1 2 3 4 5 9 | bottom
Quote# 137323

[When you grand plan is simply telling a bunch of lies]

I've thought one way we can get realtalk dispersed widely among the normies is through a "deepfake" psy ops, in which so many celebs and politicians and business leaders are spoofed into saying ugly truths that the mass denials which inevitably follow would so saturate the airwaves we dissidents would have our work done for us.

Heartiste, Gab 5 Comments [3/18/2018 12:49:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 137322

The Bible proves itself but Simon thinks that is circular reasoning. I'm done posting to him for that reason.

Maryjj, ravingatheists 2 Comments [3/18/2018 12:49:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 137320

A message to shitlibs begging for Civil War 2:

You will lose.

It'll be over in two weeks.

You have no guns.

You are concentrated in urban centers.

You'd starve once the roads, bridges and tunnels are blocked.

And the survivors among you will be eaten by your third world pets.

Be careful what you wish for!



Heartiste, Gab 6 Comments [3/18/2018 12:49:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 137318

Sally Edwards:
This isn't about denying a creator, it's about there being nothing about transgenderism in the Bible. And there isn't.

Amos Moses:
WOW .... because i have been in NUMEROUS conversations right here on this forum ..... where it was claimed that it DOES ...... so which is wrong ..... YOU ..... or the "TRANSGENDERED" person i had the conversations with .......... do tell ..... which of you is a liar ............

Sally Edwards:
Look Amos, it isn’t hard. Either present me with scripture that specifically addresses transgenderism or admit it does not appear anywhere in the Bible. And invite anyone you know to do the same.

Amos Moses:
as i said .... AGAIN .....i have been in NUMEROUS conversations right here on this forum ..... WITH "TRANSGENDERED" PERSONS ...... or so they claim .......... where THEY claimed that it DOES appear in scripture ...... and that it is NOT a SIN ........ so are YOU ..... or the "TRANSGENDERED" person i had the conversations with LYING .......... do tell ..... which of you is a liar .............. YOU are on the "TRANSGENDERED" side of this issue ..... your position is DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED to their position ...... you both CANNOT be telling the truth ....... so ..... AGAIN ...... which of you IS LYING .....

Sally Edwards:
So you can't name the scripture. Consider the matter settled. Thank you.

Amos Moses:
MATTHEW 19 ........ that is the scripture they used .............. so WHICH OF YOU IS LYING ..... the "transgendered" person OR YOU ...........
OR since they are saying it does talk about them and that it is not sin and YOU are saying it does not talk about them .... YOU are calling them LIARS ..............
do i understand your position correctly ............ those "transgendered" persons LIED .........

Sally Edwards:
I don't care who used it. It doesn't say transgendered or specifically refer to them. They are wrong and so are you.

Amos Moses:
so when it says ..........
19:11 But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.
19:12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
that is not them ...... and YOU are calling THEM LIARS ............ and they are wrong and you are right ..... WHY .............

Sally Edwards:
Eunuchs are not transgendered people. That's why.

Amos Moses:
WHY .... who says ... YOU say so ..... WHY .... what are YOUR qualifications to make that judgement ...... those "transgenders" are reading the exact same text ...... what makes you smarter than them ...... are YOU a "transgender" ..........

Sally Edwards:
Because they're not transgendered people, Amos. They have entirely different definitions. Do you know what a transgendered person is? Maybe you don't and that explains why you're so unsympathetic to them. A eunuch is a sexless person. A transgendered person still has a gender.

Amos Moses:
they were TRANSGENDERED persons saying that ... are you calling them stupid ...... that they do not know what they read and they do not know WHAT they are .... YOU are SMARTER than they are as to WHAT THEY ARE ............. ARE YOU SERIOUS ............. and then YOU have the temerity to say " Do you know what a transgendered person is?" .... are you saying THEY do not know ...............

Sally Edwards:
In the first place I'm sure they didn't say that, I think you're probably misquoting them. Secondly it's not a difficult concept, the idea of transgenderism is relatively new, and so it could not possibly have appeared in the Bible.

