1 2 3 4 5 6 | bottom
Quote# 142813

Inceldom as subcontious level of society

According to psychonalysis, people try to ihibite negative thoughts , emotions, pushing them into subcountiousnes, because those inhibeted contents of subcontiousness are too painfull to be faced.
Projecting this psychological law onto social model we can assume the following ; incel subculture is subcontious level of society , wich , naturaly enough, society tries to inhibite by such methods as censurship, ban, ridicule ( I.T.) even Do'S attacks end et. c. Endeed Incel' s omniresent black pill is the truth that is extremely hard to swallow.
According to psychonalysis the result of supression of unpleasant contents of contiousness into uncountiisness is the distrortion of countiosness , namely, neurosis or psychosis in worse case.
And we see, endeed, that society rapidly loses its mind plunging into collective schizophrenia. By suppressing the truth of black pill they lost grip of reality.

Nothingness, incels.is 9 Comments [3/14/2019 5:32:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142811

[Serious] Being 6'2" in Germany ain't worth shit

Average height in (western) Europe is too damn high. After getting out of bed i'm 6'2.5". Guess what? I'm getting heightmogged left and right within the first 30 seconds after i left my house. No one ever said something like that to me "SARMcel you are a tall dude". Simply because this isn't considered tall AT ALL. Everyone on here knows celebheights.com. Delusonal people over there, classify everything over 5'10" as tall. Are these guys really that blind? Being over 6 foot means NOTHING in todays society. No height will save you from being an fucking untermensch like i am, because EVERYONE is tall. My 14yo brother is already 6'1" and his friends are all well over 5'10". WTF is this shit?

So please stop the heightcope.
FACE>>>>>>>>>>>> Height

SARMScel, incels.is 11 Comments [3/14/2019 5:32:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142808

(="The delightful (cough) Martin Yirrell explains the xtian stance on babies. Enjoy.." note: Martin's actual qoute couldn't be found so we're relying on a picture=)

Babies are rebels too, not with such an accumulation of sin as you have, yet they too deserve hell. God offers you mercy.

Martin Yirrell, Twitter 7 Comments [3/14/2019 5:31:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 142803

Stop Funding Hate: Great to see that Center Parcs is now trending in the UK! Unsurprisingly, the trolls are now out in force with all the abuse & venom we've come to expect - but let's keep it polite & friendly and set a different tone by refusing to respond in kind! #LoveNotHate

Martin Yirrell: Homosexuality isn't about love, it's about lust.


Nathan: What are you basing that on?

Martin Yirrell: Love never causes another to sin, homosexual activity is sin, thus homosexual activity is only about lust.

Martin Yirrell, Twitter 11 Comments [3/14/2019 5:30:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 142801

Shaden_Freud_e:
ITT i shall argue that an atheistic society destroys social darwinism and eugenics by; Promoting low birth rates trough supporting birth control and gay rights Opposing any form of warfare Allowing the poor to thrive and seeking to limit the power of the rich All this amounts to a dysgenic society.

Atheism doesn't require any of that.
Promoting low birth rates trough supporting birth control and gay rights

Pro-eugenics groups have historically been in favor of low birth rates for undesirable demographics, so that's a bit simplistic. They sterilized a number of black people, Hispanics, Native Americans, and poorer white women in the US, while also demanding that middle- and upper-class women bear many children to prevent "race suicide".
By the way, it's not like we need more people on this planet right now.
Opposing any form of warfare

Warfare right now is no longer as reliant on genetics. You don't need to be physically healthy to launch a missile or call in a drone strike. I also don't see how generally being averse to war is a bad thing, as long as you can get involved when it's necessary. Your genetics also can't save you from getting hit by an IED in some hellhole.
Allowing the poor to thrive and seeking to limit the power of the rich

Oh, no, not equality! If you're looking for the best to rise, then fucking over most people in favor of the guys with some cash isn't the way to go. You think the rich are limited right now when they can bribe their way into top schools and get a born advantage to everyone?
This argument is pretty trash, and I fear for a society that you desire.

Robertredgreen:
I STAND by no inequality. The rich havebeen denied their due status and villified all across the media. I notice you said"hellhole" Is the great nation of afghanistan,who teaches usa how to treat women,a "hellhole"? Is DETROIT a hellhole? I stand by the third world. The first world is anti eugeni

Shaden_Freud_e:
I STAND by no inequality. The rich havebeen denied their due status and villified all across the media. I notice you said"hellhole" Is the great nation of afghanistan,who teaches usa how to treat women,a "hellhole"? Is DETROIT a hellhole? I stand by the third world. The first world is anti eugeni

Funny, isn't it, that you decided not to address the majority of the argument. The rich have their status and they can get away with literal murder. Don't you deserve to be vilified if you can cheat your way into Yale on Daddy's dime? And are you trolling by saying Afghanistan is the best exemplar of how to treat women, or are you a misogynistic asshole?

We should be extremely wary of eugenics, given its track record, unless you're really into involuntary sterilization, pressuring other women to bear kids, and Nazism. Wouldn't surprise me if you were, but.

