1 2 3 4 5 8 | bottom
Quote# 126364

I just assume all frat bros are guilty of sexual assault. That's just the kind of people that typically join organizations like that.

Prinny Squad, Daily Kos 8 Comments [4/16/2017 4:53:15 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126343

Well, I have personally been in situations where I did not know that the male had sexual interest in me and I thought he was only interested in being friends, then they attempted to make a sexual advance that was quickly shut down. I simply expressed clearly that I was not interested in sexual intercourse with that particular individual, this however does not mean that I was not afraid in doing so, because it is a frightening situation saying no to someone who can overpower you physically.

I would surmise that a large number of females are not as brave. Just because I was afraid to say no, if the sex did happen, it was not "rape", it was just unwanted sex, which is not the same. "Rape" is a criminal act that has an intention.

I have learned, from experience that explicitly detesting sexual advances is the only consistent means of letting a male know that you are not having sex, even one action implying consent is enough for the majority of males to keep going.

It is far more optimal, to teach both genders about consent to avoid women cry wolfing "rape" because they had unwanted sex and to stop women from having the unwanted sex, additionally it is optimal for people not to put themselves in any dangerous situation.

Electra Cute, Reddit 7 Comments [4/15/2017 11:25:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126342

He's not wrong. Feminism seems obsessed with promoting degeneracy above all. Encouraging women to have loads of promiscuous sex, kill their own babies, cheat on their husbands. Want to get an education in science or engineering or medicine? Want to become a good mother and raise good children? Nah, fuck that. The best thing you can do is be a whore and do drugs and swallow cum at college.

Leaderofgamergate, Reddit 10 Comments [4/15/2017 11:24:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 126341

You may, but men tend to think differently than women so it's less likely.
The behaviors I described are mostly the result of women feeling as if their partner-objects are not providing the utility which they expected (or were promised), and as women's love for men is usually based on some assessment of men's utility to them, when it is lower the men tend to get treated like any other object which isn't providing the expected utility, poorly.
Men more frequently love women for who they are, or at the very least, for a different set of utility. So there is a much lower likelihood that you will have the same problem.

Seemedgood, Reddit 4 Comments [4/15/2017 11:24:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 126339

This is a moralizing. The people who do best with women are attractive, there are plenty of people who do well with women that view them as opponents, enemies and inferiors, I would even surmise that most men do view women as inferior.

Electra Cute, Reddit 3 Comments [4/15/2017 11:24:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 126336

A fun game is to ask your smartest male friend how long a woman keeps a tampon in for and when they answer you'll realize men are children.

alison becker, Twitter 20 Comments [4/15/2017 11:23:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126331

[Note: I initially assumed this to be satire, until I saw a follow up piece from the Huffington Post which indicated that this was quite serious.]

Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa's biggest cities.

If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.

At the same time, a denial of the franchise to white men, could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners. After all, white men have used the imposition of Western legal systems around the world to reinforce modern capitalism. A period of twenty years without white men in the world's parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world's wealth far more equitably shared. The violence of white male wealth and income inequality will be a thing of the past.

This redistribution of the world's wealth is long overdue, and it is not just South Africa where white males own a disproportionate amount of wealth. While in South Africa 90 percent of the country's land is in the hands of whites (it is safe to assume these are mainly men), along with 97 percent of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, this is also the norm in the rest of the world. Namibia has similar statistics with regard to land distribution and one can assume this holds for other assets too. As Oxfam notes eight men control as much as wealth as the poorest 50 percent of the world's population. In the United States ten percent of the population (nearly all white) own 90 percent of all assets – it is likely that these assets are largely in the hands of males. Although statistics by race are difficult to find from other parts of the world, it is very likely that the majority of the world's assets are in the hands of white males, despite them making up less than 10 percent of the world's population.

It is obvious that this violent status quo will not change without a struggle, and the only way to do so will be through the expropriation of these various assets and equitably distribute them to those who need them. This will not only make the world a more equitable place, but will also go some way to paying the debt that white males owe the world. Over the past 500 years colonialism, slavery, and various aggressive wars and genocides, have been due to the actions of white men. Redistributing some of their assets will go some way to paying the historical debt that they owe society.

It is no surprise that liberalism – and its ideological offshoots of conservatism and libertarianism – are the most popular ideologies among white males. These ideologies with their focus on individuals and individual responsibility, rather than group affiliation, allow white men to ignore the debt that they owe society, and from acknowledging that most of their assets, wealth, and privilege are the result of theft and violence.

