1 2 3 4 | bottom
Quote# 142799

[Serious] Does anything productive or original actually go on inside a woman’s brain?

I know that there are really “smart” women who work in fields with an education much higher than mine. I know there are foids who build, work with chemicals, and are rocket scientsis. But do they actually have their own original thoughts or do you think they get by from stealing co-worker ideas and pushing them forwards with the benefits they get from being a woman. Can they process their own thoughts or are they good at modifying ideas and faking it. Its hard to believe that they could have a sense of deeper meaning, bc if they did they would surely empathize wouldnt they? :confused:

JailBait109, incels.is 6 Comments [3/13/2019 4:56:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142798

Foids can't be incel



(ABannedIncel9)
JFL femcels is not a thing. CEL STANDS FOR CELIBATE. Fucking celibate. Name yourself something else you losers

(theworstworld)
That's what I have thought. Why don't they create a new term for themselves? Or I thought that, until someone reminded me "Men are the inventors, women are the leeches."

(MRinvalidusername)
They literally cuda just made a sub for single women with single women "problems" instead of hijacking what the incels have created, whilst not even being fucking CELIBATE AND truly ALONE

(TheVantablackPill)
Women are stupid & retarded and only know how to leech off popularity of other people & groups. They will always try to take the attention in towards themselves and until a bigger group comes with a worse name they will call themselves femcels.

(theworstworld)
"I have met plenty of men that get between 5-50 matches. I have 2600 matches. I don't know if this is embarrassingly low." Hahaha! I never realized foids were this stupid until I found this sub!

(Ohrami420)
And she’ll deny men have it harder in dating

(MRinvalidusername)
A handicapped, disease ridden, drooling, mentally degraded dog looks less stupid compared to these femcels

(Salusa-Secundus)
She just skips over that, even if her 90% thing is legit, that leaves ALMOST THREE HUNDRED POTENTIAL PARTNERS. And that's an ugly girl.

(justforlulzandkeks)
Women literally, unironically, without exaggeration, CANNOT comprehend male loneliness

they can have shit like hundreds of tinder matches, talking to dozens of guys, and they STILL won't count it because of this or that reason

Female rationalization is MIND BOGGLING

(R706)
Complain 90% of men on dating apps only want sex, while only wanting the most attractive men themselves and would cheat on their life partner for Chad at the drop of a hat.

Also she's fucking stupid as tinder was only ever intended to be a hookup app, it's just idiots like her treating it as a dating platform because they flock like sheep to whatever the popular thing is and try and twist into something that works for them.

A bit like how on every other MMO one time people developed the catchphrase "Go back to World of Warcraft", because they'd just want the same thing, but different.

There may not have even been any point to her post, it might just be her humble bragging about her matches.

(looksmaxxedcurrycel)
2591 matches. That doesnt even include the guys she swiped left on, who swiped right on her. JFL. Meanwhile, the only time i ever get matches on tinder is if i change preferences to men.

(Disappointedshorty)
This is not even funny anymore. I want her to fucking die.

Various incels, r/Braincels 3 Comments [3/13/2019 4:56:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 142795

Article: "Fraternity brothers rape 300% more than other men." But remember, it is lonely virgins in their caves who are a threat to women, not the Chad who rapes her and beats her up

Toxic incels can telepathically r women with ease


Volcel if you haven't tried telepathically raping girls

Back in uni I remember seeing frat Chads do all kinds of ridiculous things like slapping girls on the ass right in front of their beta bfs and hearing them say things that would have some of us utterly shocked. Women to them are nothing more than fuck puppets and they love it.


"and they love it."

That is the part that pisses me the fuck off. Billy Beta has to obey the rules and never stare at a woman for longer than 10 seconds, but Chad can literally rape girls and get away with it

People do NOT hate misogyny nor sexism nor misbehavior against women. They hate unattractive men.

The University of Missouri considers banning women from fraternity parties to prevent them from being raped.

The popular jocks are so dangerous that we need to separate them from women to avoid rapes. But remember: it is ugly guys who don't even talk to women who are a threat to women's safety.

Also: the women immediately dismissed the idea. Huh? Didn't they want to be separated from rapists?

SomeTurdInTheWind, r/Braincels 3 Comments [3/13/2019 4:56:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 142794

A couple years ago, I gave some Alexander Scourby audio King James Bibles to a Bob Jones University woman that I liked at a local church, but she didn't even say thank you! (She was the one who cold-heartedly told me to go away!) She will make a great old maid some day! I know some ungrateful people believe that a gift is free, and so you ought not be expected to thank them. However, that is a poor attitude. If someone gives you something and you don't thank them, you are an ingrate! If you don't thank God for your eternal life, and for pardoning all your rotten sins, you deserve to burn in Hell as an ingrate! Yet, our great God “is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil” (Luke 6:35).

This generation of ungodly spoiled brats, sluts, dykes and lesbians is going straight to Hell. And sadly, that feminist influence has crept into our churches, masculinizing our women, so that they are tough like men these days. It is sickening! I admit that I ABSOLUTELY HATE military women! I detest them! I cannot stand them! GET AWAY FROM ME!!! I detest women cops. They belong at home burping babies, baking cookies and being a good wife! I can't stand professional type women, who dress and act decisively like men. It is Biblically wrong! The perverse “UNISEX” (MP3 sermon by Dr. Jack Hyles) movement has destroyed our country. Where is the feminine, sweet, loving and submissive woman anymore? A feminist brat doesn't just all of a sudden become a loving, sweet and submissive wife after she gets married. Women are messed up, so much so that many Christian women don't even know how to be feminine anymore. And worse of all, they don't desire to be! Feminine women are literally mocked and laughed at by American religious women today. Our nation has become so evil and far away from God that people get mad when anybody calls a queer a queer! People don't want to hear the truth. In today's ungodly society, you are allowed to talk about how wonderful it is to be a sodomizing queer, but you are ganged-up on and called a hateful bigot if you say that homosexuality is a filthy sin! That is the truth by the way! Homosexuality is a filthy disgusting sin!

This untoward generation hates those who hate unrighteousness! Truth is only hate to those who hate THE TRUTH! I hate every falsehood, because I love THE TRUTH of God's inspired Word. Psalms 119:104, “Through thy precepts I get understanding: therefore I hate every false way.” Women are so screwed up today that many of them are having their eggs frozen, so they can pursue a career, and have children in their 40's. If that is you, YOU DON'T DESERVE TO BE A MOTHER! A recent study in 2018 found that many woman aren't freezing their eggs to pursue a career, but simply because THEY HAVEN'T FOUND A MAN!!! Ha, am I right on target or what? If that is not bonkers, what is? Hey, I've got a question: What's the difference between a Bob Jones University nurse who is too religious to settle for a cool guy for a husband, or a nut that freezes her eggs because she is too messed up to find a husband? NOTHING! They are both going to die old maids! Call me what you want, I've got all the e-mails from guys just like me, who are bewildered at how bonkers women are today! And sadly that includes church women too! What does a poor guy have to do nowadays to get married?

