What is the difference between sexual freedom and male genocide? Or forced castration?
One is people enjoying sex without all the arbitrary restrictions placed upon us by stodgy moral guardians, one is killing all men, and one is people being castrated against their will. Nest question?
The results are largely the same, men who don't measure up don't get to reproduce and will live be forced to live significantly shittier lives.
Except you haven't been murdered, you still have your junk, and you could still live a decent life if you chose to stop complaining about how women aren't lining up to blow you every day of your life.
Oh and how is lookism different from racism?
Because "lookism" isn't really a thing, while racism has been national policy for a significant portion of our nation's history.
Both justify discrimination based on genetics yet for some reason normtards don't think there's anything wrong with good looking men living on easy mode and that it's something we need to get over.
Have you ever been made to sit at the back of the bus because "Chad" wanted your seat? Were you abducted from your homeland, carried across the ocean in an overcrowded ship and sold to a "Chad" who made you his slave? Were you ever made to go to a worse school because the better school was "Chads Only" by law? No? THEN YOU'RE NOT BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST!
Imagine them telling minorities the same thing.
Imaging you telling minorities that women not finding you attractive is exactly the same as what they've had to go through. I'm sure they'll have some pithy responses for you.
So what is the difference? I'll tell you what the difference is, the latter is usually instant and involves less suffering than the former.
The difference is that it only exists in your mind and only causes you suffering because you let it. Get a fucking hobby and stop whining about how life isn't like a porno.