1 2 | bottom
Quote# 142368

A non-primitive female is said to be non-slutty or innocent.

A commonly fallacy incel forums is that many members say that they could tell if a woman is slutty or innocent by her face or the way she dresses. However this isn't true. Even the most innocent looking females have a slutty past because it's easy for females to be hypergamous and being hypergamous will inevitably prevent them from getting long-term relationships. This will lead to them having a series of short-term relationships and one-night stands, racking up their laycount. So sexual dynamics will inevitably force every female (no matter how "innocent" she looks) to become slutty unless they "settle" very early for a looksmatched partner.

A common idea is that Asian men are with "non-primitive" women. This is far from the truth. The majority of these women probably had a slutty past, and are just settling. And, if any break-up occurs, she will resume her slutiness.

A woman's past slutiness could not be judged by how she currently dresses. Women change their attire depending on whether she is looking for casual sex or a long-term relationship. If a woman decides to "settle" she will inevitably dress less slutty.

Incel Wiki, Incel Wiki 4 Comments [2/10/2019 11:44:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142367

The dogpill is the theory that women like to fuck dogs more than incels. Women's genitals are naturally stimulated by a wider variety of things than men as measured by Meredith Chivers, Ph. D., an assistant professor of psychology at Queens University in Kingston. This included all images of animal coupling they were exposed to: including e.g. Bonobos.[1]

There are more internet forum threads with women describing sexual attraction to their own dogs than there are websites with women describing their attraction towards male virgins.

Incel Wiki, Incel Wiki 7 Comments [2/10/2019 11:44:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142366

Nonredamancy

Nonredamancy is a more formal way of describing the friendzone. It basically refers to the situation wherein one makes efforts to romantically connect with a person and faces only rejection, nonreciprocity and unrequitedness. In a nutshell, nonredamancy consitutes typically failing at one's courtship attempts.

Causes

The most common cause of nonredamancy is the failo effect. The common side-effects of nonredamancy are sexlessness, perpetual singehood, isolation and becoming GDE (a genetic dead end).

Although rejection is normal and even something which normies should anticipate, the rate at which people face nonredamancy varies widely. Whereas it is possible that top decilers such as Francisco Lachowski don't even know what nonredamancy feels like, bottom decilers such as Joseph Merrick (elephant man) will probably face a stupendous amount of nonredamancy.

Since cold approaches and warm approaches are primarily a male domain, women are often similar to Lachowski in that they typically are unaware of what nonredamancy feels like. This obliviousness is one of the reasons those in the incelosphere tend to be perplexed whenever they see a female journalist writing about male sexuality. In the cybercel's mind, this makes zero sense since a female cannot possible have any inkling of what the male experience is like. One demographic that is well-acquainted with nonredamancy is those on the inceldom spectrum. What separates normies from those on the inceldom spectrum is that whereas normies may experience nonredamancy at an intermittent rate, for the latter, nonredamancy is perpetual; hence the neologism perpetual nonredamancy.

Synonyms

There are many rhematic synonyms and near-synonyms of the term nonredamancy. The following are examples that are based on a heterosexual model out of pragmatic purposes:

*cockblock (female to male)
*friendzone (gender-neutral)
*incelize (gender-neutral)
*left-swipe (gender-neutral; dating apps)
*cold-shoulder (gender neutral)
*ghost (gender neutral)
*unrequit (gender-neutral)
*unreciprocate (gender-neutral)
*clam-jam (male to female)
*twat-swat (male to female)

Incel Wiki, Incel Wiki 7 Comments [2/10/2019 11:35:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142346

Isn’t it funny how we hear all these roasties talk about their “chubby short boyfriends with a beard” to try to disprove us, and yet we never see these short, bearded chubby dudes with girlfriends or wives?

And that the only time you do see these men with girls, they’re older and married? And probably betabux?

Really makes you think.

Former-Incel-User, r/Braincels 11 Comments [2/9/2019 11:32:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142338

(Paragraph breaks added for ease of reading)

You people are insane ! literally insane. You spend the last thousand years aping the Romans, as you believed them to be, morphing your men into rage filled emotional cripples, then you bitch and moan.

Yes men have emotions other than rage but, a 1000+ years of conditioning prevents the majority of publicly expressing them.

After so many generations i would not be surprised if it is part of the male genetic code by now.

Women clearly do not choose the soft emotional type to reproduce with, so.. men fake it till they make it.

You chose that type of man for your society. Tf are you bitching?

Feminism.

if not for the moral busybodies that stick their noses in to my entertainment, i would not give a fuck about feminism and feminists.

