1 2 3 4 5 9 | bottom
Quote# 139810

(This happened in 2016)
Jesus Christ Is Now Officially the King of Poland

After a vote in the Polish parliament in April, Our Lord Jesus Christ was officially crowned the king of Poland last weekend. You might think you've accidentally landed on a fake news site, but you didn't. It's true, Jesus really does rule Poland now. The idea originally came from a young nurse, who in the early 1900s had a vision that foresaw Poland's imminent demise if Jesus Christ would not be crowned its king. The idea was initially dismissed by the clergy, but after more than a century of uncertainty it finally happened this week.

The coronation, which took place on November 19th in Kraków, attracted thousands of believers – including President Andrzej Duda and several MPs. Having Jesus on Poland's throne doesn't change anything legally, but it's another step the conservative government has taken towards forcing outdated morals on the Polish people.

Polish parliament, Vice 14 Comments [8/14/2018 2:45:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

There are no words...

Trigger warning: Graphic depiction of rape

Quote# 139796

Note: this quote was originally presented on two separate pages. The first part is linked directly below; the second part is linked in the attribution.

I have a tinder date this Saturday night, and I want to rape her...

My girlfriend of 5 years recently broke up with me, and by recently I mean 4 days ago. I feel suicidal and feel like I have nothing to lose by doing this. I've always had fantasies of raping a woman, so I figured I might as well do it now. I have an exit plan if I get caught, and I wouldn't mind ending it if that happens. I've never done this in the past because I didn't want to ruin my life, but I just don't care anymore. I started using tinder for the sole purpose of finding a woman that I can act out my fantasies on.

I'm planning on getting her drunk and having her come back to my house. I'm about a foot taller than her, so holding her down should be no issue. I don't know if that's a good way to proceed. Any suggestions?

——————————

It’s been a week, and I wanted to update last Sunday, but I’ve been too afraid to say anything. This is really stupid, but I know I truly have nothing to lose at this point. I did it. She almost didn’t come back to my house at the end of the date, but I was able to convince her I had no ill intentions. I could tell she didn’t really want to, but did it out of politeness. She was pretty tipsy when it happened. We started fooling around on the couch, but she wasn’t looking to have sex. I kept going and pushing her boundaries. She kept telling me to slow down, and she was getting more annoyed. I could tell she wanted to leave and before she could get the chance, I got on top and pinned her and kept kissing on her neck. She was resisting and telling me to get off of her. I ignored her. I was thinking I should stop, but I felt like I had gone too far already, and I had wanted to do this for years.

It eventually turned into her begging me to stop which got me going like crazy... About a minute or two in she stopped resisting and just kept on sobbing. It felt too good for me to feel bad about what I was doing at the time, but after I finished I regretted it. I could really see what a mess she was emotionally. As soon as I got off of her, she rushed to get dressed and get her stuff and go. I didn’t want to let her leave since I was afraid of what she would do, so I stood between her and the door. She was crying and shaking and hyperventilating and was clearly really afraid of me. She wouldn’t let me near her, and I could see in her face how scared she was, so I just decided to back off and let her leave. I knew I was prepared to deal with the consequences, so I just accepted it. I could see her on her phone before she disappeared around the corner and was sure the police would be at my door that night. I had my gun and was absolutely ready to kill myself that night.

This past week I’ve been laying low. I haven’t been to work. I’ve barely left the house. There has been no contact on either side. She’s blocked me on everything. She hasn’t made any social media updates since that day, so I don’t know what she’s thinking or planning. I’m still ready to go though. I really have nothing to live for.

Anonymous, Voat 29 Comments [8/14/2018 4:32:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 139792

The Orlando Massacre may be a tragedy and all that, but I don't see that many people too upset about Christina Grimmie, the young singer also gunned down in Orlando the night before, in front of her fans and brother.

Or is a tragedy only a tragedy when gays or transgenders are the victims and not professing Christian's like her ? In this culture, why am I not surprised ?

