1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | bottom
Quote# 128555



BlackpilledIncel, Imgur 1 Comments [6/27/2017 10:18:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128559

[Summary: False dichotomy between "looks are completely irrelevant" and incel crackpottery. Conspicuously silent on numerical results. Also a "wonderful" demonstration of neochauvinists' failures at understanding biology and a nightmare to format.)

The Black Pill backed up by hard data and facts.

Preface:

All cursive text is not my own, they are quoted from the articles sourced under every title.

Black Pill Edition: Female nature
____
The relevance of personality as a petulant farce

____
Small Appetizer
____
Before we start with the more serious studies let me present you a small appetizer to stimulate the intake of the Black Pill.
____
A couple of years ago OkCupid conducted an interesting experiment. January 15th, 2013 was proclaimed by OkCupid as “Love is Blind Day” to celebrate the launch of a blind dating app released on that same day.

During “Love is Blind Day”, pictures were removed from OkCupid for a total of 7 hours and so data was gathered and the way people interacted with each other visibly changed!


As you can see, there was more and deeper conversation with an increase in exchange of personal information. A vast improvement for everyone! So, it seemed.

Here’s what happened next:

When the photos were restored at 4PM, 2,200 people were in the middle of conversations that had started “blind”. Those conversations melted away. The goodness was gone, in fact worse than gone. It was like we’d turned on the bright lights at the bar at midnight.

Summarized in this graph.

Starting from the moment OkCupid released the photos, conversations died down almost immediately. The conversation life expectancy dropped nearly 30% just two messages later in the thread when the photos were back on.



There was another also another smaller experiment, that can be summarized by this excerpt:

We took a small sample of users and half the time we showed them, we hid their profile text. That generated two independent sets of scores for each profile, one score for “the picture and the text together” and one for “the picture alone.” Here’s how they compare. Again, each dot is a user. Essentially, the text is less than 10% of what people think of you.

The second graph.

The text makes almost no difference on how you’re viewed.



Lastly, there was also the experiment where Okcupid let people predict personality based on profiles. In this case a beautiful picture strongly correlates with a beautiful personality when you let people be the judge. Third graph.

Conclusion:

Photos have a greater impact on the course of a conversation than the intimacy of that same conversation, which displayed the personality of both correspondents. The text added to your profile meant to introduce your characteristics, plays an insignificant role next to the photo. Your personality will be established in advance primarily based on your photo.

source: https://theblog.okcupid.com/we-experiment-on-human-beings-5dd9fe280cd5


What is beautiful is good, really good.
____
It's commonly known that "looks matter", but have you asked yourself the question: How much do they matter? Especially in regards to the widely and heavily emphasized personality?

Let us take a look in some more professional studies who have pondered this same question.
____
In the year 2015, a study in Italy (subject: social psychology) researched the effects of attractiveness, status and gender on the evaluation of personality.

quote:

Present research examines the combined effects of attractiveness, occupational status, and gender on the evaluation of others’ personality, according to the Big Five model.



I chose this particular study, because it's recent and the first of it's kind. A myriad of older studies have already concluded that perceiving a person as good looking fosters positive expectations about personal characteristics (1).

The effects of attractiveness are strong and pervasive. As Langlois et al. (2000) underline in their meta-analysis, attractiveness is a noteworthy advantage for both children and adults in almost every domain. Based on the “what is beautiful is good” effect (Dion et al., 1972), several studies (Eagly, Ashmore, Makhijani, & Longo, 1991); Feingold, 1992; Langlois et al., 2000) demonstrated that this phenomenon functions as a stereotype, making the perceived link between appearance and personality larger than the actual link

In short, attractive people are perceived as having far better personalities even when that isn't the case.

Indeed, people seem to assume that positive interpersonal qualities and physical attractiveness are systematically linked (i.e., a “halo effect”) (Andreoni & Petrie 2008; Callan, Powell, & Ellard, 2007; Smith, McIntosh, & Bazzini, 1999).



Off topic personal note:

It’s not that incels have bad personalities, they are perceived as such because of their looks. Now you’ll say that we possess misogynistic and violent attitudes but ask yourself, was this behavior preempted by the way we were treated or did we grow towards it?


Now to the final closure of this particular study.

In general, results are in line with the ‘beauty is good’ effect (Dion et al., 1972), as people seem to believe that physical attractiveness implies positive personality traits, but the effects of attractiveness are different for men and women.

The results came in as predicted, with the exception that there were differences for men and women. Attractive men were perceived as more extroverted and open minded than attractive women, creating an advantage for attractive men.

In other words, it’s better to be an attractive man than to be an attractive woman.

For Extraversion the effect of attractiveness is the same for women and men but is stronger for male targets. Attractiveness has a positive effect on Conscientiousness only for women whereas it increases Openness only for men.

Thus, overall the “beauty is good effect” seems to be greater for men.

I will not go too deep in the status aspect because it was stated as rather controversial.

source for the cursive text: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873083/


Female nature
____
Excellent genes or providing ability
____
The covering of personality serves as a foundation to grasp in a clearer manner for what I am going to say next. Now, what does a woman want when looking for a mate?