I begun studying them out of intellectual curiosity, nothing more. After 30+years i probably know shit about feminism its origins and its masks that most feminist have forgotten, or were never told.

That and a genuine out rage at the unacceptable violation of the" All equal under the law" principle makes me one of their deadliest opponents.

Again idid not go out seeking battle i have better things to do than wasting time trying to convince a bunch of intellectual blind people of the obvious they refuse to see.

You cannot reason with religious zealots, it can not be done. Tried and failed ,several times, since that moron Akenaten tried to convert the priesthood of Egypt to montheists.

Religious zealots bow only to superior force. You think the Roman emperors enjoyed sending troops to settle religious rebellions?

They knew there was no other way.

Anyone convinced they are morally right 10% and there can be no opposing view can not be reasoned with. They will make life not worth living for the whole of their society eventually to match the mental picture they have that is ever shifting.

Wake the fuck up and smell the bullshit.

The grievance industry is undermining even the hard sciences now. the law has become a toy in their insane whims.

There never was another way. history proves the right and sanity of what i propose. You want your children to be born slaves to some insane cretins that keep changing their minds every time they move their heads?

Men's rights are human rights . Yeah right !Human rights that keep getting violated daily yet you still refuse to do what is needed to free yourselves.

You and creationist will be the death of my presence on line.

Soon i wil chose my personal peace of mind ,say screw it ,and .. delete this account.

You don't want to listen and i am getting frustrated of banging my head against a wall. Enjoy you mutilation at the hands of some unwashed fundie from bum fuck nowhere.

It wil happen. See you all after the collapse if you survive , maybe.

nickyiil, YouTube 2 Comments [2/8/2019 5:58:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 142327

By The Goddess, I can't wait for males and their filthy abominable dicks to disappear off of the surface of OUR Home, planet Earth. They will NOT be missed one little ass bit. They can go eat each other's disgust phallus in Hell for Eternity and leave Us to Our Divine Yoni worship. Oh this'll be good.

Ange-des-Tenebres, r/truelesbians 10 Comments [2/8/2019 12:25:54 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: kumala

Quote# 142326

If lesbians truly knew what this whole lesbian erasure truly was about, we would literally all come together, take to the streets and destroy this entire shithole of a hellish male world in a matter of literal seconds and utterly effortlessly. And THAT, is the exact reason why they want to erase Us. We hold such unimaginable power, we can do things that no one can fathom. We are Creators. We are Love. If only Lesbians could wake up to this already, I am so beyond exhausted, but I'll keep trying to help women realize the extent of our divine expression and power as much as I can.

If those who want to erase us had any chance, we lesbians wouldn't even exist today. They have failed and they will keep failing. We have been through so much. We can't even see how insanely strong we are because we are still in this Hell. But if only We knew...And We WILL know one day. We will remember everything. We will retrieve our former glory. We are so infinitely much better than this ugly male world. In fact, even this world itself is waiting for us to awaken and restore it to what it's supposed to be.

They know all of this. They know the extent of our greatness perhaps even better than we know it ourselves. They know that the millisecond we wake up, it will be the absolute, eternal end of their pathetic miserable spiritless selves. And it absolutely terrifies them like NOTHING else in the entire Existence of things. One doesn't simply wage an eternal war against another simply for the heck of it. They hurt our weakest link when we weren't looking, and now here we are. But there is no backing down, for this war against Lesbians/Femalekind is reaching its climax, and there is no way we will not come out victorious and free. We are everything they will never be, they have already lost from the start, for in the Circle of Life, there is no such thing as time nor space.

Males and their servants can very much feel their imminent obliteration coming up, and they really are giving it their all, one cursed last time before we transcend this moronic plane of existence where they have kept us enslaved for aeons and leave them behind in an even shittier Hell. A truly pathetic existence, a truly pathetic battle.

Mind not these disgusting haters. We will triumph for We are Love.

Ange-des-Tenebres, r/truelesbians 8 Comments [2/8/2019 12:25:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: kumala

Quote# 142314

Women ruin every male dominated community and/or group they join [rant]

It's ridiculous. Every male dominated site,group,community,whatever. They always make it about themselves and ruin it in the process. Have you ever seen any female related steam groups or female steam profiles? They always have their face as their profile picture and bunch of photos of themselves in their showcases, probably to attract simps and orbiters to get them to donate games or ingame items. And these sad incels in denial in these communities and sites encourage their behavior by giving them constant attention and sucking up to them,hoping they will fuck them. Which we all know won't happen.