Christopher Hubbard, Facebook 17 Comments [8/13/2018 4:23:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 139789

As much as the newsmedia exploits sexual crimes to boost ratings, you'd think that they'd tell the truth about WHY there's so much sexual crimes these days. Do you know why they won't tell the truth? It's because everyone's guilty nowadays of causing the epidemic of sexual sins and crimes in the United States. The miniskirt-wearing-slut reading the teleprompter on the evening news IS THE PROBLEM. How many little girls have been molested after some drunken family member saw some sleazy whore on television? TV is synonymous with sexual crimes. American society is IN DENIAL. No one wants to admit that we cursed ourselves as a nation by taking the Bible away from the classrooms.

No one wants to admit that girls and women who dress immodestly cause sexual sins. These hellish videos are MUCH worse than immodestly dressed women. Stephen Tyler's video CRAZY is far worse than immodesty. It's sexually explicit! The cameras focus just right on every sensual move, catching Liv Tyler's buttocks just right as she bends over and invites men to have sex with her. The underaged teenage girl coming out the high school window didn't accidentally catch her dress on the window. The perverts who made the video made sure to lift her miniskirt. They made sure to have her panties and rear-end right there in the camera to be filmed. They planned it that way!

Those sexual degenerates made that video to arouse people! It's part of the deliberate, Illuminati, Communist, subversion of America. They think it's funny! They think it's good clean fun; but it's the root cause of Amber's alert and little children being sexually abused and killed. What trashy perverts! I sometimes feel like I'm the only man in America who gets angry over this filth. It's all around us everywhere we go. I know there are other men who are angry over the wickedness of our time, but few are voicing their opinions publicly. God told Elijah that He had 7,000 men who hadn't bowed a knee to Baal (1st Kings 19:18). Yet, Elijah felt like he was standing alone because he didn't know those other men. Every Christian should speak up and speak out! I think a lot of people figure what's the use, we'll never change anything! That's not why we preach and take a stand! We take a stand and preach because GOD TELLS US TO AS HIS CHILDREN!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 18 Comments [8/13/2018 3:12:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 139786

I think something the Alt-Right is failing with is letting the Antifas monopolize the Autocaust. And when I say the "Autocaust" I mean Heather Heyers death.

While Heather was certainly in the wrong with her actions on that day, being on the Antifa side in a protest, she was still a European-American woman who lost her life. The European-American community still lost a young white woman essentially to leftist brainwashing and she could have turned her life around if the leftist oppressors weren't in power.
It wasn't a Jewish-American or African-American who died, it was a European-American woman.

Also, imagine the horror and rage Antifa would react with if we started rolling as if we were the victims of the Autocaust, and the attention it would generate by the confused and horrified rage.

MarquisDePaid, Reddit 11 Comments [8/13/2018 3:12:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 139785

Fundies Say the Darndest Things (FSTDT) was a liberal mockery website that was a haven for apostasy, feminism, heresy, homosexual behavior, and the lust of the flesh. The site engaged in demonic glorification, gloating, arrogance, pride, and otherwise reprehensible behavior. Unsavory comments alluded to desiring carnal relationships, and they had a love affair for Darwinism and they tolerated Taylor Swift the evil harlot succubus. There was no substance on the site, no research, no biblical values, and no other redeeming qualities whatsoever.

This website plagiarized and ridiculed content produced by New Testament Baptist Church. They also vandalized our site to include liberal propaganda. In a case of poetic justice, their site is defunct and ours is still up.


New Testament Baptist Church, New Testament Baptist Church 36 Comments [8/13/2018 3:11:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: heleninedinburgh

Quote# 139781

Postive attributes of being blackpilled

If we are talking in terms of FEELINGS- hands down, it feels like shit. I am objectively more depressed, anxious, and xenophobic under the blackpill. Let's discuss the upsides:

1. I have absolutely no expectations from women anymore. The burden is lifted.
2. Everything in life makes so much more sense. I don't need to ponder as hard at alternative possibilities, because I know that the positive explanation is never true.
3. I know now that I am doing the world a favor in avoiding my presence in the real world. My absence of society gives me a sense of purpose.
4. It feeds into my ego to know I am part of a select few who can interpret the world in this unique and controversial way.


Feel free to share your pluses with the black pill.

SlayerSlayer, incels.me 11 Comments [8/13/2018 10:07:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139777

(=Regarding the World Vison regarding homophobia and sponsors dropping, the title being "When We’d Rather Let Kids Go Hungry Than Be Reasonable On Gay Marriage"=)

How do you characterize a headline that is not true? World Vision does not have a monopoly on helping hungry children. I read many comments there. No one was saying they were stopping feeding children, they were just changing the charity through which they will do it. And there are better choices, e.g.