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 12 Comments [3/13/2019 4:56:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 142792

(DerekWIll)
Boys should not be raised by women beyond age 6 or so. Women, from mothers and aunts to teachers and other strangers are very likely to try their best to suffocate their boy’s sexuality, to make him into the kind of man they wish they were attracted to. This is how you end up with mountains of nice guys.

The reason, quite simply is the nature of female sexuality as submissive to male sexuality, and women not wanting to appear as sexual beings in front of their offspring (which is normal). Men have to raise boys to be men. School, and civilization generally, also have a neutering effect, in that they demand compliance.

(G-Man)
The jews are pretty brilliant at making their deviant fantasies come true. The various races of the earth are not equal, but by encouraging miscegenation eventually the jews make everyone equal, so it’s a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Same thing with Freud, his Oedipal Complex probably only applied to a handful of men, but thanks to modern (((conditioning))) all moms want to shoot pornos for their sons - progress!

DerekWIll & G-Man, Daily Stormer 2 Comments [3/13/2019 4:55:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 142791

Study Finds Sex-Based Brain Differences IN UTERO: Blank Slatism BTFO

Did that misogynist just imply that men and women are different?

From the study’s abstract:

Sex-related differences in brain and behavior are apparent across the life course, but the exact set of processes that guide their emergence in utero remains a topic of vigorous scientific inquiry. Here, we evaluate sex and gestational age (GA)-related change in functional connectivity (FC) within and between brain wide networks.

Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging we examined FC in 118 human fetuses between 25.9 and 39.6 weeks GA (70 male; 48 female). Infomap was applied to the functional connectome to identify discrete prenatal brain networks in utero. A consensus procedure produced an optimal model comprised of 16 distinct fetal neural networks distributed throughout the cortex and subcortical regions. We used enrichment analyses to assess network-level clustering of strong FC-GA correlations separately in each sex group, and to identify network pairs exhibiting distinct patterns of GA-related change in FC between males and females.

We discovered both within and between network FC-GA associations that varied with sex. Specifically, associations between GA and posterior cingulate-temporal pole and fronto-cerebellar FC were observed in females only, whereas the association between GA and increased intracerebellar FC was stronger in males. These observations confirm that sexual dimorphism in functional brain systems emerges during human gestation.


Bbbbut a top neuroscientist woman recently told us that men and women have the same brain!



Everyone knows that men and women are the same and here’s proof:

Women hate women
Feminists say men and women are equal
Feminists hate men

Feminists say all kinds of bad stuff about men while also saying that they’re equal to men, so the logical assumption here isn’t that women just hate themselves but that they hate men and that they’re equal to men.

Does that make sense?

Okay, maybe women do hate themselves.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pJeK1MRZkk

But that’s just further proof of how terrible men are.

Besides, baby boys and girls already have different brains while inside the womb because their mothers have been socially conditioned by the patriarchy and the babies somehow got that conditioning through the umbilical cord. Okay?

If trannies had babies, the babies would be gender-neutral. Or… something.

Probably something.

Pomidor Quixote, Daily Stormer 3 Comments [3/13/2019 4:54:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

ANGER ISSUES AWARD

Quote# 142788

[RageFuel] [GO ER] IT bitch implies that our standards are high and that we should shoot for fucking LANDWHALES.

I WORKED ON MY MYSELF TO LOSE WEIGHT FOR NEARLY FOUR FUCKING YEARS STRAIGHT AND THESE FUCKING STUPID SJW NIGGERS THINK I SHOULD SHOOT FOR AN OVERWEIGHT GIRL. I WOULD RATHER KILL MYSELF THAN SHOOT FOR SOMEONE WHICH REMINDS ME OF THE OLD ME WHICH I HATED SO MUCH. HER LIFESTYLE WILL ONLY TRANSFER TO ME ANYWAYS AND I WILL BECOME OVERWEIGHT AGAIN IF THAT HAPPENS. AND IF I EVER TELL THE BITCH TO LOSE WEIGHT AND SHE DOES, SHE WILL DUMP ME FOR CHAD.

I HATE WHEN PEOPLE SAY THIS. IT MAKES ME ANGRY. YOU DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH SHIT I WENT THROUGH JUST TO TRY TO LOOK ATTRACTIVE. BUT HELL I GET REJECTED BY MY LOOKSMATCH OR EVEN BELOW AND I AM SOCIALLY OSTRACIZED BY WOMEN EVERYWHERE I GO. WHY SHOULD I SHOOT FOR WAY LOWER THAN MY SMV IF I ALREADY KNOW THAT MY PHYSICAL PROWESS SURPASSES THEIRS BY LIGHT YEARS. IT'S NOT NARCISSISM YOU DIPSHITS, IT'S A MATTER OF FACT, AND ANY PERSON WITH A FUNCTIONING BRAIN WOULD AGREE. EITHER WAY, OVERWEIGHT GIRLS WOULDN'T WANT ME, THEY ALL STILL GET CHAD THROUGH DATING APPS. FUCK OFF AND GO CHOKE ON A FUCKING POINTED SPEAR.

ordinaryotaku, incels.is 8 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142785

Mothers Furious After Watching Rape Porn Make a Porn Film to Show to Their Kids

Some mothers will make their own porn films to educate their kids about what sex is really about.

This isn’t even peak degeneracy yet.

Daily Mail:

A group of five mothers are making a porn film they would be happy to show their children after being disgusted by watched X-rated videos online.

One mother was so horrified by online porn that she threw up and one was so traumatised that she quit the whole process.

Sarah, 40, from North Wales, cried while watching rape-based content during the mothers’ research portion of the show.

According to The Mirror, she said: ‘If that was the first time I’d seen anything about sex I’d be petrified. I just thought all of a sudden that I was going to throw up.

‘We need to show kids that there’s something else than this horrible sh*t we see on the internet.

‘If my son treated a woman like that I would kick his a*** to kingdom come.

She added: ‘Porn doesn’t represent normal women, the actors and actresses they use mislead kids. They need to realise it’s not normal.’

The mothers are making their own porn film as part of a Channel 4 TV show called Mums Make Porn.

The three-part series will see a group of mothers create a film with sex in it that they would be happy to let their children watch.

Their mission was to create a porn film which promoted positive attitudes towards sex and realistic expectations of what it involves.

They worked with industry experts and were given all the tools they would need to make the film.

At the end of the series, the mothers reveal their X-rated film to their friends and family, including their children.


That’s right, kids. Mommy will teach you how to fuck women now.

How about not letting kids watch porn instead?

They’ll likely say that that’s just not realistic, but if that’s the case, how can making them watch more porn — even if homemade — be the solution?

Because this isn’t even about porn. It’s about women policing men’s sexuality.

One of the mothers literally said “If my son treated a woman like that I would kick his arse to kingdom come” and that is the perfect synthesis of what all of this depravity is really about; women not approving of how men experience their sexuality.

