Quote# 129295

There's absolutely nothing wrong with book burnings of its of degenerate literature that's unhealthy & harmful to a people.

nontolerantman, Twitter 29 Comments [7/15/2017 12:57:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 | bottom


"unhealthy & harmful to a people"

In the sense 'disagrees with the views of nontolerantman'.

7/15/2017 1:13:30 AM


Prove to me that you have ever read a book first. Your English is worse than mine, and I am Swiss. Pwned!

7/15/2017 1:20:33 AM


Alright then, might I suggest we burn all the religious texts?
Something you find distasteful might be someone else's favourite, you twit.

7/15/2017 1:36:39 AM

So we can burn Bibles and Qu'arans?

7/15/2017 1:43:15 AM


There's something wrong with assuming that you are the one human who is uniquely qualified to judge what's "unhealthy and harmful". Sorry, but we do not have to tolerate a nontolerantman.

7/15/2017 5:20:14 AM

Shepard Solus

Huh. And here I thought you'd defend the Bible.

7/15/2017 7:31:49 AM


The only way literature can be unhealthy and harmful, is if it gives people paper-cuts.
More Kindle's to the people!

7/15/2017 7:41:48 AM



Shall we start with the Bible: it's degenerate, unhealthy & harmful.

...and watch nowtoldrantingman backpedal faster than Sir Jesus Wiggins can ride forwards on water.

7/15/2017 7:55:59 AM

Thinking Allowed

Cool, I think I'll grab some bibles and a lighter.

7/15/2017 7:59:31 AM

The Angry Dybbuk

Yes, there is. And the fact I have to point this out now really pisses me off:

"Dort wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man auch am Ende Menschen." - Heinrich Heine, 1823.

Yup, he had it figured in 1823. One would think, after all that has happened since, that "Heine was right" is now settled.

Apparently not. Each generation has to fuck up like the last - a dog returning to its vomit.

7/15/2017 8:25:58 AM


If you really must feel the need to dispose of any "degenerate literature" you have, I would recommend tearing the pages out and shredding the pages in a shredder. That way, the paper could be recycled; perhaps the hardcover could be recycled as well, or at least reused.

On the other hand, I feel that burning books, especially in an open fire outside, would not be the smart choice, as the smoke would create air pollution, which could be harmful to the ozone layer, and indirectly become part of the reason why your town is receiving those record-breaking, triple-digit heatwaves.

7/15/2017 9:03:05 AM

Fundy's: Burn books.
Internet Atheists: Burn all religious books.

Fundy's and Internet Atheists both the same.

7/15/2017 9:19:23 AM


Look, a nazi!

7/15/2017 10:27:02 AM

Man Called True

@#2074394: It's called "making a point", and taking it seriously shows a lack of ability to grasp metaphor.

7/15/2017 10:53:02 AM


Well, what else are you going to do with Windoze 95 manuals and outdated medical books and all the crappy ghost written Patterson novels once their useful life has ended? I mean people get hysterical when they see libraries tossing the guts of books in the recycle bin. Using them to heat the building makes sense, and we don't have to worry about our discards showing up as donations.

Oh, you're one of those dipshits burning Teen vogue because they produce well written and accurate sex education materials and they refuse to fellate your anointed orange strong man...fuck you! People have a right to information. Yes, I even buy books I disagree with passionately for my library because people are entitled to information.

@Muchacho1994 Book covers cannot be recycled. Some people make cool crafts with reclaimed book covers. My favorite are the purses. National Union catalogs make dandy Christmas Trees and have no other use. I've also seen one library build a cool fake fireplace out of discards. Also, recycling most book pages is a marginal idea at best. By the time libraries get rid of them the chemical deteriorate has reduced the paper to a weak and smelly state not a positive addition to the pulp.

7/15/2017 12:01:29 PM

Pharaoh Bastethotep

There's absolutely nothing wrong with book burnings of its of degenerate literature that's unhealthy & harmful to a people.

Like Mein Kampf and The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion?

7/15/2017 12:03:00 PM


So the Bible?

7/15/2017 12:40:20 PM

Demon Duck of Doom

So, we can burn The Art of the Deal without any threats from you?

7/15/2017 1:41:10 PM


Internet Atheists

>What is the concept of Irony. And Sarcasm.

...but then, a certain Alt-Shite retard has yet to learn of the concept which this site is built on: Satire.

Also, if certain books are to be burned, therefore so can others: a concept known as 'Sauce for the Goose'. Taking the logic of the fundie then ramping such up to it's ultimate extreme, and turning such against them to annihilate their entire argument. Thus if they don't like the sound of such, therefore their own thinking - via their own words - is utterly unjustifiable, ergo it has no right to exist.

