(Denying evolution is a science, calling it a religion instead)
You keep claiming "science" when there is none.
(Note - he says "flat earth blood-letting" to mock things which scientists believed to be true at one time.)
19 comments
"If I didn't carry out an experiment personally then no one has done it! Any other* scientists are just lying, doctoring results and photoshopping any photographic or video evidence! Because I'm just that singularly intelligent, goddamnit!"
*This is in no way an acknowledgement that this drooling lout is anything else. Only in their stand-in for a mind will they ever be credited with holding a position requiring even the barest modicum of critical or creative thought.
Yes, it has, and yes, it has.
Can you test some of the claims of the Bible? No, you can't.
You keep claiming "creationism" when there is none.
Ever notice how religion is special and must be protected when they do it, but they use "religion" as a derogatory term to describe something they don't like? When they claim that evolution is a religion because it has no evidence and is based only on belief, they unknowingly say the same thing about Christianity.
Interesting you should say that, you moron. About a month ago, the European Space Agency announced the Planck probe had detected the background radiation from the Big Bang and were able to determine the beginning of the universe as 13.8 billion years ago. All due to the magic of relativity.
You effing boob.
You again? What would happen if society demanded evidence for all the stuff in the bible, before they would allow a church to open up? (Well, what would REALLY happen is that society would have tons of prime real-estate that might be sold to tax-paying entities. Not a bad idea at all!)
Did you test God? No you can't.
Did you test creation? No you can't.
And yes, there is plenty of evidence of speciation and the age of the universe. Just because you refuse to accept it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
The trick is to knock the perceived opposition so that ones drool infested nightmare can seem as though it has legitimacy. In this case, disparage science so that Bible God nonsense can flourish and pretend to be relevant to the real world of sanity.
But it's not working. What is actually happening is that Oboehner comes across as a simpleton with an oafish tendency to lie and make idiotic internet droolations.
Too bad that Biblical mythology has been shown to be false with succinct observations throughout the sciences. Much of what you take issue with has been observed, and has more reliable evidence going for it than centuries old scripture that is not historically valid.
@Doubting Thomas:
That's because Christianity is not a religion, it's a personal relationship with God. [/fundielogic]
image
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
