1 2 3 4 5 7 | bottom
Quote# 142067

A reply to TheEyeOfTheLight

I blocked you because you are crazy. In this world there are two type of persons: those whose values are defined by society and do not like to think (you) , and those whose value are defined by reality and like to think (me). You are amongst those whose values is defined by society and do not like to think. I warned you lovingly that what you do is wrong, but you keep on denying reality and God to satisfy your delusions. I can see which kind of person you are, and you are the type with whom talking about reality and showing proof is a waste of time. You are a hypocrite, and delusional. You are the kind who has blindfolded themselves from the truth. You claim to respect my beliefs. Yet, you came here with the purport to change them. You claim to believe in God, and yet in the comment you said that probably God is not true. You claim to be interested in learning, but when confronted with evidence you ignore it and plunge your head into the sand. I don't hate you, but I don't see the point in repeating the truth when you have unwilling ears. It seems you have not read the Bible. If you had read it, you wouldn't say such biblical myths.

I'm not being a hypocrite. All I'm saying is what is written in the Bible and what facts support. Facts show that asexuality is as healthy as heterosexuality, that's why priest practice it. Jesus himself said that being eunuch ( not interested in sex) is okay, whilst God condemned homosexuality in the New Testament and in the Old Testament and homosexuals were listed as those who will burn in Hell. God commanded his followers to hate sin, and to love the sinner. One can love a homosexual man whilst detesting his homosexuality. One can love a murderer whilst detesting the murder he committed. One can love a man without loving his sin. And, by 'love' God means that we should do our best to help the fella turn away from sin and to help him whenever his in trouble (for example, if a sinner is starving, we should give him food).

Sin is something that one can stop doing. We are all born wicked, and with a tendency to sin. But, through God we can all overcome sin. Homosexuality is not inborn; there's no evidence to support that. Homosexuality can be changed, and there are many studies which prove it. For instance, a study performed by Robert Spitzer ( a pro-homosexual psychiatrist, who was amongst the groups of psychologist whose efforts contributed to homosexuality stopping to be considered a disorder) showed that highly motivated homosexuals can change their sexual orientation. Thus, homosexuality is a condition which can be changed as long as the gay individual is has enough desire to change. In the same way a highly motivated drug-addict can stop being so, a highly motivated homosexual can change his sexual orientation. Thus, it is not a pointless battle to fight against addicting sin, but a battle that the one who perseveres will eventually win. God did not condemn people who suffer from homosexuality to the lake of fire, for he gave them the ability to change. It's up to homosexuals to decide whether they want to keep on committing atrocities with their bodies or change. It's up to them to decide whether they want to go to Hell or Heaven. Having said this, there's no such thing as homosexuals, but rather people who suffer from homosexuality. Since homosexuality is an illness with a cure, there's no such thing as homosexual, since homosexuals are neither born gay nor condemned to remain that way.

What's the point of the study? Not too long ago, many Christians believed whites were superiors to blacks, and thought the Bible supported their beliefs, when it is written that in God everyone is equal and that we are all descendants of Adam and Eve. The fact that a majority of Christians are being brainwashed by public schools since tender ages to accept homosexuality does not mean that homosexuality is accepted in the Bible. This shouldn't surprise you but, many studies have shown that an alarming number of Christians has never read the Bible, and believe myths about it. Many Christians even believe certain sins to be okay whilst they are condemned in the Bible, and other laughable falsehoods. Homosexuality is literally condemned in the Bible, by God, Jesus, and Paul. But since most Christians do not read the Bible, it's not surprising that they practice heresy.

What I told is the opposite of what you accuse me of. I said that our duty is to forever help sinners overcome their sins, and their worldly troubles. Look, we are all sinners, and we all forever be so. But only to those who forever try to overcome their mistakes, God will reward them with Heaven. Our duty is to eternally try to overcome our sins. Our duty is persevere as we walk the thorny path to Heaven, and at the same time lovingly help those who we find lost in the way to our destination. But, those who give themselves up to evil and practice it will burn in Hell (unless they repent). God loves all of his creation. But, He is just, and his love will not pervert His justice. There's Heaven and there's Hell, and wicked people will not go to Heaven (unless they repent since repentance will cleanse a man of all his evil and make him good) Those who sin are not forever cast away from God (whilst they live), as God is always willing to forgive them and help them overcome sin. I dare say, God weeps and feels sad when any individual chooses to sin and lives a sinful live without ever repenting of his mistakes. Men who suffer from homosexuality will burn in Hell unless they repent and try to overcome their illness. Men who steal will burn in Hell, unless they repent and try their best not to steal again.