Let's look at this from an evolutionary perspective.
____
Physical attractiveness and especially masculinity indicate good genetic quality, which is important for healthy offspring while ability to provide amplifies the survival rate of offspring because it needs sufficient resources to survive as well(2).

The reason why masculinity plays an enormous role in the mating choices of the human female, is because masculinity in itself greatly enhances physical attractiveness. However, a female's desire for strong masculine features may be influenced depending on whether she wants a long term relationship or a short term one on which I'll come back later.

From an evolutionary view, extremes of secondary sexual characteristics (more feminine for women, more masculine for men) are proposed to be attractive because they advertise the quality of an individual in terms of heritable benefits; they indicate that the owners of such characteristics possess good genes. In other words, such traits advertise the possession of genes that are beneficial to offspring inheriting them in terms of survival or reproduction

Females may choose less masculine faces in some cases (for LTR) because they will often associate masculinity with infidelity, masculine men will not be perceived as good long term partners(3). A woman needs a loyal provider to raise offspring. Masculine men are still preferred for copulation however, because they possess the best genes to pass on.

Increasing the masculinity of face shape increased perceptions of dominance, masculinity and age but decreased perceptions of warmth, emotionality, honesty, cooperativeness and quality as a parent.



YOUR PERSONALITY IS ASSESSED THROUGH YOUR FACE

This may be well and good, but women want men who possess certain personality traits too. Someone who they can form an emotional connection with is what they claim. Funnily enough, the way your personality is judged is through your face. You will not be liked for your personality but in fact for your face. People do not care for who you are but what you look like. As you already know: “The better your face, the better your so called personality”.

Personality traits are reported cross-culturally to be among the most important factors in partner choice by both sexes [1,118]. If desired personality is so important, it would appear likely that personality attributions elicited by a face would affect its attractiveness. For example, women who value cooperation and good parenting may avoid masculine-faced men. Thus, instead of feminine faces being attractive and this attractiveness driving positive personality attributions, it may be that the personality attributions are driving the attractiveness judgements.

They are essentialy saying that your personality equals your face. Personality = Face

The meme is confirmed true.

One study has indeed demonstrated that a desire for some personality traits influences judgements of facial attractiveness [121]. Individuals valuing particular personality traits find faces appearing to display these traits attractive.

Even when it’s not related at all, if your face looks like a certain desired personality it will be attractive to the person who desires that personality.

Being aware of this prospect makes women pickier than thought before. At first women emphasizing the importance of personality made them seem much less shallow since anyone, regardless of looks can possess a certain personality. Now it is not really a certain personality they are desiring, but a certain face that looks like that personality.

Thus, desired personality influences perceptions of facial attractiveness in opposite sex faces, changing the result to: ‘what is good is beautiful’ [121].

source for the cursive text: : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130383/



THE INFLUENCE OF THE MENSTRUAL CYCLE

It's possible one could be thinking that none of this poses an actual problem because different women want different personalities, thus different faces. Following from that, most men should still have a shot.

Things are a little trickier than that, unfortunately.

During ovulation, when a woman is most fertile and the best moment for impregnation; her desires for masculine features increase significantly and so her chances for cheating in her quest for a sexy masculine man(4).

Women prefer the smell of dominant males, more masculine male faces and men behaving more dominantly when at peak fertility than at other times in their menstrual cycle.

That’s not at all, during peak fertility they also prefer more masculine bodies and more masculine voices.

The perfect strategy for a female is to be impregnated by a masculine dominant man and be provided by less masculine more loyal and less dominant men.

Cyclic preferences could influence women to select partners when most likely to become pregnant that possess traits that may be most likely to maximize their offspring's quality via attraction to masculinity or serve to help acquire investment via attraction to femininity.

source for the cursive text: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018506X07000360

For reference, from masculine to less masculine.

If you understand this, it’s far easier grasp how it comes that 8000 years ago when there was no civilization; 1 man used to reproduce for 17 women. I can only hypothesize the female copulated with the dominant masculine males while being provided by ignorant less masculine men(5).

Final conclusion:
____
You are not desired for your personality as man. You are desired for your looks, genes or ability to provide.

Fun addition:

It's been posted here some times before, but just to be sure.

http://www.webtoons.com/en/drama/lookism/list?title_no=1049

Black pilled fun to read manhwa.

ElliotsSecondAscent, /r/incels 6 Comments [6/27/2017 4:06:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128556

I just don't understand why normies bully us when they are the ones that should be treating us like kings and thanking us.

Think about it. If incels were never born or if we all decided to commit mass suicide, guess who would be the new incels? YUP, NORMANS. Since beauty is comparative, if we didn't exist, the new subhumans would be today's normies. By me breathing and staying alive, I am giving Normans a chance to succeed in life.

They all want us dead, but they don't know the consequence of that. The new bottom of the barrels would be the 5-7s. Forget sub 8, sub 10 would be a suicide sentence.

