Anon #sexist antifeministtech.info

Summarizing some of the points here :

The scarcer reproductive resource is the one far more valued than the less scarce one.

BUT,

The scarcer reproductive resource is the slower to evolve, and hence obstructs the overall evolution of the species.

The scarcer reproductive resource has the more specialized skills, as there is not enough room for too many skills outside of those ancillary to reproduction.

Once a species has any purpose beyond mere reproduction, the scarcer reproductive resource starts to become obsolete, as they cannot transition to any other useful role.

The scarcer reproductive resource makes virtually no contribution to anything that a more advanced civilization would measure our progress on, which pretty much comes down to space exploration and matter/energy harnessing.

Hence, the scarcer reproductive resource is really just a stepping stone towards the eventual evolutionary endgame, which breaks the Fermi paradox.

So yes, this does explain the Fermi paradox. Out of millions of species’ that have ever existed, only one has become sentient. In the same way, out of millions of civilizations that reach our level, perhaps only one manages to adapt around the scarcer reproductive resource.

29 comments

Confused?

So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!

To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.