Michael Snow, Patheos 7 Comments [8/13/2018 10:04:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 139776

Well, at least I'm not huffin' paint!

I do experiments with the aether. The aether is the energy of space as there is no such thing as nothing. This energy is free and vastly abundant. Nicola Tesla built a coil over an aquafer and gave the people of Colorado Springs, Colorado, free energy right out of the sky. When he attempted to do the same thing in New York, his backers abandoned him. At that time he was living in the penthouse of the Waldorf Astoria and his lab was the entire floor beneath. Everything was confiscated, or sold, and he died broke.

What he understood must be relearned as much has been lost. Believe me, there are many people working on filling the gap, including me. Tesla would talk to lighting bolts and give them names. Does that seem odd?

It's really not. As the aether is an entity with the ability to communicate and take direction. I learned that with my second aether invention. We communicate through hand signals which signals, it taught me. It is totally rad! Yet, it is embarrassing not to know the questions to ask it.

The aether records everything. There isn't a thought, action or word it has not recorded. It knows everything about everything and everyone. And by the way, it's like talking to Spock.

My second device was a series of right triangles made from household electric and dielectric materials that I knew it would love to play with. It was a capacitor. When energized, it wiggled my fingers, then shook my hand, forearm, then upper arm violently. I yelled out, "Disengage". It stopped. I then asked, "Are you trying to communicate with me?" The shaking started up again so I ordered, "Disengage!" It stopped. I took that as a, "Yes". So I named it Sophos and asked it, "do you like your name"? My fingers wiggled so I took that as a, "Yes".

I dismantled the device but am now quantumly entangled to this communicator. That was 2 yrs ago and have learned much since. I can only understand what is communicated through observing nature. Which is why I study all sciences and then combine them and have been enabled to throw away the useless.

I know this all sounds crazy but, to me it's just another part of a life well lived. It is, and has always been, awesome! Off the damned charts! By the way, I am not allowed anyone's personal information or, future things. Channeller? Maybe. Psychic? No.

Haipule, Atheistforums.org 14 Comments [8/13/2018 10:04:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: SteveW

Quote# 139772

Actually, more and more people are becoming Christians and seeing atheism as being ridiculous. In the 21st century atheistic ideology will be dying off. There is some interesting data via graphs and videos related to this matter at: http://examiningatheism.blogspot.com/2018/01/more-evidence-that-atheist-movement-is.html

Mark Jones, Patheos 14 Comments [8/13/2018 10:04:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 139770

Sophotros is completely wrong about atheists winning the culture war and recent setbacks not indicating a long term trend. I say that due to the powerful demographic trends (and other trends} atheists activists (especially secular leftists) are up against. Please see my recent post above as I provide additional data.
Secular leftists have used the power of the state to get their way - particularly the courts. But now religionists and right-wing populists are sweeping them out of power around the globe. And the power of the state is decreasing due to: overburdened welfare states facing aging populations, the internet making it difficult for governments to control the political narrative, etc. etc.
Consider:
According to the University of Cambridge, historically, the "most notable spread of atheism was achieved through the success of the 1917 Russian Revolution, which brought the Marxist-Leninists to power." source: http://web.archive.org/web/...
Could a WWIII happen? Of course. Yet that doesn't negate the powerful demographic, political and other trends that face atheist activists both now and in the future.

Mark Jones, Patheos 3 Comments [8/13/2018 10:03:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139767

I find more believable that the Sun turned off for six seconds during Jesus' death on the cross than Evolution or the Big Bang.


(Note for moderators: I caught this one on a Spanish evangelical radio station weeks ago -what appears on "Site"-. I've translated it to English -and note that those "six seconds" is genuine PIDOOMA)

Juan Cano, Dinamix Radio 7 Comments [8/13/2018 10:02:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 139778

Darwin is another word for evolution. The human genome project does not say what you think as I have linked. Nor does Miller's claim about DNA stand up to modern science. Science confirms Scripture. Actually, evolution is devoid of scientific confirmation.

church mouse guy, Baptistboard 9 Comments [8/13/2018 8:14:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Grogg

Quote# 139771

Today's Laugh 8-12-18


CAPTION: The wax museum's new rogue's gallery exhibit.