So how about you normies show some respect and acknowledge what we are doing for you huh? Your little girlfriend would leave you as soon as we all die since you would be the new subhumans. So show us some fucking respect and be grateful that we exist so you don't have to face what we face.

failednormie, /r/incels 2 Comments [6/27/2017 10:19:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128563

Feminists hate male virgins

Heard it from the mouth of a feminist today.

A guy in my calculus class got a pefect grade on a test and this feminist who sits in front of me said to her friend: "he must be a virgin anyway"

This was after the professor praised the guy.

acenosk, /r/incels 6 Comments [6/27/2017 5:01:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128557

[LIFE FUEL]I made a young slut prostitute cry

LMAO. I'm ECSTATIC right now

I know a guy who's basically a pimp and like half an hr ago, out of rage, I called and asked for a hooker. I mentioned young and blonde. She arrived like 20 minutes ago.

Once we exchanged info she just wanted to get over with it. Took her top off and was wearing a lacy bra underneath. Had a nice ass under her jeans shorts. She looked at me and made a disgusting face. At this point I got a little pissed.

She is EXACTLY the Stacy you imagine. the one who shuns incels. The one who makes up lies about us because we're subhuman. The one who would NEVER, EEEVEVVVEEERRRRRRRR EVER touch you in any other situation.

Conversation went soemthing like this: Me: Why that face? Her: Ugh.. just shut up

Now she looks away and sits on my lap. Literally looks away from me. I don't care, and I wrap my arm around her waist. Her skin feels like awesome soft rubber even though she's a fucking slut. I feel mixed emotions.

I spoke to her about why she needed money and she opens up totally. She basically said her dad kicked her out and stopped supplying her with money after she spent shit tons of his money without him knowing. AND she slutted around with one of his golf friends(probably 40 year old past-his-prime Chad). Of course, she didnt say it like that. She acted like her dad was a comic book villain but I could clearly see the story. Power of the black pill. I feel sorry for her dad but good for him, kicking the ungrateful slut out.

I'm sitting there actually wondering how this bitch can be so ungrateful and retarded.

Me: How old are you? Her: 20 Me: Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh do you go to college? Her: No Me: When did you realize your life was going downhill? Her: .............. ......... excuse me? at this point she gets up

I get up too and pull her closer. She seems pissed but lets me. So while I was feeling up her tits and grinding against her as she was disgusted I go "You don't seem very smart, what if this is how you spend the rest of your life?"

She yelled FUCK YOU and her voice cracked(she was about to cry). Wore her clothes. I was like "Don't cry" while laughing and she burst into tears and left

This is basically the gist of it. My mind is so hazy from enjoying the physical contact and being a sadist that I can barely get my thoughts together.

I am officially not only physically, but mentally a subhuman too. My personality is dogshit now. But it doesnt fucking matter. LOL. This is not me being bitter, fellow cels. This is one day I'm actually happy. I didn't have sex, but I will call that pimp and ask for THIS EXACT girl to fuck tomorrow.

I'm thinking of putting it on Youtube(not the sex, me trolling the whores) but Im not sure if it's illegal and I don't want trouble with the pimp.

By the way, bitch saved me $400 by leaving which I WILL be spending tomorrow :) Fuck this incel life.

GiftMeARope, /r/incels 4 Comments [6/27/2017 10:21:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128558

A woman ruined my gymcelling attempt for LITERALLY NO REASON

I'm ugly but my only redeeming feature is that I am 5 foot 11 inches

So I figured let me go and get ripped, surely that will work. I been doing this for the past month with small results.

Today I was on the treadmill and there was a chick, 7/10 on the one next to me. All the others were occupied. As soon as I got on she took one look. I thought for once, maybe she's admiring me. LOL. She made a disgusted face. Seeing it, I made an angry face but I wasn't staring at her.

Fucking bitch literally fucking says "muscles wont do anything for you" like she had a fucking bad day and took it out on me. I'm shaken at this point so I go "Why don't you mind your business you stupid cunt" At this point I seem very angry on the outside, but on the inside I'm crying

Fucking cunt gets off the treadmill. Calls security and says I called her a cunt and other shit (Idk what she said but she definitely made shit up). The guard (big guy who usually stands near the door, IDK if he's a guard or what but he sure looked like one) asked me what the problem was, made me get off the treadmill and started scolding me near the lobby/shoe rack.

I was literally shivering at this point. Wore my shoes and went off. I don't ever wanna see that gym again but I HAVE A FUCKING 3 MONTH MEMBERSHIP and those cunts definitely arent giving me my money back

GiftMeARope, /r/incels 5 Comments [6/27/2017 10:22:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128496

About 15 years ago, when I was already in my 30’s, I met a German mother and her 14 year old daughter in London, and they invited me over to Germany to visit them, which I did. I was careful not to so much as kiss the girl on her cheek, even though both were making it clear that I could bang her and expected me too. The girl even started claiming it was making her depressed and I wouldn’t touch her because she was ‘fat’ (she wasn’t – and she was really pretty). Anyway, they actually fell out with me because of it. The regrettable irony is, I was unaware that it would have been entirely legal for me at the time to have had sex with the girl. It only became ‘illegal’ when Jacquie ‘pig’ Smith closed the ‘loophole’ when she was Labour Home Secretary (the same Jacqui Smith who was forced to resign because of corruption).