Robertredgreen:
No,you do not. Learn to accept others good luck. I Embrace afgaghnistan. Take the black pill. You call me an asshole but im defending you from thots who will cheat on you for another man I dont have any hard words for nazism. Sterilization is bad because even the poor must breed.

Robertredgreen, r/DebateAnAtheist 2 Comments [3/14/2019 5:29:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Quote# 142796

If you are an atheist, when you die, what would make you think that you would end up in heaven? That is ludicrous. Would you want to suddenly spend years with someone whom for most of your life you have never talked to, ignored, and even denied their existence? Well, as an atheist, that is how you have been acting towards God, so when you die, you will realize how dreadful that you have acted towards the all loving and caring God.

At the time of death you will of course believe in God, and at the same time feel such a dreadful shame that you will not want to face Him. It is you who will actually banish yourself from His presence. Since God dwells in Heaven, you will choose the opposing dwelling place, which is Hell. Of course God will sentence you to that place, but it will be what you have sought all your life, to be out of God’s presence, so it will be only natural for you to want to continue in that manner despite the dire circumstances.

Of course most atheists, though they want to pretend that they are just as moral and upstanding as any Christian, in most instances have some underlying depravity that does not jive with recognizing that there is a Supreme Being that has set in place certain laws which all men are bound to follow, so there will of course be the other physical punishments that will be part of the Hell that you as an atheist will have chosen.

Of course God gave you a free will, and also an inherent ability to know that there must be a God from the beauty and order observed in nature and the universe. Using Evolution as a crux for trying to deny a Creator is not ever able to be totally convincing for anyone. But as long as you still have life, you are free to use that free will to change the road that you are following on your way to Hell. Hopefully you will at some point make that necessary change before it is over. The choice though is entirely yours.

Tom Heck, BS Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin - Madison (1991), Quora 27 Comments [3/13/2019 4:56:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 142790

George Pell sentenced to six years' jail for sexually abusing two choirboys

Cardinal George Pell has been sentenced to six years' jail for sexually abusing two choirboys when he was Catholic archbishop of Melbourne in the 1990s.

Pell, 77, was found guilty by a jury last December of sexually abusing the choirboys after a Sunday mass in December 1996 and then assaulting one of them a second time two months later.

The man who was once Australia's most powerful Catholic sat in the dock dressed in a black shirt and a grey blazer, without a clerical collar, as County Court Chief Judge Peter Kidd delivered his sentence.

The chief judge described Pell's abuse of two choirboys in the sacristy at St Patrick's Cathedral as "a brazen and forcible sexual attack on the victims".

"The acts were sexually graphic, both victims were visibly and audibly distressed during the offending," he said.

"There is an added layer of degradation and humiliation that each of your victims must have felt in knowing that their abuse had been witnessed by the other."

"There was a clear relationship of trust with the victims and you breached that trust and abused your position to facilitate this offending," the chief judge said.

"I would characterise these abuses and breaches as grave."

Pell will serve a minimum of three years and eight months in jail before he will be eligible for parole.

He continues to deny he sexually abused the boys and has lodged an appeal against his conviction on three grounds, including that the jury verdict was unreasonable.

'Breathtakingly arrogant' offending

Chief Judge Kidd said the power imbalance between the victims and Pell as a senior church official was "stark".

"The brazenness of your conduct is indicative of your sense of authority and power in relation to the victims," he said.

"You may have thought you could control the situation by reason of your authority, as archbishop, whether or not that belief was well-founded.

"Such a state of mind would have been extraordinarily arrogant, but the offending which the jury has found you have engaged in was in any view breathtakingly arrogant."

The chief judge said Pell's abuse had had a "significant and long-lasting impact" on the wellbeing of one of his victims, whom he referred to as J.

"J has experienced a range of negative emotions which he has struggled to deal with for many years since this offending occurred … he has found it difficult because of issues of trust and anxiety.

"I take into account the profound impact your offending has had on J's life."

The chief judge said he did not have the benefit of a victim impact statement from his other victim, referred to as R, who died of a heroin overdose in 2014 and never reported the abuse.

"However on the basis of J's account at trial I am able to say your offending must have had an immediate and significant impact on R," Chief Judge Kidd said.

"Whilst it is not possible for me to quantify the harm caused, or articulate precisely how it impacted on R in the long run, I have no doubt that it did in some way."

The chief judge gave permission for the hearing to be broadcast live by media outlets and the court room was packed with abuse survivors, advocates and journalists.

[...]

Pell's crimes committed at cathedral

The court heard that Pell abused the choirboys, who cannot be identified, after celebrating one of his first Sunday masses as archbishop at St Patrick's Cathedral in East Melbourne.

He caught them drinking altar wine in the priest's sacristy, which was off limits to the choir.

One of the former choirboys gave evidence Pell had planted himself in the doorway and said something like "what are you doing here?" or "you're in trouble".

