In addition, Darwin was a FLAMING HOMOSEXUAL. Do you want your kids to learn theorys by a raging HOMO? Fags want to insert there penises into other mens anuses. Is that what you want taught in public schools? Sounds like it to me. Have fun in hell.
93 comments
I want my kids to learn the theories that are generally accepted by the scientific community, including the theory of evolution as refined in the century and a half since Darwin wrote On the Origin of Species and theories of computing, partially based on the work of Alan Turing (who, by the way, committed suicide for reasons relating to his homosexuality).
Math is used by homosexuals.
Therefore, you will go to hell for teaching math to kids you homo loving faggots.
Right?
I don't know if Charles Darwin was homosexual or not. I looked it up but couldn't find anything that said he was, just some stuff about his wife and kids. However, even if he was, I couldn't care less. It has nothing to do with what he taught. There are plenty of homosexuals that were geniuses at what they did. Da Vinci was supposed to be gay, Tchaikovsky was gay too. Makes no difference.
Yep. That's why I don't read Psalms. Don't read nuthin' by that Johnathan-buggerer David.
Don't read the New Testament, either. 13 unmarried guys who hung around with each other constantly AND weren't avid D&D players? Hmm.
Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound! Able to go from seething idiocy to inelegant erotica in a single sentence!
It's... Fundieman!
Oh, and thanks, I will. See you there.
And the kids can't be taught English either, because some gays speak English. So, STFU, unless you want to catch teh gay.
"In addition, Darwin was a FLAMING HOMOSEXUAL."
Not that it would invalidate the theory of evolution but, citation please. Really, I'd like to see it.
"Do you want your kids to learn theorys by a raging HOMO?"
Why should I care?
"Fags want to insert there penises into other mens anuses. Is that what you want taught in public schools? Sounds like it to me."
I must have missed the biology class where they taught that.
"Have fun in hell."
If any justice exists in this universe then Hell is reserved for people such as yourself, I'm sure.
Ah, I remember that debate tactic from middle school. "Oh yeah, well, UR GHEY LOLOLOLOLOL!" Not only is it totally irrelevant and unsubstantiated, it brings back bad memories to me. Thanks a lot, asshole.
First you need a citation for your claim that Darwin was gay. Then you need to show how that's anyone's business but his, then you need to show how a person's sexuality affects the validity of his theories.
That's if you're not too busy reading the Bible translation authorised by that raging bisexual "queen" James.
In addition, Darwin was a FLAMING HOMOSEXUAL.
Based on my overall impression of the era Darwin lived in makes me doubt he ever "flamed". If he was a homosexual it wouldn't change my attitude toward him in the least. He was one of the great minds of the 1800s.
Do you want your kids to learn theorys by a raging HOMO?
I'm having a tough time finding a way to bridge the disconnect between Darwin's alleged bedroom activities and the validity of his work. Perhaps you could help me with this by telling me, in intimate detail, how your heterosexuality affects your professional life.
Fags want to insert there penises into other mens anuses.
Not all of them apparently. I reliably informed by people in the know that a considerable portion of the gay male population does not engage in anal sex but instead relies on oral sex as their primary source of sexual pleasure.
Is that what you want taught in public schools?
Do you?
Have fun in hell.
You too.
It's like a Reese's commercial:
"Hey, you got rampant homophobia in my flagrant disregard for science ..."
"Hey, you got complete scientific illiteracy in my gay bashing ..."
Dharmabum
#559378
2008-Jun-04 04:17 AM
It's like a Reese's commercial:
"Hey, you got rampant homophobia in my flagrant disregard for science ..."
"Hey, you got complete scientific illiteracy in my gay bashing ..."
Caffeine Free Diet Coke just squirted out of my nose.
I don't think that there is much evidence or even rumor that Darwin was a homosexual.
King James, on the other hand.......
@ Beebelbrox
You're welcome ...
So what?
Even if he had been the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal, his 'Theory of Evolution' is still a valid theory explaining quite nicely the origins of species.
But ofcourse he wasn't the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal, as we all know that the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal is extremely stupid, so mind-bogglingly stupid infact, that it thinks that if you can't see it, it can't see you. ... now where did I leave my towel ???
BTW as Hell is by your own accord void of stupid people like you, it must be a lot better place the Earth.... or heaven. i.e. having fun there won't be much of a problem.
You know the computer you used to post your bullshit, well, urm, I'm not sure how to put this but: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_turing
Please leave the internet NOW, or your computer will rape you.
There isn't anything confirming this statement; can you provide a source please.
And, his sexual preference had nothing to do with his scientific study. The two always have been and always will be mutually exclusive.
Wow, lets just say for the sake of argument that darwin was a homosexual. That does not refute the theory he came up with, does it?
Your tone is clearly indicative of a RAGING LUNATIC. You can't disprove the theory, so you try, but fail, to attack the messenger.
Folks like you deserve all the pain your hatred brings you.
And the winner is....
Dharmabum
I'm actually laughing aloud at this one.
If this guy isn't a Poe, then there isn't a Poe on the whole fucking internet.
"In addition, Christ was a FLAMING HETEROSEXUAL. Do you want your kids to learn theorys by a raging HETERO? Breeders want to insert there penises into women's vaginas. Is that what you want taught in public schools? Sounds like it to me. Have fun in hell."
Hey, it makes just as much sense! I will never understand why inserting a penis into a particular hole is supposedly so much more disgusting than inserting it into a different kind of hole.
But on a more serious note, Darwin's sexuality has nothing to do with anything. Regardless of what he did in bed, that's not what his theory was about, so that's not what chidlren would be learning in public schools. Duh.