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 5 Comments [6/25/2017 12:52:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Xavier

Quote# 128545



Anonymous, Whisper 3 Comments [6/26/2017 9:24:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 128503

It should be legal for incels to rape females if they use protection and the female is unconscious

Inceldom is a deprivation of a basic human need. If an incel does rape an unconscious female with protection, the female wouldn’t even know that she was raped. Even if she found out it wouldn’t be that bad. No violence or anything would be used against the female because she would be unconscious. She wouldn’t even remember it. Rape to a female would do way less harm than inceldom does to a man. Overall suffering would be reduced. If a man is an incel long enough to rape a female, then he is the victim, not the villain. No starving man should have to go to prison for stealing food, and no sexually starved man should have to go to prison for raping a female. Without food, the body of a man dies. Without sex, the soul and mind of a man will die. If a man is an incel long enough he will end up going insane sooner or later. This way the females would not remember or know that they were raped. Men would be able to keep their sanity and the suffering of us incels would be ended. In my opinion, it should be legal for incels to rape unconscious females if they use protection to create a better world with no suffering.

Canino1997, R/incels 11 Comments [6/25/2017 11:13:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 128504

Electroshock Collars to stop female entitlement

Electroshock Collars to stop female entitlement. After the female child is 4 she will have to get an electroshock collar around her neck. They will never take the collar off even when she gets married. Just the control of the collar will change from male parent to the husband if she leaves the house and gets married. Every time the female tries to take entitlement or behaves entitled the male presses the button and she will get shocked. If she talks about feminism or anything remotely entitled she will get shocked. It is possible to condition people with electro shocks. This will stop female degeneracy and entitlement. Their evil nature will be suppressed this way and the world will become a fairer place without female entitlement. This will solve inceldom indirectly. The world will be a better place in the long run. The horrors of the sexual revolution and feminism will be rolled back. Females will know their place again. Growing up they will be conditioned to be submissive and they will know their place. They will not be tainted by feminism or entitlement.

Canino1997, R/incels 16 Comments [6/25/2017 11:14:03 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 128506

The illusion of female equality exists due to their cocksleeves

Females are the inferior gender and they would be treated inferior to men if it wasn’t for their meat holes. They are inferior in every way. They are only better at being cock sleeves. Their main value is in that. The only thing they have over men is that. The only thing that makes them get equal or better treatment are their cock sleeves but make no mistake. They are below us. Since their sleeves are denied to us they have no value or worth to incels. Females are inferior. They need a gynocentric society and movements to stack everything in their favor to appear equal. If you think of females as equals you are already cucked. Why can they get away with this? Why does this illusion work and nobody does or says anything? It’s because of their cocksleeves. If female sexual resources wouldn’t be so overvalued or if they didn’t have vaginas would they be treated equally to men? The answer is no. They don’t sleep with lesser men to keep sex overvalued to keep their power and monopoly going. The only reason they get somewhat equal treatment is due to their cocksleeves. They appear somewhat equal to beta morons due to their cocksleeves. Their only value is as an object. Females always were objects and always will be objects. Females consciously or subconsciously like being objects because they get equal treatment out of it. Lesser men are getting played if they believe any of these illusions. They love being objects to chad but not lesser men that’s why we are all here.

Canino1997, R/incels 12 Comments [6/25/2017 11:14:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 128521



Atavisionary, Twitter 8 Comments [6/25/2017 11:16:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 128523

A video on how to spot a trannies
https://youtu.be/zq7zebz4E1Y

Jeremiah Weeps, youtube 4 Comments [6/25/2017 11:16:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: ,P E.T.S

Quote# 128505

Rape is taking back power from females and stopping female entitlement

Even the option of prostitution is female entitlement. Incels that go to a prostitute are enablers. The most common way a female has power over a man is with their vagina. Females cling on to that power with everything they have. They are monopolizing sex. Females are monopolizing sex because deep down they know that they are objects and that they have no other advantages over men. Having a vagina is their default value. If you go to a prostitute you are engraving your subhuman ness. You say that no female would touch my genitals unless I pay her. You are accepting defeat. The females win if we go to a prostitute. They will successfully have power over you if you go to a prostitute. You will be a part of their monopoly they have on sex. This is why rape is such a big problem. The act of rape takes away their power. They feel powerless while being raped because they lose their power over lesser men if they get raped by lesser men. This is why rape is considered such a big crime. Females convinced the world that rape is such a big crime just to keep their power. They have convinced the world that rape is a crime just to be able to play out their sick monopoly they have on sex without repercussions. This sick monopoly they have on sex is the reason why we incels suffer. Men are being driven to prostitutes out of desperation that other females are responsible for. Prostitution is not an option for most of us because of that. Prostitution is accepting defeat and becoming part of their sick monopoly. Prostitution is giving power to females. Rape is taking power away from them. Females have the power in the sexual marketplace by default. They can try to go for chad. Men don’t have that kinda power if a 4/10 male would go for a 9/10 female she would say no and everybody would laugh at him. In the reverse case, chad is more likely to say yes. This is where the common incel belief that chad is taking away all girls come from. Every female has power over lesser man because of the double standard in dating and female entitlement. I want to eliminate that double standard. The legalization of rape would even the odds and end the sick female monopoly they have on sex.


