These fucking child-rape promotors need to be put in their place. A lot of these quotes, lately, and the ways by which the OPs excuse their behaviour, are not only obvious bullshit but the real-world outcome of sexually assaulting children is precisely the opposite of what these kiddie-diddlers pretend happens.
Using the concept of 'enlightenment' as an excuse to rape children is a bit like using the concept of palliative care as an excuse for forced euthanasia. After all, only a monster - the same kind of monster that would deny enlightenment to children - would deny those who suffer from ongoing and painful conditions access to a highly effective pain killer that only needs be given once.
Active pedophiles can come up with some of the most twisted and asinine "logic" for their actions. It's all bullshit, especially from pedophiles who claim to cherish' children.
Being sexually objectified is dehumanising at best, but when it occurs at a time before the kids thus victimised understand they're being wronged through no fault of their own, it changes them:
There is a closer link between obesity in adults related to childhood abuse, including sexual, than there is between weight and genetic factors, weight and the robust marketing of high corn-syrup food, or weight and a lack of control around food. The CDC-Kaiser Permanente Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study is one of the largest of its type ever conducted, including data from 17 000 participants between 1995 and 1997.
A close reading by Miriam Gordon reveals...
More than six million obese and morbidly obese people are likely to have suffered physical, sexual and/or verbal abuse during their childhoods.
Gordon mentioned another study as well; one I've seen before. The ACE data is far from the first time Kaiser Permanente ("KP") looked at the riddle of obesity.
Back in 1985, KP had grown concerned over the rate of obesity among employees.
Dr. Vincent Felitti, who had been running a weight loss clinic for outside clients and KP employees since 1980, was assigned the task of finding out why...not only why people who were succeeding at weight-loss had dropped out of a program wherein they did well, but why chronic eaters would, rather than simply gaining more and more weight with each passing year, instead gain hundreds of pounds over a decade when they’re young (after having been of average weight until they reached a period close to puberty) only to plateau at (e.g.,) 400, 500, or 600 lbs by their 20s or 30s.
If a lack of control over appetite were the driving factor behind their weight gain, the larger a person became the more he would eat.
The Atlantic put together a fairly comprehensive article on what Felitti discovrred:
His first surprise occurred at his own clinic, where 55% of those enrolled each year for weight-loss help left the course before finishing. Odd thing was, most of the drop-outs had been successfully losing weight. (Gordon)
From Olga Khazan for The Atlantic:
In 1985, a 28-year-old woman named Patty arrived at a weight-loss clinic in San Diego operated by Kaiser Permanente. The clinic was designed for people who were between 60 and 600 pounds overweight. Patty asked the doctor running the program, Vincent Felitti, for help. Patty weighed 408 pounds. In less than a year, she had shed 276 of them on a [medically supervised] near-fasting diet.
Patty stayed at her svelte new weight for a few weeks. Then, in less than a month, she gained back 37 poundsa feat that would require eating more than 4,000 excess calories daily. Patty blamed it on sleepwalking....
Felitti believed her sleep-eating story, but he asked her, “Why did that start now? Why not five years ago? Why not 10 years from now?”
Patty said she didn’t know. When Felitti pressed her, she said there was a man at work who was much older and married. After she lost weight, he complimented and propositioned her.
Felitti countered that, though the sexual advances were understandably unpleasant, extreme weight-gain seemed like a strange response.
That’s when Patty revealed that her grandfather began raping her when she was 10.
To be overweight is to be overlooked.
And even people who didn't react to abuse by eating still ended up feeling ashamed of their own bodies disgusted by the parts of themselves they felt had been defiled.
Long-distance swimmer Diana Nyad ended up speaking to the press about a series of sexual assaults perpetrated against her by a swimming coach 50 years earlier.
In an Op-Ed for the New York Times, Nyad talks about what happened, which started with her taking a nap at her coach's house:
I was dead asleep in the master bedroom when it happened. Out of nowhere, he was on top of me. He yanked my suit down. He grabbed at and drooled onto my breasts. He hyperventilated and moaned. I didn’t breathe for perhaps two full minutes, my body locked in an impenetrable flex. My arms trembled, pinned to my sides. He pleaded with me to open my legs, but they were pressed hard together. If breath gives us force, that day I could feel the strength in my body from the polar opposite from not breathing. He ejaculated on my stomach, my athletic torso I was so proud of now suddenly violated with this strange and foul stuff.
(Underlined emphasis mine.)
And, despite Nyad's overwhelmingly negative response, her coach went on, as Keith Raniere would have it, to force enlightenment’ on her again and again.
Infamous former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky not only abused his position for gross self-gratification at the expense of those who should have been able to rely on him for guidance and protection, but he passed that curse (maybe through acts of child abuse) to his son.
From the USAToday article...
According to court records, Jeffrey Sandusky is charged with 14 counts, including criminal solicitation and corruption of minors. The records stated that the two victims were minors with whom Sandusky had daily contact and that he is accused of asking one to send him nude photos via text message. Once turned down, Sandusky asked the victim to erase the messages, records show.
“No, we don't need to talk and we aren't going to,” the victim responded. “You did what you did and I'm not going to give you a chance to try to justify it. You literally tried to guilt me into doing it and you even told me specifically what I 'needed' to do. You know who does that? Rapists and abusers
I don't know how many times I need to tell you no and to stop before you get it.”[/url]
(Emphasis mine.)
Note how child predators defend their crimes by claiming kids from young children to teens are allegedly “mature” enough to understand and consent to sexual contact and yet they somehow lack the understanding to say “NO!” and have the predator respect that they mean it. There's a simple explanation for that disconnect: Child sex offenders know they are lying about the emotional maturity of children.
They love children the same way lions love gazelle.
Jerry Sandusky's own victims are still dealing not only with his using them (if you'll excuse the term, which I've chosen precisely because it's ugly, obscene, and profane) as wads of toilet paper there merely to catch his semen, but also with a bevy of imbeciles who defend Sandusky for one ridiculous reason or another perhaps for the same reasons a young Canadian gym teacher, Jeffrey Clay, was given the benefit of the doubt' over the complaints of multiple students:
Clay taught physical education. He was well liked by his students, and often he asked boys in his class to stay after school, to do homework and help him with chores. One day, just before winter break, three of the boys made a confession to their parents. Mr. Clay had touched them under their pants.
The parents went to the principal. He confronted Clay, who denied everything. The principal knew Clay and was convinced by him. In his mind, what it boiled down to, van Dam writes, “is some wild imaginations and the three boys being really close.”
The parents were at a loss. Mr. Clay was beloved. He had started a popular gym club at the school. He was married and was a role model to the boys.
“We weren’t really prepared to call the police and make it into a police investigation,” one of the mothers told van Dam. “It was an indiscretion, as far as we were concerned at this point. It was all vague: Well, he put his hands down there.’ And, Well, it was inside the pants, but fingers went to here.’ We were all still trying to protect Mr. Clay’s reputation, and the possibility this was all blown up out of proportion and there was a mistake.”
The families then learned that there had been a previous complaint by a child against Clay, and they took their case to the school superintendent. He, too, advised caution. “If allegations do not clearly indicate sexual abuse, a gray area exists,” he wrote to them. “The very act of overt investigation carries with it a charge, a conviction, and a sentence, a situation which is repugnant to fair-minded people.”