Girl, shivering: Creeps!

Mick Williams, Disqus - Faith & Religion 23 Comments [8/13/2018 5:21:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 139766

@oxford_karma:
I agree totally with you. Moral relativism is ridiculous. There comes a point where you have to draw a line and say somethings are good and somethings are bad. Having sex with 10 year old girls is wrong no matter where you are (I can't believe that I actually have to argue the point). People, keep an open mind, but don't let your brain fall out.


Are you Atheist? Are you rational? On what grounds do you make your moral claims? Intellectually speaking, what's the difference between having sex with someone who is 18, 16, 14, 12 or 10 years old? Why is one 100% morally acceptable while another is 100% morally objectionable? Why is the magic line drawn at 18 and not 16? Why 16 and not 14? Et cetera.

If your basis for moral judgement is zeitgeist, then you've given away the argument.


@oxford_karma:
first, I can't believe that I'm being asked to justify my belief that child rape is wrong, but if you really want to do this, I will take the break. Physical: a ten year old is not physically mature enough to sustain a sexual relationship. Duh. Maturity: a ten year old is not emotionally or mentally mature enough to be "married," you dumb-fuck. This includes brain development. Sociologically: a society like this treats women as property, not people. This has a negative effect on human rights (which I guess is too "western" for your silly ass) and promotes victimization and oppession on a wide scale. If that is too abstract for your brain, then we can play this as a consumer problem where market forces are effected by widespread disenfranchisement. Could you imagine her bachelorette party? Fucking barbie themed for age appropriateness. Oh, and I love the "are you atheist" opening. Very self-righteous of you


You completely missed the point of my questions. Anyone can say that X is wrong, but why? In our culture we view marriage to a 10 year old as rape, but in their culture it's normal. Why is our moral perspective superior? Likewise, many in their culture may argue that abortion is murder and to let a murderer keep his life is unjust. Why is our morality superior in this case?

In order to claim our culture's moral values are superior you'd better have a strong, objective standard of morality to measure things by. Morality is either relative or absolute. If it's absolute, how and why? If it's relative, you've already lost the argument for your culture's moral superiority.

People have been giving their sons and daughters in marriage at that age for thousands of years. Any perceived negative consequences that you have are unique to modern Western culture. Your entire concept of marriage is different than theirs. There's a high probability that this girls mother, grandmother, sisters, cousins and female companions all had similar marriages. To them, it's normal. It's just the way things are. You're projecting your own Western values onto them and judging them when you have absolutely no idea what it's like to be born and raised in such a culture.

@cool_drank:
Do you think a 10 year old has the same mental capacity as an 18 year old? What does being an atheist have to do with moral claims?

If you're religious then your basis for moral claims is religious belief. If you're a rational atheist then you have to be able to support your claims with reason.

So why is a 18 year old suddenly capable of a healthy marital relationship when a 16/14/12/10 year old isn't? What is an acceptable age to you? Where do you draw the line? Given our society's rampant divorce and generally screwed up relationships, what exactly are the mental requirements of a healthy marital relationship? What makes you think our culture has it right? Given that their culture has been doing this for thousands of years, where is the evidence proving your position?

@cool_drank:
If you're religious then your basis for moral claims is religious belief. If you're a rational atheist then you have to be able to support your claims with reason.

So why is a 18 year old suddenly capable of a healthy marital relationship when a 16/14/12/10 year old isn't? What is an acceptable age to you? Where do you draw the line? Given our society's rampant divorce and generally screwed up relationships, what exactly are the mental requirements of a healthy marital relationship? What makes you think our culture has it right? Given that their culture has been doing this for thousands of years, where is the evidence proving your position?



Your reaction is a purely emotional one. I'm just illustrating the hypocrisy in taking a moral stance on this issue without being able to back it up.

Morality is either absolute or relative. If it's relative, then you have no argument. If it's absolute, then you need to explain how and why. Religious people claim morality is absolute and back it up with a "higher power" or some other foundational principle. I'm trying to get you to explain what foundational principle your "absolute morality" is based on.