Old story, really.

Don’t let front-holes tell you how to fuck. You are the one doing the fucking. These bitches do nothing but lay there anyway, so what say should they have in the activity?

If they don’t like it, they can go get themselves fucked and beheaded by niggers.

Besides, women really enjoy when you’re not concerned about their enjoyment of sex. They actually want you to take control over their bodies for your own pleasure, without worrying about their pleasure.

It’s all just a gargantuan shit-test.

Pomidor Quixote, Daily Stormer 8 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 142784

I basically took a shit on a Chad and a roastie today - felt amazing

1. Entered a university to buy a coffee from a vending machine.

2. In the hallway l saw a food with a Chad - 6'4", blonde, 7 or more face. Beta vibes.

Sitting next to the window is forbidden because the construction is affected.

There are huge signs saying it.

I said: "YOU CAN'T SIT HERE. IT IS CLEARLY WRITTEN."

She said: "ok" but with intonation suggesting to go fuck myself.

I bought coffee and returned. They were still there. She was still sitting on it.

I said: Bitches never learn and passed by

Chad said: calm down with his Betta voice.

I kept walking.

I fucking that on them.

They were disturbed and scared from uninstall.

I semi-dominated Chad in front of this cheap hoe.

His it fag voice was patethic

uninstall, Incels.is 9 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:41 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 142783

[Venting] Anyone else gotten more and more agressive?

I cannot contain myself anymore. I almost hit my own mom in the face yesterday. Female nature just makes me so fucking mad, I simply cannot fathom that this is how it is, the powerlessness gets too much to handle. Everwhere I look I see blackpill, I see girls lying through their teeth, manipulating men, getting a free pass to everything they want in life and I see them being bitchy and arrogant about it and I see these pathetic fucking cucks kissing the ground they walk on. It's truly sickening. I almost hate those men more than foids, they're the ones allowing this, they're the ones who have put us in this situation. The only reason females have the power they have today is because weak men let them.

HardToSwallow, Incels.is 5 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 142782

(Lonelycel)
[JFL] "Ex-incel" posts on inceltears: "I escaped inceldom by transitioning to a female"

Personally, I think this is a massive troll.

But JFL at the comments, they think it's real.

This is proof that IT are negative IQ

Read just the last 2 paragraphs if it's too long for you

(AlwaysLawRoute)
The fact that becoming a "female" gives you thousands of positive points to the eyes of society proves how highly overrated foids are,so many men don't want to be men anymore because the rules are rigged in favour of the """"opressed """"" gender.

(MarriedAndLookin4Fun)
Jesus I hope that's a troll. Trannies need to get killed by firing squads, hundreds of them at a time

(RegisterUserName)
Trannies are a black pill in themselves; you cannot be happy as a male, so become a female. It's just accepting that females have astronomically easier lives.
Fucking LARP either way...

(Mainländer)
That's exactly what (((they))) want you to do. Become a faggot or a crazy person who thinks he is the opposite sex of what he really is because of circumstances created by (((they))) themselves.

(Life Wasted)
Lol they dare not question a tranny, if you larp as a trap the left will bow to you like you are God.

Yeah but there's no way IT would ever acknowledge foids have it easier tho.

(Sans)
My opinion on this is like a double edged sword. I don’t think it’s normal and all but at the same time I’m a bit happy for an Incel who does that to get female privilege. However, this tranny became a cucktear so I have no sympathy.

(MSCW)
That's what they do with vulnerable people.
I hope for that man he is trolling.

(Dregster666)
This piece of shit didn't escape inceldom. It's worst than escortcelling or plastic surgery, this faggot completely overhauled his body of work for validation instead of embracing what he truly was.

Disgusting.

(Marquis de Sade)
Naw it doesnt. I dunno where u live. But here trannys face a life of being openly mocked, ridiculed and avoided. If some tranny walked into the pub an tried to hit on a guy. It would probably get the shit kicked out of it. They are an abomination, and no amount of postive press about them will make me thing otherwise.

(anon2719)
I know many trans people who were former incels in the speedrunning community so I can believe. I still think all trannies should be put to death though

(ovrload)
being a tranny is a cope because you know your pathetic genes are worthless as a male so they try and transition to becoming a female which never works out.

Various incels, Incels.is 1 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 142781

Fuck that shit. Women are STARVING for more dominant men. I just wrote a post about this but I talk to a lot of women (dread sharing pics with them but still) and they all get off to the idea of me being really in shape and dominant. I told them I prefer women who are into traditional roles and they seem really into it.

Women seem stuck in this weird position, they have this weird instinct where they just HAVE to go along with the herd so if the herd is saying "feminism is great, cucks are great, men who cry at pixar movies are great" they'll repeat it in public while screaming inside. They want guys to oppose that shit, we're still animals when it comes to sexual attraction and women react the same way to a guy grabbing them by the neck as we do to a hot girl laying face down submissively in front of you. Nothing will change that for the next 10,000 years, it's just built into us.

These women, if these "bulls" had the same commitment and money as their long term boyfriend, they'd leave in a second. That's why women differentiate between "fuck bois" and regular guys. They can pin a regular guy down and blackmail and extort him into staying and putting up with her bullshit. Women become abusive around sub guys. Guy's need to start getting testosterone shots, why the hell is testosterone dropping so rapidly?

nashyneddly, r/Braincels 3 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 142780

Re: 90% of this cumminity is volcel

You cannot claim incel unless you are actively trying to get a girl or are actively trying to better yourself.

I'm sick and tired of these incels that don't groom themselves/workout and have never even approached a girl, you've never really attempted and wonder why you've never had a girlfriend "b-but Chad gets approached" the only legit male model Chad I know was dysfunctional and too scared of rejection to approach a girl, and he was a KV until 22. David Gandy, didn't have his first gf until 21, because again, he was afraid of rejection.

You don't truly know where you stand unless you ACTIVELY TRY. Even if you've been rejected by 100 different women, you need to keep trying to be incel.

Inaction is voluntary, and thus your celibacy from inaction if voluntary.

Only people that can get away with not trying are people with actual genetic diseases/conditions such as Treacher Collins and cerebral palsy and not just "muh mm of bone" copers.


I’m not going to waste time grooming like some queer. I’m not going to slave at the gym for the CHANCE at some pussy. And I’m not going to approach 10000000 women like some fucking cretinous trog begging for scraps. I’ve worked and went to college for years now, I’m 25, no gf not even any fucking friends. It is OVER, I hate this word but self improvement is a fucking cope, it is. People like me are doomed and nothing short of a miracle will help. I don’t give a shit about your retarded anecdotes.

TheDicman, r/Braincels 7 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 142776

Re: News outlets report that a "woman" commits multiple assaults. Surprise! The accused is actually a man.

(raddy-set-go)
Honestly the whole "woman commits crime / oh by the way she's trans" is becoming the "jump scare" of news stories. It's meant to catch you off guard but you end up seeing it coming miles away.

