['Logically derived from confirmable evidence, evolution is understood to be the result of an unguided, unplanned process of random variation and natural selection.' - Definition of evolution signed off on by 38 Nobel laureates]
As all of us who don’t cling to strawman versions of ID know, the only bone we have to pick with that definition is the unguided, unplanned part. We are of the position that evolution, in part or in whole, was a guided or planned process.
So how does one go about falsifying unguided evolution? By demonstrating that the process was guided, of course.
ID is the means by which this theory of unguided evolution can be falsified. If ID cannot be falsified and is itself just religion disguised as science [it's about time they admit that!], where does that leave unguided evolution? Why it leaves unguided evolution as unfalsifiable pseudo-science.
DaveScot, Uncommon Descent 9 Comments
[1/20/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4