"If you removed all of the homosexuals and homosexual influence from what is generally regarded as American culture, you would pretty much be left with "Let's Make a Deal." ~Fran Lebowitz
and while you're at it, tear down the sistine chapel! smash the pieta! christianity is full of queer propaganda!
@ Gloob
It's obvious from a careful reading of the Bible that Jesus and the Apostles actually did play an early form of D&D. Jesus, of course, was the DM. The "bread" mentioned at the Last Supper was simply an economy-sized bag of Cheetos, and the "wine" was a large cooler of Mountain Dew.
In any case, it matters not whether Darwin was gay, straight, black, white, purple, male, female, short, tall, skinny, fat, Christian, Hindu, Pastafarian, atheist, or any other qualifier that has absolutely nothing to do with science. Not one of those things has any bearing on the merit of his research and theories. To claim otherwise is nothing short of pure ignorance and bigotry.
Don't read the New Testament, either. 13 unmarried guys who hung around with each other constantly AND weren't avid D&D players? Hmm.
That made me laugh.
"D&D is the second most fun thing consenting adults can do together."
Somebody's protesting gays just a little too much, I think.
Also, my good friend is homosexual and a teacher, and he rocks (while leaving his sex life OUT of the classroom). STFU.
So, we start out with an ad hominem attack, and a fallacious one at that. Then we continue with an added attempt at a "gross-out" factor, and top the whole thing off with argument ad baculum. FAIL.
"Do you want your kids to learn theorys by a raging HOMO?"
Yes.
Yes Poe.
Sure, and that whole thing where he was married to a female woman-type wife in an Anglican ceremony in England during a time where homosexuality was illegal and heavily frowned upon and managed to father ten children with said female woman-type wife, that's all just a beard. A very committed beard.
Fucktard.
@Kuyohashi
"Sure, and that whole thing where he was married to a female woman-type wife in an Anglican ceremony in England during a time where homosexuality was illegal and heavily frowned upon and managed to father ten children with said female woman-type wife, that's all just a beard. A very committed beard."
That, and him being one of only five non-royalty persons buried in the Church of England's central place of worship, Westminster Abbey (and he became an agnostic, post-Evolution discovery). When C(unt) David Parsons the closet case himself can have a state funeral and a memorial that makes Lord Nelson's in Trafalgar Square look like a chipped & mouldy gravestone in a forgotten cemetery, then he can consider himself superior to Darwin. Oh, and as for you, Davey-boy, I don't see your face on a banknote:
image
Here endeth the lesson.
"Fucktard."
Never was a truer word said.
Apart from the gay-bashing, this is also a fucking ad hominem attack which makes no sense at all.
It's a bit like some people in Germany criticizing we still have some laws from Hitler's days in use. The fact that the Nazis invented them doesn't make them bad by itself.
And while there's nothing wrong with being gay anyway, Darwin being one of "teh homesecksuals" (btw, citation needed) has fuck all to do with his theory.
Darwin's personal life and opinions are irrelevant to the area of science to which he is credited. He could have been a transvestite from Rhodesia; it wouldn't make a blind bit of difference to reality.
Einstein was a brilliant man, and yet he was wrong about things, most notably quantum mechanics. ("God does not play dice", anyone?)
Alternatively, I could object to the Bible on the grounds that it talks about "women grinding" and "two men in one bed" and "lusting after their genitals"...
I thought that Darwin had wild monkey sex with apes during the voyage of the beagle and then went home and had sex with Mrs Darwin and had many children ?
nothing gay in that at all.
we are all HOMOS as in Homo Sapiens.
*ceiling cat says Hi *
"In addition, Alan Turing was a FLAMING HOMOSEXUAL. Do you want your kids to use the inventions of a raging HOMO? Fags want to insert there penises into other mens anuses. Is that what you want taught in public schools? Sounds like it to me. Have fun in hell."
i.e. stop using computers you hypocritical fuck.
To answer your question, I don't really care what two consenting adults do.
By the way, [citation needed]
since Darwin was training to be a minister, was maried and had a bunch of kids, I say you are wrong.
Some homosexuals prefer to have a penis inserted in their anus. Now you know more than you did, congratulations on being better informed.
By the way, some heterosexual women like anal sex , and some even like doing their husbands up-the-butt with a strapon.
No public schools to high school level should not in my opinion be teaaching sexual techniques. They should teach, this goes in there , that breaks and then the guy ejaculates and the girl may get pregnant , however condoms and birth control pills prevent some nasty diseases and may prevent pregnancy.
Says he, using a computer invented by a homosexual.
I have to say, I giggled at the thought that Darwin's sexual orientation would have the slightest impact on the accuracy of his scientific work. If it turned out that Newton was gay would Parsons step out of a 20th floor window to check if gravity had suddenly been discredited?
Poisoned Well Fallacy.
It matters not a fig whether Charles Darwin was a homosexual or not. What matters is the evidence and reasoning behind his Theory of Evolution, as brought up to date by Gregor Mendel, Thomas Hunt Morgan, Theodosius Dobzhansky , and others.
Evidence and reasoning are the foundations of Science, NOT bigotry.
By the way, nobody who knows anything about Charles Darwin believe him to have been a homosexual. Not that that would affect his conclusions at all.
“In addition, Darwin was a FLAMING HOMOSEXUAL.”
“Do you want your kids to learn theorys by a raging HOMO?”
"Fags want to insert there”
“Sounds like it to me. Have fun in hell.”
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