The ten commandments do not state anything in relation to homosexuality, but there are other sins not mentioned in the Ten Commandments which God will punish people from. That is why, Christian should read the whole Bible, rather than cherry-pick a few parts of it. Homosexuality is condemned anywhere where it appears in the Bible as vile degrading feelings which are an abomination unto God, and God always punished homosexuals, who did not repent, for it. Homosexuality is condemned alongside zoophilia and adultery in Leviticus. It is condemned in a particular section dedicated to sexual immorality:

Leviticus: “If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death. If a man lies with his father’s wife, he has uncovered his father’s nakedness; both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. If a man lies with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall surely be put to death; they have committed perversion; their blood is upon them. If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. If a man takes a woman and her mother also, it is depravity; he and they shall be burned with fire, that there may be no depravity among you. If a man lies with an animal, he shall surely be put to death, and you shall kill the animal. If a woman approaches any animal and lies with it, you shall kill the woman and the animal; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.”

In the new Testament homosexuality is condemned. Besides the many verses condemning sexual immorality (as defined in the Bible), there are a number of verses exclusively condemning homosexuality. For brevity’s sake, I will include only one. Also as there’s a controversy over its accurate translations, I will include the original text as well.

Corinthian 1: “Or don't you know that the unrighteous will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don't be deceived. Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor male prostitutes, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor slanderers, nor extortioners, will inherit the Kingdom of God. Such were some of you, but you were washed. But you were sanctified. But you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and in the Spirit of our God”

....

(arsenokoites): homosexual, men who sleep with men
Composition:
Arsen (variant of árrhen): male
Koíte (variant of koité): marriage bed, sexual intercourse, bed, mat.

Extra: arsenokoites was first used by Paul as a reference to Leviticus. So, claims that it does not mean gays do it being used later to describe other acts are invalid (though it was still used to describe homosexuality). The word clearly means homosexual, and is a reference to Leviticus.

?a?a??? (malakos): soft, effeminate, doing things that women do, acting like a woman, feeling or doing stuff appropriate for women.
Extra: malakos comes from a myth about a king named malakos who acted like a female by dressing like a woman, and did other things considered to be womanly. But, by Paul’s time it had come to mean other things. It came to describe any sort of action considered appropriate for women, or anything associated with the female sex. It meant cross dressing, women were considered morally weak thus it also meant morally weak, emotional, homosexual, and other stuff. Taking into account that Paul and his disciples were emotional and cried in a number of times (weeping was considered feminine, and thus; men who cried were considered malakos), and taking into account Paul’s statement that spiritually men and women are equal, in this case it refers to homosexuals (men who harbored homosexual feelings were considered effeminate since those were feelings women were supposed to possess) and transgenders. It could also mean being morally weak, but considering Paul’s statements that women and men were spiritually equal, it seems unlikely he meant morally weak. Taking into account Paul’s statements condemning homosexuality (both in emotions and actions just like adultery) and transgenderism, it must mean both of them. However, considering homosexuality is condemned in the same text (see arsenokoites), it could mean solely transgenderism. I myself believe that in this case, malakos means homosexuals and transgenders due to historical reasons. Contrary to a common myth, it does not mean catamite. The belief that it means catamite stems from a passage in which malakos (malakos can also means softness of clothes, and the like) is used to describe the softness of catamite’s clothes. But, this conclusion ignores the fact that it is also used to describe the clothes of the nobility and other figures who were not catamite.

Anyway, back to the given task of preaching the truth to delusional ears, judging is not a crime. Judging is not condemned in the Bible, hypocrisy is. Judging is essential for life, as it’s something necessary for every action we take. Unless we exercise judgement in every facet of our life, from going to the grocery store and when confronted with sin. Unless we judge, we will be weak before Satan, as we will be unable to distinguish righteousness from unrighteousness. In the Bible, one must take heed to the context of every passage. In this “judge not” passage, Jesus is preaching against hypocrisy. If he was condemning judgment (as determining whether one of our brothers is doing wrong or not), he would not have said that we can help our brother take the splinter out of his eye, if we have taken the log out of ours (in other words, implying that we can judge whether our brother has a splinter in his eye or not, whether he is doing wrong or not). In other words, we can help our brothers overcome sin and judge whether they are sinning or not (so as to help them turn away from the path to Hell), but only if we are not practicing the same sin (note how both men have wood in their eyes, the same sin). It is a sin and a crime to judge someone as evil and preach against their sin when we are committing the same sin (like a man preaching against adultery when he is committing adultery). But, when we are committing a different sin, it’s okay to determine that someone else is sinning and help them overcome sin whilst we ourselves try to overcome our shortcomings, but we have to acknowledge that we are both sinners. Judgement is fine when it is educated and founded on God’s words. Thus, it is perfectly okay for us to judge or deduce that homosexuality is wrong based on reason, studies that has proven its unhealthy nature, and condemnation by God. It is okay for us to judge homosexuals as wicked, as long as we remember that we both are. It is our duty to distinguish the evil people do to help them.

