One of the biggest tricks the Devil ever pulled was convincing people that porn was protected by the First Amendment.
By definition, speech carries a message. There is no message in porn, just base stimulation. It serves no higher purpose than as a masturbation aid.
21 comments
So Matt Forney is even more stupid than I thought. Not surprising, actually
What strikes me as odd is his hostility to pornography. Especially given their reaction to "Grab them by the pussy", I would expect the manosphere to be strongly in favour of detabooising pornography because they are sleezy porn addicts feminazis oppressing male sexuality.
So what's the higher purpose in the Hokey Pokey? Or country and western? Or a campaign ad?
It might not be art, but art isn't what's protected. Speech is what's protected.
@Pharaoh Bastethotep
Oh but porn to them is simply a constant reminder of their utter failure to attract an actual mate, one they`ll still use but with probably ever growing disgust at themselves. Besides they`re blind-ass drunk on their newly perceived power, some of them might actually believe they`ll be getting their state assigned fuckslaves any day now.
Porn can have a message. For example, the tapes I found in my dad's stash had the message "the copier repair guy constantly gets to f*ck on the machine". Ok, that message wasn't true, bUT it was still a message
There is no message in porn
Then why does "Playboy" still exist to this day?
Also, Larry Flynt. NEXT!
...and unless you've never so much as touched yourself at night - thus enjoy your terminal Prostate Cancer & Blue Balls - ask yourself why I refer to you as 'Matt Porn ey'.
There is no message in porn, just base stimulation. It serves no higher purpose than as a masturbation aid.
You say that like it's a bad thing. Not all art necessarily has a message, either. It can be just aural or visual stimulation. But it's still protected.
Besides, there's plenty of message in porn. Namely that foreplay consists of five seconds of cunnilingus, and women really enjoy the guy coming in their mouth even if they have a disgusted look on their face.
@Bimaac
He literally is, he has a nofap promo in the sidebar of his website.
He's also really into supplements if that's of interest to anyone.
Porn isn't protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that it is up to individual communities to decide what they think is indecent. So, porn is protected by, surprise, surprise, people not actually getting that bent out of shape about it.
@KingOfRhye
...and thus 'I read it for the articles'.
But Matt Porney hasn't got that message . However, as proved here with Hugh Hefner:
image
Carrie Fisher did.
One of the biggest tricks the Devil ever pulled was convincing people that alt-right memes were protected by the First Amendment.
By definition, speech carries a message. There is no message in alt-right memes, just incoherent bigotry. It serves no higher purpose than as a masturbation aid.
Fixed that for you.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