Some may argue that this is unfair. Let's be clear, it may be unfair, but a moratorium on the franchise for white males for a period of between 20 and 30 years is a small price to pay for the pain inflicted by white males on others, particularly those with black, female-identifying bodies. In addition, white men should not be stripped of their other rights, and this withholding of the franchise should only be a temporary measure, as the world rights the wrongs of the past.

A withholding of the franchise from white males, along with the passing of legislation in this period to redistribute some of their assets, will also, to a degree, act as the reparations for slavery, colonialism, and apartheid, which the world is crying out for to be paid.

As we saw after the recent altercation between a white man and Lebohang Mabuya at a Spur restaurant in Johannesburg, white males still believe that they are in control, and people who aren't white or male (in particularly black female-identifying people) have to bow to their every whim. There are numerous other examples of white angry male violence in South Africa and abroad, often against black bodies (Dylann Roof's terrorist actions in the United States is only one of many examples). It is time to wrestle control of the world back from white males, and the first step will be a temporary restriction of the franchise to them.

Although this may seem unfair and unjust, allowing white males to continue to call the shots politically and economically, following their actions over the past 500 years, is the greater injustice.

Shelley Garland, Huffington Post 11 Comments [4/15/2017 11:15:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 126299

Everything About Hannah Montana is Wrong

Patriotic America regrets Hannah Montana. Hannah Montana represents everything wrong with American girls and women—spoiled, sassy, and bratty—everything that brings shame upon a child's parents. There is no honor in leading young girls to be sassy whores—like Hannah Montana does—mentoring them to become total fools, selfish-minded, immodest, and destined for divorce and failure in life. It's sickening and tragic to helplessly witness Taylor Swift and Katy Perry indoctrinate and train teen girls by example worldwide to be nude, lewd, and crude. These freaks and God-haters are our children's heroes, promoted on sesame street and everywhere.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 7 Comments [4/15/2017 11:05:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 126294

Happy international cunt’s day

In honor of international cunt’s day this week, I have decided I am going to write another honoring hero’s post. This week, our hero, who is one of the greatest hero’s to ever live IMHO, is George Sodini.

For those who do not recall, George Sodini was a 48 year old incel, who tried everything to find a woman, and got rejected each and every time. He even tried PUA and went to bootcamps, blowing his money to get his head filled with BS advice, which did not work. One day, George got tired of all the rejection and instead of suffering his fate of spending the rest of his life alone, he decided to go and do something about it. George Sodini got revenge by going on a rampage at a gym, shooting up a woman’s fitness class. The only mistake Sodini made, was not racking up a large enough body count. George was a fairly well to do man, having over $250,000 in cash stashed as well as outright owning his own home. Sodini should have used this money to buy some bigger guns, and perhaps, learned to make some bombs to really up the body count. Of course, in the aftermath, once the whining and crying settled, the media started slandering him and twisting his situation by saying he was only after 20 year old women and if he went after women his own age, he would have found somebody. Oh boy, doesn’t this sound familiar. I suggest you go back and read my post so titled. Anything to take all the blame off the poor wimminz. Any and all responsibility is kryptonite to today’s cunt, almost as much as the incel man is. George Sodini would have gotten rejected if he approached 20 year olds, 30 year olds, 40 year olds, 50 year olds. Maybe if he tried approaching 60 year old women, one would have given him a chance, but even that is doubtful. Bottom line is George Sodini had NO chance with ANY women, since he was introverted, quirky, and was not a badboy or thug. As if all this were not bad enough, to add injury to insult, he had to deal with the mockery from men as well as women of being a 48 year old, never married incel. I know from experience that in the part of the country George Sodini lived in, this alone would exclude you from just about all social gatherings, unless of course, you lie, but sooner or later the truth would come out. Why couldn’t just one girl have given him a chance? Oh, because that would be Ewwww, disgusting, now wouldn’t it cunts? Well, when they were cleaning the contents of your head off the floor, I am sure that some poor aftermath cleaning crew was saying the same thing about you. Well, cunts, enjoy your international women’s day. BTW your so called “strike” made absolutely no difference to the economy. You cunts are only good for one thing, and you know it o!o.

rantsofanincel, Rants Of An Incel 15 Comments [4/13/2017 9:54:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126287

In prehistoric times, life was very tenous... An alpha male was not guaranteed to be alpha forever, he would get sick or injured eventually and I think women evolved to branch swing to the strongest male when an alpha showed signs of weakness. The women who stayed with a broken, diseased alpha male were at a disadvantage over the women who cut their losses and moved onto the next guy. Loyalty during the hard times was likely selected against.

