Quote# 131595

Today's woman has fought for "total control and responsibility" for her body, so she should be responsible for deciding to spread her legs. If she is not fully prepared for that responsibility, then she should keep them closed until she is. Fact is, less than 5% of all abortions are due to rape and incest together, meaning the other 95% was out of carelessness on the womans part mostly. Again, it is her body, she knows the consequences that not being prepared may bring, just as the rest of us do in any wrongdoing we choose to do, so she should not get a free pass to murder something she herself is primarily responsible for. Having said that, we all make mistakes, many times on the spur of the moment. My problem is with the system making it easier for women not to have to worry about being responsible anymore, they can just get pregnant as many times as they want and kill their babies...especially at the taxpayers expense. That offends me...so where are my rights for being offended by these lowlifes?

theradicalson, Realabortiondebate 14 Comments [9/13/2017 2:09:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom


Where are your rights?

Absolutely everywhere including every branch of government. What you are complaining about the lack of is your rights to be obeyed without question or disagreement at all times by every female person in the country.

To which I say: Did Fucking Ums.

9/13/2017 3:46:50 AM


Oh please we all know you probably wouldn't be spouting this bullshit if men could also get pregnant.

9/13/2017 4:49:02 AM

Churchy LaFemme

You'd complain if you were involved with a woman and she refused to have sex with you, even if she claimed she didn't want to risk getting pregnant. If paying for abortions with tax dollars upsets you, consider how many tax dollars would be necessary to support a woman and her child on welfare.

9/13/2017 5:36:33 AM


Women don't just magically get pregnant. A penis is usually involved, so unless that "other 95%" is somehow made up entirely of women who went to the sperm bank or something, then the guy who owns the penis is JUST AS RESPONSIBLE. JFC. How is this a difficult concept to grasp?

9/13/2017 5:41:41 AM


Damn, all these years I thought women needed a man to get pregnant. Thank you for explaining that only the woman needs to take responsibility.

Oh, and those kids in the back yard? There's a reason they resemble the mailman...

9/13/2017 6:28:56 AM

Doubting Thomas

That's all fine and dandy, but you people constantly try to refuse women access to contraception as well. Proving once again that the anti-abortion stance isn't about saving babies but trying to control women's sex lives.

And BTW, you have no right to not be offended.

9/13/2017 7:05:56 AM


Donald Fart the manslut. Also, Newt Gingrich.

Hey, if men can have sex with whomever they like - be Sexually Liberated - therefore women can have sex on their own terms. They're far more sensible when it comes to contraception, too. Having a few condoms on hand: and insisting that their partner(s) use them. A practical - and extremely simple - system.

I refer you to Charlie Sheen.

Now you see why you retards don't have the right to think the way you do...?!

9/13/2017 8:08:11 AM

Thinking Allowed

Has theradicalson ever thought "Gee, if I don't give into my sexual urges and have sex with a woman and accidentally becomes pregnant, she won't get an abortion."

My problem is with the system making it easier for women not to have to worry about being responsible anymore, they can just get pregnant as many times as they want and kill their babies...especially at the taxpayers expense.

Pro-tip for the day: Tax money does not go for abortions.

9/13/2017 8:10:00 AM


Because of our medical knowledge we don`t have to and you fuckers won`t be burdening us with this "responsibility" which exists only in the minds of a repressed shitheads ever again. Also it`s terminate their foeti, killing babies is still very much a punishable offence.

9/13/2017 10:55:08 AM


Today's woman? What about Today's man?

Today's man is responsible for deciding to spreading his sperms. If he’s not fully prepared for that responsibility, then he should keep them inside his pouch until he is.

Ever hear about guys nagging women until the women give in and have sex with them? What about condoms tearing, or falling off, or guys promising to withdraw before ejaculation but “forgetting” to do that, pills not working properly?

Just as the rest of us? That makes it sound like women are a small minority, or like every single woman has a couple of abortions every year.

You’re a vegan and an anti-gun person, right? You’ve never been an accomplice to murder anything, right?

Abortions still carry risks with them, even if they are done safely in hospitals. An infinitely small number of women use abortion as birth control. Most just see them as "when all else failed" final solution. Do you know how hard it is to get an abortion in the US? Me neither, but I have a fair idea.

Abortions don't kill babies, they remove embryos, or (more seldom) fetuses. Is this the "baby" you're worried* about?

People choosing to smoke or refusing vaccination get medical care at the taxpayers' expense too, don't they?

As you clearly ARE offended, THERE's your right to be offended by normal people minding their own business.

* Btw, that's a chicken embryo, not a human one.

9/13/2017 1:32:20 PM


And yet I'm willing to bet that this guy wouldn't be okay with not having sex until he's married to a person who can have a baby and they are ready for parenthood.

9/14/2017 8:34:15 AM

And theradicalson fights for the rights to control women and force them to be brood mares. He should be responsible for anything after as he forced the women to give birth. But let's face it. Like so many other pro lifers he does not give a shit once baby is born. And theradicalson just because you are offended does not mean you are right.

9/14/2017 10:30:24 AM


so where are my rights for being offended by these lowlifes?

You're the lowlife in question here.

9/16/2017 4:29:30 AM


Today's woman has

Kind of a tangent, maybe, but I really hate it when people talk like that.....rather than saying something like "today's women have" or even better "most of today's women have". I find it's usually a sign someone is about to say something VERY prejudiced. Like how racists will say things like "the black man" or "the white man" has done this or that, or thinks in some way. As if ALL people of whatever group they are describing are all the same. I mean, there are women who are against abortion or even undecided about it....are they not "today's woman" just as much any other woman is?

9/16/2017 5:11:04 AM

1 | top: comments page