Ezekiel: “ 'O wicked man, you will surely die,' and you do not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity, but his blood I will require from your hand. But if you on your part warn a wicked man to turn from his way and he does not turn from his way, he will die in his iniquity, but you have delivered your life.”

We are all wicked, but only those who strive to overcome their sins will go to Heaven. Salvation is not solely through faith, as Jesus himself confirmed. One may believe in God as one pleases. But unless we try to follow his statutes, we’ll burn in Hell.
Mathew: “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’

If it’s a crime to execute or incarcerate humans who commit crimes against humanities, we should not punish murders. History has shown us that evil should be punished, as it affects all communities. Homosexuality is a depravity and a crime against humanity, thus it should be punished. However, they should only be punished for the crime of committing homosexuality if there’s any evidence against them, rather than due to a witness or mere accusation. I myself believe all sinners should be put in jail rather than executed, so that they have a chance to repent. I believe sinners should be put in jail and put to do labor. But, I understand if sometimes circumstances do not allow for such lenience.
Love as defined by God and reason is about helping your brother, not letting them walk to their death. There’s no love in allowing your brother to walk to his death by doing evil, without attempting to save them.

I hope God will help you understand what love is, and that He will free you from your delusions. Now, don’t misunderstand me and think I’ve called you crazy out of hate. I’m the kind who speaks the truth or their thoughts out loud, without meaning any form of aggression. I’ve concluded you are crazy due to your writings and denial of reality. However, a more accurate term to describe would probably be stupid. But, regardless, I’m going to pray and hope God’s frees you the demon in your heart, and that all goes well in your life. May you live a long happy life with God by you side!

natsumihanaki20, DeviantART 11 Comments [1/21/2019 5:11:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 142064

And then they came for man earrings

For many Chinese people, man earrings are a mainstream fashion, no longer a novel object or a taboo. Earrings, after all, are just accessories that have no gender. But ultra-conservatives at the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film, and Television of the People’s Republic of China (SAPPRFT), China’s top media regulator, certainly don’t see it this way.

Regarding itself as a defender of the core values of the Party and China’s traditional culture, where toxic masculinity and gendered norms ultimately rule, SAPPRFT appeared to take issue with man earrings recently as some people noticed that the earlobes of some male celebrities are blurred on television.

It seems that a male earring ban has been implemented. Chances are TV stations were informed with such short notice that they did not have time to ask those men to take off their earrings when filming. Blurring out their ears, which seems extremely weird, as this video-editing technique is usually used for censoring private parts like genitals, was the only option left for TV producers to avoid breaking the new rules.

Given SAPPRFT’s past history of introducing arbitrary policies without giving any explanation, it’s highly unlikely that it will reveal the real intentions behind the man earring ban. Theories trying to decipher the authorities’ motives abound on the Chinese internet. Some people speculate that SAPPRFT considers man earrings an affront to national masculinity, which stands at the core of the regressive gender culture in China, where men are expected to manifest manhood in every aspect of their lives, including how they dress themselves. Others think the root of the problem is SAPPRFT’s antiquated taste in men’s fashion.

Unknown Chinese regulators, SupChina 6 Comments [1/20/2019 11:12:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 142062

Just having returned from a visit to “the greatest place on earth,” my wife and I were shocked at how many men boldly acted like women. Lispy sentences, light gestures, soft mannerisms, and flamboyant jokes were everywhere to be seen — on display for a park flooded with children. No hiding it. No shame. No apologizing. This perversion of masculinity warranted no commercials.

Instead, our society celebrates what Paul calls literally “soft men” (Greek malakoi), a group that will not enter the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9). And discomfort at this will-not-inherit-the-kingdom version of manliness is exactly a symptom of what the APA finds malignant in traditional manhood. But as much as the APA and LGBTQs protest it as hate speech, the effeminate shall not enter the kingdom of God, and it is unloving not to say so.