Men are romantics pretending to be realists, women are realists pretending to be romantics.

Five_Decades, r/MGTOW 6 Comments [4/13/2017 1:54:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126282

Nope, totally helpless is good. Men say “I love you”, women say “I need you”.

“Take some deep breaths and walk around for a while, then please try to explain why you are so upset by women using tools around the home.”

You want my personal motivation? Buckle up. I live in a society where women are so safe and provided for, they have zero need for unsexy men like me. Guess what? If Barbie doesn’t need me then she doesn’t want me. She marries Welfare and rides the carousel until the Wall hits and leaves her a burned-out waste of a human soul, while I starve for sex and get treated by society like a drone.

I lose. She loses. My country burns.

Does it bother you that I want to spook women into good behavior? To push their faces in the facts of how much that fish needs a bicycle? To sabotage their ability to survive without a man around? I want to do it because it works. The Democrats have been scaring women into obedience for decades with great success. Even Christ did no less when He repeatedly warned us of Hell. Women are creatures of fear. Fear motivates women in healthy directions. Taking away her fear is like taking away a man’s courage. The result is loathsome, unmotivated androgyny.

I live in Androgyny, USA. The men are allowed little chance to strive & succeed, or even trade friendly punches, eventually slouching into parodies of masculinity such as lumbersexuals. The women fear nothing and therefore stop exerting themselves, inflating like pool toys, their minds devolving to a level of stimulus-response that would shame a worm. How did we get here? Safety first! Barbie must always be safe!

Either we frighten women into marrying early and young, ripping away every “I don’t need no man” crutch possible, and in the process giving men the chance to be heroes, or the West will continue its decline into a matriarchal slum of men checked out on video games and women checked out on social media. Neither wanting to live in this Brave New World of safe spaces.

That’s why I don’t want Barbie to feel safe, to be competent in my absence. She is a woman and therefore, the price of respecting a Beta like me is living in a constant state of mild fear to which I am the answer. So be it. I will be her hero and she will be my cheerleader with benefits. I can rent domestic servants. I can’t rent admiration and respect.

That is Christ’s own attitude, right there. He doesn’t want us because we’re useful. He wants us because we’re grateful.

Thank you, that needed saying.

Gunner Q, Dalrock 13 Comments [4/13/2017 1:53:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126279

From comics, movies, anime, gaming, and now the more recent kids shows, feminists will use any kind of tactic to promote their evil. Stories like Rapunzel or The Sleeping Beauty have been a part of our childhood, teaching us about gender roles and the importance of them. Now they have been changed in various ways to suit modern women, giving them unrealistic expectations of what they can be. Here are nine characters that show how they have infiltrated entertainment.

Steven Universe

The show deals with an entire species that is genderless but has feminine traits (female human forms), Steven is a male protagonist that is not masculine in a lot of ways. Rather than being the strong fighter type, he acts through femininity despite being male. He cries for help from women rather than helping himself. The show contains trans, queer and homosexual characters which is typical for a show like this. They have women of different sizes and has quite a dark story line for a show aimed for children. Cartoon Network is now giving a way for brainwashing, glorifying obese women and unhealthy diets.

They even place the emphasis on disguised leftist concepts like:

Tolerance – Praising of everything non-white, non-male and non-heterosexual
Minority – non-whites, non-male and degenerates
Inclusiveness – Accepting everything non-white and degenerate
Emancipation – Disregarding rules made by conservative males

But despite all these teachings, SJWs bullied a Steven Universe artist to attempt suicide because she drew Rose (an obese female character) too thin. Hypocritical? Yes. It certainly has one of the most cancerous fanbases, consisting of bronies and white knights.

Wonder Woman

Not even girls want to be girls so long as our feminine archetype lacks force, strength, and power. Not wanting to be girls, they don’t want to be tender, submissive, peace-loving as good women are. Women’s strong qualities have become despised because of their weakness. The obvious remedy is to create a feminine character with all the strength of Superman plus all the allure of a good and beautiful woman.”

– William Moulton Marston, in a 1943 issue of The American Scholar.