The then-archbishop moved his robes to expose his penis and forced one of the boys' heads down towards it.

The trial heard one of the choirboys asked: "Can you let us go? We didn't do anything."

But instead Pell moved onto the other choirboy. He pushed the boy's head down to his crotch and orally raped him.

After a few minutes, Pell ordered the boy to remove his pants and then molested him as he masturbated.

Pell abused that boy a second time two months later, after another Sunday mass when he pushed him up against the wall of a corridor in the back of the cathedral and groped him briefly.

Evidence of the abuse came from that former choirboy alone, who was the victim of two assaults.

The Court of Appeal is expected to hear Pell's appeal over two days in June.

Cardinal George Pell, ABC News 12 Comments [3/13/2019 4:53:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 142787

[Serious] Secular humanism is one of the main reasons why this society hates incels

I will continue with the analysis of the modern West and why it is so hateful towards the incels.

The secular humanist mentality that is prevalent in the West is that humans are masters of their own destiny and if you do something wrong, you need to find a solution and fix it. This is the mentality of the modern Western society and it is from this position that incels are judged in the sense that you need to stop complaining and find solutions, usually followed by either a some generic useless advice (just do this, just do that) or straight ridicule.

Once you examine secular humanism a bit more, you realize that it comes from arrogance. In reality, human beings are not in control of everything and never will be.

To illustrate the difference between the Western secular humanist mentality and non-Western non-secularist religious mentality: I remember an interview with some European jihadi fighter who said that American soldiers get PTSD from wars while the true religious Muslim soldiers don't suffer from it because from a religious viewpoint, if you tried to do something with good intentions then you shouldn't feel guilty about yourself even if you came up short. On the other hand, the Western man, under the influence of the secular humanist mentality, will start blaming himself for his mistakes and his position in life. A Western secularistic atheist soldier who came out of cruel war will inevitably start blaming himself that he went through bloodshed and traumatic events, while a religious soldiers like medieval crusaders would see it as God's divine providence (a doctrine which asserts that God is in complete control of all things) and God's will. This is also the reason while medieval Christian soldiers were so much mentally tougher than the modern Western soldiers, the Christian warriors of the past went through gruesome medieval battles yet remained sane and found strength in religion, but these modern NATO soldiers seem broken. On the other hand, when you look at the religious jihadis today, like the Taliban for example, they have amazing will power and faith in what they're doing.

Now, I don't want to turn this into an argument about religion as such. You might say that religion is a cope, but you even from this perspective you can probably see it as a good cope for those who believe in it.

Either way, the more important thing is to understand how this reflects on social level, because this is what is the most relevant for us.

For the Western secularist society and in the eyes of secular humanism, you (as individuals) are the root of your own problems. The West doesn't believe in things like God's providence and at the same time it believes that the modern West is a wonderful progressive society. So in their eyes, who could be blamed for your problems but you yourselves as individuals?

Western secularism is a very peculiar ideology because while it technically stands only for separation of state and religion, it does this from the position that the state is superior to religion, thus making the State the new religion. You can observe this easily, whenever people point out that state and religion should be separated, the latter is seen as negative, while the state is never questioned. They basically mean that the state should be protected from religion and not the other way around (Western secularists, for example, don't have a problem when state institutions start meddling into "backward" religions and punish religious people for "hate speech" and things like that - where is the separation here?).

Western secularism worships the state, its institutions, its ideological norms (muh freedom, muh equality), its laws. It also worships progress and science and this material world the West created. Secular humanism is basically the key mindset behind it, as it believes that through these instruments, an ideal rationalistic society will eventually be implemented, or at least, we will get as close to is as possible. They believe that we're on our way there.

So whenever you, as a man, complain in the West that something is wrong not because of you and your individual failures but because of some factors out of your control - yet alone if you directly blame the state and society for it, like many incels do - the Western society doesn't want to hear it. The position of Western secularist ideology is: "We (as in, our state with its institutions) gave you this wonderful progressive society with freedom and equality, if you can't make it, then YOU are the problem because YOU didn't work hard enough for it." That's why this society is so aggressive towards incels because the incels question the fundamentals of this secularist state-worship and institution-worship.

The only people who can complain in the West are groups that do it in the context of the ruling ideology of "freedom" and "progress" like the feminist women, LGBT, "minorities" etc. because they argue that their problems will eventually be solved as we become more "progressive". They don't blame the modern society as such, but rather say that this society isn't modern enough. So they fit in the narrative and strengthen the secularist state.

But when incels blame the society for the problems, this is where the secularist West doesn't want to hear it. The West doesn't want to give legitimacy to a group of men that blame things that are out of their control for their problems because then it would give up on its own legitimacy. So this is why, at first, the Western society tried to respond to incel problem by trying to help (this is how the inceldom first started to be discussed in the 90s) and when they saw that they couldn't do anything to solve it, they started ridiculing it and mocking it and at the same time trying to repress it (we're in this stage now in the 2010s).