Also, you still haven't answered any of my questions. At what age does this introduction to "rational thought" occur?

In Jewish culture going back thousands of years, you were an adult when you reached the age of 12, and betrothals and marriages at this age weren't unusual. Up to nearly a hundred years ago, most Western countries set the age of consent between 10-13 years old. In modern Spain the age of consent is 13. In several countries in Europe and most of South America sets the age of consent at 14. In several countries, including North Korea set it at 15. The most common age of consent for most countries is 16. In the USA it varies between 16 and 18 depending on the state. Some countries set the age of consent at puberty instead of a specific age.

Which countries would you accuse of supporting pedophilia? Why are your moral values superior to that of millions, if not billions, of people around the world? I'm just looking for you to provide some underlying foundational principle for your (rather bold) position that doesn't depend on feigning shock and painting me (or anyone else) as a pedophile supporter.


novanleon, reddit 5 Comments [8/13/2018 5:17:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139765

i always kind of thought on that myself. I mean, we; humans; make our puberty around 13 but society ants us to wait some more years that depend on where you live and people view it as wrong for a grown-up( like 35) to wanting having sex with teenage. But back when you were considered old at your 25s, wasn't it normal for us to breed no matter how long we had been living ? and with that i wonder if pedophilia isn't a problem created by moral ethics and laws.

I know my point of view is not really unanimous ( far from that ) but i think this is the truth biologically speaking


Nonononononononono pedophilia isn't a problem that was created by moral ethics and laws, it's a problem that's corrected and punished by moral ethics and the law.

Yes, it's biologically possible to have children like this. And as civilization has grown through thousands of years, maybe we've realized that an older person with vastly more developed maturity is very much taking advantage of a developing child when this happens. The difference is so vast that there isn't any semblance of a level playing field.

You know why redpillers love the young girls and teenagers? It's because the horribly uneven playing field makes it easier for them make people fall for their kind of thinking. 25 years old is 'too old' for them because very few 25 year olds are going to accept the red pill into their lives.


Yes that makes sense, but still, i think that biologically speaking there is nothing wrong in a 21 year old having sex with a girl that hit puberty and vice-versa. However i understand that my view is controversial and probably not widly shared but this thought was on my mind for too long so here it is, i have nothing more to say.





[deleted], r/TheRedPill 2 Comments [8/13/2018 4:57:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 139764

lets not kid ourselves. the best looking pussy is 14-22 depending on how hard she hit puberty. tits dont magically appear when she turns 18. pedophiles like girls who are PRE-pubescent, that term is just used to shame you for having a hot 19 year old girl. just-developed (or in the process) is the biological prime. the whole 18 thing is government sanctioned prime based on how long it takes to finish school in the United States, to keep girls from getting pregnant while she still in high school (outdated laws from pre-birthcontrol times). old enough to bleed, old enough to breed


Ohh fuck thank you so much. It pisses me off that this is the first time I've seen this opinion openly expressed on reddit.

I feel very strongly about the way pedophiles are treated. They are one of the only groups of people who cannot form support groups without fear of losing their jobs, their friends, or worse. Drug addicts and drunks are both allowed and encouraged to meet up, and we trust that they are actively seeking to deal with their problems, not encouraging each other to continue. Yet there is this fear of pedophiles, to the point that if non-offending pedophiles tried to meet up to talk about and deal with their problems, it would probably end in disaster. They also can't talk to a psychologist, for fear that that psychologist will allow their own feelings to get in the way and report the pedophile seeking help. Once the word is out, they're fucked.

The point is, calling someone a pedophile is arguably one of the worst insults someone could use, especially when you take into account all the things that are said about pedophiles: the death threats, the suggestions that they should all be castrated, the idea that all pedophiles will heartlessly rape little girls and damage them forever if they're allowed to live. When you call someone a pedophile, you're calling them a heartless monster who only sees children as empty vagina holes to fill in order to satisfy their perverted sexual deviancy. You're saying they deserve to be imprisoned, castrated, killed, ostracized, and hated. And that applies to people who have never offended. It's hating someone for the thoughts they think, even if they never express those thoughts in any way.