While men who brutalize and manipulate represent one form of perversion (the kind companies now put their dollars into supporting), men who sit passive, complacent, spiritually and emotionally frail, represent another. So also do men who rebel against their sex by acting like women. And too many classrooms that celebrate this perversion act as accomplices to confusing the boys (and girls) of today. Paul commands all men, “Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong” (1 Corinthians 16:13), and offers them the hope of the gospel that they too might be washed, sanctified, and justified “in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God” (1 Corinthians 6:11).

David Mathis rightly tells us that the strongest men are gentle. But do not hear him saying that godly men are soft, fragile, weak, or effeminate. They do not faint in the day of adversity. They dress for war every day against forces of evil. They are sacrificial initiators, not limp deferrers. Men who charge against enemy gates, leading from the front, and refusing to take cover behind their wives and children. They lead. They protect. They initiate. They love. They sacrifice. They work. They worship. They are men.

Greg Morse, Desiring God 18 Comments [1/20/2019 11:11:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 142061

First, you don’t know what real racism is. You’re a brainwashed little punk with no life experience. Second, you are a minor and you have NO rights regardless of what liberals tell you. You have rights when you turn 18. Third, if i was your parent i’d tan your hide if you disobeyed me.

Jay Jake, Quora 19 Comments [1/20/2019 11:10:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 142059

(Everlasting Life said:
I think we're seeing some of the fruits of college edumacation.)


Yes we are. University and college is where children and young adults go to be educated into the most destructive pernicious Satanic philosophies like Derrida's "Deconstructionism".

athenasius, Rapture Forums 9 Comments [1/20/2019 11:05:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 142058

Anyone pastors, cake makers, etc who speaks the truth of God's word will be called bigots and haters. We are to hate the sin, but not the sinner. If you don't agree with them, they come against you to lose your job. This world hates us because we are in the world, but not of it. There are 2 fathers our heavenly father, and Satan the evil one!

lightofmylife, Rapture Forums 14 Comments [1/20/2019 11:05:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 142054

When the next “OMG Trump is totally going to prison!” media bombshell story comes out, many of us will, once again, know that it’s wishful lunacy

And the people pushing it will forget that they were wrong this time, and the time before that, and the time before that...

Buck Sexton, Twitter 16 Comments [1/19/2019 3:37:05 PM]
Fundie Index: -3

Quote# 142051

[ on turning in a murderer . ]



If my suspicions are right and he is guilty, then he didn't commit a perfect crime. Therefore, any investigators worth their salt should have been able to crack the case. I don't feel obligated to go out of my way and make their job any easier.

Rachellelogram, The Straight dope 10 Comments [1/19/2019 3:36:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 142050

[ on being friends with an active murderer. ]



Would not turn him in, would not question him, would not even let him know I know the sob is dead. Like Sgt Shultz, 'I know nothing'.

I don't know that he did it and I'm not about to ruin a friendship over suspicion, nor am I going to let someone know I think they might be guilty. If they are innocent I'm hurting their feelings, if they're guilty I'd rather they didn't think they have to get rid of me too.


Even if for some reason I was questioned I don't know anything, so there is nothing to tell.

However I will not perjure myself for anybody and once a 'friend' asked me to lie to the police for him and lie to the court for him. Nope! It was over a DWI though, not a murder.

FWIW I was kind of in this situation and I had my suspicions and I kept my mouth shut. Other peo

Sahirrnee, The Straight dope 0 Comments [1/19/2019 3:36:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 142049

Hollywood reprobate actor, Robert De Niro, who stars in the 2016 filthy movie, “DIRTY GRANDPA,” says...

“If there is a God he has a lot to answer for.”
SOURCE: Robert De Niro - Biography - IMDb


What a hypocrite! De Niro says that God has a lot to answer for? No, it is Mr. De Niro who has a lot to answer for. Here's the vile, disgusting and offensive content of De Niro's recent work of darkness, “DIRTY GRANDPA”...

2016 “DIRTY GRANDPA” FILM CONTENTS...

Violence:
- Brief non-graphic violence.
- Infrequent portrayals of hand-to hand violence with little blood and some detail.
- Depictions of fighting and electrocution.

