the side of God that we like to pretend doesn’t exist. But it does exist, and trying to ignore God’s brutal side only erodes our reverence of Him to dangerously low levels. You really don’t want to have a God with this kind of power mad at you. He doesn’t flinch at how gruesome and violent His methods are. Instead, He brags about it.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 33 Comments [7/18/2015 6:36:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 136098

Like I said, she doesn't read my articles and couldn't care less about my ministry. She never did. She has no part in my labors for the Lord Jesus Christ! The day she filed for a legal divorce, she no longer had any part in my ministry. Her loss will be great in eternity. Of the thousands of souls saved by God's grace through this ministry, she has no part in any of it. Daniel 12:3, “And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever.” I humbly believe that thousands of people will one day thank me in Heaven, appreciate that they were led to Christ through my ministry labors for Christ. To God be all the glory. I have already received many such e-mails from grateful web visitors who've been saved through this ministry. God doesn't reward rebellious, slackard, lazy wives.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 31 Comments [1/22/2018 5:53:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 136399

Baha'i is straight from the pits of hell. They are a dangerous false religion because they claim to be "Christian," but they certainly are not. Baha'is claim to believe that Jesus is the Saviour They acknowledge Christ's virgin birth. They believe in the resurrection of Christ. They believe in the second coming and the rapture. So what is wrong about this increasingly popular religion?

All Religions One

To begin with, they teach that all religions are one in the same. Here what you'll find at www.bahai.org...

"All divine Revelations come from the same Source; thus, the religions identified with them are in essence one. They differ in the measure of their teachings and particularly in their social laws and principles, appropriate to the times in which they appeared. The successive divine Revelations over the centuries have provided the spiritual force and laws for the advancement of civilization. Abraham, Krishna, Zoroaster, Moses, Buddha, Jesus, and Muhammad were all divine Messengers; the Báb and Baha'u'llah are the most recent. The coming of Baha'u'llah represents the fulfillment of this centuries’ long process of progressive revelation and of the expectations inspired by previous divine Messengers for the ultimate unity of peoples and peace among nations. -SOURCE

Buddha? Zoroaster? Krishna?...divine messengers? You left out Muhammad. The Word of God declares that salvation can ONLY be found through Jesus Christ. Acts 4:10-12 clearly teaches that there is NO OTHER NAME by which we can be saved,"...that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." Not one of the men recognized as "divine messengers" by the Baha'is taught that Jesus was the ONLY Way to heaven. They were FALSE prophets!!!

Also please notice what the ultimate goal of the Baha'i faith is at the end of the quote given above..."the ultimate unity of peoples and peace among nations." Although that goal "sounds" mighty noble, is it in agreement with the Word of God? Let's see, the Word of God teaches..."Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you" -2nd Corinthians 6:14-17. The teachings of Baha'i are NOT based upon the Truth of God's Word; therefore, we are to separate from them because they are unbelievers. It is to NO surprise that such a one-world minded religion would be very popular with the New Age movement of our day, and it surely is.

The truth is that religion is the worst thing to ever happen to this sin-cursed world. Salvation is NOT found in a religion, but in a Person--The Lord Jesus Christ (Acts 16:31). According to Matthew 7:14, only a very small handful of people will ever make it into heaven. Do you know why? Simply because so many people have religion without Truth, Churchianity without Christianity. You need to be born again my friend (John 3:3). This world is wicked and needs Jesus. "And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness." -1st John 5:19. "

Baha'is Deny the Sin Nature of Man

The Baha'i religion denies the sin nature of man...

"In the Bahá'í view, the purpose of this life on earth is for each individual to develop the spiritual and moral qualities that lie at the core of his or her nature. Bahá'u'lláh referred to the human being as a "mine rich in gems of inestimable value." These "gems" or qualities can be "mined" or developed only when a person turns to God." -SOURCE

"Develop the spiritual and moral qualities?" You've got to be kidding me? The Word of God teaches that we are ALL sinners, dirty-rotten hell-deserving sinners!!! Romans 3:10-12 declares, "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one." Also, Romans 3:23, "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;" You and I are wicked sinners. Don't compare yourself to the criminals you hear about on the news, or perhaps you might become self-righteous. Compare yourself to the Word of God, and you'll come up looking like a sinner. We have ALL broken God's commands at times. We are ALL sinners by nature. Romans 5:12 teaches that we are ALL born with a sin-nature, not with "spiritual and moral qualities." "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:" -Romans 5:12.

Sinful Human Desires are Not Evil or Bad

Baha'is foolishly disregard the Biblical teaching that ALL men are sinners, inherently evil by nature (Jeremiah 17:9; Romans 3:10,23). Jesus said in Matthew 5:28 that for a man to even lust after a woman is considered adultery. Jesus taught that the sins of the heart are just as wicked in God's eyes as sins of the flesh. Here is what Baha'is teach...

"In contrast to a number of other religious doctrines and philosophies, the Bahá'í Faith does not teach that the physical desires of human beings are "evil" or "bad." Everything in God's creation is regarded as essentially and fundamentally good. In fact, the very purpose of the human body and its physical faculties is to serve as a proper vehicle for the development of the soul. As the energies of the body are gradually brought under the conscious control of the soul, they become instruments for the expression of spiritual qualities. It is only undisciplined physical passions that become causes of harm, and hinder spiritual progress." -SOURCE

Baha'i is full of lies. The Devil works to DESENSITIZE people concerning the wickedness of sin. In contrast, the Word of God makes us very aware of sin (which is why the world hates the Bible so much, John 3:20). Just as Wiccans, Baha'is do not recognize wrong doing as being a sin. "Sin" is a Biblical term that implies judgment from a Divine God. Deceitfully, Baha'is call themselves "Christians." No one can be a Biblical Christian who does not accept the plain Scriptural teaching that all men are sinful, under the condemnation of the Law until their sins are forgiven in Christ Jesus.