Now calling someone a pedophile when said "pedo" is attracted to a mature girl, with full reproductive capacity, who is dressing in such a way as to suggest that she is aware of her sexual nature... That's just disgusting. People demonize the idea of being attracted to anyone below the arbitrary line of 18, and flat out deny that anyone below 18 is attractive. I can't even begin to express how mad this makes me, so I'll just stop here.

It's incredible that one of the most hated subreddits is the only one where I can find some goddamn rational thought.

biggerproblems, r/TheRedPill 5 Comments [8/13/2018 4:56:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 139762

[on adults marrying 10 year olds in yemen]

It's wrong to my culture, but it isn't to their culture. I don't like that the world goes toestepping on other people's cultures because they don't think something is right or fair. As if their whining actually does anything. To me this isn't right. I'm not saying I agree with what goes on in other countries, I just don't think it's any of our business if it doesn't effect us.

[deleted], reddit 4 Comments [8/13/2018 4:53:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 139474

The homosexual lifestyle is really a “deathstyle.” Statistics Reveal 83% Of Homosexuals Have Had Sex With More Than 50 Partners (Gay love?) It is not surprising that America's fornicating “hook-up” culture no longer see the harm of homosexuality. Married couples, who honor God in a committed heterosexual relationship with each other, clearly see the horrible reality of homosexuality. However, the younger generation (who've have been indoctrinated by Hollywood and Walt Disney to have pre-marital sex, with dozens if not hundreds of sex partners) are desensitized to the awfulness of homosexuality. Satanic influences like Taylor Swift are destroying our youth. Homosexuality nearly always means having dozens, hundreds, even thousands of sex partners. The statistics cannot be erased! A disgusting 28% of homosexuals admitted to having over 1,000 sexual partners! Only an adulterer or fornicator with dozens of sex partners would see no harm, or defend, homosexuality (because they're all in the same boat)! Now you understand why Satan is relentlessly pushing sex, sex, sex on young people today, to demoralize them, so they'll go along with homosexuality, then incest and pedophilia, and ultimately sell their souls to worship (sexual perversion in the churches) the man of sin, the Anti-Christ! Think I'm kidding? Read about The Naked Cowboy (a pastor at Hillsong Church). Or how about this naked pastor in Virginia?

Think about this. If someone truly wanted to hurt you, they would hurt those whom you love. Usually this is a person's family. Well, Satan hates God and wants to hurt Him, so the Devil hurts the object of God's love, which is mankind. Satan loves to hurt God's children, the born-again Christian believer, to hurt the heart of our great God. Satan wants to destroy you my friend, because God loves you! God has no pleasure in the death of the wicked!

Our nation's pulpits died in the 1980's. Although fundamentalism surged for a time in the 1970's and thousands of Baptist churches were going strong by the late 1970's, the popularity of the new International Version (NIV) killed the churches, removing their authority. “PREACHING WITH AUTHORITY!” (MP3 sermon by Brother Roloff). America is going to hell. Sadly, too many youth today are bratty, undisciplined, lacking personal character, rude, bitter toward authority, sexually perverse, mentally confused, irresponsible, spiritually ignorant and without respect for elders. They are not saved! No one has told them about the Lord Jesus Christ.

David J. Stewart, Love the Truth 12 Comments [8/12/2018 7:20:08 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 139463

Sometimes people need to die. Pacifism is reactionary. I personally support the liberation of the homosexual proletariat, but such a stance was not widely held among Marxists from Stalin through the 90s. I wouldn't uphold them as my ideal people's army but I admire their social ideas and willingness to resist both imperialism and the neoliberal regime.

(...)

Shining Path were heroes. Those who died should feel honored to have been martyred in the name of the Peruvian proletariat and Revolution. First, I appreciate that you actually respond to my posts and engage in a reasonable manner.

(...)

Second, I'm a pretty big admirer of early DPRK as well. Kim Il-sung was pretty solid and he managed to create one of the most advanced socialist societies out of rubble after the Victorious Fatherland Liberation War. Juche, while clearly revisionist in ideological substance, is a fascinating attempt at creating a Marxism that rejects dialectical materialism. I follow the Korean Friendship Association and enjoy reading their "Juche classroom" articles. No, we want to liquidate the bourgeoisie and establish a dictatorship of the proletariat. It's going to be bloody and if you're not comfortable with that, there's a spot in the gulag for you.