Canino1997, R/incels 3 Comments [6/25/2017 11:14:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 128463

Why Ghostbusters Was Doomed from the Start


It wasn’t a bad script that killed Ghostbusters (2016); the movie was doomed from the start.



BassFzz’s Video: My Problem With “Empowered” Female Characters

The new Ghostbusters film hasn’t even been released yet, and it’s already turning into a disaster. Audiences are panning the trailers, heads are rolling at Sony, and the Director – Paul Feig – is blaming it all on misogyny.

The problems with this film should have been obvious from the beginning. There’s a reason audiences have reacted so negatively, even before rumours of the lame duck script were released. It’s not just that they got the music wrong, turning 80s synth into modern orchestral; it’s not just that the outfits look dumpy, and the jokes are lame; there’s a far more fundamental problem which poisoned this film from the get go, which no amount of creativity could have compensated for.

The problem with Ghostbusters 2016 is that main cast is all women.

Now am I saying that an all-female cast in a comedy-adventure movie aimed at general audiences is an inevitable death knell? Am I confirming Feig’s accusations of misogyny, that audiences are just angry because they can’t deal with strong, female characters?

No; not at all. In fact, if you took the four women playing the ghostbusters and put them into another film it could have been incredibly successful; in fact, the 2011 comedy Bridesmaids had much of the same cast, and the same Director, and it was received extremely well; if, instead of Ghostbusters, the four of them had starred in a sequel to, say, Jumanji – just imagine it, the same four actresses fighting off giant insects and killer plants, while the Great White Hunter comes after them, hating them for no reason at all – that could have worked, as a comedy, as an adventure, and it wouldn’t have traipsed all over the good will from the Robin Williams film.

So is the problem that this is a transparent, feminist reboot? Taking a beloved IP, sex-swapping the lead roles, and pretending that this somehow makes women empowered? Not exactly. While it’s certainly a blatant slap in the face to audiences, that’s nothing more than the icing atop a concept that was fatally flawed from the beginning.

The reason Ghostbusters doesn’t work with a female cast is because at the core it is a male story.

Now I’d like to step back for a moment and consider the term “Strong Female Character”; my colleague Zarius has a video where he discusses this topic at length, and he uses the term “Strong Female Character” to mean Good female character; it’s a great video, and I definitely recommend that you check it out. But I’d like to go in a different direction, and consider the specific words that are being used. Strong Female Character as opposed to Powerful Female Character.

Strength – physical strength – is one of the defining aspects of masculinity. When you contrast the sexes, there’s no contest; the average man is stronger than 95% of women; and even female bodybuilders don’t get much stronger than your part-time gym rat. This is why hitting women is such a universal taboo. We expect men to use their physical strength to protect women – not abuse them.

Somebody who’s strong is somebody who’s powerful – but strength isn’t the only form of power. In Game of Thrones neither Tyrion nor Varys are strong physically – Tyrion because of his dwarfism, Varys because he was gelded – and yet both of them are powerful and admirable despite their physical weakness.

This is why I find the phrase “Strong Female Characters” so interesting; it sets women up to fail, competing in an arena where men are the superior sex – or it requires that they be “Empowered” by the director, who winds up giving superhuman abilities to 120 lb Scarlet Johansson. This results in cognitive dissonance for the audience. In Avengers, Black Widow is tough enough to beat up hardened Russian Mobsters at the beginning of the movie – but later on, when we see her fight Hawkeye, every healthy, well-adjusted person in the audience is subconsciously outraged that this big man is beating a tiny woman.

Strength isn’t the only difference between the sexes, though it’s one of the most obvious; men and women differ in so many ways – in complementary ways! Each sex is specialized to work well with the other; men are good at some things, women are good at different things, and trying to judge either sex by the standards of their complement isn’t just foolish; it’s dehumanizing.

So let’s return to Ghostbusters – the Real Ghostbusters from 1984. What’s this movie really about? When you strip away all of the makeup – the setting, the ghosts, the gags, and the big name actors – what is the kernel of narrative that you find?

It’s a movie about four friends putting together a start-up business, and the difficulties they have to deal with – both from clients, and from regulators.

This is a masculine story at its core. Not because women are incapable of inventing a proton-pack; not because men have better instincts for what sort of businesses will succeed; the reason it’s a masculine story is because of the psychological inheritance we received from our ancestors.

Men evolved to go out and prove themselves to women; to take big risks, to bite off more than they can chew. Women evolved to find security in the home environment so that they could raise their children securely. Women who took risks wound up failing the test of evolution; so did the men who played it safe. Because of this our ancestors were the risk-taking men, who would do something like gamble on Ghostbusting being successful; and our ancestors were the cautious women, who would rather achieve a stable income on etsy, even if that means that they’ll never hit it big.