Comics publisher Max Gaines asked him to create a new superhero for their comics, to fill the void he felt existed with something new. The creator knew that he wanted his hero to embrace love over violence, and to value peace over war. He assumed that women value love and peace. He valued independent, educated, and unconventional women.

Wonder Woman remains a feminist icon 75 years after her creation, because she symbolizes the idea of female domination. According to NY Post, Wonder Woman was not ‘feminist’ enough for Social Justice Warriors, because SJWs and feminists are never happy with anything in society until white men are silenced. Most wonder woman comics were terrible, but the media keeps pushing it on readers that they HAVE to give in.

BatGirl

Buffy the Vampire Slayer creator Joss Whedon is allegedly a woke male feminist ally. He’s a mangina allegedly known for directing “strong female characters”. His characters are unrealistic as women simply can never be tough. He cares about fake women’s issues like the pay gap and the alleged success of lady Ghostbusters. Joss is directing Batgirl, the story about a super heroine who is basically Batman but a woman. Currently he’s facing back-lash on Twitter, but in smaller amounts due to more and more people accepting these kind of reboots.

Overwatch

This game is tainted by women who blame their problems on men. Basically, every character in Overwatch has different victory pose animations that a player can unlock and choose from. And for the time-traveling character Tracer (one of the female characters in the game), her victory pose gives players a wonderful view of her buttocks, clad in skin-tight leggings. Obviously, if men are enjoying something there must be feminist intervention, so Blizzard changed her appearance and stated:

We’ll replace the pose. We want *everyone* to feel strong and heroic in our community. The last thing we want to do is make someone feel uncomfortable, under-appreciated or misrepresented. Apologies and we’ll continue to try to do better.

Women expose themselves to men in conventions, and when they are assaulted they complain that “men should respect women,” even when their own clothes were designed to attract men. But when a character in a video game wears skimpy clothing, there is an outright backlash against it. Overwatch is even taking strides to be LGBT inclusive. This marks the end of straight white man in entertainment.

Wandering Son

Wandering Son follows two fifth graders who do not identify with the genders they were assigned at birth. Shuichi Nitori identifies as a girl, and Yoshino Takatsuki identifies as a boy. This series marks the end of an era, modern anime has come to suit feminist tastes. The rest is pretty self explanatory.

Splash

The 80s film, starring Tom Hanks and Daryl Hannah, is set for a reboot with Channing Tatum starring as the “merman”. The original Splash was about a man, Allen Bauer (Hanks), who falls in love with the mermaid (Daryl Hannah) who rescued him when he was a boy. Their relationship is hampered somewhat by the fact that the mermaid (who later names herself Madison) has to return to the sea after just a few short days, and also by the deranged scientist determined to prove that merpeople are real by throwing water at her.

Since the announcement, many feminists have been celebrating the gender swap on social media – particularly Tatum’s casting as a merman as some kind of feminist victory… but why? Because of the casting of a white, straight male in a role that was originally held by a woman. Hollywood’s content has become more man-hating than ever before. Seeing men in feminine roles is a way of brainwashing men to be submissive and less masculine.

Gender swapping is fast becoming a fail-safe way for Hollywood to shut up anyone who kicks off about equality without actually having to write anything new: Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, Sleeping Beauty, 101 Dalmatians, Ghostbusters. All these films have either been made or are in the works and all of them have some kind of “feminist twist”. I’ve seen these gender bends in anime too, although no one seems to notice because anime gender bending is normalized.

Undertale

Your character is non-ambiguous (genderless) and non-white, which one could assume it is Asian or Mexican. They never refer to you as “him” or “her”. Despite having a small amount of characters, it managed to include homosexual relationships and a transgender robot. There are more homosexual couples than their opposite counterparts, and both the prominent female characters break out of gender roles. Undyne being the best fighter in the underground, another unrealistic feminist expectation that women can be better than men.

Do you see where “progressiveness” in gaming is really heading? Because the game pushes “progressive propaganda”. One of the major themes of the game that people have been gloating about is the notion that gay relationships are wonderful and perfect, straight relationships are doomed, diversity is strength, promoting inter-species romantic relationships, and it’s primarily because of this thematic content that the game gets praised. That is why Tumblr is spamming the votes, and the media is circle-jerking over the game. Nearing the end of the game I dawned upon the similarities of this game and Steven Universe. There’s nothing particularly special about the game except for discreetly lecturing you about homosexuality and political correctness.