Nailing that fundie logic's head to the floor. Or making it pull it's own head off via Sarcasm, Dramatic Irony, Metaphor, Pathos, Puns, Parody, Litotes, and... Satire. [/Doug & Dinsdale Piranha]



Reminds me of the time Conservatroll said it was an honour to be quoted here. Of course I have seen terrorists, rapists, atheists, Pagans, Muslims all quoted on here. He is honoured to be affiliated to those people


(Good FSM, the Alt-Shite retard community has devolved to such cancer!)


@Philbert McAdamia

chop your cock off.

In soviet Russia, is last name

Has Chopurcockov come to claim his new screename...?!

...and curious how the formerly named 'Conservatroll' was quoted from that - and thus 'Nicknamed' by Philbert McAdamia - thread, and mayhaps has resurfaced in this one, to be named thusly: both in quote threads by nowtoldrantingman.

I wonder...?!

7/15/2017 2:17:41 PM

I wonder if conservaytoll still calls it an honour to be quoted

7/15/2017 3:56:51 PM

Oh and it seems conservatroll is against burning religious books such as Qu'aran. Which means he stands with Muslims. And we all know he advocates guilt by association. So he is standing with terrorists. Which explains why he didn't condemn certain terrorists, he himself now being one by standing with Muslims against Qu'aran burning

I love it when trolls just pwn themselves. It is always so worth it.

Mr. Chopurcockuv should just pull a Russ at this point. It is the only way he can redeem his miserable self. Unless he is trying to spread stupidity like Jerry did

7/15/2017 4:08:32 PM



Oh and it seems conservatroll is against burning religious books such as Qu'aran. Which means he stands with Muslims. And we all know he advocates guilt by association. So he is standing with terrorists

Right-wing American terrorists exist. If all Muslims - No Exceptions - are terrorists, therefore by his own logic, all right-wingers like him are terrorists. No Exceptions.

If it pleases the court, I would like to submit Exhibit A:


@Aunty-FSTDT (a.k.a. Conservatroll: now Chopurcockov):

the fact that Islam is a theocratic totalitarian model



For the record I do want to say

abolishing a republican form of government in favor of a theocracy, I'd have no problem


I almost wish that there would be, like, a simultaneous telecast, and all Americans would be forced–forced at gunpoint no less–to listen to every David Barton message, and I think our country would be better for it. I wish it’d happen

-Mike Fuckabee

The prosecution rests.


I refer you to here:


Also here:



So anonymous coward calls others wife beaters and liars and scum. Seeing that he has excused Christian terrorists, he is at the best an enabler for their terrorists. Though like other Islamaphobes, he accuses others of the same thing when they point out Christians can be just as bad. Thus he thinks it's ok when one side does it but not the other. Or he outright supports it. Naturally though he does the same with homosexuality and paedophilia. Notice in other threads he ignored things like republican pedophiles and Quiverfull, and always brought up NAMBLA

...but mainly this book-burner. Enjoy your paradox, Chopurcockov the terrorist. You = ISIS. Because you clearly defend their right to think the way they do. When the NSA, CIA, FBI, and MI6, GCHQ & Scotland Yard's Anti-Terror section can answer the easy question of 'Does ISIS have the right to think the way they do?' with the even easier 'No'. I answer 'No'. So what's your excuse, rightist terrorist...?!

(PROTIP: The ex-ISIS terrorist who gave the western intelligence services that priceless ISIS data: thus he answered that question 'No': therefore he himself admitted that he had no right to think the way he did. Your call.)

ISIS and Alt-Shitists like Chopurcockov: both the same.


I love it when trolls just pwn themselves

All too easy. [/Darth Vader]

7/15/2017 4:56:49 PM


@ #2074394: Cats don't understand sarcasm, either. Kind of tells us about your intellectual wattage.

7/15/2017 5:42:05 PM

Creedence Leonore Gielgud

>There's absolutely nothing wrong with book burnings

You're right, because we're to the point where it's a completely pointless gesture. You could not possibly suppress any piece of literature, music or whatever at this point because there's no way you can ever be sure that you deleted every digital copy of any given title.

7/15/2017 6:01:40 PM

You know what the Nazis claimed they were doing when they burned all those books? Burning degenerate literature that's unhealthy & harmful to people. Of course, any literature that disagreed with Nazi ideology was obviously degenerate, unhealthy & harmful to people.

7/15/2017 8:56:55 PM

1 2 | top: comments page