Furthermore; we tend to have more sympathy for women than we do for men; we’re more likely to give them help when they encounter difficulty. There are good evolutionary reasons for this (reasons that are so obvious I won’t even bother mentioning them), but when it comes to Ghostbusters this innate empathy undermines the conflict. In the original film, Walter Peck – the EPA regulator – was an antagonist we loved to hate; but he wasn’t a villain. At the end of the day he was just another man doing his job, even if he went about it foolishly, and his anger at the ghostbusters was comedic.

Replace Dan Aykroyd with Melissa McCarthy, however, and we’re right back to Hawkeye acting like a wife beater; what was once a funny pissing match between a couple of guys, is now an abusive misogynist who doesn’t want women to succeed.

For most people the differences between the sexes are so obvious that they wind up being difficult for us to even notice. Are men and women equal? Of course they are! What sort of savage would say otherwise? Should you treat a gentleman in the same manner that you’d treat a lady? Why of course not, what an absurd suggestion! This is all so obvious to us, on a subconscious level, that when something like Ghostbusters 2016 shows up on our radar, we just know it’s wrong, even if we can’t quite orchestrate why. So if that’s the case – how did Sony fail to realize that this was a disaster from the beginning?

It’s time we looked at the Director, Paul Feig. In a 2015 interview with Variety, he discussed how his world had been female-centric from a young age; how he never learned about masculinity from a father who was always working. In another interview with Hollywood Reporter, he made a point of saying that his favourite colour is purple.

According to Feig, his world has been female-centric from an early age. Growing up in Michigan an only child, and with a father busy running a surplus store, he spent a lot of time with his mother. “Most of my friends growing up were either women or sensitive guys like myself,” he notes. Though his last name is pronounced “Feeg,” its close enough to a gay slur that boys his age teased him. “You know how guy comedy is,” he says. “They would call me names and punch me. And I would think, ‘I don’t enjoy this male bonding!’ And I hated the locker room, because that’s where I got beaten up.”

It is clear that Feig is a man who’s deeply confused about the sexes. Not because he’s a dandy necessarily – Oscar Wilde was a dandy, and he had a very deep understanding of the sexes – but because from the earliest ages he was encouraged to identify with the female, to seek female primacy.

He was a boy raised to be a woman; and now that he is a man, he takes his malformed, stunted understanding of masculinity, and projects it onto the other sex. He wants to see women as saviours, as soldiers, as successful in business; he wants a woman who will continue to over-mother him, protecting and providing for him. His latent masculine instincts are screaming that he ought to be protecting and providing – but because he never grew up, he projects those roles on to women.

In their review of Star Wars prequels, Red Letter Media pointed out that the biggest failure of those movies was that they didn’t tell a human story. Audiences couldn’t relate to the characters on the screen, and so once the dazzle of the special effects faded, there was little left to care about.

Man is the story telling animal; all of our narratives are built off of rules and tropes embedded deep in our subconscious. The reason that “Rescue the Princess” is a theme you find throughout all cultures, is because women have always been attracted to men who are strong enough to defend them. When you flip the sexes, putting a woman in place to rescue a man, the romance at the end of the story evaporates. Instead of fighting to rescue a lover – she is fighting to rescue her younger brother.

Everybody understands this, even if they can’t put it into words; and when you present them with a narrative that’s broken from the get go, they can all sense that something’s wrong, even if they can’t put their finger on it. Both Paul Feig and Amy Pascal, the Chairman of Sony Pictures, are deeply sexually confused, and as such are obsessed with forcing female bodies into character roles designed for men. They want to see a strong princess go and rescue a weak man and then fall in love with him – to everybody else’s disgust.

It wasn’t a bad script that killed this movie; it wasn’t problems during production; and it certainly wasn’t fear or hatred of women. What doomed this movie from day one was the deep set mental illness of Feig and Pascal. Rather than crafting a good film, they tried to force their sickness into the world; twisting reality with contradictions, and demanding that reality accommodate them. They went against the logic of the human soul, and because of that, Ghostbusters was doomed from the start.

DAVIS M.J. Aurini, Stare At The World 12 Comments [6/25/2017 6:12:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: P.E.T.S

Quote# 128520

[For the uninitiated, autism (including the low-functioning variety) is associated with high synaptic densities, so deriving intelligence from synapse count is fundamentally dubious]



Atavisionary, Twitter 6 Comments [6/25/2017 11:16:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 128491

i don’t like…….being a woman….. around men and men thinking that they can talk to me or look at me

gonegal, Tumblr 4 Comments [6/25/2017 6:19:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128453



ExistentEagle, Twitter 9 Comments [6/25/2017 6:10:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128446

Hahah women beating up a whole bunch of men. WTF kind of retarded universe is that on? Even the strongest woman would have trouble beating up a below average man. Well, maybe if the man is in a wheelchair the woman has a chance, otherwise its pure fantasy.?
Reply

Robert Fex, youtube 8 Comments [6/25/2017 6:08:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 128510

A video about women in the workforce
https://youtu.be/MNURDy_uGu8

Davis M.J. Aurini, youtube 2 Comments [6/25/2017 11:14:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: P.E.T.S

Quote# 128473

What kind of -cel are you?