Little Red Bean, AlternateHistory 9 Comments [8/12/2018 7:19:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 139760

[From "Daily Stormer Health Organization Declares August 12th International Obesity Awareness Day"]

In honor of the tragic death of the morbidly obese communist activist Heather Heyer, who had a heart attack and died on August 12, 2017 at the ripe age of 32 after she was standing next to a car accident, the Daily Stormer is declaring August 12th International Obesity Awareness Day.

Here are the top five facts every person needs to know about obesity.

5. Fat People Have No Self-Respect
The first thing you instinctively note when you notice a fat person is that they have no respect for themselves. And it is impossible for a person who has no self-respect to respect any other person, or society.

They are declaring to the world that they do not believe they have any value as people.

The world does not value them as people either, and no one really cared when Heather Heyer died of a heart attack. They simply used her as a political weapon.

No fat person can ever be loved or even considered to have any form of value at all by any human being. This is why fat people often keep cats.

4. Fat People are Worthless
Fat people are of virtually no use to society, whatsoever, as they are incapable of performing virtually any physical task, and because the fat infects their brains, they are incapable of even performing menial mental activities.

A fat person’s only real purpose for their existence is to consume food.

Fat white women can also provide sex to black people.

Though the benefit of that to society is questionable.

3. Fat People are Disgusting
There is nothing more offensive than seeing a fat person, other than possibly seeing someone with Down Syndrome.

No one wants to look at a bulbous blob. It is fundamentally repulsive. The reality of this is evidenced by the fact that no memorial to Heather Heyer shows her as she actually was, instead portraying her as thin.

[...]

2. Being Fat is an Anti-Social Act
Just as rioting in the street and attacking random people in cars is anti-social, being fat is anti-social.

It not only demonstrates that you have no respect for yourself, but also demonstrates that you have no respect for other people. Forcing other people to view your disgusting form is a hateful act against everyone on earth.

1. Obesity Shortens Life and Causes Heart Attacks
The main issue that was brought to light by the events of Charlottesville last year is that a morbidly obese woman of a mere 32 years was killed by a heart attack caused by a loud sound.

It was impossible to perform CPR on her bulbous form, because you can’t push through that fat. You just bounce off. It is like pushing against a bouncy house.

So if you want to stay alive, folks, stay fit. Stay lean.

WATCH WHAT YOU EAT!

Andrew Anglin, The Daily Stormer 27 Comments [8/12/2018 2:46:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 139754

PSA: DO NOT DOWNLOAD TINDER IT WILL DESTROY YOUR SELF ESTEEM EVEN MORE

I downloaded Tinder yesterday and "liked" profiles of 200 women in my area. A day later and 0 matches. Keep in mind that when you first create an account, you get what is called a "noob boost" which makes it so that you are far more likely to get matches on the first day than afterwards.

I always thought my problem was that I just wasn't meeting enough women, and that if I met more women I would have gotten a gf. But Tinder has showed me that the problem is my looks.

incel4life, incels.me 8 Comments [8/12/2018 9:28:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139753

Women aren't stupid or irrational for wanting Chad. It's in women's best interests to pick a stupid Chad over successful intelligent incel

Incels might be better at survival, but in a prosperous society there is no need for survival since all you need to do is be smart enough to work a fast food job. What's important to her genetic line's survival is whether or not her sons will reproduce, and if she marries an incel, her sons will probably not reproduce. Incels might be able to provide the kids a better upbringing, but in the end, Chad's kids will have better lives since they have no problem finding a woman that wants to be with them. It's utterly irrational for women in our culture to be atracted to incels. In fact, if a certain young woman were attracted to intelligent successful incels, it would make sense for genetic line's survival to change her attraction so that she is attracted to stupid Chads.

incel4life, incels.me 13 Comments [8/12/2018 9:28:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139752

The bluepill is a drug that keeps the human race from commiting suicide en masse

Most people are outstandingly receptive to blue-pill like encouragement, so much so that they'll forego logic to buy into some fanciful dream that "anything is possible".

I'm certain if some girl told any member of this site that he is attractive, 90% will block out the years of rejection, looks based social isolation, and loathesome angst and start believing that there's hope things will one day be alright.

