Article "Sweden" #racist

Article "Sweden" #racist en.kingswiki.com

The Kingdom of Sweden (Swedish: Konungariket Sverige) is a country in Northern Europe, bordered by Norway and Finland. It is known for its far-left policies and extreme liberalism.

Recently, Earth Hour had to be cancelled in the country in order to protect women from sexual assault by the Rapefugees.

Sweden's official Twitter account

In 2011, the government of Sweden started allowing its citizens to run its Twitter account. The idea was that each week, a normal Swede would get to use the account to illustrate daily life in Sweden.

In late August 2016, the account was given to a woman named Elin, who was harshly criticised by members of the Alt-Right for general harlotry. Many comments pointing out the rapefugee situation were made. On 6 September 2016, the account was handed over to a transgender man calling herself "Gavin". She instantly began to receive the same reaction as her predecessor.

Sweden as Islamic caliphate

Due to the high amounts of rapefugees (Islamic economic migrants) that the country takes in, many believe that Sweden will become the first Islamic caliphate in Europe since the days of the Ottoman Empire. Recently, a prosecutor declared that the flag of ISIS did not constitute hate speech[1], practically legalising it.

15 comments

old comment by Uilleam

It is known for its far-left policies and extreme liberalism.

Translation: "It is known for being a sane liberal democracy during a time when us fascists are well on our way to experiencing a revival, and that just won't do."

Recently, Earth Hour had to be cancelled in the country in order to protect women from sexual assault by the Rapefugees.

Translation: "As with the rest of Europe, we cherrypick the fuck out of rape cases that happen to involve Muslims to make it seem as if the Syrian refugees who just want a home are a menace to society. By making people focus on this non-issue, we just happen to distract from the fact that this awful cucked SJW government we hate so much is actually doing well and their country is a genuinely swell place to live. Screw that, dystopian misery is the way to go!"

In late August 2016, the account was given to a woman named Elin, who was harshly criticised by members of the Alt-Right for general harlotry. Many comments pointing out the rapefugee situation were made. On 6 September 2016, the account was handed over to a transgender man calling herself "Gavin". She instantly began to receive the same reaction as her predecessor.

Translation: "Elin committed the unforgivable sin of being a woman. Gavin committed the unforgivable sin of being LGBT. On the other hand, vicious abuse and trolling is not only perfectly fine, but the height of moral good. We are not fucked-up little cretins at all, by the way."

Due to the high amounts of rapefugees (Islamic economic migrants) that the country takes in, many believe that Sweden will become the first Islamic caliphate in Europe since the days of the Ottoman Empire. Recently, a prosecutor declared that the flag of ISIS did not constitute hate speech[1], practically legalising it.

Translation: "We happen to ignore how heavily monitored the dude wielding the ISIS flag was after this incident. We also ignore our own fetishization of free speech, though, to be fair, we have an extremely distorted definition of that particular term. Most importantly, we scream bloody murder if you point out that all you have to do is take an ISIS manifesto, replace "Muslim" with "white" and "infidel" with "cuck", and you've created a roughly 90% accurate alt-right manifesto."

old comment by

Quit licking frogs plagiarist of culture. Noting that attributing rape to being of a particular race, religion, or simply being an immigrant is both a thin dodge to construct an excuse to wall people off and ignore them and an exercise in trying as hard as possible to ignore it within the accusers own environment by painting it as something other people do on merit of being what they are and not an extension of it being minimized in many societies is not defending rape or rapists.

Brushing it off in that manner is actually a contributor to a trend of escaped punishment and increased acceptance of rape as it creates an environment where crimes within and against the stigmatized group are treated as a matter of course or a joke while any attempt to assimilate into society is met with pre-emptive assumption that such people are criminals no matter what they do and leads them to believe that they might as well be the monster you expect them to be because they will never be seen as anything otherwise.

It's not somebody else's problem and the more you try to make it that way the more it will backfire on you.

old comment by

No, our first answer was that there's nothing inherently different or special when a man of one race commits a crime over another yet you didn't give a flying fuck if other people raped, robbed, and rioted and focused on groups you don't like as though it was unique to them. Then you threw numbers around without a care in the world for how it rates against "white on white" crime or the consistent trend in prosecution to nail minorities against the wall for longer periods with less evidence or even none at all. Instead you use the lopsided conviction rate and severity of how they are punished as "proof" the punishment is justified. Try and reconcile just how much evidence is required before a white rapist is convicted in a white majority country compared to what is taken on faith in a case against a black man. A white man raping a woman could be caught on camera forcing himself on his victim and still get off. If he's an acquaintance of the victim it is for some reason presumed that a certain level of consent is implied. Less than 3% of rape cases that make it to court end in a conviction. But when it's a black man - especially if the woman is white - just having been in the area when the rape occurred is enough for a jury to break out a noose. King's Wiki is a prime example of this mindset as they've encouraged an incredible amount of the kind of institutional abuse of women, pedophilia, and dismissive treatment of rape they're trying to insult Muslims as savages for. Indeed their ideal society so closely resembles the most hardcore and contemptible practices of fundamentalist Islam it's a wonder they don't convert.

Then we pointed out that crimes of all kind are higher overall in poverty stricken areas of civilization regardless of ethnicity for the simple fact that nobody thinks it's worth looking into crimes *against* what guys like you consider society's trash outside of easy arrests that nobody will question going as far as to invent the reasons for an arrest themselves and prefer to keep the poor locked down where their wretched existence won't offend society's upper crust. And that minorities get intentionally shuffled into that pit and their fingers stepped on if they try to claw their way out. From then on the full protection of the law ceases to apply to them, guilt is presumed at all times. Outside the pit? Reasonable doubt applies at all times and suddenly it's not fair to call anyone criminals before they're convicted, or a date rapist what he is when clearly a woman was teasing him by not putting out, or treat a white collar criminal like an embezzler as though they were about to physically attack you, or to assume anything in the police shooting of a well-heeled man even if he's holding a gun. A fact people like you happily ignore with the bullshit contrivance that everybody who has it rough deserves to have it rough and there's no problem making things even worse for them and then leaving them to rot which adds to the problem. But you don't care about any of that because it cannot be twisted into something you can smash with a hammer so you instead try to make it about race because that's an easy target to pick out in a crowd and gives you someone to hit.

Then you declared victory because you frankly don't much care for society's actual mechanics or underlying functional problems or anything else that doesn't give you a visible target and instead try to push the problem of unequally viewed crimes and how they spiral into a default state of presumed hostility onto race. Then as it becomes glaringly obvious that people in these groups are going to be treated like criminals no matter what they do and they begin to grumble their frustrations using language half as threatening as anything directed against them would turn up in your casual conversations you seize upon it as a statement of coordinated intent and if anyone ever descends into a "then let me be evil" mentality you dance with unrestrained glee and believe that blanketly justifies everything you have done and will do in the future, forever.

If crimes were actually investigated equally as crimes and victims actually treated like victims without categorical dismissal as "having it coming" half the problems in North America would vanish overnight. But instead assholes like you stand atop a wall trying to shout down to people, tossing rocks and blaming them for all the problems in the city on the other side of that wall completely and blissfully unconcerned with the fact that just behind you the very shit you're saying was the fault of the people you're pissing on continues completely unabated between the remaining population you approve of and you'll just find another reason to compartmentalize it so there's nice visual shorthand you can try to build another wall around.

Or if that was too long and you didn't bother reading: If we don't say what you want to hear you make it up for us, because everything is always the fault of the people you want to be at fault and the solution is always bashing them over the head.

old comment by Pepe

No.
>>A white man raping a woman could be caught on camera forcing himself on his victim and still get off

I stopped reading here for the night, but I assure you ill read it at tomorrow lunch. Sorry, but my bullshit meter just hit me on the face. When I recover, I will answer sentence by sentence. I'm back from the construction site, and field engineering is tiring work.

You just sit back and google swedish rape or finnish rape and see. A much cleaner land is despoiled by people who aren't even supposed to be there (why not rich muslim countries?), and there is nothing, NOTHING that justifies this.

Blacks blame whites all the time, I am yet to see a consensus against MUCH BIGGER, LONGER AND HORRIBLE arab slave trade that ruined africa and mediterranean and got women into sex slavery.

I see piece of shit agitprop like "Django unleashed" and the constant bombardment of your side as if whites invented slavery (when it was in circulation for as long as human history), I am yet to see a genuine agitprop against Arab-ISLAMIC slavery of blacks.

It is very, very natural of anyone, even a Turk to see that your progressive-cosmopolitan side is clearly waging a dark war against anything traditionally western, which I naturally see in different versions in losers of history, such as an unwanted sibling waging a passive aggressive war, or a "runt of the litter" in a social circle.

When I see less white bashing and more "Humans are Bastards Trope" grade consensus on your side, I'll be more civil. So far this page and many others JUSTIFY right wing wankfantasies like Turner Diaries.

P:S : My political compass is exact centre.

old comment by Passerby

>>A white man raping a woman could be caught on camera forcing himself on his victim and still get off

I stopped reading here for the night

You just sit back and google swedish rape or finnish rape and see.

FYI we've got an actual Swede as a regular here who described how often rapists get off even with hard evidence against them, simply because of how rape is perceived. And I've seen for myself how perception drastically warps when people decide that race factors into anything. But by all means, please, keep on running your lips.

If you think Google search results are an almighty indicator put in "Disproportionate Sentencing" and waste some time telling us how that's all biased while the angry WN bloggers and political commenters who've never set foot in Sweden are spewing the Gospel Truth by your estimates.

And you don't see people bashing slavery in Muslim countries? What rock were you hiding under when the world went apeshit over the Boko Haram slave raids? And if you look around on this site you'll run across a handful of Islamic fundies suggesting reinstituting slavery and us ripping them to pieces in response. You hear what is relevant to you and little else. If I hear a Muslim trying to reinstate institutional slavery I'll give them the exact same shit I give the League of the South. Thing is proximity to those egotistical fucks means I'll be hearing from them a lot more than I'll be hearing from Imam across the sea whose statements are only aired locally in a language I don't speak.

Didn't factor language barriers or comparative activity in social media into that accusation, did you?

Shifting attention to the traders does nothing to distract from the role of buyers and owners as you hope it will, and certainly nothing to negate slavery apologists and continued dehumanization in the modern age and quite pointedly our own backyards.