Sailor Moon

It redefined the “magical girl” genre in its native Japan and its overseas influence has shown up in girl-power shows like The Powerpuff Girls and is the definition of a feminist anime. Haruka and Michiru, the series’ Sailor Uranus and Neptune, were a lesbian couple who helped girls around the world come to terms with their sexuality (lesbian propaganda). The series also makes a point of looking down on femininity, by showing how the less feminine girls have trouble coping with gender roles, like how Makoto learned to cook because she was teased for being a tomboy.
Though, I somewhat find it astonishing that the creator of the site anime feminist doesn’t care about “fanservice”, which is short softcore porn scenes, it occured to me because they know about the female supremacy in anime.

Life Is Strange

The creators of the game met with resistance to make the protagonist female. It’s a story about a girl named Max who learns that she can time travel. Life is Strange are some of the few games that are telling women’s untold stories in ways that make it seem as if women have it harder.

It’s simply a game made to exaggerate and show how cruel men can be to women (almost every man in the game is either a loser or a woman beating trash). It attempts to lecture you and say things like “these men need to be in check” whenever it finds the chance to. This game was published by SQUARE ENIX who also published Tomb Raider. Why is it that those people who push equality so much then decide to make a game where it’s about the girl, never around the male?

Conclusion

Modern entertainment is becoming more about social justice than hardware, software, story, gameplay, or animation, while we get to endure feminists complain about everything they don’t like, ruining entertainments we were once able to enjoy.

Ryan Ashville, Return of Kings 25 Comments [4/13/2017 1:49:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 126271

We've got a bunch of evil women running around America boasting about their “rights,” murdering their own precious children as such, failing to realize that the are fulfilling a Communist population control agenda. The same women dress indecently, criticize Biblical preachers and are worldly. God is an Authoritative God. The Bible is an Authoritative Book. A genuine man of God; therefore, preaches with Authority from the Scriptures. The Bible is clear on the issue of modesty. It is a shame how American women dress in public, shaming our nation. Proverb 31:10, “Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.”

Women file for divorce twice the rate of men in the U.S., because of the evil feminist agenda at work in America. I agree with Alex Jones, who said:

“Our women are incredibly entitled, worldly and angry about everything.”

—Radio host Alex Jones, The Alex Jones Show, December 29, 2009

Lewd women like Taylor Swift are dime-a-dozen; but a Godly woman who fears the Lord and dares not cause men to lust (Matthew 5:28), is a rare person these days. I don't expect most people to care, considering that 50,000,000 American women have killed their own babies; but I know some decent ladies do. Not one man has ever had an abortion! Feminism is the rot of America. Women today have become imprudent, arrogant, worldly and angry at everything. They are lewd, rude and crude!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 10 Comments [4/13/2017 1:48:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126263

I hate watching porn

But I have to. It's so degenerate. So disgusting. I am being forced into cuckoldry by watching other men have sex with women. My mind is being warped by the sickening things that they do. By the disingenuous sounds that they make. I have to poison my mind just so I can concentrate on something other than women and focus on what I need to do. It's so tragic, that I should have to destroy my innocence and humiliate myself simply because society rejects me.

Brazierlord, /r/incels 27 Comments [4/12/2017 1:18:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126262

The Ballad Of Stacy and Chad

Stacy and Chad
Chad and Stace
Stacy's a "sexually free" woman
So she gets turned on by Chad spitting in her face

She rims his ass while stroking his cock
Chad loves domination and he's hard as a rock
Stacy embraces her "independence" and likes being a "sub"
She learned this lifestyle from reading "Fifty Shades of Grey" while giving her pussy a rub

Vanilla sex is for losers and ugly girls anyways
BDSM games are the only ones that Chad plays
She gets excited, Chad is going to cum
She screams "Master, please don't use lube shove it raw in my bum!"

wokecel, /r/incels 23 Comments [4/12/2017 1:18:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126261

My Explanation for How the "Normie Platitudes" Originated...