Sexual Content:
- Frequent use of crude and descriptive sexual language and gestures.
- Sexual references and innuendo.
- Infrequent portrayals of sexual activity, with buttock nudity and a little detail.
- Nudity in a brief sexual situation.
- Breast and male frontal nudity in a non-sexual context.
- Full frontal nudity.
- Embracing and kissing.
- Fondling.
- Brief simulated sexual activity.
- Implied sexual activity.
- Frequent crude and offensive scenes.

Language:
Approximately 270 instances of coarse language, including:
- Pervasive use of the sexual expletive, many in a sexual context.
- Frequent use of scatological slang.
- Infrequent use of vulgar expressions.
- Use of sexual, racial, and developmental slurs.

Alcohol / Drug Use:
- Two scenes of drug use involving marijuana and/ cocaine.
- Portrayals of alcohol and illegal substance use, sometimes to excess.
- Tobacco use.

SOURCE: http://parentpreviews.com/movie-reviews/content-details/dirty-grandpa


It is not God Who has a lot to answer for Mr. De Niro, it is us sinful human beings!!! Ecclesiastes 12:14, “For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.” Romans 14:12, “So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.” Hebrews 4:13, “Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight: but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do.”

I don't condemn any man, for I am the biggest sinner that I know. Thankfully, my sins have been washed away by the blood of Jesus Christ, when I trusted Jesus Christ as my personal Savior at age 13, receiving His sacrifice on the cross for my sins, and believing that He resurrected from the dead three days later for my justification. I feel sorry for Woody Allen and Robert De Niro, who openly reject Jesus Christ and profess to be atheists. In effect, they have appointed themselves to be their own God.

We are all so very blessed by God. God gave us tastebuds to enjoy food, and a wondrous variety of delicious delicacies from which to choose. God gave us our eyes to see, and made the beautiful sunsets and flowers to behold. God gave us our ears to hear, and the lovely music to enjoy. God gives us our breath. Like King Belshazzar, Robert De Niro does not glorify the God in whose hand his breath is. Daniel 5:22-23, “And thou his son, O Belshazzar, hast not humbled thine heart, though thou knewest all this; But hast lifted up thyself against the LORD of heaven; and they have brought the vessels of his house before thee, and thou, and thy lords, thy wives, and thy concubines, have drunk wine in them; and thou hast praised the gods of silver, and gold, of brass, iron, wood, and stone, which see not, nor hear, nor know: and the God in whose hand thy breath is, and whose are all thy ways, hast thou not glorified.” Every way of a man's life is only possible because of God's blessings and power. If it weren't for our omnipotent God, our human heart could not pump blood 100,000 times each and every day of our life!!! How dare De Niro arrogantly say that if there is a God, He has a lot of explaining to do. God owes De Niro NOTHING!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 18 Comments [1/19/2019 3:36:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 142044

White-splaining… LMFAO.. SMH.. Sigh.. I am not White. I’m Black.

I’m not White-splaining, because I have no perspective on the White experience; nor care to — I’m speaking as a Black person who has seen racism their entire lives. Do you understand what that’s like?

So to see it here is disturbing…

Maybe you read what I wrote but your own reactionary senses thought “this is a White man” so you immediately assumed I was “White-splaining” or “Man-splaining” .. which just means, you’re not really trying to engage with me in a conversation — but instead tell me why I should shut the fuck up because I’m somehow privileged.

You’re sitting here telling me I have no idea what racism is when I’ve been beaten within an inch of my life by the Cleveland Police Department; when I’ve bad a bottle broke across my face for being a so-called “nigger” at the age of 8 by a bunch of teenage White boys; when I was told I didn’t belong in my neighborhood because I looked like a dope dealer…

Think about your own prejudice to assume SO much about me simply because I said Dear Leader is making racist comments?

Just stop.. and think about what you just said… just slow down for a minute.. damn.

Your response is something of a non sequitur: being a black person who has seen racism his entire life is no more incompatible with white-’splaining than being a woman is incompatible with man-’splaining. White-’splaining is defined by its content, not by the color of the speaker or writer. (Note that I am not commenting either way on the merits of Raucous Indignation’s charge.)
Wow. this is a first on this blog. A black man being accused of whitesplainin. And someone actually defending it as a non sequitur. #arglebargle


BMScott, Daily Kos 7 Comments [1/19/2019 7:05:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 142042

(In the thread "Can you be gay and be against gay marriage?")
Note: "Exceptional individual" and "exceptional" are Kiwi Farms's word filters for "retard" and "retarded," respectively.


How about mentioning the fact that the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage was unconstiutional and anyone saying that it wasn't bullshit judicial activism is a fucking exceptional individual?