Ezekiel 14:3 reads, "Son of man, these men have set up their idols in their heart..." You see friend, idolatry is in the heart. The reason why Catholics bow to their idols is because they are idolaters in their heart. Jesus said that from the HEART comes all wickedness..."For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders..." -Mark 7:21. This is why education, reformation, and religion will never tame the savage beast of mankind . . . because all of these intellectual vehicles appeal to the mind of man, NOT to his heart. Salvation is of the heart..."For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness..." -Romans 10:10.

Baha'is Worship a False god

Although Baha'is recognize the existence of one god, their god is NOT the God of the Bible. Baha'is teach the same New Age garbage of enlightenment and self-improvement. Take a look at their official website and you realize quickly that Baha'i is NOT Christian. Any knowledgeable Bible-believer knows that Allah is NOT God, he is a mythical character. The Islamic Muslims deny that Jesus ever died on the cross. They dent that Jesus was the Son of God. Muslims deny Christ, which makes them "antichrists" according to 1st John 2:22, "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son." Read the following statement from the official website of Baha'i...

"Although we may have different concepts of God's nature, although we may pray to Him in different languages and call Him by different names--Allah or Yahweh, God or Brahma--nevertheless, we are speaking about the same unique Being." -SOURCE

Talk about New Age doctrine! Allah is NOT God!!! Allah is the false god of the Muslims. Allah CANNOT be the same God as the Christian God because the Bible proclaims that Jesus Christ is Almighty God (John 1:1-4,14; Revelation 1:8). Jesus is the Son of God according to John 3:16, but Muslims teach from the Koran that God has no Son. Clearly, there can be NO harmony between the Word of God and the Koran. Yet, Baha'is prey upon the ignorance and indifference of today's worldly religious crowd. All over the world people are joining all sorts of wishy-washy religions that have a form of godliness, but deny the existence of an Individual, Personal God. "Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away" -2nd Timothy 3:5. The Devil is homogenizing the world's religions into ONE to prepare the unsaved masses to receive the antichrist when he appears. We often hear about a "one-world religion," but it will more than likely be many religions which have all adapted to the "politically correct" New Age religion. I say "politically correct" because the agenda of our apostate time is to accept everyone in the name of love, while turning a blind-eye to wickedness and doctrinal heresy. It is sinful for believers to unite with the wicked (2nd Corinthians 6:14-17). It is far better to be separated over Truth, than to be united be error. The Word of God is Truth (John 17:17).

Baha'is Deny Jesus Christ as the ONLY Way to Heaven

Baha'is do NOT recognize Jesus Christ as being any greater than Moses, Muhammad or Buddha. The Bible declares that at the NAME OF JESUS shall every knee bow, and NO other name (Philippians 2:10, "That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth."

"There can be little disagreement that human history is strongly influenced by the Founders of the world's great religions. The powerful impact on civilization of Jesus Christ, Buddha, Moses, or Muhammad is seen not only in the cultural forms and value systems which arise from their works and teachings, but is also reflected in the effects that the example of their lives has on humankind." -SOURCE

Did you read that? Baha'is recognize Buddhism as a "great religion." Folks, Buddhism is straight from Hell!!! Buddha was a demonically inspired imposter. New Agers (and Baha'is) teach that there are many roads to "the light," and that no one has a right to criticize or refute someone's else's religious beliefs. Of course, they vehemently deny the Biblical proclamation that Jesus is the ONLY Way to heaven (John 14:6). Listen to Oprah Winfrey deny Jesus Christ for yourself. The Bible proclaims that we are ALL wicked, dirty-rotten sinners deserving of hell. Mankind is born with a SIN-NATURE. The ONLY Way for us to go to heaven is that we must have our sins forgiven. Religion didn't die on the cross for you. Krishna, Buddha, and other FALSE prophets didn't die upon the cross for you. Jesus Christ wasn't just a prophet, He was God Almighty in the flesh (1st Timothy 3:16 -1611 King James Bible).

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 11 Comments [2/3/2018 11:38:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 130805

Let's think why we can defend pedophilia:
1. It is not forbidden in the Bible, but encouraged.
2. It is proven a lot of people are made better because of it. The kids get pleasure and the pedos get satisfied.
3. The actual act would cause orgasms which probably are quite pleasurable. I've heard the younger you are, the more good you feel.
4. Some kids who have low self esteem would no longer because when someone tries to do something sexual to you, it proves they find you attractive.
5. A LOT of nations accept it or at least forms of it. Haiti, Japan, Mexico, Afghanistan, India, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, South Africa, etc. They must know something you don't.
6. Pedophilia does not cause STDS. If it did, then absolutely hate it with a passion.
7. People who defend perverted behaviour like homosexuality are hypocrites. Homos may be born that way, but pedos are without any doubt. Not to mention homos are notorious about defending what they do, and the ways they have sex cause a great, great risk for nasty STDS.
This is just my opinion, and if it offends you tough.

TontonMacoute, DeviantArt 15 Comments [8/21/2017 1:32:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: menomaru