caamib #sexist

caamib #sexist caamib.wordpress.com

[Excerpt from his manifesto "THE STORY OF YOUR INCEL – AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH"]

NECESSARY PRECURSORS

1) All civilized societies were patriarchies.

2) Women are agnostic about male behavior. This means they’re not naturally attracted to any type of man but that their preferences change depending on which kind of men is the most successful with women.

3) In connection to nr.2, women’s preference for a type of male changes simply based on a degree of success a type has with most women.

4) Seduction is worthless, even harmful for most species, as it does not promote any valuable traits that make the species better. It is a form of deceit males make do spread their genes and it creates worthless offspring. This is explained by a phenomenon called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisherian_runaway

5) I believe voting is a privilege that should only be given to intelligent men and shouldn’t be given to women.

36 comments

old comment by Skide

5 indeed it is and exactly why your kind should be stripped of it. Because you can`t operate on reality you don`t deserve to affect it on mass level. Because you see females as less capable, less sentient as a priori. Because your kind demonstrated to us all with perfect clarity, that while everyone should posses the possibility through their lives to aquire their voting rights, they must stil be able to at least prove the basic understanding of the socio-political system in which they live, that they care enough about their society and species to be given the influence over others and perhaps that they respect the basic laws of reality too.

The rest of this simply serves to demonstrate my point, you have no concept of how our brains work and how attached we can get to our mates if we "click" or even that we do get attached primarily on the basis of personality and character, not the amount of disposable income a male can throw our way.

old comment by Jamaican Castle

This means they’re not naturally attracted to any type of man but that their preferences change depending on which kind of men is the most successful with women.

Can you not see the circular logic here? "Women are attracted to men who attract women"? It's not like "good with women" is a separate, individual trait; it's a reflection of what someone's done, of what their other traits have gotten them. I won't deny that, to a degree, some women might be attracted to what society suggests "should" be attractive to them, and attractive traits thus gain some inertia, but they don't simply spring into being of their own accord. Someone, somewhere - some population of women - had to get the ball rolling.

I believe voting is a privilege that should only be given to intelligent men

So that's you right out, huh?

old comment by Anon-e-moose

1 - Queen Elizabeth I. Also, Boudica. NEXT!

2- Simon Weston:

image

How is it that he only found a girlfriend - and ultimately married her - after the Exocet missile attack on the Sir Galahad in the Falklands War: the resulting fire disfiguring his face, and he having 70 operations to restore him to something resembling 'Normality'?

Looks-wise, even after those operations, what would you rate him out of 10? The woman who ultimately married him cared not a jot about what he looked like, so you tell me.

3- Physically, Weston failed. How is it that he still succeeded: and not just in terms of relationships?

4- Prof. Stephen Hawking can only move his eyes, so it's impossible for him to 'seduce'.

image

Game, Set, and Annihilated Argument to him.

image

Objectively, those who denounce the Western concept of democracy, and thus human rights: which you would deny half the world's population, have no rights. You don't have the right to an 'Opinion'. You don't even have the right to exist.

Remember: Human rights are a Western concept. As you hate the West and everything it stands for, therefore you have no rights whatsoever. What makes you think you have the right to them?

...and besides: as no human being would so much as think the way you do, why should you be regarded as a human...?!

6- ?????

7- Time for that dose of crystal meth; it's proven effects on memory. Otherwise, how can you possibly continue this course of same old same old talking points BS if it keeps being refuted into the dirt?

That's why you eternally FAIL, He Who Must Not Be Named.

old comment by Skide

@Anon-e-moose

Meth, from the posts he creates you`d believe it must be street legal in Croatia.

Also it`s funny that our saintly friend would regularly take one of the few drugs I myself would never put into my system. I, a known and proud druggie know better than to take shit which will literally dissolve your brain.

You know there`s a certain saying some of us junkies like to tell ourselves: You will know a man by the shit he takes. Extrapolate this to the desired effects of a given substance and I say it tends to contains a bit of truth. Weed and psychodelics are taken for the introspection and long conceptual talks, powdered cocaine, amphetamines and a few newer invetions designate the desire for extreme sensoric and metabolic overcharge, dmt and such are for the trips and meth, as well as opiates is for the ersatz that can`t kill themselves properly, yet have no desire to continue any semblance of human existence. The slang term for metheads is Zombies and it`s a damn precise one at that.

Then again we can place some faint hope on this and some croatian cop having watched one too many zombie flicks last weekend... It happend a few times already over the world with metheads, lets say the drug does a marvelous job of making you look like and in some cases even bahave like an early to mid stage infected.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@pyro

Do we really need to dumpster-dive like this?

...a certain Mad Aussie Sparky has gotten himself a nice 2.66 GHz 24-core 2X Xeon-based video rendering setup for bugger all by doing exactly that - and Xeons cost thousands - so I wouldn't knock it! b^_^d

He repurposes electronic stuff, we follow his example, re. The Darndest Things said by the likes of He Who Must Not Be Named: 'Don't Turn It On, Take It Apart!' [/Teardowns]

And we're in like Flynn, to borrow Dave Jones' catchphrase when he opens up something to either praise something: or criticise it; 'It's a bit crusty!'

@Bimaac

And even the earliest & most basic discrete logic ICs possess as much sentience as Deep Thought, KITT, Orac, Holly, J.A.R.V.I.S, E.D.I., Colossus/Guardian, WOPR/Joshua, Wirbelwind etc than the Croat Scroat ever will.

old comment by Swede

1. There were/are probably more equal societies among the civilized ones, than among the non-civilized ones.
2. Women are individuals.
3. Women’s preference changes based on what time of the month it is. On the other hand, most men are not cardboard cut-outs, but humans with depth and scope of character and can easily adapt.
4. Seduction works perfectly fine for normal humans. In most species, the ones with the largest horns, the biggest tail-feathers, the most intricate dance, the clearest song, etc, are usually the ones with strongest/most stable DNA. A man (or woman; women can seduce too) with regular features and a pleasing way also probably have strong/stable DNA. I.e. seduction is beneficial for most species.
5. It wouldn’t get voting privileges, as it’s pretty far from intelligent.

old comment by Bimaac

Marjie forms its opinion of what women are attracted to from watching trash talk shows, KoR.

It's a bit like what I keep telling "Nice Guys"TM and "incels" who constantly whine about how women only go out with "assholes"; it's because they're assholes too. And if they would try taking them down off the pedestal they have them on because they're "hot", they would realize this too. Let's face it; for all their whinging that women are "shallow", these dipshits tend to be pretty superficial themselves.

And this also speaks volumes to the type of women that Cammy-Poo finds attractive. Personally, I'd never consider dating the women who are on the talk shows that thing thinks define what Western women look for in a partner. For a drunken one night stand maybe but to actually date? Hell no!

There's a reason why a lot of women go out with "bad boys"; they like the drama. I'm at the point in my life where I left my teens and early 20's behind a long time ago, I'm not looking for any drama in my life.

caamib #sexist caamib.wordpress.com

36 comments

Confused?