@Jaiman:
You can't just not give people basic freedoms in fear that some faggots will try to take advantage of it. NAMBLA tried to take part in LGBT movements since the 90s, and pedos are still shunned by society.


Shut up, cuck.
"""""basic freedoms""""

@Clintonberg:
basic human rights


Your name fits you well, kike.

@PurcupineTree:
Ok sure but of all the unconstitutional shit to complain about, I’m not going to choose the one that benefits a large group of people and harms nobody.


It harms states' rights. And nobody cares.

Of all the things to override democracy for, we're stooping to fucking gay marriage because some dudes couldn't be buried together. It's especially heinous because it matters so little.

@PurcupineTree:
Does it? I mean, would the world really be that different if that order wasn’t made?

If I was a super straight person I guess I might feel a little more scandalized, but in the rare event that I found a compatible wife, I would very much like to get married and adopt kids. My perspective is biased here.


Yes, because laws were overwritten to make it happen. It was an issue traditionally, (at the time of issuing it) recently, and consistently handled by indivdual states. (Parts of Alabama and Texas still don't have gay marriage because of the few institutions there that can validate marriages refuse to do it- wait until that's overriden too for the technicolor special interests groups.)

But fuck that, lolololol. Right side of history.

@PorcupineTree:
k that’s fair. I’m just an unpatriotic fag and don’t care enough lol


And that is why your kin will fall.

@PurcupineTree:
. They can’t singlehandedly topple democracy, I promise.


They have roasties and kikes as allies.

Y2K Baby, Kiwi Farms 10 Comments [1/19/2019 7:04:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 142040

Something horrible that I have noticed is many churchgoers are faithfully living a religious life—attending church, dressing modestly, listening only to religious music, talking the religious talk, associating with only other religious people, being loyal only to their particular religious clique, living a clean and moral life—yet at the same time these damned people are using satanic Bible versions, following a demonic corrupted Gospel that requires discipleship for salvation, and have no genuine concern for the truth. They are damned because they have believed a lie! The Scriptures proclaim a CURSE upon anyone who preaches “ANOTHER GOSPEL,” and that CURSE extends to any people who trust in that false Gospel...

Galatians 1:6-9, “I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.”


Evangelist Ray Comfort is accursed! Pastor John MacArthur is accursed! Evangelist Paul Washer is accursed! Pastor Jon Piper is accursed! Pastor David Pawson is accursed! Evangelist Billy Graham is accursed! Pastor Joel Osteen is accursed! Pastor Rick Warren is accursed! Dr. James Dobson is accursed! Pastor Charles Lawson is accursed! Pastor Keith Gomez is accursed! All of these false prophets preach a corrupted Gospel!!! I say that not to be unkind, God knows my heart, but to be truthful.

David J. Stewart, Soulwinning.info 17 Comments [1/19/2019 7:04:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 142037

Good point. It seems to me that the gay community is in fear of the truth and will do anything to gag it.

Adrian Smith, Twitter 7 Comments [1/19/2019 7:02:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 142031

(In a debate on the right to die)

Slow agnozing deaths build character, u murderers

Bailey Beier, Facebook 15 Comments [1/18/2019 9:11:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Winston Jen

Quote# 142030

(=Regarding Mike Pence=)

Richard Dawkins Foundation:
Dear @VP,
Your religion is disgusting, oppressive, and anti-intellectual. It isn’t intolerant to point this out to you. Turns out, freedom of speech means we get to tell you that the religion you’re free to believe in is utter nonsense.

Martin Yirrell: And remember we all know God exists.

Martin Yirrell, Twitter 11 Comments [1/18/2019 9:11:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 142029

Richard Dawkins Foundation: A magistrate who resigned rather than perform gay weddings shouldn't be getting a payoff.

(link: http://ow.ly/ZN2e30irT2p) ow.ly/ZN2e30irT2p

Martin Yirrell: Why not, gay wedding are a lie, marriage is only between a man and woman.

Martin Yirrell, Twitter 9 Comments [1/18/2019 9:11:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 142026

Look at these unreasonable thug cops, and the evasive authorities, and the horrible way they mistreat Wolfgang Halbig, a former state trooper who dared to ask questions about what happened at Sandy Hook. ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH6hmI1h-iQ

The very way the authorities have shunned him, demonized him, shut him out and even criminalized him, clearly evidence that Sandy Hook was a massive hoax! Halbig makes 100% good sense. He is asking very simple questions, that every parent would ask. As Halbig points out, 27 children were declared dead in 8 minutes and no ambulances were called. Who does that? Portable restrooms were ordered the day before the alleged Sandy Hook shooting!!! Someone pre-ordered a big machine that displayed electronic messages, which read: “Check-in Here!” Who would order this for a shooting event?