I used to be friends with 3 other guys who i used to play games together with,one day one of them invites this 5 feet obese girl in our group chat and everyones' personality changed, they were constantly putting each other down and trying to impress this 5/10 (3/10 without make up probably) mediocre girl,one of them even would buy her expensive skins thinking she would suck his dick because of it. I dreaded playing with them but i still did because they were my friends.In the end the group broke up because of constant fighting and drama because of that girl ,but of course no one dated her in the end and she found some dude way better looking than her.

Anyway,don't let women infest your communities and friend groups, it will be ruined.

totallynotaNEETcel, r/Braincels 13 Comments [2/7/2019 3:17:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142313

Things Chad and the average female will never experience

* Eww-face
* Flaking
* Rejection of any kind
* Moving away on public transport
* Walking across the street just to avoid you
* Indifference
* Contempt

ObeseSoyChugger, r/Braincels 10 Comments [2/7/2019 3:17:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142296

We didn't start life on intense difficulty, that's a nonsense cope

That would imply we started the game at all. No, we started life on Game Over mode, and pressing Start doesn't return us to the main menu. It's over, boyos. It's been over since before it ever began.

And for the record, foids started on TAS mode: press a button, let the game be completed for you.

bigantennaemay1, r/Braincels 13 Comments [2/6/2019 12:18:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142286

(shockinghillaryquote)
women are supposed to connect sex to emotion, far more than men do, and to that end, sex is less about the 'physical' for women.

so, at least this is what we're told.

funny how that 'connection' seems to only occur with Chad.

(Fernandonut)
Saying that they connect sex to emotion is just one of the tools they use to keep blue pilled cucks in line. If everyone stopped believing that they'd lose a lot of their power.

shockinghillaryquote and Fernandonut, r/Braincels 6 Comments [2/5/2019 2:08:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142285

A US judge has found that two girls, aged 13 and 14, were partly to blame in a sex abuse case involving a 67-year-old man - and reduced his sentence.

County District Judge Michael Gibbens said "the victims in this case, in particular, were more an aggressor than a participant in the criminal conduct".

He reduced the sentence of Raymond Soden, who was convicted last year.

Prosecutors are considering an appeal. A child rights group said the girls were the victims, not the aggressors.

Soden was sentenced to five years and 10 months in prison, less than the minimum of 13 years called for by Kansas sentencing guidelines.

The judge said the girls went to Soden's house voluntarily and had taken money for sexual favours.

"They were certainly selling things monetarily that it's against the law for even an adult to sell."

Michael Gibbens, BBC 6 Comments [2/5/2019 12:58:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas

Quote# 142280

I often hear foolish women, like singer Janet Jackson, sing about what a man can, DO FOR THEM! That is an ungodly selfish attitude. Millions of American women today are either single or divorced, selfishly looking for a man in their life who will spoil them. Their internet profiles are laughable... “I want this! I want that! I want a man that will make me feel like a woman; I want, I want, I want, listing all their MUST HAVES!” That sounds like Lucifer. It would be nice to find a sincere Christian lady, who has a servant's heart, who has a desire to help her man, as a loyal wife. I haven't found one to faithfully stand by my side. Tens of millions of American women today are selfish, only thinking about themselves. 1st Peter 3:1 and 6, “Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives... Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.”

The duty of every woman, with few exceptions, is to become a wife and help her own husband. The institution of marriage in America has been destroyed. The whole idea of a career woman is unbiblical. Singer Dolly Parton chose never to bear any children, to pursue a career instead. I think that is very sad. Kindly, she is a failure in life in God's eyes. God didn't create her to be an entertainer. God's will for a woman is to, “marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully. For some are already turned aside after Satan.” (1st Timothy 5:14b-15). We are living in a selfish generation, where women value careers over motherhood. I want no part that heathendom!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 18 Comments [2/4/2019 3:42:48 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 142276

The Pill gave women reproductive freedom like Pandora's Box gave sickness and death freedom. Discuss.

Heartiste, Gab 11 Comments [2/4/2019 3:36:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 142273

Vox Day has been campaigning against evolution, arguing that like Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming, it is fake science, demon worshiping religion dressed in the sacerdotal lab coats of science.

Vox is a great man, and I am a huge admirer of his. He had the courage, doubtless strengthened by his faith in God, to take on the enemy and show that the enemy can bleed. He should be an inspiration to all of us, and you would be wise to buy SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police (The Laws of Social Justice Book 1) I can report from personal experience that this is how you survive attack by social justice warriors. Long before this book was written, I dealt with weaponized sexual harassment complaints (directed against other men, not against me, even though I am the only male in any workplace I have ever been who actually does sexually harass women) in a fashion similar to that advised by this book, with the result that the complainant “resigned”, and I did not get fired.