MarriedAndLookin4Fun:
I'm:
* Gymcel
* Suicel
* Acnecel
* Narcissist-cel

ppdthrowawa:
Gymcel, heightcel, ethnikcel, bignosecel

throwawayfreak44:
* bloatcel
* doublechincel
* skinnycel
* gymcel
* weirdcel
* sickcel
* degeneratecel
* poorcel
* scumcel
* subhumancel

dont_count_on_me:
* Workcel
* Baldcel
* Uglycel
* shortcel
* Copecel

TheEngineer19:
* Uglycel
* Autismcel
* Heightcel (5'6")
* Jawcel
* Chincel
* Teethcel (Teeth are wonky)
* Acnecel
* Framecel

GeneticSewage
framecel, recessed chincel, negative canthal tiltcel, lowiqcel, scleral showcel, severe acnecel, presbyopiacel, latepubertycel, needtoenditcel

Assorted incels, r/incels 16 Comments [6/25/2017 6:15:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128456

Sex is an accessory for women

Sex is primary for men; we are ready at the drop of a hat to pull out our cocks out and stick them in the hottest blondest women. This is one of the greatest needs in our life.
Women only drop their panties for the alpha male; this is common knowledge here at TRP, but lets exam why.
1.) The function of a woman for a man (in this cruel world) are to only be his object of desire: sex.
2.) The function of a man for a woman is to secure either a.) his resources or b.) his genes. This is the dual strategy of female mating.
So keep in mind, sex is accessory for women whereas it is primary for men. A woman's ultimate goal in seeking out a man ISN'T SEX; it's your resources and genes.
JUST REMEMBER the next time you are standing by the side of your bed with a blonde hb 9 pulling off her panties and biting her lip, she is only doing this unconsciously to secure your resources.
JUST REMEMBER when that hb8 says 'its ok, you don't have to use a condom, I'm on birth control', you are not the greatest sex rockstar of all time, she just wants your sperm.
JUST REMEMBER after a few months of lifting and now every female is checking you out, they don't want you for special snowflake you: they want your sperm.
JUST REMEMBER when you finally are getting consistently getting the sloppiest blowjobs from the hottest women, they are doing it to secure your resources!
Of course this happens on a subconscious level; no woman on planet earth will ever openly say they are fucking you for your sperm. Wait, until you are in the throws of passion when a girls begs for you to cum in her. If you had a great life-changing opportunity, wouldn't you go to great lengths to get it?
SEX is not the ultimate goal for women; they just use it as a means to an end. Sex is an accessory for women.
EDIT: After re-reading what I have written, it is clear that I am no where near out of the anger phase despite taking the red pill 6 months ago. Each time I exercise a new principle learned here in TRP out in real life, my perceptions of reality are shattered and I continue to be further angered.

Halfmcdadbod, r/TheRedPill 4 Comments [6/25/2017 6:10:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128337

Having small penis is the fucking worst.

Small penis will ruin you, I can't get motivation to improve my self because even if I do I will still have small penis, no matter what skills you have, how good you look, that thing will attract people, having a relationship is impossible, if it wasn't for my mother and father, I would be long gone dead, but again they will suffer either way, they still don't realize that my life is over, I am poor, and have no motivation to study in school, I never had a girlfriend nor I will have, I live in a shitty country, too, that doesn't help at all, only one thing is good, slowly I am losing feelings for others, I literally don't care if anyone from my family dies except my father and mother and my 2 brothers which I actually hate and they are part of the reason for which I am an incel.

_This_Is_Magic_, /r/incels 11 Comments [6/21/2017 4:13:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128438

Considered from a long memory point of view, feminism is quite recent, owing its exponential development to a very specific modern historical context. The matriarchal tribes Leftist anthropologists have been crazy about are but a historical aberration. All civilizations and peoples who were able to go beyond the small tribe stage and erect kingdoms or empires were patriarchal.

The irony of modernity lies in men having invented most of what exist out there, toiled in steaming factories, dug up dark mine drifts, fought in bloody wars, and managed to produce an incredible wealth—for the result of work to be taken away by entitled, ungraceful womyn.

If you look closely, the suffragettes and their ilk did not revolt because “oppression of women”, but to the contrary, in a context where men were already weak and womanly ways were already dominant. Nineteenth century American prostitutes had many things wives did not—like money, glamour, the ability to travel and fuck many wealthy guys, and even men’s attention—and they have set a precedent.

Likewise, if you look at the Belle Époque (roughly 1870-1914) art, it overflows with sensual, bewitching beautiful women, accompanied by high-status or wealthy men orbiting around. Men of these times had already turned into weaklings, proud to be mesmerized by some lipstick-wearing bitch. Far from being “oppressive”, these men were dependent, and spoiled women could easily gauge money and power from them.