I've looked at the videos, which YouTube has relentlessly censored. YouTube is owned by Google and they (very much) DO censor THE TRUTH!!! We are fighting an information war, not only in the secular world, but also in the churches. Effectively, the battle over the inspiration of the Word of God is a fight over WHICH AUTHORITY can be trusted? Before the year 1881 there was only ONE ENGLISH BIBLE TRANSLATION SOURCE, the Textus Receptus! Westcott and Hort raised up and introduced a SECOND AUTHORITY in 1881, which contradicted the first, final and only true authority, which is God's Word! So since 1881 the world has has TWO AUTHORITIES!!! Consequently, a THIRD AUTHORITY is needed (which is modern-day scholars) to decide which of the first TWO authorities can be trusted. This is humanism and apostasy, which religious colleges like Bob Jones University are guilty of supporting, sanctioning, selling, using and tolerating! The ONLY authority that a born-again believer needs is the King James Bible!!!!!!!

David J. Stewart, Love the Truth 17 Comments [1/18/2019 9:09:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 142025

The Massive Population Increase Evidences We're In The End Times

The following graph reveals the startling explosion in the world's population numbers over the past 300 years, especially the past 100 years (i.e., one century). Clearly something very different is happening in the world and this massive growth rate cannot be stopped without massive genocide, murderous abortion, global sterilization or war on an unprecedented scale which will kill billions of innocent souls!!! Everything I just mentioned is already in the diabolical blueprints of the globalists and their monstrous New World Order, which will be completed likely around 2030.

...

I'm just a guy who's a Christian and loves Jesus, and I have a website ministry for the Lord (for which I thank and praise God daily). My personal opinion is that the Pretribulation Rapture is VERY near! The trumpet is out of the case! Amen! I'm waiting for the Uppertaker, not the undertaker! The political saber-rattling between the leaders of the nations cannot last indefinitely. Tension is building! At some point red buttons are going to be pushed and things will BLOW UP!

We're living in a whole new ballgame of predator drones, anti-matter weapons, computer-fired guns, laser-beam weapons in outer space, and new super weapons beyond imagination. Even so, come, Lord Jesus!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 16 Comments [1/18/2019 9:09:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 142019

Kabeer Kabeer: We don't want statues, we want hospitals , sewage treatment plants, toilets and better government schools

Follow the Bakri: what abot over 350000 plus Moskes and ur still praying on streets parks private land !! Hospital and toilet in 57 moslem countries r very few, sand desert will help u relive ur crap ?

Follow the Bakri, Youtube 16 Comments [1/17/2019 2:34:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Quote# 142018

The IQ-Sapping Virus



(TRANSCRIPTION - this is just a picture of what is supposed to be Rod Serling)
For aficionados of the macabre, today marks a milestone. Our two realities have finally overlapped, and this is not the Twilight Zone. We're about to visit the set of a comedy show. They're as perplexed as you about the left's masochistic penchant for shooting holes in their liberal feet. Hold onto your hats, because this is that runup to a cataclysmic seven-year period we like to call...The Pre-Trib.)

HOST Listen up, men of the world--you're suffering from a mental disorder. It's called--being a man! [Laughter] No, I can't say that with a straight face, and no, I'm not making it up! Here's the solution: we all turn ourselves into women--or half-baked facsimiles thereof. [Crowd titters] [Turns to panel] Lou, here you have the so-called authorities on psychiatry, and they're all nuts!

LOU [Fellow comic] Just the latest domino to fall. They're pandering to various bases. If men go away, the radical environmentalists get their zero population growth. It has obvious appeal to the gay and trans groups. It also means half the conservatives disappear. And feminists get rid of the father figures they hate so much.

HOST Katya--even Gillette has gone anti-man! Now I have to buy brand-X stuff to shave with!

KATYA [Blonde reporter] They get so much joy from spewing their hate that they're willing to alienate half their fans or customers. I dunno--it's like they're infected with a virus that makes them go all stupid and self-destructive. [Laughter]



(TRANSCRIPTION - Picture #2 (Serling again)
Our blonde reporter is half right. The infectious agent is courtesy of that master bioterrorist who specializes in IQ-sapping spirit poison. But alas, like all mad scientists and their cult followers, he'll suffer the same ultimate fate, with a twist. This time, the actors don't take off their makeup and go home. They'll have all eternity to reflect on rejecting the One who could have snatched them from the abyss...in The Pre-Trib.)