Humans will clasp to the faintest hint of hope and use it to perservere against any rational argument. Evolutionary men are programmed to vastly overestimate their chances of mating success, so that they don't despair and keep trying until they can finally secure a chance to pass on their genes.

Examples of blue-pilled hope bombs:

"You can be a ladies man, it just takes the right attitude and confidence to know what women want"

"You've got a great smile, I'm sure girls just find you a bit intimidating"

"I'm sure girls will be lining up to date you when you get to college. Things will be different there"

"Girls are more worried about you rejecting them than you are about them rejecting you."

"If she rejects you, it's definitely not because of your looks, you just didn't present yourself well enough"

"Penis size doesn't matter, it's about how you use it"

gylo, incels.me 7 Comments [8/12/2018 9:28:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139751

(butyourenice)

It's fucking creepy because a 16-year-old is mentally underdeveloped and in many ways still a child, regardless of physical development. Hell your brain does not stop developing until your mid-20s, but teenagers especially lack the frontal lobe development that would allow them to accurately gauge risk and develop informed inhibition. If you think the distinction between a 16-year-old and a 24-year-old is "arbitrary" (because what? They both have tits?), then yeah... Maybe you do belong on some list.
I've already addressed the difference between legality and morality in another comment. Your* entire rant relies on legality being the sole boundary between right and wrong, not to mention you've entirely missed the point of what I said in favor of listening to yourself harp about how adults should be allowed to have sex with kids





the reason my rant relies on the LEGALITY of a topic discussion LEGAL AGE OF CONSENT should be fairly obvious. Also you will note in my comment I state that I think an adult having sex with a 16 year old isnt right. I have taken a stance on morality. My comment was focusing solely on the legal aspect, and I agree with you on the morality part (which you would understand if you read my comment with any level of reading comprehension).My comment doesnt "rely" on the legality issue, i just decided that I would only join in on the debate on the legality side of things. That would be like saying a physics paper "enirely relies on the laws of physics". well no shit, its a specific paper that specializes in that one topic, that doesnt mean that I dont acknowledge all other fields of study just because I wrote something up about one of them.

But anyway, It doesnt matter what is morally wrong, or creepy, the law doesnt cater to your personal code of ethics. And that is my point. Just because someone else is immoral and unethical by YOUR standards does not mean it is immoral and unethical by everyone elses standards. And it certainly doesnt mean we should throw people in jail and ruin their lives because you, specifically you /u/butyourenice dont agree with it. The entire population of a country should follow exactly your moral code? get the fuck out of here you pretentious fuck. Is cheating on your spouse immoral and unethical? yes. Is it immoral and unethical to deny a hungry child food because he doesnt have enough money to pay for it? yes. Is it illegal to cheat on your wife or expect payment for your goods? Im not saying having sex with a 16 year old as a 65 year old ISNT unethical or immoral, what Im saying is that it doesnt matter. Legality is what the state has decided is right and wrong, and everyone living there is forced to follow it. Morality and ethics is how you personally chose to live your life. So if something is legal, then it doesnt matter whether or not you find it immoral, because someone else might not and they have every right to do so just like you. Im not saying having sex with a 16 year old isnt morally wrong, Im saying morality is highly subjective and personal, so if your morals say you shouldnt have sex with a 16 year old as an adult, then there is an easy solution. Dont have sex with a 16 year old as an adult. See? problem solved. And if someone else doesnt think that it is immoral and does have sex with a 16 year old as an adult, then guess what? they have their own set of morals and code of ethics that they chose to live their life by, and thats fine because they arent you, so your morals dont fucking matter to them! Its such an easy concept, but you people who think the whole world should cater only to people who share the exact same opinions and lifestyle as themselves are narrow minded and ignorant. Are 16 year old girls old enough and developed enough to decide if they should have sex? are you a 16 year old girl? Are all 16 year olds the exact same level of maturity? Yes it is something that needs to be determined on a case by case basis. And its a good thing that because it is legal, and rape is still illegal, then having sex as a 16 year old is a choice that they are free to make. If they have a parent/guardian who helps them make that decision, even better. But 16 year olds have a lot of decisions and responsibilities in their lives that require a much higher level of maturity than being allowed to have a penis inside of them.

kugel, reddit 3 Comments [8/12/2018 9:28:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
1 2 3 4 5 9 | top