1. Standpoint Theory.
This is an idea used by Marxists and Feminists. The rundown is that incels and noncels have different lives and thus develop different experiences and attitudes about the world. Further, a noncel will have difficulty identifying with an incel's plight. Think of it this way: You know that severely impoverished people exist, but can you fathom what it would be like to live like them? You probably take clean water and shelter for granted because of your economic position. In the same way, sex and relationships for noncels are easy or at least possible, thus they assume that their experience must be true for all people. This is why you hear "take a shower and socialize" as if that will fix everything. For them, it DID work, but not due to it's own devices: They were simply more attractive than you are. The first person who said "Be yourself" was likely a Chad, because that's truly all he would need to do, and he probably didn't understand that non-chads do not share his genetic privilege, or he was willfully ignorant, which leads to my next point:

1. Denial of the Nature of Sexual Selection.
Sexual Selection is one of the fundamental pillars of our understanding of how sexually reproducing creatures evolve. However it comes with a very uncomfortable implication: If mating is nonrandom and based on genetic inheritance, than there must be some members of the species that have the qualities being selected for and others who do not, through NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN. This flies in the face of "there's someone for everyone" because it implies that there must be some members who are the objective losers of the mating game. It also implies that if someone has a spouse, that person is attracted to them for reasons which they have no control (looks) rather than for their honest achievements which they have worked for. We want to believe that women love us "for who we are" and that we ALL have a chance at pair-bonding, despite all evidence of the contrary. This is why you're often told that it's "your fault" you can't get laid for whatever reason.

1. Denial of the Nature of Sexuality Itself.
Sexuality is much like which foods we like or what colors we like in that it is malleable, but ultimately INVOLUNTARY. We don't choose which aspects of a person we are attracted to, what things are turnoffs, etc. Why would anyone purposefully choose to be a pedophile, for example? This truth has another bad implication: If we wind up having an attraction which we do NOT like, there's nothing we can do to change it. This is important because it explains why women are called "shallow" for being attracted solely to looks. We don't like the idea that our love is based on eugenics-esque factors which we have no control over, and would prefer if people loved based on "personality." Thus, if someone demonstrates attraction based on "bad" factors, we say it must be their fault somehow, as if they chose to be attracted to bad boys or skinny women, because to do otherwise would open the door to criticizing sexuality itself. This is where "Personality is what really matters" and "you're chasing the wrong women" comes from: It's a criticism based on the wishful-thinking of how sexuality works rather than the reality.

(Submitter's note: Yes, the sections are really all numbered 1.)

FloridaTulpamancer, /r/incels 7 Comments [4/12/2017 1:18:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126260

A good female psychologist should let an incel fuck her

While discussing his psychological problems of course.

thegambler953, /r/incels 18 Comments [4/12/2017 1:18:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126252

(I couldn't find a link to the original post, but I couldn't resist posting this to SSDT)


I think there is a very simple solution to the ‘problem’ of the team sport of gang-raping that is so popular as a form of gay male bonding between football players. Mandatory castration of all men who play football and all men who watch football. This would be a quick and easy solution. The violent, woman-hating ‘sport’ will disappear overnight and women will be a little bit safer in this fucked up and dangerous world, full of fucked up and seriously dangerous men.

Allecto, Wordpress 10 Comments [4/11/2017 10:29:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126250

(A radfem's critique of the TV series "Firefly")

Zoe...is meant to be our empowered, ass-kicking sidechick. Like all sidechicks she is objectified from the get go. Her husband, Wash, talking about how he likes to watch her bathe. Let me just say now that I have never personally known of a healthy relationship between a white man and a woman of colour...So you will forgive me for believing that the character, Wash, is a rapist and an abuser, particularly considering that he treats Zoe like an object and possession...Joss Whedon does not share my view, of course, and he paints the relationship between Zoe and Wash as a perfectly happy, healthy union.

Allecto, Livejournal 7 Comments [4/11/2017 10:28:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126249

hmm , not really. i'd say white women are tougher and more tenacious than asian women, but they're not as good and creative as they think they are. Their visual-spatial abilities are weaker than men by a standard deviation, hence the lack of prominent engineers, architects and master painters. The female IQ bell curve is less spread out, meaning for every 5 or so guys with an IQ above 130 there is one woman, and this discrepancy becomes larger the further you go down the bell curve.

Do you think the lack of female intellectuals and patent holders in western society is due to discrimination like the feminists say, or do genetics and evolutionary forces play roles too?

Porntormo, Reddit 2 Comments [4/11/2017 10:28:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126243

Even in my dreams I am incel

I cannot get laid or any action from females even in my dreams. I watched a chad get a blowjob from a cute girl in a classroom, in my fucking dreams. Can you believe that shit. I am utterly defeated.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 11 Comments [4/11/2017 10:26:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126237

Feminism has destroyed more families than Adolf Hitler ever did.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 8 Comments [4/11/2017 10:26:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 126218

Women didn't want you because you respect them and you didn't want to rape because you know nothing about women. If you knew anything about women you'd know that you caused them more suffering by just existing like that and not raping them.