But on evolution, Vox Day is full of crap, and it is getting in the way of his understanding of women, with the result that he is purple pilled, and his novels feature kick ass action girl who rescues lad in distress.

Yes, the evolutionism of Gould, Jerry Coyne, and Richard Lewontin is demon worship wearing lab coats as sacerdotal robes. But Darwinism is true. Species originate by natural selection. We became human through a thousand genocides. We are risen killer apes. Jerry Coyne theoretically does not go full Gould, but rejects the obvious implication of Darwinism that subsaharan Africans are substantially less distant from chimps than whites are distant from chimps. He kind of knows its true, but favors silencing anyone who mentions it, having his cake and eating it too.

It is impossible to understand the nature of women except from the point of view that humans and races of humans were formed by natural selection over an immensity of time. Believing in the curse of Eve gets you half way there, but one can theoretically believe in the curse of Eve and still be blue pilled. Natural selection explains the desire of women for invasion, conquest, and rape, while the Curse of Eve merely tells us that husbands should rule wives.

The origin of species by Natural selection, Darwinism, is true science.

“Evolution” is indeed fake science: – the doctrine that humans arose from non human forms without the inconveniently racist and sexist conclusions that flow from the idea that humans arose from lower forms by natural selection.

Hence my koan: A creationist, an evolutionist, and a Darwinist were walking in the woods

You will notice that in this koan the evolutionist is depicted as, like Global Warmers, unscientific, indeed hostile to science, and, like a gnostic, hostile to reality and the world.

Gnosticism is an anti human, and anti this world Christian heresy. Reaction worships Nature’s God, and to understand the will of Gnon, have to see men and women as they truly are, and one can only see them as they truly are if one accepts Darwinism. The red pill on woman only makes sense from the point of view of natural selection – that for women abduction and enslavement is an escape from prisoner’s dilemma, and that their resistance to rape, enslavement, and the authority of their husband is merely a fitness test.

Jim, Jim's Blog 10 Comments [2/4/2019 3:21:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 142261

Re: r/Relationship_Advice: [25m] my girlfriend[24f] told me she had only slept with 3 guys, her best friend [24f] blurted out that they slept with a guy every city in Europe they visited

(SomeTurdInTheWind)
We were talking about some topic and it came to Europe and she told me that they slept with a bunch of super hot guys. It seemed that everyone tuned in then. I laughed it off and didn’t make it into a big deal.


"I laughed it off". Why do guys nowadays solve everything by grinning and smiling and laughing like chimpanzees when a bigger chimpanzee threatens to beat them up?

She had previously told me that she only been with three guys. Long story short she and her friend when they went to Europe would sleep with a hot local guy every city.


This always happens. No exceptions.

When we saw each other she didn’t even want to sleep with me for three months until we were official. And now hearing how she slept with guys hours after meeting them bugs the hell out of me.


Oh, look, the same thing as always.

(bcat124)
From the comments :

I know right now that's not the biggest priority in your brain. You're hung up on images of her fucking her way through Europe. That's just your lizard brain doing lizard brain shit. Set it aside for a moment. Difference in experience? Meh. Banging around in Europe? Meh. That's not the important shit here.


We live in a matriarchy where women have all the sexual capital and take full advantage of it. What a joke

(robfordscrakpipe)
Men, ignore your natural instincts that are hardwired in your brain to help you survive and pass your genes on, that's patriarchy. Ignore your repulsion towards promiscuous, overweight, loud, unattractive women, that's all social construction. Women, if you feel the urge to sleep with that stud at the bar, go for it! Do what feels right! Forget about your boyfriend! Anyone who tells you otherwise is a horrible person who hates women and has a fragile ego and small dick.

(elephant__dick)
If this stuff was meaningless women wouldn't freak out and lie about it. Also if it doesn't matter then why do they always make certain guys wait?

(arissiro)
Exactly - the crux of the issue here is why did her current boyfriend whom she supposedly loves have to wait 3 months, while randos all over Europe had to wait 3 seconds? Why could she make him wait and not them? Why did she feel compelled to make him wait?

(COPE_OR_ROPE)
A roastie inadvertently dropped a brutal blackpill in the comment section:

Also, many guys don't understand that women often wait longer to sleep with someone they really like and want to build something long term with. If the guy is just fun for one day of a trip it doesn't matter to wait. Quick sex doesn't equal a stronger liking of someone for women, though men seem to interpret it that way.