This trend of female takeover, be it through seduction, subtle social power-grabbing or direct threats against men, has shaped many of last century changes. Our masculine potentialities were buried in taboo and oblivion by the blue pill, and now that we are developing ourselves again, it is becoming increasingly obvious that we have to roll back the degeneracy and illegitimate powers we were taught to take for granted. With this is mind, we need a traditional, extra-modern perspective from which to stand and strike hard at the Libtard Church.

The Law Code of Manu, an ancient Hindu legal code, is exactly the kind of content that can feed a “neo-traditional” perspective. Its rich contents led me to write on it twice on ROK, and now is a third and last Law of Manu piece specifically about relations between the sexes. What did an allegedly supra-human lawmaker say on women—and that allowed for a civilization standing the test of time?

...

To regulate the market and prevent an unholy alliance between party girls and notches-racking assholes, the Code states that a man must be older than the girl he woos: “a 30 year old man should marry a charming girl of 12 years, or an 18 year old, a girl of 8 years or sooner” (9.94). In other words, instead of giving way to the temptation and throwing themselves in a cutting-throat competition for notches, young men have to master their own desires while getting a betrothal with younger girls. Then, as a well-deserved reward, they get a good spouse, each of them peaks at the same time, each can naturally enjoy the other—the 30 year old enjoys the young female who enjoys an older, dominant male—and build a home.

...

3. Women ought to be made dependent for their own good

The Code states:

" Even in her own home, a female—whether she is a child, a young woman, or an old lady—should never carry out any task independently. As a child, she must remain under her father’s control; as a young woman, under her husband’s; and when her husband is dead, under her sons’. She must never seek to live independently. (5.147-8)"

If women depend from their families and ought to be traded or cared of by men, this makes pairing easier and more straightforward. Being traded, women can focus on their own value and avoid being damaged by their own foolish choices. Also, as they are hypergamic, women ought to be made socially inferior for their own satisfaction: if they get equal to men, they will despise men of equal value and want for a higher value one at the expense of whom they should pair with.

Women belonging to their families are limited in their ability to lure any male into their traps: if they do, they will likely get the wrath of their responsible relatives.

" Day and night men should keep their women from acting independently; for, attached as they are to sensual pleasures, men should keep them under their control. (9.2)

Drinking, associating with bad people, living away from the husband; travelling, sleeping, and staying in the houses of others—these are the six things that corrupt women… Lechery, fickleness of mind, and hard-heartedness are innate in them… Recognizing this, a man should make the utmost effort at guarding them. (9.13-6)"

...

5. Husband and wife do not have to be “equal”

Some things ought to be checked as relatively equal between a husband and a wife, such as the caste, social value, or being in one’s prime, for the marriage to work well, with the exception of “times of adversity” when higher caste men can marry down. Everything, though, does not have to be the same.

A woman realizes herself and flourishes through her place in the family. She ought to be dutiful to have her proper center and dignity. Therefore,

" Though he may be bereft of virtue, given to lust, and totally devoid of good qualities, a good woman should always worship her husband like a god. For women, there is no independent sacrifice, vow, or fast; a woman will be exalted in heaven by the mere fact that she obediently served her husband. (5.154-6)"

On the other hand, a husband can go away for years on which his wife ought to maintain the home, provided he secures some resource for her to live on (9.74-6). He is also free to repudiate his wife if she loathes him without a proper reason. Specific reasons are specified by the Code, such as if he turns into an unrepentant alcoholic, or becomes “foul-mouthed” (9.81).

Men and women’s respective roles and different, complementary, and unequal. Modernists should get over it instead of wrecking social life in the name of an equality between non-existent abstract individuals.

A man’s striving expresses mostly on the public scene, outside from the house, while the man’s quest finds its center in himself and larger projects. A man ought to be able to thrive outside, whereas his wife, by being supportive, realizes herself at the same time that she helps him. Also note that risks are properly shared here, as the woman may seem in a more risky situation at home, when the husband meets with the risks outside.

...

Conclusion

That the modern trends of “emancipation” of women would actually unravel into a catastrophe for most men, not to mention our civilization as a whole, could have been predicted by the wise men living millennia ago. Particular vocations, social equilibrium, good chances and fair trade were ensured by the wisdom and fidelity of traditional men.

As we toil for taking back our institutions, countries and civilization, it is also necessary to glean discernment from (almost) timeless Scriptures. Odds are, the most familiar we become with antique wisdom, the more specifically modern trends will look like blind or monstrous deviations. This may be unsettling. I could bet my last penny, though, that in the long run it will be understood as a necessary step for getting outside the rotten world we were born in and avoid falling for the same mistakes again and again.

André du Pôle, Return of Kings 6 Comments [6/25/2017 6:06:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 128472

Two types of love an FHO can give

Motherly love and romantic love
That's it.. If she isn't your mother and doesn't want to fuck you she wishes you were dead

NewLoadsOfFun, r/incels 6 Comments [6/25/2017 6:15:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | top