@Goomy pls
...and here's Sadsick cammy, proving me right about him being a sad act who constantly searches his screename(s du jour) for anyone pointing & laughing at his micropenis (both digitally; HTML, and physically) that is his 'Coalfart'-ism 'pholosophy', he needs to fulfil his OCD-like obsessive need to chimp out, and further proving he's Europe's own Chris-chan, when he knows the only possible way he can prove us wrong.
Still, at least he's replenishing Snoogins's stock of cammy-tears. So crisp. So refreshing. So soul-nourishing. >:D
Certainly superiority-recharging enough to annihilate cammy's so-called 'argument':
http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=105473&Page=3#1747685
@cammy
"rape isn't an actual crime in the west"
Ched Evans. Convicted of rape - for which he was jailed, therefore it IS a crime here in the Western country of Britain, as our statute book says - and as a result, has effectively destroyed his own career as a footballer. NO football team will think of touching him, and one team's fans threatened to destroy such, if they were to take him on. He's now persona non grata in British sport. He is to sport what Gary Glitter is to pop music here in the UK, such is the P.R. nightmare he represents.
Gary Lineker: Footballer. The 'Mr. Clean' of sport, for not so much as being booked once. P.R. image & reputation spotless, even post-retirement & TV presenting, and 'face' of Walkers Crisps (in their TV adverts).
Jonathan Edwards: former Olympic gold medallist Athlete. Ex-long time Christian-turned Atheist. P.R. image on the up & up, post-presenting the 2012 London Paralympics for Channel 4, and now the go-to guy for sports presenting on TV.
The notion of 'Self Control' isn't even an issue for them, because like all normal, decent, sane men, they would never so much as think of doing what Ched Evans did. And why should they? You tell me.
Having a spotless reputation & flawless public image. Being a reviled and self-destroyed social pariah. My, but that's a toughie, eh? And all down to a simple concept:
Self Control.
Just two words that makes all the difference. And annihilates any & all possible 'arguments' to the contrary. Please explain how messrs. Lineker & Edwards are 'Insane' & 'Lunatics' (as you've referred to me in the past), because I'd sure like to know.
I don't have so much as a criminal record for spitting on the pavement. I can walk out my door without fear of so much as a odd look from anyone else, such is my standing in society, spotless reputation & public image utterly intact. And all down to two simple but argument-annihilating words:
Self Control.
I has it. Do you?
'Rape not a crime', you say? Yeah. Just keep telling yourself that, all the while you're living in that river in Egypt. What particularly fabulous hue is the sky in your little one-man dimension, cammy...?! [/hyper-sarcasm]
"actual rapists are a protected, worshiped class that women adore."
'Women adoring rapists', you say?
image
Oh no more, please Mr. Wilde, I am bereft of ribs! Next, you'll be telling us that women loved being tortured to death by the SS in WWII. [/mega-sarcasm]
And if 'twere the case that 'women adore rapists' as you claim, question: why did no woman support Ched Evans' right to go back to his career as a footballer, post-his release from prison? [/hyper-paradox]
Aye, there's the entire argument-annihilating rub, indeed. So why aren't you equally criticising John Wayne Bobbit for his not feeling pleasure when Lorena cut his cock off? Or for divorcing her as a result? Because if as you claim that 'women enjoy rape', and 'worship their abusers', then if you say that women must do so, purely for your 'sake', then men are FORCED to take whatever punishmen by women equally dished out to them like a man, LIKE it, and never complain. EVER.
Because if unmarried women can't have sex on their OWN terms - when, where, how, and with whom they want, with nobody else having the right to think otherwise (even 'Slut' becomes Thoughtcrime) - equally what makes the likes of you think you have the RIGHT to have sex: EVER?
...oh yeah, that's right: in your case, no woman will. EVER.
And why should they? You just keep thinking up your own rationalisations & excuses to justify your own FAIL, via your constant doublethink that is your own unjustifiable self-serving, solipsistic psychological morass of FAIL.
Because your 'Coalfart' philosophy is SO right, and is utterly impossible to criticise in any way, shape or form, you're sure getting the rest of the planet's entire male population to agree with you, yessiree! [/hyper-sarcasm]
Meanwhile, in the words of the LaTour song, 'People are still having Sex'. Penile insensitivity due to chronic wanking is a pain in the dick, eh Mary Jane Lick Sick? [/ED] I wouldn't know about that, however, as I'm in a consenting relationship: something we supposedly 'Insane' and 'Lunatic' men enjoy.
'Insane'. 'Lunatic'. I now wear these appelations as badges of honour, as I'm Insane for Sci-Fi, and a member of the New Lunar Republic, so where does that leave you? And not just in terms of now useless 'insults', neither...!
A simple but utterly 'philosophy'-destroying poser for Mary Jane Lick Sick, if as he claims 'Women enjoy rape'. Question: Would you enjoy being raped by a man far bigger & stronger than you? A simple one requiring an equally simple 'Yes' or 'No' answer (and if he answers with anything else other than 'Yes' or 'No', or he deviates from such or refuses to answer the question 'Yes' or 'No', then it'll count as a No).
Because if your answer is the only one possible, the fact you'll have destroyed your own argument will be the least of your problems. It'll also mean that you don't even have the right to THINK the way you do, and 'Coalfart'-ism, least of all 'Incel' are concepts that have absolutely NO right to be regarded as credible 'concepts' by anyone, and are only rationalisations & excuses by you, a.k.a. Butthurt. And all you deserve is to be treated like the Lolcow you really are. [/@'Holden', CWCki Forums]
...after all: 'Incel' a word? Yeah. Right. When the professors, academics, scholars, etymologists, lexicographers et al at the OED - who take their work ultra-deadly serious - include in the latest version of the definitive collection of the lexicon of the English language, the Oxford English Dictionary (especially the two-volume Concise Edition) the word 'Lolcat', get back to us when your 'word' at least reaches the ears of those at the OED.
But we won't be holding our breaths. Even 'Selfie' has a better chance of being included in any future edition of the OED than your non-'word'.
--EDIT--
@Passerby
What do you bet that Mary Jane Lick Sick/Alexius/GG Anus/coconuts/cammy/Holden (*Insert screename du jour of your choice here*) simply does what he always resorts to: being the contrarian little squit he really is. Calling it, now II. [/Snoogins]
I've said it before, but bears repeating: he's Humpty Dumpty from "Alice Through The Looking Glass": words - and basically morality itself - are extremely malleable; they can mean exactly what he wants them to. Nothing more, nothing less.
image
Tweedledee: 'Are you Tweedledum, or Tweedledumber?!'
And she (Natsuko Kuwatani) is the one who wears the trousers in their partnership as ES-Members (with their Electromagnetic/Gravitational Field Manipulation abilities; also she being an omni-systems-hacking Technopath), who always verbally bitchslaps said partner Tweedledum (Jun Fukuyama) whenever he speaks out of turn/gets ideas above his station. And he always obeys her.
...oh, and in b4 calling it II, this just today from CWCki Forums (http://cwckiforums.com/threads/marijan-%C5%A0ikli%C4%87-thatincelblogger.6576/page-806#post-507998):
image
Get those bottles of cammy-tears ready on ice, Snoogins, we've got some serious celebrating to do; even if he proves me wrong about him proving that he's basically Europe's own Chris-chan in terms of Lolcow-osity, and never appears here in FSTDT/WGW/ED/TvTropes/CWCki et al, or even if he does appear in FSTDT again - this thread at least - it's win-win for us! Goomy pls, I'm looking at you. b^_^d