What's the blackpill here ?


She admits that women make betas wait months for sex while Chad get's to ravage her 10 minutes after meeting.

(Thrwwwwaway6)
The blackpill (hidden behind all that delusion) is that girls wait to sleep with guys who make good providers but aren't attractive.

(arissiro)
Yip, a lot of foid delusion there which soymales will fall for. Thing is the "reasoning" itself (if we can even call it that) is incoherent: if this sex thing is important enough for some men to have to wait for - why should it be the men the women "actually want to build something serious with" that wait, instead of random fucking strangers? That's like loaning money to random people immediately without doing credit checks whilst waiting three months on someone with a good credit rating.

You and I know what's going on of course.

(Magehunter_Skassi)
I like that one other roastie in the thread too. Honorary blackpiller. If you're going to be a slut, you may as well own it instead of lying.



I love sex. The idea of finding a different guy in every city I visit in Europe sounds exhausting, but also fun. That said, I’m not too worried about how that “makes me look”.

[...]

Like I get that some people will say shit. But why would you want to start a relationship with someone who judges you for your past anyway?


(PerfectCeI)
So basically the same as... I have a history of multiple arrests for workplace violence and thiefts, many companies wont hire me because of my criminal history but why would you want to start working for a company who judges you for your past anyway teehee

Foids really have the impulse control and accountability of a 4yo child, those Saudis are right in some ways

(mantrad)
Women are nothing, and I mean fucking nothing but cum holes, the more attractive and less used the cum hole the better, that's their only value

(GuacMerchant88)
whatever her claimed total is x by 7 to get an accurate body count. it used to by x 3 before tinder and other quick hook up apps, but modern tech has allowed instant hookups for average looking women to fuck chads at a moments notice. Although roasties are collecting a higher body count and are encouraged to do so by their fellow feminists, very few are willing to be honest with potential beta providers of their true body count. They know that even most betas will not want to finance a roastie who slept with 30+ men (which is more than 75% of women in their 20s today).

I am collecting data on this trend and will post back in a few months with charts/graphs. I will be banned when I report on it but will be good info. r/dataisbeautiful will downvote it to oblivion.

The data is indeed self-reported. The sample size as of right now is only 23 women who agreed to partake. My goal is 2000 women aged 18-40. This is just taken from Tampa. I will be in Boston, NYC, and DC in the next few months and will ask women there as well. The questions are simple:

How many men have you slept with?
Have you lied to your current partner or a potential partner about the amount of men you have slept with?
If so, what number did you tell them? (18/23 admitted lying about their number to current/potential spouse)
Why did you feel the need to lie about your number?

The first 20 responses indicate a 6.7x actual body count to claimed body count.

(arissiro)
Absolutely brutal blackpill mate. Remember this is what life's like for so many men who "aren't incel" - they get laid every now and then, sure - but it's like the homeless guy who sometimes gets to finish off some rich guy's leftover lunch at a restaurant.

(hopfield)
Ahahahhahaa look at this cope:



That's literally the opposite of how it actually is.

Like imagine you're hungry but you're too tired to do much so you just slap some baloney from Wal*Mart on dome bread and eat it. It ends the discomfort from your hunger but it still sucks and is unhealthy for you and not even very enjoyable.

But later on you get yourself together and decide to be healthier and decide it's worth it to do a bit of work to be able to eat actual good food so you learn to cook and start cooking really excellent cuisine for yourself, like 5-star restaurant stuff. It's s not only healthier but a million times more enjoyable than the stupid baloney sandwich which seriously wasn't even good at all, it was just easy.

That's how casual sex is for most women. It's the sucky baloney sandwich they didn't even enjoy, but it was just the easiest thing at the time. They know if they want an actual good meal, they have to put time and effort into it.

When a woman waits a while to have sex with you, she's not "making you wait," and it's certainly not because she thinks you're "beta," it's because she knows the only way the sex will be truly enjoyable and fulfilling for her is if she spends the time getting to know you and making a connection. Then there a chance the sex will actually be like a 5-star meal instead of a baloney sandwich. If she'd had sex with you sooner, it would have sucked for her and not even been enjoyable. She waits because she likes you enough that she'd actually like to have GOOD sex with you and maybe keep having good sex for a long time, instead of having bad sex that would make her want to never see you again.