(DontbetheGround)
Yeah. That's true. Headlines/articles along the lines of:

"Women rapes and murders women and children" Or "Women tries to murder random strangers with an ax in a crazed violence spree 'cause her feelings got hurt"....um....yeah. No. That don't sound right....hmmmm.

Takes 2 seconds to Google: Oh. Okay, not some rare outlier of our statistics. No. No. It's just another dude. This one is "claiming to be a women." Wonder how I knew to Google that?

These males are going to completely screw up data and research.

(2or3thingsIknow)
Yet another reason these sick and twisted men should stay men. They are not welcome as women. They are men.

(Penfragon)
Yes, absolutely. This was in /r/news with no one mentioning he was trans, only saying she/her, and I fucking knew something was really not right about it without realising it was an inevitable Tim yet.

(Feminazcabooby)
No real woman would go around attacking men because dude... HAVE YOU SEEN MEN? Unless you're targeting elderly or disabled men, you're going to get your ass handed to you.

(DontbetheGround)
Hate to break it to you: old men are still stupid strong. As for disabled, I reckon that depends on the disability. I know a paraplegic, double amputee, that works as a bouncer in a really rough place. If someone is within his reach (and dum-dums get cocky and move within his reach) their ass is grass.

Nope. Males are stupid strong. They, general statement, don't tend to be weak until they are 'death bed weak.' (Just sharing information.)

(womeninlove)
The standards for reporting that make this person out to be a woman are like nation-wide gaslighting.

Even with the outlets that are reporting on the fact that he is male, the powers that be will never let the story gain enough traction to spur discussion about the problems inherent in reporting feelings vs. facts and how harmful this is to women.

(Mountains_beyond)
If a man identifies as a woman, no matter how clearly deranged he is, he is taken seriously. In this case in Oregon, where some lady-identifying dude was arrested for “its just a prank, bro!” threatening people with a gun, they had to add “suspect identifies as a woman”, because there was no other way to tell.

(Carthimundia)
I remember a while ago the news had a really tough time reporting on this TIM who went back into Male mode to avoid the police after committing a crime. They said they were looking for a woman who was impersonating a man. But of course it was really a man who had just taken his wig off!

AhhhhhhhhHahahahaha you’re joking right? There’s no fucking way real detectives/cops said “a woman impersonating a man”


I can’t remember that case now, but there was another case with a TIM and the newspaper headline said “woman commits fraud by pretending to be a man.” But he was a TIM who changed his identity back to his old male one to defraud people!

(morningtea50)
The job of journalists is to check and then report the facts. It is NOT their job to push a political agenda by lying about the sex of the person committing crimes because they think they’re winning social justice points or something. At this point I no longer trust anything I read about a ‘woman’ committing a crime until I go into the article itself and read the comments – sometimes the media will include a photograph of the criminal so we can see the person is a biological male that does not happen very often.

Great job, news media. I no longer trust what I read when it’s anything about women committing crimes.

(vulvapeople)
I've seen it suggested elsewhere that the attacker might actually be a TIF, which would track with one of the victims identifying the attacker as a woman and with the rather female body shape of the attacker. (That's all I have to go on anyway. I haven't been able to find a good image of the suspect.) It'll be interesting to see if this is ever clarified as the case progresses.

Regardless, this story is yet another example of how trans bullshit makes it impossible to report the news accurately.

Various TERFs, r/GenderCritical 1 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 142775

(AlrightRealNice)
Trans women are not women

For the last time, trans women are not real women. People keep calling me transphobic and I am so annoyed by it. Do trans women have ovaries, breasts, vaginas, labias, and everything else a real woman has? No. A woman means you were born with a vagina. I hate these men telling me they’re women and invading my spaces. It just pisses me off so much that people try to be a “good person” by calling me transphobic. I can’t wait for the day that people start realizing how problematic trans people are. I don’t hate trans people. I just hate the specific trans people that think it’s ok to bash me and invade my space. If I said I was a dinosaur, am I a real dinosaur? No! I’m sick and tired of all of this.

(CallaAETHIOPICA)
Yes, Yes, YES! There are very very distinct biological differences between men and women and just because we choose to not deny it and acknowledge it, we are transphobic. We aren't, we just don't partake in delusions. One can dress however they want, change their name, it doesn't matter. It doesn't change their anatomy. Even with surgery. It doesn't change the fact that a TIM was born a male and a TIF was born a female.

(ahcabot)
On another sub there’s a TIM going on about how nobody will claim to be trans to access women’s spaces because “you can’t just claim to be a woman if you’re not!”

Absolutely right, I say. That includes you, sir.

There’s no concept of irony at ALL!

(Caranda23)
More simply, transwomen cannot be women because they are men.

(Sinnes-loeschen)
One thing I have to ask is-

If trans women and women are interchangeable, why can't I call myself a trans woman?

(Snuggle_Kitty_AGoGo)
Also could Liberal Feminists not invade this forum. We don't centre cock here. I am not a cock chaser. I am a menopausal grumpy woman biologically. I was not assigned female at birth. They took a look at my vagina, and observed my sex. Also Judith Butler is Satan.

Various TERFs, r/GenderCritical 2 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 142772

Lamenting Disney’s New Queen

As I consider Disney’s new depiction of femininity in Captain Marvel, I cannot help but mourn. How far we’ve come since the days when we sought to protect and cherish our women.

The great drumroll of the previous Avenger movies led to this: a woman protecting men and saving the world. The mightiest of all the Avengers — indeed, after whom they are named — is the armed princess turned feminist queen, who comes down from the tower to do what Prince Charming could not.

Am I nitpicking? It is a movie after all. I wish it were. Instead of engaging the movie’s ideology as mere fiction, a fun escape to another world, we have allowed it to bear deadly fruit on earth. Along with Disney, we abandon the traditional princess vibe, and seek to empower little girls everywhere to be strong like men. Cinderella trades her glass slipper for combat boots; Belle, her books for a bazooka. Does the insanity bother us anymore?

She Will Not Be Appeased

The ideology that sends Brie Larson soaring fictionally around outer space has sent our real daughters, mothers, and sisters — devoid of such superpowers — to war to serve and die in place of men. Real wars, the kind where “horribly smashed men still [move] like half-crushed beetles” (Surprised by Joy, 240). Real wars, the kind C.S. Lewis elsewhere describes as the amalgamation of every temporal evil.

We ought to lament that feminist lust cannot be appeased, even with blood. It takes its daughters and now, calling men’s bluff, advocates for sending its mothers into the flames.

Unquestionably, men ought support women’s desires to be affirmed, respected, and honored. But indeed, few actions display our resolve to honor our women more than excluding them from the carnage of the battlefield. Where can we more clearly display our ultimate resolve to love our women as queens than to step into hell on earth as sacrificial pawns in their defense? Generation after generation has mobilized its men to be devoured — that its women might not be.

Yet the feminist agenda does not condone this exclusion. It will not be patronized by any messages of “you can’t,” “you won’t,” or “you shouldn’t.” Even when we say, “You can’t go into the lion’s den for us”; “You won’t risk a brutal death to protect us”; “You shouldn’t expose yourself to the bullets bearing our name” — even then, the deprivation still causes offense. But our God, our nature, our love must firmly say, You are too precious, my mother, my daughter, my beloved. It is my glory to die that you may live.

Marvel Indeed

Yes, Marvel may be on the verge of ruining a decade-long movie saga with identity politics. So what? Will we fuss more about this than the government sending our daughters — stripped of photon blasts and the ability to fly — to fight our wars? We used to be attuned enough to know how shameful it is for men to hide behind their women, hoping she will take down Goliath. Have we forgotten how precious our women are? Have we forgotten that it is our glory to die in their place?

God’s story for all eternity consists of a Son who slew a Dragon to save a Bride. Jesus did not put his woman forward, and neither should we. Where Adam failed, Jesus succeeded. He is the Good Shepherd who laid his life down for his people. Even from the cross, God’s wrath crushing him, he saw to the welfare of his mother (John 19:26–27). Should we so cowardly send our women to protect our children and us? Protecting our women with our very lives is not about their competency, but their value.

Greg Morse, Desiring God 15 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 142771

[OP of thread "[Experiment] Dick quotas"]

I just had a genius idea to make society and the sexual market fairer. We all know being a dicklet sucks and foids will ridicule you for it, and most men want to fuck JBs, so why don't we make the AoC dependent on the guy's dick size?

If your cock is 3 inches or less, the AoC is 12 for you.
If your cock is between 3 and 4 inches, the AoC is 13 for you.
If your cock is between 4 and 5 inches, the AoC is 14 for you.
If your cock is between 5 and 6 inches, the AoC is 15 for you.
If your cock is between 6 and 7 inches, the AoC is 16 for you.
If your cock is between 7 and 8 inches, the AoC is 17 for you.
If your cock is 8 inches or more, the AoC is 18 for you.

Everyone wins.

[JB stands for "jailbait" while AoC stands for "age of consent"]

Mainländer, Incels.is 1 Comments [3/12/2019 4:03:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 142768

Re: Girl has a long history of going to bars and having sex with 35-year-old men ever since she was 14 years old. What were YOU doing when you were 14?



(DownvoteWomenOnSight)
These are the same whores who tell us that we're incel because of our personalities and lack of hobbies

(femailhivemind)
Its over for gaslightingfemalecels

(half_acre_lot)
Just

Fucking

Lol

(femailhivemind)
Trash gender literally never responsible for their actions, always mens fault!

(DereIzNoPoint)
At 14 I was wondering why everyone dislikes me for something I had no control over, why I had no friends, and why I was a khhv. And at that age she knew very well what she was doing, she's trying to blame the men rather than admit being a whore from that age.

(mybutt100)
they shouldve known better!

because I wanted to have sex with people!

(Zippo-Cat)
This is why you should #neverbelievewomen. Their worldview is so fucking warped and ass-backwards and self-serving that even if they speak honest truth - to them - it still means nothing as far as actual facts go.

(youknow889)
doesn’t surprise me at all. girls in my highschool dated guys in college. girls in college dated college guys and random 30+ year olds who bar hopped

Various incels, r/Braincels 0 Comments [3/12/2019 4:02:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 142767

Terry Crews has been widely criticised for saying the children of same-sex or single parents will grow up "severely malnourished".

The Brooklyn Nine-Nine star has become a celebrated figure for advocating for women and for his 2017 testimony about allegedly being assaulted by another man.

But public opinion might be shifting against Crews after he made a series of tweets about parenting.

It began on February 25, with him complaining about a New York Times article that accused President Barack Obama of "scolding" young black men.

Crews said he was bothered that a female journalist had written an opinion piece "about how boys should be taught to grow into successful young men".

"How would she know?" he asked.

terry crews
@terrycrews · Feb 24, 2019
If a successful black man can’t advise the black male youth of the next generation, who will?

THE STREET. That’s who.

Why Does Obama Scold Black Boys? https://nyti.ms/2Np3sT5


terry crews
@terrycrews

Another thing that bothers me is that this OP-ED was written by a WOMAN about how how boys should be taught to grow into successful young men.

How would she know?

MEN NEED TO HOLD OTHER MEN ACCOUNTABLE.

3,079 4:22 PM - Feb 24, 2019


That tweet provoked accusations of misogyny, which Crews denied - and then it all got much worse.

"I've reiterated many times that same sex couples and single parents can successfully raise a child," he wrote on Saturday (local time).

"But I believe paternal AND maternal love are like vitamins and minerals to humanity. No matter where you get that paternal and maternal love. MY purpose is to give paternal love."

Another Twitter user replied: "Love is not gendered. A child will not starve with only one gender loving them."

"But they will be severely malnourished," was Crews' response.

Terry Crews, Newshub 2 Comments [3/12/2019 4:02:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 142766

The Snobby Bob Jones Nurse Who Will Never Find a Husband

One thing that bothers me about a woman, more than anything else, is a woman who cannot stand upon her own two feet! Most religious women follow the crowd, going along to get along with their religious employer at a church. They cannot think for themselves. I remember attending church a few years ago, and a female staff member (a Bob Jones Graduate) met me in the church parking lot with an elderly man that is her friend. She was too much of a coward to approach me by herself. I liked her but was going through a very rough time in my life and didn't reach out to her. I wish I had. In hindsight, I really liked her a lot (and still do). A friend of hers confirmed to me that she liked me. A couple years later, after being driven out of the church over my King James Bible only beliefs, I met up with her one day while walking along the ocean. I hadn't seen her for a long time, but I had thought about her often and missed her. My heart leaped when I saw her.

So I wrote her and finally poured out my heart to her, explaining how I felt about her. She cold-heartedly wrote me back, coerced by her church employer, telling me not to contact her again. That was the end of that. What a coward! She lied and said she never liked me, but I know as sure as I'm saved that she did. How can a woman like that with poor character make a good wife? She can't even tell the truth, think for herself, or stand upon her own two feet! I wouldn't be surprised if she never found a husband! The guy before me dumped her, because her attitude is all wrong! I like what Pastor Jack Hyles often said, “To lose something in the will of God is to find something better!”

I have never seen her since. I have wanted to contact her many times, but I cannot after she forbade me to do so. I'm not stupid. One day when she is an old maid, having never been married, with no children of her own, she'll lie to herself, like a lot of foolish women do, saying retarded things to herself like: “Well, it must not have been God's will,” et cetera. But the truth will be that she did that to herself, making foolish decisions throughout her life. One day she will realize that she grew old, and passed up a real opportunity to have a husband that genuinely cares about her. I still pray for her often, for God's will to be done in her life. Professed Christian women are so foolish today, living in The Twilight Zone. The random photo to the left is what she'll probably look like in 25 years! No woman can be truly happy who does not fulfill her God-given purpose to be a HELP MEET, pursuing a career instead of serving the Lord by a husband's side (Genesis 2:18). If she does marry, she'll never find a more sincere man with a loving heart than me!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 3 Comments [3/12/2019 4:02:32 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 142759

HEADLINE: Being Tucker Carlson Means Never Having To Say You're Sorry For Defending Child Rape

On Sunday afternoon, Media Matters For America released a series of audio tapes of Tucker Carlson making regular calls to the Bubba the Love Sponge show in which he made a variety of disturbing comments, not the least of which were several defenses of FLDS leader Warren Jeffs and his habit of marrying young girls himself or forcing them to marry other older men -- a crime Tucker Carlson does not consider all that bad if it is even a crime at all.

While most people in Carlson's position would apologize and do the whole "I know better now" rigamarole, he is refusing, and has instead released a statement telling people to watch his show.
Media Matters caught me saying something naughty on a radio show more than a decade ago. Rather than express the usual ritual contrition, how about this: I'm on television every weeknight live for an hour. If you want to know what I think, you can watch. Anyone who disagrees with my views is welcome to come on and explain why.

Hard pass!

The newly released tapes reveal that in 2006, Carlson defended Warren Jeffs by saying that he didn't do anything that bad because he didn't rape any of those underage girls himself, insisting that forcing a girl to marry an old dude and have sex with him the rest of her life just is not as bad as pulling a stranger off the street and raping her.
CARLSON: He's not accused of touching anybody; he is accused of facilitating a marriage between a 16-year-old girl and a 27-year-old man. That's the accusation. That's what they're calling felony rape. [crosstalk] That's bullshit. I'm sorry. Now this guy may be [crosstalk], may be a child rapist. I'm just telling you that arranging a marriage between a 16-year-old and a 27-year-old is not the same as pulling a stranger off the street and raping her. That's bullshit.

THE LOVE SPONGE: But Tuck, that's just a small little thing that they got him on. Now, this guy is a --

CARLSON: Wait, wait, wait. Since when do you believe everything the government says? Wait a second.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Hold on. You know what --

CARLSON: All of a sudden, like we're very skeptical about everything until like some prosecutor comes out and says, "This guy's bad," and the rest of us nod in agreement like a church choir, "Yeah, he's bad." How do we know he's bad? What do we know exactly? Nothing.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Tucker, Tucker, settle down, lover. I mean, come on. I mean, jeez.

CARLSON: Get excited.


Yeah. If Warren Jeffs had only ever forced underage girls to marry and have sex with old dudes, that would still be illegal. However, that was not the case. While the charges Jeffs faced in Utah and Arizona were for facilitation only, he was indicted in 2008b on felony charges in Texas for personally sexually assaulting two girls, ages 12 and 15 (the conviction on which he is currently serving time, as both the Utah and Arizona charges were thrown out so that Texas could pursue the more serious charge). In May of 2008, The Smoking Gun released "first anniversary" pictures of Jeffs, taken in 2006, with a girl he had married when she was 12.

[Photos of Jeffs with his child-bride shown (her face is blurred). Caption reads, 'These were available and well-publicized at the time Carlson said Jeffs did not marry underage girls himself.']

Now, had Carlson only said these things in 2006, it would have been fair for him to say "Well, that information was not available to me at the time." Yet, all of this information was available to Carlson in 2009 when he made these other statements about Jeffs, which repulsed even the shock jock hosts:
CARLSON: Look, just to make it absolutely clear. I am not defending underage marriage at all. I just don't think it's the same thing exactly as pulling a child from a bus stop and sexually assaulting that child.

CO-HOST: Yeah, it's -- you know what it is? It's much more planned out and plotted.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Yeah, it should be almost -- you almost should put a premeditation --

CARLSON: Wait, wait! Hold on a second. The rapist, in this case, has made a lifelong commitment to love and take care of the person, so it is a little different. I mean, let's be honest about it.

CO-HOST: That's twisted.

That is, indeed, twisted.

By no measure is rape somehow more OK if you marry a woman and rape her for the rest of her life. It's not more OK if the rapist "loves" the victim, it's not more OK if they buy the victim dinner first, or if that rape is part of their "religion." A father who rapes his daughter has also made a commitment to love and take care of her, and I don't think anyone would say that is somehow "less bad" than if he grabbed another girl "off the street." Jeffs forced hundreds of underage girls to marry adult men and have sex with them. He also married and had sex with underage girls himself.

In 2009 -- which was, I remind you, a full year after Jeffs' Texas indictment and the pictures released by The Smoking Gun -- Carlson continued insisting that Jeffs absolutely did not marry underage girls himself.
CO-HOST: Yeah, that's what Warren Jeffs' in prison for. He's not in prison for polygamy, he's in prison for child rape.

CARLSON: Well, actually, he's not in prison for that. He didn't -- Warren Jeffs didn't marry underaged girls, actually.

CO-HOST: No, he's in prison for facilitation of child rape.

CARLSON: Whatever the hell that means.

CO-HOST: That means that --

CARLSON: He's in prison because he's weird and unpopular and he has a different lifestyle that other people find creepy.

CO-HOST: No, he is an accessory to the rape of children. That is a felony and a serious one at that.

CARLSON: What do you mean an accessory? He's like got some weird religious cult where he thinks it's OK to, you know, marry underaged girls, but he didn't do it. Why wouldn't the guy who actually did it, who had sex with an underaged girl, he should be the one who's doing life.

Wait until he finds out about Charles Manson!

And then he said:
I should make the -- you know what, I should make the laws around here, and Michael Vick would have been executed, and Warren Jeffs would be out on the street.

For the record, of his own 78 wives, 12 were 16 when Jeffs married them, and another 12 were 15 or under. So not only was Carlson's defense of Jeffs "twisted," he was also incredibly factually wrong about what Jeffs was accused of doing.

Of course, Carlson's defense of Jeffs isn't that far off from what other conservatives have said in the past about rape. Notably, Todd Akin tried to argue that there was a difference between "grey rape" and "legitimate rape," while claiming that women could not get pregnant from "legitimate" rape.

These weren't the only horrific statements Carlson made on the program. He also defended a teacher sleeping with a 13-year-old male student by saying that the teacher was actually doing a "service" by raping a child, so that the girls in his class wouldn't have to have sex with them.
So my point is that teacher's like this, not necessarily this one in particular, but they are doing a service to all 13-year-old girls by taking the pressure off. They are a pressure relief valve, like the kind you have on your furnace.

Again, child rape is bad. It's not up for discussion.

Carlson also laughed gleefully at the idea of abusing women, called Martha Stewart's daughter "cunty" and offered to give her the "spanking" she deserves (Carlson notably flipped out over Samantha Bee using the word "cunt" to describe Ivanka Trump, saying that he didn't know any man who would ever dare use that word because of how degrading it is), he compared women to dogs and called them "primitive," he repeatedly accused Hillary Clinton of wanting to cut off all of the penises in the world, and claimed that there is "no Canadian woman" anyone would pay to sleep with.

Will Carlson face the same fate Milo Yiannopoulos faced after he defended child rape? That's doubtful. The fact is, none of this is any worse than what he says on a daily basis on his show. He says terrible things all the time, and that is why he is so beloved by so many terrible, terrible people. It's not surprising that he is standing by his statements, or that people like Erick Erickson think the real crime is unearthing the things he said many years ago in the first place, suggesting that defending child rape as an adult man is just some kind of youthful indiscretion that isn't worth being concerned over.

After all, what would you expect from the party that elected President Grab Em By The Pussy?

Tucker Carlson, Wonkette 7 Comments [3/11/2019 11:21:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: SpukiKitty

Quote# 142758

[Historypill] Why the Western white men have become such cucks

It's a bit long text but I can't put it any shorter.

The men that I have in mind: White heterosexual middle class and working class men from Western Europe and Northern America. Why have they become such cucks?

These men have had a very specific cultural and social history. They have been conditioned through centuries to obey their elite and to respect the hierarchy. First during the medieval and post-medieval feudal system. Then in the 19th century, these feudal states transformed into secular nations. The non-aristocratic men of all classes were technically given liberty but at the same time, they now had to follow a new religion of being loyal to the nation and its institutions, its symbols, its cultural and industrial elite. This was furthered by secularism which removed the power religion to a large extent and separated it from the state, so the state became THE religion.

These regular white men had to work hard in factory, support their families, go to wars for their nations and were expected to be blindly loyal to the Institutions of the State and its Law. A modern ideal of manliness was born out of this that among other things included the idea that you should accept all the hardships ("men don't cry", men aren't supposed to show emotions etc.) and that you should always blame yourself for your failures, because you live in this wonderful nation that provides you with everything. This is the mentality from which the incels are judged today (basically as a man, you should never complain, and if you have a problem, it's your own fault).

During the 19th century, these Western European nation-states became the dominant superpowers and controlled almost the entire world. The white Western men suddenly became an aristocracy of their own in the global perspective, fueled by the ideas of the white racial superiority, and they started to see themselves as such. The white race as a whole adopted the aristocratic mentality that they are the noble men who have to spread civilization all over the planet (the idea of the white man's burden). The white men now became the gentlemen, the white knights, the nobility of the world.

Meanwhile, the Western society started "liberating" all kinds of "vulnerable" groups from the supposed "oppression". After the WW2, this process was intensified and was systematically directed by the institutions of the Western states. The Western white men were expected not only to continue to respect their regime and its institutions and its new ideology, but also to stoically accept all the insults and provocations from all the feminists, gays, degenerate "artists" and other groups dedicated to shame the white men and their past. The white men were expected to bear all this and they did because they still saw themselves as some sort of gentlemen and aristocracy that is "above this". It's basically like the concept of noblesse oblige where the nobility is expected to be held to a different code of conduct than the rest of society and to be generous and benevolent, not lowering itself to the conduct of the plebeian lower classes. This is basically what you have in the society today, one code of conduct for the white men (you have to be liberal, respectful, humble, work hard, don't complain) and another for everyone else (you can complain, be loud, insult). White men were raised with this code of chivalry for a long time and have integrated these ideas about protecting the weak. They repressed their manly impulses which would mandate them to lash out and respond aggressively.

This is why the middle class and working class white men allowed all of this post-WWII feminism, LGBT, sexual liberation and other degeneracy to flourish. They believed that they still held a position of power and that they have a responsibility to serve the Western civilization (which became synonymous with liberalism, capitalism, feminism and 'freedom'). So they not only accepted all the degeneracy and all the insults, but even became proud of it and bragged to the entire world about what kind of freedom they have. They were doing it from a position of power, feeling as if it's their duty to protect the weak. This why you have all these manly men in Western armies bragging about fighting against the Muslims or other non-Westerners for "muh Western freedom" while their Western women are whoring themselves out at home. They're actually proud of this degeneracy. They see it as a sign of power and progress. Ever wondered why the American army doesn't have any equivalent to Muslim nasheeds? Because for the Western men, listening to some degenerate rap is their nasheed as it symbolizes the alleged power of Western liberation and global supremacy.

The thing is, all these vulnerable groups that the regular white men are supposed to protect and bow down to in fact aren't weak at all. They have been systematically protected by the increasingly more powerful State and its Institutions (that the white men are blindly loyal to) for decades. The West gives this groups like women, LGBT, immigrants etc. special privileges like the old feudal kings used to do in the past, so that in turn, they can expect their support and loyalty. This is basically what we have in the West right now, these "weak" "vulnerable" groups serve the system, they endorse it, they want stronger state, stronger institutions, stronger police repression (at the excuse of protect this vulnerable groups) etc. And the system gladly accepts their demands.

It's very interesting to note that the feminists never really opposed the white-knightism and chivalry of the patriarchical Western culture. They're perfectly fine with the middle class and working class white men thinking that they hold this alleged position of power where they have to help women. They don't want to convince them into true equality because if there was true equality, they wouldn't need these white knights, and the white knights would no longer help them. The feminists are just promoting a specific type of ideology that tries to strengthen the system and its ideological norms and which tries to humiliate the white men while at the same time giving them a false impression to these men that they're actually being noble and strong.

The white Western men are still too blind to see all of this. They still believe in the old conduct of chivalry, either in the form of being a left wing cuck, or a right wing cuck. They both very similar in mentality when it comes to protecting "muh freedom" (which in reality just means giving more power to the state which gives you this "freedom" and protects it). Both left and right wing cucks are blindly loyal to the West and see it as the peak of all human civilization and progress.

The attitude towards racism is very similar in the West too in terms of white-knightism. As a white male you're supposed to formally criticize every form of white racism, but this comes from a specific position of power as well. As a white male, you're also expected to be much more liberal than a non-white male. Non-whites can get away with certain anti-liberal ideas but the whites can't (eg. Muslims can be much more radical than the white Christians who get persecuted for the slightest offense). This is because as a white man, you're supposed to be a gentleman and protect the "weaker" races. This is literally what this so-called liberal "anti-racism" is all about. It's not about equality of the races, it's about white men being expected to be cucks and white knights for other races. So it's essentially racist in itself, although it doesn't really benefit the majority of the white race (and arguably it doesn't help the non-white races either).

Note, I'm talking about middle class and lower class white men here. There are whites who do perfectly fine in the West now, the rich oligarchic elite which holds the power, the politicians, judges etc. They hold a similar position to the aristocracy and clergy in the feudal systems, they're the ones who are actually above all of those things and laugh at the pathetic white peasants who work like idiots for this system while being humiliated and insulted by all the privileged "weak and vulnerable" groups at the same time.