Caamib, FSTDT 25 Comments [4/11/2017 9:12:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 126215

From the discussion of both my post on manface and girlpower characters it is clear that even in the men’s sphere there is much love for “strong women”. In my most recent post the discussion eventually turned to the question of teaching women to defend themselves (martial arts, weight lifting, concealed carry, etc).

Before I go any further, I’ll state that:

My own thinking on this topic has changed over time, as I started with something closer to the mainstream conservative view.
I’m inclined to generally respect other men’s choices regarding their own families.

Temptations of the kickass gal.

With bullet point number two above in mind, I think we need to be aware of the temptations involved. The kickass gal is a well established conservative feminist trope, and we should be aware of this when considering how we direct the training of our wives and daughters. Feminists know why they want our daughters to move out on their own in the big city and experience the carousel. Conservatives on the other hand pride themselves in knowing how to make this feminist goal “safe” for our daughters to achieve.

The kickass conservative gal trope is easiest to spot when it comes to guns. Conservative shooters love the idea of guns as a realization of the feminist dream. If you aren’t familiar with the subculture, go to any online forum on guns and you will find a group of men eager to explain how tough their pistol packing wives/daughters are. One of the local DFW gun ranges understands this culture well, and features pictures of a kickass gal with a pink gun on their website. This is not, I should add, a range dedicated to women shooters. I’ve been to their store, and their target customers are the same group of men every other range/store in the area caters to. The same is true of another gun shop just a few miles away, B&S Guns. They have a billboard* by the freeway with a picture of a woman shooting a rifle that says something to the effect of “Don’t worry, we won’t tell your husband.”

If you decide you want to teach your wife/daughters to shoot, keep in mind that the entire culture you are bringing them into is designed to tempt them into a feminist rebellious frame of mind. This doesn’t mean you shouldn’t do it, but you shouldn’t kid yourself about the temptations you are throwing their way.

There is also the reality of the difference between men’s and women’s interests when it comes to masculine pursuits. All of the men I know who shoot enjoy going to the range to practice, and even enjoy breaking their guns down to clean and maintain them. I have yet to observe a wife or daughter who takes this level of interest in shooting. They may embrace the “empowerment” of it, or simply enjoy infrequently going to the range for a bit of shooting, but I’ve yet to come across a woman who really “got into it” the way men do. This, plus the realities of men’s and women’s different instinctive response to violence means that training and arming women is going to be much less effective than gun owning feminists desperately want to believe.

Again, I’m not saying you are wrong if you decide to teach your wife or daughters how to shoot. My wife enjoys coming to the range with me from time to time, and I plan on teaching our daughter to shoot. However, we need to be realistic about the risks and benefits involved with this.

We’re so manly, even our women are like men!

There is another temptation involved with this, and this temptation is for the men involved. Part of the appeal of the kickass conservative gal is the idea that the man who masculinizes his women is proving how much more manly he is than other men. This tends to start with selecting a specific masculine pursuit and declaring it to be the very definition of manliness. In a general sense this could include marriage and fatherhood or even the ability to attract women, but for this specific example it is something like shooting, hunting, rebuilding an engine, weight lifting, or martial arts. These are all positive pursuits for a man (in the right context), but none of them are essential for being a “real man”.

The base temptation for men is to declare that one of these manly pursuits is the real test of a man, and any man who doesn’t do them isn’t a real man. The tie in temptation is then to add another layer cementing the man’s status as the only real man in the room, by declaring that any man who doesn’t think highly of masculinizing women in this specific way is merely too much of a girly man to appreciate strong women. This is a standard feminist slogan, but it comes from a conservative I’m more manly than you are position.

*I’ll try to make it over to that section of town so I can snap a picture of the billboard.

Dalrock, Dalrock 4 Comments [4/11/2017 9:11:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126214

Your videos are fuqin awesome and inparticular why women destroy nations!
I have been saying this same point for years!
Women are fickle and will gravitate to men who appear strong and have less group loyalty?

Captain Nemo, Youtube 6 Comments [4/11/2017 9:11:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
1 2 3 4 5 8 | top