Women aren't like men. They don't enjoy casual sex like men do. There are even numerous scientific studies showing women are unlikely to orgasm during casual sex and are likely to regret it and not really enjoy it. Putting the time in before having sex literally makes women enjoy the sex itself more, if they don't put the time in and just have sex right away the sex will be garbage like a Wal*Mart baloney sandwich.

They "make you wait" because they actually want the sex to be good and know it won't even be enjoyable for them if they just have sex right away.


"likely to regret it and not really enjoy it."

Then why the fuck do they willingly do it??? Almost as if these cucks are fucking stupid

Girls regret it so much that they go hunting for one-night-stands with Chad week after week after week.

Not even an incel. Just have to post and point out this guys a retard.

The making you wait is about making sure you've invested enough time and money into her so that you can't bail when you find out how much of a cunt she actually is.

This is some 'we wuz kingz' level coping right here. what a soy.

(Big_Iron_PP)
I wrote a poem for the OP:

Fish and dicks down in London

The two met near the Thames

He had a noble accent and

His name, I think, was James


In Paris, the Eiffel Tower

Wasn't what she tried to climb

Tho it was hard like ancient iron

Jaques was a stunning mime


In Amsterdam, where the smell

Of weed hung in the air

The dealer Daan van Dorn and her

Oh, they made a lovely pair


Madrid was hot and sticky

She siesta'd for a while

And after one bull fighting match

She dodged Juan's cum in style


In Venice on a galley

She nigh fell of and drowned

Cause it was all a shaking

When she the oarsman found


Berlin, she really loved to see

What a truly German city

She was a bit surprised when things

With Franz turned to shitty


Budapest of Hungary

She was eager to test

And Jànos did not disappoint:

He was well hung like the rest.


And finally, in Moskva cold

Her journey came to an end

She met you in a bar

And loved you as a friend

various incels, r/Braincels 6 Comments [2/4/2019 4:16:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 142265

[OP of "My reaction when women say they have the right to vote"]



[On the picture: a man with a mask saying "Tell me, why do you deserve that?"]

cubev10, Reddit - r/Braincels 7 Comments [2/4/2019 4:06:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 142263

Womanlet transitions to male and becomes a 4'11 hypermanlet, now is depressed that no woman wants to date her JFL



(Flipcel)
OH NO NO NO NO HAHAHAHAHAHA she literally had everything in the world. Now she's just a fucking manlet not even 1/10 fems will accept. But hey, height don't matter right IT? It's probably because she's a misogynist that's why she's an inkcyl JFL Christ why didn't 'he' just lesbianmax in the first place.

(Ononox)
Lol when women transition to men they probably imagine they will be these bad boy Chads strong, masculine and hot. Turns out they just become ugly bald manlets with weak frames for the most part. It must be brutal though.

(Kalsbsk76)
They experience the blackpill first hand. Fantastic. I bet she transitioned back to female after swallowing the blackpill, easy life again.

(JucheforWhitePeople)
To top things off, they'll also have feminists (including MtF trannies) telling them that they have male privilege.

(justforlulzandkeks)
HAHAHAHAH

i absolutely adore the irony in woke leftists eating and contradicting themselves, it's legit hilarious to watch

(ICQME)
Looks will get you dates and personality will help keep them. Trans-men usually act too passive and submissive when dating or they put on a hyper masc front which just comes off as being an insecure jerk. Trans men lack the masculine energy most women want even if they look decently masculine enough to play the role. IT'S OVER FOR TRANSMASC'CELS

What's funny is the incel site incelistan(lgbt incels) is dominated by FTM trannys.


Not surprised. They don't realize the extent of female privledge until it's too late. Women often believe the life of men is ease and privledge in both dating and professional worlds simply because they're men. Some females do realize their privledge and will never admit it which is why most afab 'trans' will do the non-binary/gender fluid/they-them thing.

(imadethistoshitpostt)
Transmen have to be incel's greatest allies.

I can't even imagine going from occasionally having guys ask you out to invisible man mode, zero interest no matter how hard you try for the rest of your life.

(justforlulzandkeks)
It's no wonder 99% of trannies are male to female, because they realized women live life on tutorial mode.


lmao, 99% of trannies are autistic males that will never pass as a female, so much for their tutorial mode

(EATravelGuy)
The fact is the majority, if I am not mistaken over 80%, of transgenders are male to female. It's a hyperbole but we could say society knows how screwed it is to be a male and consequently fewer are opting to become one.

Also most female to male transitions still look noticeably female (short hair doesn't turn you into a dude) and most women aren't lesbians.