Amos Moses, Christian News Network 2 Comments [3/18/2018 12:46:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 137317

Stephen Hawking was regarded by his peers as the smartest scientist since Albert Einstein, his book entitled A Brief History Of Time sold over 10 million copies. But Stephen Hawking and his celebrated intellect was unable to grasp one simple truth that my kids all had a hold of before the age of 10. That everyone of us are sinners who need a Saviour, and that Jesus Christ is the promised Messiah of Israel who paid our sin debt on the cross 2,000 years ago. Ironically, in the same words where he steadfastly denied the very existence of the God of the Bible, he said he was ‘grateful for the grand design’ of the universe. Hmm….any first year art student will tell you that without a Designer there can be no design. Hawking at this very moment is hyper-aware of the reality that God does exist, that Jesus Christ is the only way, and that Heaven is real. But sadly, that information does him no good now. He died in his sins with no one to pay for them but himself. Want to be smarter than the smartest man in the world? Ask Jesus to save you on the basis of His death, burial and resurrection, and when you die, instead of burning in a fiery Hell reserved for the Devil, his angels and the unsaved, you’ll be in Heaven with Jesus. Heaven or Hell? You don’t need a college education to see which one of the those two things is better.

Geoffrey Grider, Now The End Begins 5 Comments [3/18/2018 12:42:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 137314

Dead Works Are Man's Works

Cain tried to impress God with the work of his hands. Cain worked hard tilling his fields day and night, irrigating and weeding daily. Cain grew some nice crops, a bumper harvest no doubt, and brought the best of the best to offer to God. The Lord instantly rejected Cain's DEAD WORKS!!! They were “dead” because they were based in human effort, and not upon God's redemptive plan for mankind. Isaiah 64:6 warns that all of man's self-righteousness is as “filthy rags” in God's sight. Man's very best is offensive to our holy God. This is a difficult truth for many people to grasp. You could spend your entire adult life helping, building and sacrificially giving to operate orphanages for poor, starving and naked little children, and yet, go straight to Hell to burn in the torments of God's wrath for ever and ever in your sins. No amount of good deeds can counter the evil deeds (Ecclesiastes 12:14), manipulative ungodly thoughts (Proverbs 24:12) and idle words (Matthew 12:36), for which all men must give account at the Judgment Seat of God.

Ungodly Playboy singer and actor, Frank Sinatra (one of the shady “Rat Pack”), donated $100,000,000 of his amassed fortune upon his death to help suffering children in orphanages. That was a nice gesture, but not one penny of Sinatra's philanthropy can buy him out of the Lake of Fire. Sinatra was a lifelong shallow Catholic, trusting in the sacraments of a Mary-worshipping cult to save him. Sinatra was an outspoken critic against organized religion, but he never professed any faith in Jesus Christ either. By all indications Sinatra died in his sins without having ever personally received Jesus Christ as His Savior. So sad! So tragic!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 3 Comments [3/18/2018 12:42:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 137312

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Studies show: Sexual orientation top risk for suicidal thoughts in college freshmen (non-Christians)"

From Fox News:
Nearly one third of first-year college students have thought about suicide, according to a study across eight countries, and non-heterosexual identity or feelings were the biggest risks for this kind of thinking or behavior.

Having a religion other than Christianity, being female, having unmarried parents or at least one deceased parent and being age 20 or older were also important risk factors, though being a sexual minority also carried the highest risk of transitioning from suicidal thoughts to plans to attempts, the researchers found.

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified. Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

Lady Checkmate:
Seek Jesus Christ, find Truth, choose life and live.

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 2 Comments [3/18/2018 12:41:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 137310

(The subject in question is Vice-President Mike Pence and his crazy Dominioninst leanings)

One man crusade against women? Next he declared Jihad and blew himself up?

He perceives abortion as equal to the Holocaust in terms of evil; as do many Americans. You are shocked that he would take steps put restrictions on it? Again you didn't actually go into his beliefs or positions; you went into policy that you disagreed with him on and made a bunch of assumptions and leverage a whole bunch of hate.

Dominionist is a made up term by ignorant people who are fearmongering. There is no such thing. No more than there is a "War on Christmas". The term was coined in the 90's by rabid atheists who wanted to generate fear Christian influence in the government. I say that as someone who is agnostic and have no stance on religion.

"As a non-American"

And there it is. As a non-American your fears are irrelevant and pointless in this discussion as it is not your society or your people. Perhaps you should worry about your own people and government which is likely shitting all over your civil liberty and you are too busy "fearing" about a politican over seas with no real political power.

"he terrifies me just as much as Donald Trump does; the only difference is that no one knows what craziness is at work in Trump's mind, but we can predict - to a point - the craziness in Mike Pence's mind."

Your ignorance and bigoted positions should terrify you. Take the time to self reflect that you can't abide people who hold different political, philosophical, and moral positions than you. That speaks volumes about you; and little about the people you are screaming at. So before you start trying to even fix your own society; take the time to reflect inward. As trying to change the world around you before even having a solid foundation within is a sure way to cause diaster and conflict.

"Oh, and by the way, SANE people don't hear voices telling them what to do."

Sane people have a moral compass. Religious people feel that their spiritual figure be it Jesus, Mohamad, or God is helping guide that moral compass. Religious people spend their lives trying to live up to what their god perceives as good and just. Decent people don't go around telling people they are crazy because they hold religious beliefs. You could easily say "I disagree with the moral teachings of your religion, or at least parts of it" and work from there using critical thinking and rational arguments.

But instead let us just spew hate and project evil onto those people while making vast generalizations about them and their intentions. Don't be controlled by your emotions. The more decisions you make based on emotions the more likely you are being manipulated; and you are clearly being manipulated by specific political interests here.

avalatis, Deviantart 1 Comments [3/18/2018 12:41:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 137305

Random Boy:

Relative to Jesus being a pacifist, it is as true as Him having long hair or not hating anybody. NOT!

As always we must look to the Bible (KJV 1611 ONLY) relative to absolutely any belief we may hold. The Bible tells us that Jesus approved of His Father's command that children who cursed their parents should be stoned to death (Matthew 15:3-4). Does this sound like pacifism, forgiveness, and love to you? It is BLATANT INTOLERANCE for anyone that does not follow the Word! Jesus told his disciples to bring before Him any non-believer and to slaughter that non-believer to death right before Jesus' eyes (Luke 19:27). Yes this is a parable, but it refers to His second coming. But the main facts are that JESUS spoke this parable, therefore the KILLING reference is attributed to Him! Does one KILL because they love someone or because they HATE them? Heathens are such ignorant dolts!

More so, Jesus had one man eaten alive by a swarm of worms because the man failed to give Jesus His due (Acts 12:23). Jesus struck a Jew blind for thwarting His teachings. He struck a man dumb for not paying close enough attention (Luke 1:20). He SCARED a husband and wife to DEATH for not giving Him all the money they made on a real estate transaction!!!! (Acts 5:1-10). Does this sound like love and forgiveness to you? Jesus had to hate these people to be able to do these abhorred acts. This is the Jesus that we know, love, and worship.

Jesus told us we are to live in constant fear of God for He can torture us forever in Hell (Luke 12:5). This is why we must take a rather abusive manner regarding the heathen that does not follow ALL of the doctrines and precepts within the Bible. We don't have time to sugar-coat Gods word, H-E-L-L-O!

If one opts for Christianity, it is beyond me to think that anyone is able to extrapolate from the Bible that of which they accept, the lovey dovey Jesus loves me parts, and not be held responsible for the obligation of the whole where our Savior is KILLING AND TORTURING His creation! I for one cannot usurp what God has written regarding how His Son reacted in certain instances, therefore setting an example, can you?

In the name of our Savior,
Brother T

Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D., Disqus -- Grace and Truth 21 Comments [3/16/2018 3:25:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 137304

Cardi B Wells, Twitter 19 Comments [3/16/2018 3:24:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 20

Quote# 137292

I think the big difference is that, when DNA research is able to objectively and without doubt state the intelligence and capacities of an individual, people will be classified and assigned jobs per their capacities.

Right now we can all accept the 'feel good message' of "you can do whatever you want" and I could even say that in a way we live in a society that really doesn't block you from thriving and reaching wherever you can. But once this science is matured and treated as known facts, then castes might be explicit. Even, I'm thinking that culturally, the western world is going down, and who's rising? China, Asian culture, and I think this is more prone to castes, so if China becomes the hegemonic nation, our "I can be whatever I want" goes bye bye.

Luis Sanchez, Information Processing 14 Comments [3/16/2018 1:14:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 137280

(in response to this quote)

@(the submitter):
I guess it depends what your moral framework is. I don't particularly care about being nice to people, I care about civilised nations being developed. Trying to raise up natives to be civilised is an incredibly slow process that's still not borne very great results to this day, in comparison to wiping them out and replacing them with Europeans, such as with Australia which is a highly successful modern country.

How very civilised of you...

You are not the saviours of the West. You are not the last champions of the Occident. You are the barbarian throwbacks trying to bring down Civilisation from within.

Compassion for the undeserving isn't what created the modern world, it's a decadent excess in its decline. The people who created modernity were by your standard 'barbaric' in their attitudes, which is why your standard is absurd.

Compassion isn't civilisation.

Australia is being nice to the remaining aboriginals, and the results are unimpressive. Meanwhile the colonists, who were originally criminals, are very civilised.

Compassion for the undeserving isn't what created the modern world, it's a decadent excess in its decline.

Spoken like one indeed undeserving of compassion.

Our civilisation is neither decadent and decline. It's just that much of society has become complacent to your ilk.
The people who created modernity were by your standard 'barbaric' in their attitudes, which is why your standard is absurd.

They were still ahead of their times, and you would have hated them if they lived back then. Meanwhilel, your ideologies are quite literally the very antithesis of modernity, only exploiting and superficially supporting whatever seems useful for your vile goals and/or your ego.

The way I see it, economic and technological progress was the real progress, and changes to social values were usually a superficial thing that followed the 'real' progress, and have currently gone too far. Only in a few cases like the Reformation would I say that a moral change actually aided technological and economic advancement.

That's some funny trashtalking from both of us.

I like to only partly ironically talk about how I wish Thomas Paine had been executed for treason, and how it's a tragedy that Emperor Julian's attempted restoration of paganism against insurgent Christianity fizzled. So 'you would have hated them if they lived back then' is totally right.

-Reactionary_Vizier-, r/DebateAltRight 9 Comments [3/15/2018 1:07:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 137268

I guess it depends what your moral framework is. I don't particularly care about being nice to people, I care about civilised nations being developed. Trying to raise up natives to be civilised is an incredibly slow process that's still not borne very great results to this day, in comparison to wiping them out and replacing them with Europeans, such as with Australia which is a highly successful modern country.

-Reactionary_Vizer-, r/DebateAltRight 10 Comments [3/15/2018 9:49:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 137267

I also think it's a total travesty that we pay the oil-producing states on the Persian Gulf money for their oil. Mostly they use that money to subsidise their populations into obesity and uselessness, vanity projects, and terrorist financing. Ideally we should have reacted to the 1973 OPEC embargo with a full invasion and annexation followed, if necessary for the security of the oil production from guerilla activities, by ethnic cleansing.

Most of the people here seem to want to be somewhat isolationist and respect foreign sovereignty, but I think imperialism is completely worth it, at least over absurdly valuable areas like the Persian Gulf. It's completely absurd to pay so much money to people when you could just conquer them and take it for free. Unless of course their civilisation is worthwhile, but it's not.

-Reactionary_Vizer-, r/DebateAltRight 19 Comments [3/15/2018 9:48:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 137261


Let histories, Parthenius, extol the power of a Sesostris, Assuerus, Nebuchadnezzar, Alexander, Solimaun, Tamerlane, Charlemagne, Louis, or any other potentate the world has yet seen, or may possess to the end of time: let them boast of their dominions, their states, their kingdoms, and their empires; their riches, their enterprises, their battles, their victories, and their deeds; the display of their luxury, of their power, and of their authority; the enemies they conquered, the cities, provinces, and kingdoms, however savage and barbarous, which they have subjugated or destroyed; what will they say at last? To what conclusion will they come? They will say that for a few years they were great and powerful in a small part of a small point, as the earth is with respect to Heaven, and then they found they must die, and see their power be reduced to dust and scattered by the wind. And what was their power? It could not raise itself to Heaven, extend over all the earth, nor descend into the bowels thereof; they could not command the animals, rule the elements, prevent the intemperature of the air, the changes of the seasons or of fortune, nor shield themselves from the many evils that afflict and torment the body, nor ward off the inevitable blow of death.

Mary, yes, Mary is that Most Powerful Empress of the Whole World, whose power rules in Heaven, extends over the whole earth, and reaches to the bottom of the abyss; she it is that commands the angels and most sublime spirits; is respected and obeyed by nature, and by the elements; is venerated and felt by rational, sensible, and vegetable beings; is formidable and terrible to the demons: her power extends even beyond the confines of life and of time, and makes death its tributary and vassal. Oh, this indeed is power! This is command! Let us examine, Parthenius, and consider that it is all for you—all for your sake.

"All power is given to her in Heaven," says Saint Bernard. (Serm. sup. Salve Reg.). Do you doubt it? She is the Lady and Queen of Heaven, and although the blessed, and the saints, virgins, confessors, martyrs, apostles, prophets, and patriarchs, angels, archangels, virtues, powers, principalities, dominations, thrones, cherubim, and seraphim are indeed reigning princes in that great kingdom, yet they are all vassals, subjects, and servants of this Great Queen, whom they all venerate and obey; and she is the Most High Queen, reigning over millions and millions of most sublime and supreme princes. If it be true, and it is most certain, that the more numerous and noble are the subjects, the more glorious and powerful is the prince who rules them and to whom they are subject, think what glory and what power Mary possesses, who presides and reigns over so many princes and principalities. Every one of her heavenly subjects is a prince and ruler so powerful, that all the princes and rulers that are and will be upon the earth are and will be obliged to yield them vassalage and obedience, with their knees and necks bowed down to the earth; and they are so numerous that it would be easier to count the stars of Heaven or the grains of sand upon the seashore than to tell or guess their number, which is known to God alone.

You may now understand what boundless power she has who rules and commands so many most high and powerful princes and sovereigns. And these most sublime spirits it is that serve her and form her court; they are her messengers, and the executors of her every will, in Heaven, on earth, and in the abyss. With reason did Bernardine Bustis, of the order of Saint Francis, say that Mary is the most powerful of all creatures; for although all the saints in Heaven are most powerful with God, on account of their merit, yet she surpasses them all in power, for she is the Mother of the Celestial Emperor, having with Him almost infinite power, for the Glorious Virgin has merited more than all the saints together; whence it follows that she is more powerful than them all with God: hence she says, "In Jerusalem is my power," that is, above all the saints.

But what will you say, Parthenius, if I tell you that not only the saints and angels in Heaven serve and obey Mary, but even God Himself? Perhaps you will say I go too far; yet I may say it, for it is not I that say it, but Saint Bernardine of Sienna. (Tom. 2, serm. 61). And what wonder that the Son, although He be God, should obey the Mother, since He even deigned to obey the command of men. Not only on earth did He wish to be subject to Mary (Erat subditus Mi), but also in Heaven. Yes, even in Heaven He glories that He obeys every wish, every thought, and every desire of hers. "Ask of Me what thou pleasest," Saint Bridget once heard Him say to His Mother, "for thou cannot ask in vain; because thou hast denied Me nothing on earth, I will deny thee nothing in Heaven."

D. Roberto, The Love of Mary (book) 12 Comments [3/15/2018 6:24:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 137260

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Community Council 11 Comments [3/15/2018 6:24:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 137259

[Christian News Network story: "Appeals Court Rules Funeral Home ‘Illegally’ Fired Male Director Who Wanted to Dress as Woman"]

Skywatcher57: Some clients are not going to like seeing perverts in their faces at a time when emotions are running high, etc. I dare to say that these perverts may very well be putting themselves into harm's way by acting out in this manner. Some men may decide to take matters into their own hands and tune them in...right on the spot. They are under tremendous stress and emotional duress and don't need to be faced with such. A fist to the face may shake the gel inside their head and cause two brain cells to come together, inducing them to wake up and to realize just how ill they really are/were. Those are not hate words; those are stating the cold hard facts; not all of us are ready and willing to bend over and take this politically incorrect foolishness into our own lives. There are many men who still view homosexuality as a perversion, as the older psychiatric textbooks rightly name it, and they may strike out.

What about men who've been molested by a member of the LGBTQRST faction? Are they going to feel comfortable in the presence of a "queer" at a time such as this, when they have to deal with the death of a loved one? These messed-up people need to stop and think a minute before jumping to conclusions and acting out...just because they can. There will be consequences on this side of eternity, and on the next. It won't be fun and games or entertaining as they foolishly suspect. They're setting themselves up to get hurt, and are too stupid and self-absorbed to realize it.

If one wants to act out by wearing the clothes of the opposite sex on their own time, so be it. While at work, they're on their boss's time clock, and should respect that, considering how their appearance may affect others and themselves. This is a very dangerous situation, and the LGBTEQSTGW and others are forgetting that they used to be in the closet for a very good reason...they used to be ridiculed, attacked, and killed for stepping outside of the accepted and Biblical norm...

Skywatcher57, Christian News Network 12 Comments [3/15/2018 6:24:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: KingOfRhye

Quote# 137258

Texas state lawmaker defends his response to Stephen Hawking's death: 'God exists'

A conservative Christian lawmaker in Texas had to defend his response to Stephen Hawking’s death after initially taking a jab at the world-famous physicist’s stance on religion.

Republican state Rep. Briscoe Cain tweeted early Wednesday, shortly after news broke of Hawking’s death, that the scientist "now knows the truth about how the universe was actually made," while offering his sympathies to Hawking's family.

After internet backlash to that comment, Cain later issued a comment to The Houston Chronicle to clarify his tweet.

"Losing a loved one is never easy and I am sympathetic for his family's loss. My prayers are with them. Stephen Hawking was brilliant, many even called him one of the greatest public intellectuals of the last century, but the fact remains that God exists," Cain said.

"My tweet was to show the gravity of the Gospel and what happens when we pass, namely, that we all will one day meet our Creator face to face. Though Hawking has long been a vocal atheist who advocated against and openly mocked God, I hope nothing but the best for his family and pray that he came to know faith before he passed."

Social media users took that as an insult to the award-winning scientist who famously stated, “There is no god. No one created our universe, and no one directs our fate."

Without mentioning Cain, Republican Texas state Rep. Jeff Leach took to Twitter to call out fellow Christians making “hateful and snarky” comments about Hawking’s death.

Rep. Briscoe Cain, The Hill 15 Comments [3/15/2018 6:24:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 137257

Personally, I make a rather large distinction between human rights and LGBTQ rights.

In dealing with other countries, I think there are issues far more important within the purview of US stance on human rights than the narrowly-defined agenda of the LGBTQ community.

They have extended their US reach far beyond what is warranted in the US and to extend that even further outside the US would be a diplomatic waste of time given the pressing needs of so many other issues.

econjack, Free Republic 11 Comments [3/15/2018 6:24:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 137256

OK everybody---let's hear it for the LGBT activists: AWWWWWWWWWW.

When a tiny single digit percentage of Americans make the news as "being livid" about anything, you know something is wrong, perverted, screwed up about the media. This would be akin to gnats shaking their fist at a giant. And why they are livid must have something to do with Pompeo putting his foot down about these pervs spreading their mental disease to children or others.

I don't give a flying fig about what other people do in their bedroom, but why should a miniscule group demand "special rights" to not only engage in such practices in their bedroom, but also try to tell us that it's normal and desirable? And try to recruit kids?

EinNYC, Free Republic 14 Comments [3/15/2018 6:24:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 137255

My neighbor will not talk to me anymore after asking what I believe. I explain that a person can not change their sex. They are what they were born with.

Getting a sex change will not make those people happy. People who are confuse about their sex should just except the fact they are gay and changing your sex is not going to make you not gay.

By the way, his son is gay... He thinks his son is a woman stuck in a man’s body.

DEPcom, Free Republic 13 Comments [3/15/2018 6:24:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 137252

Hardly a day goes by when you don’t read about more insane Lefturd stupidity coming out of Sweden. THe Green slime, Mona Sahlin is a prime example of insane stupidity. Perhaps she would enjoy being gang-banged by muzzturds from a dozen different moslem shit-holes & all named Mohammed? All in the interests of diversity & community cohesion of course!

Swedenstan is at the precipice of turning completely into an Islamic state & these Lefturd fucktards are too insanely stupid to see the end game. Following each other like lemmings to their own self-destruction.

The Swedes have one last chance to try & turn the ship around with their elections in September. Miss this opportunity & the Ship of State shall be called the Titanic. And we all know what happened there…

Mohammed Wazza Paedophile, Bare Naked Islam 8 Comments [3/15/2018 6:23:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 137250

Every single fucking movie has a fucking sex scene/kissing scene or other displays of affection in it.

I'm fucking sick and tired of watching that shit, it literally just shows what we will never have, it's like the universe just wants to fucking rub it in.

I fucking hate every single second of this existence. You literally cannot do anything without getting reminded of being an incel. Fuck this shit.

VST, incels.me 22 Comments [3/15/2018 6:23:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 137249

Stephen Hawking now knows the truth about how the universe was actually made.

My condolences to his family.

Briscoe Cain, Twitter 16 Comments [3/15/2018 6:23:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: checkmate

Quote# 137241

In Australia, tobacco use rises for first time in a decade.[1]

A number of factors, including overall societal decline, are causing intelligence scores to drop in Australia as well. See: Irreligious Australia and intelligence

Question: Will irreligious Australia repent, embrace biblical Christianity and have its citizens become better at sports, spelling bees and non-smoking campaigns?

Conservative, Conservapedia 20 Comments [3/14/2018 11:00:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
1 2 3 4 5 9 | top