A response of a non-Western, non-secularist traditional religious society to the incel situation would be very different. In a traditional religious society, people in incel position (those who can't find wives) would be seen as the less fortunate. They wouldn't be blamed for their problems, or at least no exclusively. For example Catholic Church always gave advice to people who couldn't marry (who were basically 'incels') to accept celibacy as a blessing (basically they should become 'volcels'). Again, I'm aware that many of you wouldn't like such advice either, but the key difference is that in a religious society, you wouldn't be personally blamed for your inceldom and you wouldn't be ridiculed or attacked for it. It would be seen as God's divine providence and something outside of your control. IMO this would be a much better position than being seen as an evil outcast.

I think the main reason why many of us are so resentful of this modern society is because of this BS secular-humanist-like advice of "find solutions and fix it" and "it is your own fault" type of mentality which inevitable leads to mockery and attack on basic human dignity ("no woman likes incels because they're evil/losers/lazy/have bad personality"). In reality, love and relationships in this modern dating world are a perfect example of something that is not in your own control. You can't force people to like you, it's as simple like that. If there is one thing you can't possibly have any control over, it's this. It's basically in God's hands - if you're religious. And if you're not religious then you can explain it by losing the genetic lottery. It all comes down to similar things, basically - it was something out of your control.

Like I said, whether you're religious or atheistic is not really relevant here. The modern West is not atheist but rather "pagan" because it worships this idols like the secularist state and its ideology. So even if you're an atheist, you should have a problem with this. The Westerners are really fanatical in their modern 'paganism', and that's why they don't want to accept that a group of men (the incels) has it so bad in their wonderful modern society that they worship like some pagan idol-worshipers.

Teutonic Knight, incels.is 18 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142786

This is the song if you go ER and get caught

[Music video of Bohemian Rhapsody]
"Mama, just killed a man
Put a gun against his head Pulled my trigger, now he's dead
Mama, life had just begun
But now I've gone and thrown it all away
.
.
.
But I'm just a poor boy and nobody loves me
He's just a poor boy from a poor family
Spare him his life from this monstrosity
Easy come easy go - will you let me go "

FinnCel, incels.is 10 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142779

The fact is the people with loveless live are the sexually active homosexuals.
Research was done with 200 homosexuals over a period of 2 years and the first and foremost finding was that the one thing they were not and that is gay.
He said that they were the unhappiest people that he had ever met.

2marktime2, Christian news Network 6 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 142778

"People don't become homosexual because of traumatic events from childhood. Look at a book written later than 1950."

Which book do you suggest?

Have you read any book that researches the subject and discovered that all homosexuals interviewed have had a deficient relationship with their father and as a result have an identity problem which is the cause of their choice to adopt the homosexual way of life.

If they don't choose then every act of homosexuality is rape.

2marktime2, Christian News Network 15 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 142777

Here is a but of truth for you. Homosexuals claim that the reason why they suicide in such large numbers is due to society not accepting them and their way of life.

Lie.

The reason is the constant rejection they get from other homosexuals in thier search for acceptance. They go from place to place day after day to find acceptance through sex and when they don't get it because they are not the right type i.e. handsome, good body, wrong size of penis, not wanting to do what the other homosexual wants them to do the spiral downwards begins. When they hit rock bottom their is only one course of action that can alleviate the pain and that is suicide.

I have researched the subject and presented a paper to the government on the issue so I know what I am talking about.

2marktime2, Christian News Network 22 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 142773

If I were the last man on the planet to think so, I would want the honor of saying no woman should go before me into combat to defend my country. A man who endorses women in combat is not pro-woman; he’s a wimp. He should be ashamed. For most of history, in most cultures, he would have been utterly scorned as a coward to promote such an idea. Part of the meaning of manhood as God created us is the sense of responsibility for the safety and welfare of our women.

Back in the seventies, when I taught in college, feminism was new and cool. So my ideas on manhood were viewed as the social construct of a dying chauvinistic era. I had not yet been enlightened that competencies, not divine wiring, governed the roles we assume. Unfazed, I said no.

What Real Men Do

Suppose, I said, a couple of you students, Jason and Sarah, were walking to McDonald’s after dark. And suppose a man with a knife jumped out of the bushes and threatened you. And suppose Jason knows that Sarah has a black belt in karate and could probably disarm the assailant better than he could. Should he step back and tell her to do it? No. He should step in front of her and be ready to lay down his life to protect her, irrespective of competency. It is written on his soul. That is what manhood does.

And collectively that is what society does — unless the men have all been emasculated by the suicidal songs of egalitarian folly. God created man first in order to say that man bears a primary burden for protection, provision, and leadership. And when man and woman rebelled against God’s ways, God came to the garden and said, Adam, where are you? (Genesis 3:9), not Eve, where are you? And when the apostle described the implications of being created male and female, the pattern he celebrates is: Save her, nourish her, cherish her, give her life (Ephesians 5:25–29).

God wrote manhood and womanhood on our hearts. Sin ruins the imprint without totally defacing it. It tells men to be heavy handed oafs or passive wimps. It tells women to be coquettes or controllers. That is not God’s imprint. Deeper down men and women know it.

John Piper, Desiring God 19 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 142770

(Liner notes of their album "Hail Metal.... Destroy Faggotry!" Keep in mind that The Raunchous Brothers are a mix of hardcore punk and thrash metal.)



TRANSCRIPTION:

Before Heavy Metal there was nothing. In ancient times, battle hymns would inspire and lead many legions of Romans, Barbarians, Vikings and other warriors into battle. Then, of course, came the classical masters such as Bach, Mozart, Beethoven and Wagner, whose expertise in song structure, time changes, counterpoint, melodies, harmonies, etc, is reflected in the brilliance and power that is Heavy Metal music. In these modern times, the one and only musical form that contains the virtues of honour, strength, testosterone and pride needed to lead us proud warriors of today into battle is Heavy Metal. Metal is powerful, glorious and truly elite.

Hip-Hop/Rap caters to uneducated and mindless robots who are slaves to a destructive criminal trend. Punk, Hardcore and Indie Rock are degenerate and subversive forms of brainwashing. This shit exists for the sole purpose of emasculating our United States of America and promoting an agenda of faggotry and Marxism. We shall never allow ourselves to be influenced by the lies that have been forced upon us by these leftist traitors. These parasites and their nauseating way of life demand everything of this world, but offer nothing of value in return. May they all DIE IN PAIN!

We are The Raunchous Brothers, proud speed metal warriors of the superior tradition.
We hail the honour and the glory of Heavy Metal and accept nothing else.
We shall never tolerate the acceptance of homosexuals, lesbians, bisexuals, liberals and leftist bolsheviks.
We are forever committed to waging a relentless war against all forms of faggotry.
HAIL METAL....DESTROY FAGGOTRY!

The Raunchous Brothers, Deathrune Records 19 Comments [3/12/2019 4:02:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 142769

Science is the most powerful religion created against God, to manipulate and implement false doctrines, in which false gods are worshipped such as, heliocentrism, evolutionism, big bang, gravity, astronomy... and in which the term "theory" is equivalent to the word #faith.


(Spanish original: La ciencia es la religión más poderosa creada en contra de Dios, para manipular e implementar falsas doctrinas, donde se rinde culto a falsos dioses como, heliocentrismo, evolucionismo, big bang, gravedad, astronomía...Y donde el término 'teoria' equivale a la palabra #fe.)

La Verdad nos hará Libres, Twitter 12 Comments [3/12/2019 4:02:41 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 142765

Swamp Wars Video Game

(Note - apologies to those who can't see the illustrations, but Mick's artwork is so poor I can't properly put it into words...first photo appears to be Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rendered as Medusa with snake hair attacking a trim, young, beefy-looking Trump, but the others are unfathomable.)
(I added descriptions of the pictures. But yes, no idea what is supposed to be going on there. - Bastethotep)

It's the new game featuring you as ruler of a kingdom under siege from within! Your subjects have been heavily indoctrinated by twisted school teachers. Can you save the day?


(Trump, clad in plate armour and looking worried, is followed by a gorgon wearing a maniacally grinning mask that doesn't match her skin colour, all her hair-snakes lunging forwards in formation. The background is a photo of a foggy swamp with dead trees.)

Battle the evil Speaker of the House of Horrors and her minions! She's throwing open the kingdom's borders to get votes in an effort to oust you from office!


(A leaning woman with a bony neck, making a grimace. Behind her stands a laughing red-eyed black skeleton. From the back of the woman's head or the skeleton's left shoulder, smoke rises.

Contend with a satanic media out to get you 24/7! They're turning the populace against you with vicious lies!


(Photo of people looking at a big TV screen at the back of a truck. Badly photoshopped onto the screen is a Mick Williams "drawing" of a brunette man.)

Battle the Hildabeast as she tries to corrupt your allies!


(A gigantic disembodied gorgon head. Her original face has been badly erased and replaced with another, much too small, off-center tired expressionless female face. On her left side, she is bound by a cloud(?) chain that is breaking. On her right side, one of her hair-snakes knocks down a figure in power armour, an orange surcoat and a dark-orange belt and helmet. In the foreground, silhouettes of figures wearing horned helmets watch the scene.)

Over 50 terrifying levels of challenging gameplay. Can the Trumpinator survive the demonic hordes?

Mick Williams, Disqus - Faith & Religion 31 Comments [3/12/2019 4:02:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 142764

Alabama judge allows teen to sue on behalf of aborted fetus

A teenager in Alabama is suing an abortion clinic for terminating the life of his unborn child against his wishes. On Tuesday, an Alabama county court recognized the aborted fetus, "Baby Roe," as a plaintiff in the lawsuit, making the case one of the first of its kind, his lawyer said.

Ryan Magers, 19, of Madison County, claims his girlfriend got a medicated abortion at the Alabama Women's Center for Reproductive Alternatives in Huntsville in February 2017 when she was six weeks pregnant, according to legal documents, even though he urged her not to terminate the pregnancy. Alabama recognizes the personhood of a fetus, so Magers is suing on behalf of the fetus and himself.