(flamethrowup)
Wow, even a former woman has to admit the blackpill when forced to experience it firsthand. Reminds me of that woman who transitioned to a black man and found himself suddenly being harassed by cops—both this and OP are such obviously bad ideas that there's no rational justification for them. It's almost hilarious they thought doing this would make them happier.

various incels, r/Braincels 1 Comments [2/4/2019 4:06:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 142244

Manlet gets blackpilled while studying anthropology, and exposes the incompetence of counselors and therapists



(bcat124)
If he was truly Blackpilled, he would truly know that therapy/ counseling are bullshit.


Talking to your therapist about your newly found blackpill knowledge, and exposing their complete ignorance of basic evolutionary dynamics in humans is a step towards blackpill enlightenment.

Can you link to the thread ? I want to see the comments which I'm sure will all be soycucks saying height doesn't matter as long as you have le good personality and retarded foids saying they like short guys even though their bf just happens to be 6'5


Comments are saying that biological anthropology is not everything and that "cultural anthropology offers a different perspective" .

Cultural anthropology is to biological anthropology what astrology is to astronomy : a pseudo-scientific offshoot. Among the many absurd and unfounded claims of this garbage "discipline" is that attractiveness is totally subjective and a social construct so OP should just deal with his misogynist beliefs JFL

You can easily find the thread by looking up the relevant subreddit askanthropology, not sure if I have the right to link it.

(AnyGoal)
just luck lmao.

and fucking lol at the foid counsellor. wonder how much that dumb slut gets paid just to sit and chat. fuck our stupid society

(fadatra)
She's lying to hide how shallow evolution has made women.

(Revolutionary_Boston)
of course counselors for some reason just can't seem to be able to properly communicate with shorter men for some mysterious reason... eh but reality is subjective i suppose

(justforlulzandkeks)
I thought it was just luck


Lmao, peak blue pill delusion

This is what happens when you feed men blue pill lies, something as obvious height mattering comes to a surprise to him, when it really is self evident. With time he'd go from blaming luck to blaming himself, not realising the odds are stacked against him

Also JFL @ the quality of that """"counselling"""", either she's straight up pretending to not know or she's actually retarded

(lurkingnormie987)
Women will always deny anything that makes them look bad as a group of people.

The intensity with which women select for physical size in a mate transcends the intensity with which they select for other values such as intelligence or kindness. This makes women look like shallow, basic, primitive and simple beasts that quite literally value male’s for our convenience to physical or social violence/dominance more than anything else, so they deny it.

They’ll never admit the truth, it makes them feel bad. Women seriously value men’s height more than men value any trait on a female; Women are deeply primitive, contrary to the romanticized male perception of the ‘fairer sex’.

(moneysubber)
"In the information age, the smarter man is the Alpha male."

JUST FUCKING LOL


That top comment jesus christ. Attraction is both biological and social?

It's social in as much as a 5 foot 1 Indian millionaire might have a very slight chance at artificial companionship against a 6 foot 2 white janitor but if you strip away the socially constructed factors and "just exist" there's no contest.

(SwansonSamsonite)
Le proud atheists don't have a problem with bringing up natural and sexual selection when arguing evolution, but when you apply it to humans, suddenly attractivness is a social construct.

([deleted])
Well, then consider what the University system is and what money is.

Lies told by little people to control larger people.

Little guys work together to build Churches and Universities and so forth so that they can get the women in a place and act like they're not shit-tier subhumans.

(moneysubber)
He's presented with time tested theory with plenty of evidence to back it up and he asks "am I taking this too seriously?"

No dude you're not taking it seriously enough. The truth is the truth regardless as to wether it benefits you or not

He's contemplating discrediting his own academic education to personally save face. Amazing cope.

(muscmengr)
What does evolution has to do with humans who were created from a long lineage of biological-psychological mate selecting forming the way we look know and not like neanderthals, because primeval stonecunts choose better looking homo sapiens to mate with? What does biology has to do with social animals like us who mate for evolutional surivial and reproduction. No, you are free from evolution and physical rules, my patient you are a god freed from earthly desires. Now give me my money so I can go home and fuck my tall chiseld husband, hm sweaty.

(Singlestick)
All psychiatry/psychology/useless mental health professions are a fucking scam and mass indoctrination designed to help foids through a gynocentric-based system.

Affirmative action for holes.

various incels, r/Braincels 0 Comments [2/4/2019 3:40:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 142241

Scottish feminist group says transgender laws risk women's rights

For Women Scotland says government is ‘sleepwalking’ towards erosion of rights

The Scottish government risks sleepwalking towards a significant erosion of women’s rights, according to a group of feminist activists and academics that held its first public meeting in Edinburgh on Thursday evening to discuss proposed changes to transgender legislation.

