Eivind Berge #sexist

Eivind Berge #sexist twitter.com

Of all the man-hating charities who deserve to be defunded, Save the Children is second on my list after Amnesty. Among other odious activities, this nasty organization was a lobbyist for the Norwegian grooming law.

10 comments

old comment by Anon-e-moose

As a certain some... thing is selective in it's amnesia, just a little reminder for it; also to everyone in FSTDT:

https://lolcow.wiki/wiki/Marjan_%C5%A0ikli%C4%87#Marjan_and_Pedophilia

Marjan expresses views that are clearly promotion and justification of pedophilia. Due to his views on male sexuality, Marjan advocates the complete abolishment of age of consent for boys. He does however give boys a certain amount of free will to determine if they actually want to have sex.
When it comes to girls, their age of consent should lowered to age twelve according to Marjan. As mentioned above, this would also mean that underage girls can work in one of the brothels (or be forced to work in one of those, if their mother dared to be feminist)

...and if it further pleases the court, I would like to submit Exhibit A; damning evidence from the source, no less:

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/marijan-siklic-thatincelblogger.6576/page-603#post-496448

image

Therefore:

image

The prosecution rests.

Oh, and - unlike the Croat Scroat - don't forget the rest of that Wiki entry, but mainly this:

https://lolcow.wiki/wiki/Marjan_%C5%A0ikli%C4%87#Marjan_today

The small amount of time Marjan does not spend on the internet arguing with several people on several websites about his insane worldview is used for equally important things like the completion of his autobiography or the concoction of revenge plans on people who he thinks have wronged him, ranging from former girlfriends to women who rejected Marjan to his parents, therapists and judges over to society as a whole. When asked about his plans for the future, he claims to have none except "to impregnate women [who are] unlikely to abort[,] to saddle the system with scum", thus fully embracing the attitude and practice he purports to detest so much and excellently exposing his hypocrisy

Save the Children are the scum of the Earth

...what: because they're not saving any for you, Mary Jane Lick Sick?! [/Doug Piranha-levels of sarcasm]

old comment by caamib

"Nice haircut"

"take your incel dogma and shove it up your ass."

Which dogma are you talking about? I don't have any dogmas on anything.

Moose-Lunatic - typical for how that hilarious "article" had been written. First sentence is enough to see what kind of a lunatic we're talking about. Alongside not knowing my name and basically firing at a wrong target the idiot doesn't even understand that "justifying" and "promoting" pedophilia isn't a negative thing at all. As for the hypocrisy accusation, that would make sense if there was a choice of marrying sane women in the West who wouldn't abort the children of men who'd take care of them. Since this choice doesn't exist, as all but a few extremely ill or religious ones wouldn't even want to bear a child of a moral man that lunatic is once again making no sense at all. His basic goal is to make somebody believe one should have no sex at all in the West because Western women are bad. This is not how it goes. Modern Western women are not marriage material and deserve all the worst but still have vaginas and you can have sex with them, why not? Of course, he doesn't mention that I even believe that (regardless of whether the idiot agrees with it or not), since he just assumes that simple minded morons will say "Oh, I get it, he should date those good Western women if he doesn't want to be hypocritical", despite the good Western women not existing. Why is he doing that? Because he has written, as I told him, a Plan 9 from Outer Space of online criticism for me. The worst written article of all times for only the worst idiots. Even brief perusal of my views shows basically all of what he said is wrong.

Of course, he never mentions the actual hypocrisy, which is his hypocrisy, in that his sacred classes can kill and rape whomever they like, regardless of age and sex.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

...and if it further pleases the court, I would like to submit Exhibit B: what the defendant has just stated.

It has just damned itself further.

Every time it thinks the way it does, it makes the prosecution's case easier. For when something continues to not show remorse for their very way of thinking which causes them to annihilate their own defence: their refusal to conform, and thus be a normal contributing member of society,

Something that has been incarcerated for a month. And has the criminal record to prove it: despite it's denials to the contrary. But then, it has been proven to be a serial pathological liar* time & again, it has no right to be listened to anymore.

...and someone who doesn't have a criminal record for so much as spitting on the pavement. And isn't a misogynist and/or paedophile.

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=136250&Page=1#2132285

@#2132285

Wow, so caamib is literally claiming that good is evil, & evil is good

It's pretty much official: caamib is a deluded psychopath. There's no way anyone with a functioning sense of morality (or basic levels of sanity) would so blatantly lie, hate, and actively encourage harming children without being a parody

Something that refuses to conform. Just keep digging that hole of FAIL. Because someone else will continue to prove how unjustifiable your position is. Oh yes, that's right: I don't need to. You keep doing that yourself.

John McVicar: one of the most violent criminals in British history. Then one day - in jail - he decided to educate himself. Nowadays he's a journalist. He changed: completely. He changed his way of thinking. He conformed. Because he realised that his way of thinking did him no good whatsoever.

If he can, what's your excuse, Mary Jane?

*- And worse than being a pathological liar? If it pleases the court, I would like to present Exhibit B:

sacred classes can kill and rape

...yep, it's reduced to using that absolute lie. But then, it needs that lie to justify it's unjustifiable mindset: what's left of it's mind, anyway. But then, it needs to be reminded whenever it's reduced to resorting to that lie, via the one proven fact that means it has no right to think the way it does:

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=129067

image

You think? No subjective 'Opinion' allowed, y'see. Therefore a question, Mary Jane: Name one liberal in Britain who objected to that which you consider to be one of the now proven to be non-existent 'Sacreds' being arrested, tried & convicted for his paedophilic activities. Because when the likes of that was jailed, then you know that so much as a black man raping a woman would have as much chance of getting away with it with our police/courts' attitudes to such behaviour: least of all by a white man; don't forget this: http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=136118&Page=1#2131645

I'm a liberal, cammy-poo. I have no objection to what happened to that paedophile.

Therefore thank you for admitting that all rightists are paedophiles: and you defend them. Roissy/Shateau Fartiste. Eiverd Bilge. Roy Less. Donald Fart:

image

Americans are human the scum of the Earth

The 'Trump [I]Thing[/I]' indeed. Your failure is now complete.

As is the rightists' 'Fuhrer'. The ongoing investigation: (P)Rick Gates indicted & fully co-operating. Watergate 2.0: what happened to Nixon, thus the same can't happen to your 'Sacred Classes'? Just ask James Fields after Charlottesville. The Alt-Shite crying; just ask Chrissy Cantdoverywell. All those like him failing like their 'Emprah'. Meanwhile, we liberals smile. Schadenfreude is the order of the day. Washed down with rightist tears. Our cups runneth over. And you still have less than nothing, Mary Jane. Modernism & Feminism not only keeps on a-keepin' on, but is strengthening. Good.

Operation Ore. Operation Yewtree. 2009 Coroners & Justice Act. You have the opportunity to come to Britain, and lobby MPs in Parliament to make paedophilia completely legal: as you subjectively consider it to be 'moral' & 'legal'. Prove we in Britain wrong by doing so. The only one stopping you: is you. If this 'Modern' & 'Feminist' country can be turned into the paedo paradise you think it should be, then surely all other countries would follow suit, would they not?

Perception is everything. Because you wouldn't want to prove we in Britain right by you not doing so, amirite...?!

Eivind Berge #sexist twitter.com

10 comments

Confused?