ABORTION SURVIVORS ON NEW LATE-TERM ABORTION BILLS: 'WHERE WERE MY RIGHTS IN THE WOMB?'

“Baby Roe’s innocent life was taken by the profiteering of the Alabama Women’s Center and while no court will be able to bring Baby Roe back to life, we will seek the fullest extent of justice on behalf of Baby Roe and Baby Roe’s father,” Attorney Brent Helms said in a statement. “The time is ripe for consistency in Alabama’s jurisprudence: either we fully acknowledge the personhood of the unborn or we cherry pick which innocents we protect and which ones we trash for profit.”

Ryan Magers and Brent Helms, Fox News 12 Comments [3/12/2019 4:02:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 142763

Look how easily entire western nations have been overthrown and filled with demonic Islam.

Wake up America. They are working hard to do the same to our nation.

The stupid leftists who are too dimwitted to see the facts make me sick.

They won't take over the USA as easily, but they certainly don't care who they harm to get their way. Pelosi called it "collateral damage."

Make no mistake, Americans will fight against this.

Then we will have to contend with all the satanic nations that were once our allies.

We'll have to whip their asses too.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 14 Comments [3/12/2019 4:02:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 142761

[Idea] The Genetic & Social Lottery Equalizing Compensation Initative.

The idea essentially goes like this:

Every year at your medical evaluation you are also ranked against the populace on multiple fronts.

Looks.
Height.
Frame.
Musculature.
Status.
Money.

Then, according to your ranking in each category you receive a total score. A negative score entitles you to a certain net benefit from the government to compensate you for your suffering (paid for plastic surgery). A net positive means you get taxed.

Basically, the offer of lefort 3's for every incel!

We basically already do this to a tiny extent for "social" inequalities with things like social security.

VincentVanCope, incels.is 11 Comments [3/11/2019 11:27:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142760

Mouse on a Pedestal: Jordan Peterson, Anglocuck Supreme

Jordan Peterson - a man who teaches the quasi-science of psychology at declasse Canadian universities - is all the rage among tradcon males across the Anglosphere. His books, televised debates and utterances are extolled as 'revolutionary conservatism', a much needed antidote to the slack minded Social Justice Warriors who presently dominate Anglo academic life.

However, like all Anglo cuckservatives, Peterson is just telling men to return to the plantation. He is just Tommy Fleming lite, a pitiful Anglocuck who thinks men should accept traditional duties while women do as they please; a clown living in the 1950s, telling men to 'man up' and join the ranks of castrated cuckdom in the Anglo-American Matrix. The central problem with his position is that the Anglosphere has moved beyond his tradcon values, never to return. Peterson is still hung up on marriage, 'honour' and fidelity in a world where such things are scorned or ridiculed by women and society at large. Indeed, being an 'honourable man' is now a one-way trip to financial rape in the frivorce courts of the Anglosphere. Here is one of my correspondents, Lawrence, on the reality of the situation in contemporary America:

At one point in my corrections officer job, the incarceration of men for child support and alimony arrears got so bad that a group of us prison guards came to the warden, complaining that we were being unethically ordered to guard men who really weren’t a threat and who should have never been sent to jail. Once imprisoned, they usually lost their professional licenses, their driver’s licenses, became unemployable so they just wound up back there again. The warden just shook his head, he knew how corrupt the system is, how the US family courts, media, politicians, universities, feminists and the prison execs all work hand in glove to profit off the US slave economy fueled by all the husbands and fathers tossed into prison. How it creates sick incentives that encourage divorce and profiteering. (This is another reason the US divorce rate is by far the highest all over the world, so much money is made from it). But the warden knew he was powerless to reform it. Just like we were as guards. The vultures of the Anglosphere want their prison slaves, and husbands and fathers are an easy target.

Like I said, every man in the Anglosphere is a target of this machine, but wealthy American and Canadian men are the hardest hit, because the US legal system gives family court judges wide latitude, which really can’t be appealed, to place arbitrarily high demands on the incomes of men who have been wealthy at any point. This is why Robin Williams committed suicide. At one point he was a very wealthy Hollywood A-lister. But after his two divorces, he was no longer pulling in that kind of money. The family courts didn’t care. They said he once made big money, and in the fantasy unicorn filled land of US family courts, that meant he could just click his feet together and make the same money again. So they made Robin pay out the nose for alimony. By this time he was sick with Parkinson’s Disease he couldn’t make anywhere close to that amount of money, and his lawyer was warning him that prison time was likely coming. So he committed suicide. Here’s another famous case, a guy in New York with same sort of situation, once made a lot of money on Wall Street and became upper class, told to pay alimony every year after that at insane high levels, lost his job in recession== then off to prison when it became impossible.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-08-26/jail-becomes-home-for-husband-stuck-with-lifetime-alimony Brendan Fraser has been hit with a similar judgement, tens of millions of dollars in alimony.