The group, For Women Scotland, claims that it has support from MSPs across the political spectrum who share their concern that the SNP government is failing to consider adequately the implications for the rights of women and girls of proposed changes to the Gender Recognition Act (GRA) 2004, such as allowing individuals to change their legal sex by means of self-declaration.

When the first minister, Nicola Sturgeon, originally pledged to radically reform gender recognition law for trans people in 2016, she said that the move would be as important in her next parliamentary term as equal marriage was to the last. But the proposals were not included in last autumn’s programme for government, which has been taken as an indication of the concern within the SNP.

The intersectional feminist activists Sisters Uncut Edinburgh organised a protest against the meeting, stating: “While For Women Scot do a sterling job of making transphobia look respectable, their actions and statements do real damage to Scotland’s trans and non-binary community.”

Among the 40-strong protest, Red, a charity worker, said: “Groups like this are selling a very weighted narrative, and obscuring the facts. For example, they say that changes to the GRA will allow trans women into women’s spaces, when actually they were allowed before. They are trying to make it seem an immediate and sudden threat.”

Another protester, Cathy, said: “As a trans woman, I feel this whole event is designed to make transphobia appear respectable, and it’s very disingenuous. If a debate is what these people want, then there needs to be mutual respect.”

Speaking to a largely female audience of about 150 within the meeting venue, Susan Smith, of For Women Scotland, said: “We are concerned that the Scottish government is sleepwalking towards a significant erosion of women’s rights, both in terms of proposals to reform the GRA to allow self-identification and the failure to prevent other organisations running ahead of the law and adopting policies which are in breach of the Equality Act.

“We’re not here to quibble about toilets and we’re not here to create trouble for those who have battled crippling gender dysphoria. We welcome extra provisions for other vulnerable groups that don’t involve dismantling existing rights. If we cannot see sex, then we cannot see sexism, we cannot define sexuality, and it is the most vulnerable women who will suffer from this.”

Thursday’s meeting marked the most public expression in Scotland of increasingly vocal concerns around transgender issues.

The meeting also discussed concerns about guidelines for schools, contained in a document, Supporting Transgender Young People, and written in partnership with LGBT Youth Scotland and Scottish Trans Alliance, which say that schoolchildren should be able to compete in the sports events and use changing rooms and toilets for the gender they identify with.

Another feminist campaign group, Women and Girls in Scotland, published their own children’s rights impact analysis earlier this week. It argues that the guidelines undermine 10 articles of the United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child.

On Tuesday, a group of 25 academics, activists and former MSPs signed an open letter calling on Sturgeon to commit to carrying out a full equality impact assessment of the proposed reforms to the GRA. It noted: “Many individuals responding to the consultation raised concerns about how the proposals could affect the practical operation of the single-sex protections under the Equality Act 2010.”

Last month, the Guardian reported on concerns amongst data experts that proposed changes to the question about sex, to be asked in Scotland’s next census, risk undermining the reliability of the survey and set a difficult precedent for equalities protection.

For Women Scotland, The Guardian 11 Comments [2/1/2019 1:48:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 142236

Why I reject the label cis

It’s not because I don’t understand it. It’s not because I don’t know that cis is just “not trans”. I get that. I understand that these prefixes are used all throughout varying branches of science.

Why I reject being called cis is because I reject the idea that “woman” is an umbrella that both “cis” and “trans” fall equally under. That we are each just subgroups of women. Two different types of the same thing. No.

We are women. You are imitations of women. You call yourselves trans and us cis but really you are just men and we are just women.

i-am-less-angry-now, /r/GenderCritical 16 Comments [2/1/2019 3:16:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: pyro

Quote# 142230

[Note: About Aziz Ansari]

He is an ex muslim dog. He got what he deserved

Many incels are also ex-Muslims. You got a problem with that?


I sure do. Leaving the only religion that put foids in their place and join the soy bandwagon. Virtuslly all ex muslim women just want white men and all the ex muslim men are depressed low T cucks. Islam uplifted the curry dalits from brahmin subjugation and now when these same dalits migrate to the west they abandon honor and privilege for something cheap as western culture. Yallah, wank to your sister getting fucked by tyrones and see your dad divorced and lose everything and you coping

Knyumuru, r/Braincels 13 Comments [2/1/2019 3:07:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
1 2 | top