If [The Bible] isn't evidence, then your science books aren't evidence either.
[1/3/2018 9:39:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Text formatting help
I'm not a spambot
What is said without evidence can be discarded without evidence.
1/3/2018 10:10:19 AM
...he said over the internet.
1/3/2018 10:21:05 AM
The science books aren't the evidence, it's merely the description of the evidence.
The Bible has only itself, there is nothing behind it. If that is evidence, then Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, is the evidence of Nifflers.
1/3/2018 10:24:30 AM
"If my pile of shit isn't lunch, then your chicken parmesan sandwich isn't lunch either!"
1/3/2018 10:35:43 AM
Nuh uh you are!
1/3/2018 10:37:39 AM
1/3/2018 10:42:28 AM
Yeah they are, your playground bravado means very little to our reality.
1/3/2018 11:24:30 AM
Except that one is peer-reviewed and based upon the scientific method, and the other is a collection of ancient superstitious stories.
1/3/2018 11:47:28 AM
OK, let's treat the Bible the same way we treat science books.
That means peer review.
1/3/2018 3:05:54 PM
Kitzmiller vs. Dover.
I'm afraid that the Conservative
Judge John E. Jones III says that the Bible is lies. And Evolution is proven scientific
. The law says so.
Just ask Michael Behe: a
He's the only one in the scientific establishment who would agree with you.
fs': a very lonely place for those who are contrarian retards.
1/3/2018 5:55:36 PM
For the bible, substitute Harry Potter, a Betty Crocker cookbook, the Peterson Field Guide to Birds, or The Poets and Poetry of Linlithgowshire, and your statement makes just as much sense.
1/3/2018 6:10:33 PM
What Swede said.
1/4/2018 5:47:30 AM
"Two people say they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong."
This is their bullshit 'same-siderism' that their blind faith is as valid as authoritative voices of any kind. What did Hitch say about that shit? See first response.
1/4/2018 6:03:07 AM