What keeps the regular white men going? Four things: 1) century-long blind loyalty to the state, the church (the churches have unfortunately become too westernized and weakened to stand up to the anti-Christian secular states), the institutions, the legal system, the hierarchy etc. 2) an utopian belief that they can ascend to being the elite themselves. No matter how bad the situation is for them, they still have some weird hope that they can get a normal family, earn big money etc. This comes from the American capitalist mentality of pursuit of happiness, American dream (this mentality is now prevalent all over the West). 3) Relative economic prosperity which still enables all kinds of copes. The illusion of the mighty West that will continue to dominate the world through science and technology and solve everything. Addiction to the materialistic world and hedonism. 4) Fear of going against the Western idea of manliness where as a man, you're not supposed to cry and complain. This is further fueled by the secular humanism which promotes the idea that you are the master of your own destiny and if you have a personal problem, you have to find a solution yourself and solve it.

Incels are a problem for the regime because they have opted out of all this and don't share this mentality (other than maybe what I described under the number 3). This is also where this obsession with painting incels as "frustrated white men" (when there are in fact plenty of non-white incels) comes from. The regime fears that the white men will abandon it and stopped being the obeying little peasants. They want the white men to continue thinking that they're the gentlemen and noble white knights of this system because once the local Western white men stop being productive, it's pretty much the end for the West as we know it. That's why they want to shame the white men who turn incel.

The end of the West will come either way. This society has nothing more to offer (culturally, philosophically), it has clearly degenerated way beyond the point of no return. While not necessarily blackpilled, people are more and more cynical, they don't want to serve their nations as much as they used to (harder and harder to find people who want to serve in the army), this whole nihilism that the West promoted in regards to religion and traditionalism is now backfiring and is starting to question their own liberal ideology as well. Incels are simply a sign of things that are about to come as the men abandon the Western ideals of manliness.

Teutonic Knight, incels.is 4 Comments [3/11/2019 11:21:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142757

The reality behind "Nice Guys"

When males grow up, society tells them that being a gentlemen and having a interesting personality will eventually earn you a relationship with a female who will be drawn to you because of said personality.

This strategy works, if you are good looking. Males who are good looking will enjoy female attention and believe that the strategy will work for everyone. Meanwhile a different results happens with an unattractive male.

The ugly male will think that he has to be patient. He believes that by using clever jokes, spending time with his female friend, and showing respect for her will cause the female to eventually build up an attraction for him.

Of course the ugly male wants sex. But what he really wants is a relationship based on mutual attraction, in which sex is simply one of many benefits.

However, the ugly male is shown a completely different response. The female is not interested in his advances and only sees him as a friend. The male is confused? Did society lie to me? Is this female different from the rest? Usually, the male will respectfully decline. However, he now notices that the female is no longer interested in the friendship anymore, as she grows distant. The friendship ends and they never speak again. Eventually the male finds a new girl to hang out with.

After many rejections, the ugly male will realize something. The strategy society told him to use is not working. He will look around him at his peers in school and see what they did. His handsome tall and sexually active peers display a behavior different from his. They aren't gentlemen, they are cocky and display a nonchalant behavior when with their female friends. Of course there may be some handsome peers who are respectful, but the ugly male notices they are the minority. He chooses to copy the cocky bad boy behavior of his better looking friends.

When he attempts this new behavior, he is met with disdain and humiliation. The female will reject him immediately, and will show anger towards him. He is then taunted by his peers for being unsuccessful with females. Behind his back, they will mock his appearance.

The ugly male grows isolated and sad. He looks everywhere for advice and help on how to get a relationship. However, everyone is telling him it's his fault. People on the internet say those females were sour grapes, yet whenever he tried again, the result is the same. No matter what method he uses, he always faces rejection.

After trying to work out, dress nice, and work on his personality further, he realizes nothing is working. He becomes desperate. But amid his failure, he becomes angry. Upon being rejected, he lashes out on the female with rage. He doesn't really mean what he says, but his hatred of himself drove him to vent out in a mindless rant. The female will accuse the ugly male of having a bad personality, and maybe will screenshot what he says and post it on Reddit.

This is how incels are made.

We weren't born this way, we just know how things really work in the world. Appearance is the only thing that matters. Anyone can have a good personality, humans are social animals.

But not everyone can have a nice jawline, a tall stature, and hunter eyes.

Also, marriages with an unattractive male and a female aren't relationships. They are merely transactions, the female is not sexually attracted to the male. She is only doing so out of security and financial stability. Chances are, she is also over 30 and can no longer sustain her old lifestyle of chasing good looking males who treat her like shit.

Ap0calypse, incels.is 5 Comments [3/11/2019 11:21:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 142750

This autistic retardcel is probably fucking roasties right now who want to prove him that he's not ugly therefore he deserves love and affection



(ItsOver4Maymaycels)
Of course, of fucking course they show a white MODEL TIER Chad as the posterboy of incels to push the "it's all about personality you alt right cis white misogynist" narrative, fml, he will say actually misogynistic shit and yet get tons of approval that no other incel can and climb out while the rest of us, most not being white much less handsome continue to be every other group's chewing toy because of a few idiots that get cherrypicked, IT won't touch this with a 100 mile pole

(JucheforWhitePeople)
He even calls himself a mentalcel in the interview.

ITards think we look like this JFL, the comment section there about him is cancer


I think its great. They're proving our point because the top comments are talking about looks. JFL.

(curryvirgin)
I can't find anything I don't hate in this picture. Facebook. The normie looking mentalcel. Vice. Canada. The fucking Samsung font.

I still fail to comprehend how a billion dollar company thought that font was/is ok.


It appeals to roasties and soyboy cucks. Probably some estrogen connection.

(rafaelvicuna4)
Of course they fucking show a white guy, cause if it was a currycel or a ricecel no one would be interested in this pathetic video.

Some incels, r/Braincels 3 Comments [3/11/2019 6:05:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 142749

So, I read that study about female psychiatrists banging their psychopath patients

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9c55/a8cae3c8a5d238002a261fec643f767d1126.pdf

In a large forensic hospital, 39% of psychopathic patients had a consensual sexual relationship with female staff members (Gacono et al., 1995)

The malingerers were significantly more likely to have a history of murder or rape, carry a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder or sexual sadism, and produce greater PCL-R factor 1, factor 2, and total scores than insanity acquittees who did not malinger. The malingerers were also significantly more likely to be verbally or physically assaultive, require specialized treatment plans to control their aggression, have sexual relations with female staff


As if I needed more reasons to have a thing for that profession after seeing Kate Siegel, Margot Robbie and Sofia Vergara play psychiatrists.

Kate Siegel, who played a psychiatrist.

Margot Robbie when she played a psychiatrist.

Sofia Vergara when she played a psychiatrist.

Goodness.

Those three are the doctors. You are the dangerous patient.

Try not to get "excited" when thinking about it.

SomeTurdInTheWind, r/Braincels 1 Comments [3/11/2019 6:05:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
1 2 3 4 | top