Wealthy men across the US, Canada, UK and the Anglosphere generally are hit hard like this. And yes, a lot of them wind up in prison. The incarceration rate in Canada and the UK isn’t quite as bad, but this happens there too because the misandrist structure of the laws and family courts is as bad as in the USA, and the legal systems share the same insane practice of imprisonment after court-ordered impoverishing of a man. I found this out ironically after I expatriated and was working as a Web and database planner, when my previous experience led prison systems in many countries to contract me to help with their intake software and legal briefing documents. This imprisonment of men for marriage or kids (or in these #metoo days, just for “harassment” that in reality is “any interaction with women”) really is an Anglo phenomenon uniquely. Whatever stupid idiosyncrasies the rest of the West has with feminism, they don’t throw men in prison for this.

The very worst case I saw as a prison guard was a surgeon, yes an American surgeon who was one of the most respectable guys I ever met, hard working, worked until 2 a.m. 6 days a week to save people’s lives. With all the work hours, his wife got “lonely” and started sleeping around, eventually having 2 kids that weren’t even his as he found out later. And then she filed for divorce so she could take the surgeon’s money, blow it on cocaine and stupid luxuries for herself without doing any work herself (that’s the real destination where the “child support” money goes) and sleep around with her favorite Chad of the week, all on her hard working surgeon ex-husband’s money. She won an insanely high judgment in a US family court, millions of dollars in child support and “alimony” that the poor surgeon would have to pay. Since by the court’s judgment, “she should be entitled to maintain the same standard of living after the divorce”, even though this greedy gold-digging Anglobitch is the one who filed for the divorce to steal from her hard-working husband who was actually saving people’s lives.

After a few years of doing this, and losing his house and his nice car, the poor surgeon threw out his back while helping a patient onto an operating table. He had to cut down his hours as a surgeon, and went to the divorce court asking for a reduction in the support demands, and ask that his lazy, spoiled brat bitch ex-wife get a damn job herself. But the court refused using the same delusion filled imputation bullshit they pull on other ex-husbands, claiming he could somehow make millions of extra dollars using his surgical wizard skills somehow. Which he couldn’t do in reality with his injured back, something the family court judge couldn’t or wouldn’t even try to understand. So then now the alimony and child support were demanding 120% of his income. You see, the family court system will never let you off the treadmill once they target you, especially if you earn a lot of money. Eventually he drained his savings and retirement, couldn’t make the payments at all—and he wound up in the prison where I was a corrections officer.

The corrupt American family court-media-feminist-academia cultural Marxist-big business-prison industrial complex had worked perfectly to ruin this poor man, and what a prize they had. A dedicated, hard working US surgeon, saving lives every day, drained of his money and reduced to poverty by a gold-digging, spoiled greedy bimbo who divorced him due to his very dedication, had kids with other men to force him to pay bullshit “child support” in addition to never-stopping alimony, his assets taken by his gold-digging ex wife and the state to grease their own corruption, the “child support” in actuality supporting the ex wife’s corrupt, hedonistic lifestyle after divorce. And then the poor surgeon himself made a literal slave in a US prison, stripped of his license and made a perpetual debtor, worked to the bone but never allowed to profit from his own efforts or hard work. That really is how it works in the US family court and prison system. That poor surgeon was the worst case we ever saw, made us so mad we were talking about how we were going to “free the Bastille” and start a revolution ourselves to stop all the corruption, Robespierre style. And free all the innocent men, and even some women, who were imprisoned this way, to feed more slaves to the machine.

Because if you’re an American man, particularly a rich, well to do, middle class or upper class man with skills, saved money, assets, wealth and a good job, that’s what you really are. Fresh meat for the Anglosphere family court meat grinder machine. Like Legal Eagle said, you are literally a slave with marriage or child-bearing in the US or the greater Anglosphere, from that day on, the state and officials have full purview over all your assets and unlimited ability to seize them. Legal Eagle saw this from the legal debate and court side, I saw the horrible result from the prison side, where men were sent after all their assets had been stolen by the family courts and their only further “value” was as slaves to the prison-industrial complex. This shit’s real, guys.

And now, in the ugly aftermath of #metto, #timesupand #nameandshamehim, you don’t even have to get married or have a kid in the Anglosphere to become a slave. Any interaction with a women, even something as casual as a glance or an innocent conversation, opens you up to charges of harassment and sexual misconduct. And given that as much as half of young white women in America find even innocent male female interactions to be harassment, you’re in great danger at any moment. Many harassment and misconduct changes now are being assembled by our corrupt legal-prison-industrial complex system to become prosecutable offenses. But even short of that, the witch-burning in social media means that any vague accusation, whether recent or months or years ago, will make you unemployable and a social pariah. You’ll lose your health insurance and ability to earn a living, and then the state will have all kinds of additional ways to brand you a criminal and toss you in jail.