Mick Williams, Disqus - Faith & Religion 20 Comments [1/17/2019 2:34:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 142017

The op-ed’s author wrote that “many federal agencies are now operating more effectively from the top down on a fraction of their workforce” and that “we do not want most employees to return, because we are working better without them.”

Roughly 800,000 federal employees are currently going without pay, and millions of Americans who rely on the agencies those employees usually run — everything from the Food and Drug Administration to the Department of the Interior to the Department of Homeland Security — are going without services, except for those provided by workers deemed essential to national security or public safety.

“Now that we are shut down, not only are we identifying and eliminating much of the sabotage and waste, but we are finally working on the president’s agenda,” the official wrote, adding in conclusion: “Wasteful government agencies are fighting for relevance but they will lose. Now is the time to deliver historic change by cutting them down forever.”

A Senior Trump Official, Talking Points Memo 18 Comments [1/17/2019 2:33:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 142016

I've read a article that showed that Government is the leading cause of death worldwide, which makes sense since Satan controls all the governments of the world. And it's evil in governance that forces Moloch worship on the world. This is just one reason of many for the descent into darkness sweeping the globe. Please come quickly, Lord Jesus!

lenraff, Rapture Forums 14 Comments [1/17/2019 2:32:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Governor_Satan

Quote# 142015

I was doing Bible studies at my local church and the pastor described one time an event to me that changed my view permanently. It went something like this;

He said "When a person sins it crushes the heart of God". He took a piece of paper and said "When we sin it is like this" and crunched the paper into a ball with one hand(we single handedly hurt God). Threw it on the ground and stompped on it. Then he said "this is what every person on the planet is doing all day, every day to God". "7 billion times a day all day". "Who does that to their father"? "We deserve hell". "But through the death of Jesus we got our second chance". "Don't waist the blood". Punched me right in the face that did, I even had a tear run down my cheek at the time. Yes I make errors but never deliberately or without care, that's negligence.

Peter Baumann, Quora 15 Comments [1/17/2019 2:31:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 142013

Earlier this week I wrote and released an article for Theology Review entitled The Importance of Standing Firm Upon God’s Word. Throughout this week I have met criticism due to my views on the issue of same-sex marriage and LGBT. This led to making the decision to delete the post and start again. I was also met with criticism for doing this, despite the fact that ultimately it is my responsibility to manage my social profiles and pages.

This criticism has even gone so far as to label my response as “censorship”. So I want to use this quick post to address this issue, and ask the question, is Theology Review censoring people.

Is Theology Review Censoring People?
The answer to this is a resounding no. But let’s look at this a little more shall we?

On a practical level, the comments that anyone makes on a social media site is the responsibility of those that manage it. So in terms of my social media sites, it is ultimately myself who bears that responsibility. With this being the case it is up to me to judge whether comments and content are appropriate for the world to see.

This week a comments thread got out of hand with the majority of people, including myself, talking in a manner that was not fruitful, nor appropriate. This is exactly why I made the announcement on Thursday that any posts related to TR material would now be filtered through the comments policy that we use here on the website.

As was expected, this made those harsh commenters (and their supporters) a little bit mad. This was always going to be the case. As I knew that as soon as I made that decision, I was going to get complaints from people saying things such as “well I didn’t breach those terms”. In reality, it is me as the lead for TR to determine whether anybody (including myself) has breached those terms.

But the question here is, is Theology Review censoring people.

As stated earlier on, the answer to this is no. All too often in the 21st century, we will throw words around without thinking about what they actually mean. Censorship at its core is about silencing anything that does not conform to what’s expected, or should I say, what is desired to be expected.

In terms of the decision to start using the comments policy to gauge whether comments should be allowed on social media posts. It is certainly far from being about not allowing comments I don’t agree with. It is all about not allowing comments that will not lead to a healthy and fruitful discussion that reflects Christ. This will also go for my own comments as well as anybody else’s.

So no, Theology Review is not censoring anybody. What we are doing is putting needed principles in place to ensure that discussions can be a blessing and not a problem.

Mark Jones, Theology Review 6 Comments [1/17/2019 2:29:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
1 2 3 4 5 7 | top