[url}https://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2018/01/the-wardens-tale-why-expatriation-from.html[/url}
[url]https://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2018/01/the-wardens-tale-why-expatriation-from_31.html[url]


Peterson tells men 'to be men' - in other words, try to live up to traditional male responsibilities - in a world which despises them, getting nothing but penury and imprisonment in return. Meanwhile, single mothers with four thug-babies live happily on taxpayer handouts across the Anglosphere while Peterson's 'responsible' men foot the bill.

The point is, Anglo conservatives like Peterson have not truly grasped the reality of contemporary gender relations. At heart, they believe we are still living in the pre-feminist era where men are coming home to smiling housewives and discussing the Bible around the kitchen table before a roaring log fire. In truth, the fact that western women are no longer economically dependent on men has entirely obviated those assumptions. With the rise of sperm banks and other post-male reproductive technologies, women don't even need a man to have children. Besides, the Calvinist misandry of the Anglosphere remains unchallenged even while female rights and opportunities advance apace in every sphere - education, the media, reproductive technology and jurisprudence.

This is partly generational; but mainly because Peterson, Tommy Fleming and other 'conservative' Anglocucks are academic fantasists with scant knowledge of contemporary social reality. Boomer academics like him need to leave their post-War ivory towers and do some volunteer work in a hospital or prison to gain some understanding of how the world actually works. Academic Anglocucks like Peterson or Fleming are dangerous because gullible young males listen to their inane opinions, or even base important life-decisions on them. In the 1950s, that was no great problem; in the 21st century, with its #metoo hysteria and no fault divorce-epidemic, such 'advice' should be cursorily dismissed as the rantings of madmen.

Rookh Kshatriya , Anglobitch 9 Comments [3/11/2019 11:27:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142756

How did oldcels cope without internet?

Imagine being an Incel between 1960s and early 1990s. There's no internet, how do you cope? Watching TV and reading all day? Playing videogames?

thespanishcel, incels.is 12 Comments [3/11/2019 11:21:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142755

Suicide is an act of rebellion

Modern society is against suicide, because they want loyal wageslaves to produce goods and services for Chads and Stacies. They want you to be optimistic about the future; "things will get better," "you'll make it," "try hard and succeed." Then wham, you're 40-50 and your life is still shit and you wagecucked for Chad and Stacy for 20+ years. This is why suicides become high for the 40s-50s age group, because they realize life is ogre.

Suicide is simply dropping out of the system. My parents and society gave me a shit life. I simply don't want to live it. Society has propaganda tools like religion and optimism to keep you going and wagecucking till you're old. If all those wagecucks you see in retail stores and Amazon warehouses just decide to end their shit lives, it would be sorta of a rebellion. No more goods/services for Chad and Stacy. Society would have to restructure instead of just using propaganda to keep you going.

Modafincel, incels.is 15 Comments [3/11/2019 11:21:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142754

IncelTears is a hate group. Worse than the KKK.

Incel tears is a hate group designed to bully and harass depressed and suicidal people. On Reddit they make fun and tease incels, but they actually think they're making the world a better place because of it. If you consider all the incels who have killed themselves I think it would be fair to say inceltears are partly responsible.

I ask you all, what's more pathetic? A virgin male looking for a community who he can relate with and they can actually respect him for who he is. Or a hate group that bullies virgins online every single day whilst Tyrone is banging their wives.

narcissist, incels.is 11 Comments [3/11/2019 11:21:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142751

It's your opinion my opinion is clear for me science is a religion, you need faith to be part of it in the most of theirs 'theories'. Science=Religion. ???

La Verdad nos hará Libres, Twitter 13 Comments [3/11/2019 6:05:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 142748

The threatened Alpha

Why on Earth is the God-Emperor attacking Ann Coulter?

I think the president's response is better understood via the socio-sexual hierarchy than through politics. Trump knows better than anyone else that he's failing to deliver. He can sense his support crumbling; alphas are very sensitive to these things. And alphas highly value female opinion, as it is female approval of them that most clearly highlights their distinction from men lower in the hierarchy.

So, Coulter's brutal appraisal of the president's near-complete failure on the most important issue of his campaign stings him to his core. Coulter, by the way, almost certainly knows this and she is not attempting to tear the president down, but rather to motivate him to stop listening to the cucks and foreigners and bad economists around him and start living up to his promises.

The challenges are manifold, even though Trump is genuinely doing more to address the problem than any president since Eisenhower and he is meeting staunch and formidable opposition. But he is betrayed by his own preference for negotiated settlements and expectations of rational behavior on the part of his opponents, and by his own civic nationalism. Unless he is willing to declare no-quarter, go scorched earth on the issue, and actually behave as if he is facing a genuine national emergency of existential proportions - which he legitimately is, whether he is able to grasp that or not - he is going to fail on all three of the primary issues upon which he was elected.

That doesn't mean he has been a failure. Far from it! He has been an excellent president and he will be justifiably re-elected in 2020. The problem is that after more than 50 years of relentless foreign invasion, the situation is so dire that mere excellence will not suffice.

Vox Day, Vox Day 13 Comments [3/11/2019 6:04:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 | top