Quote# 138766

(In reply to another member, who said [sarcastically] "Sounds good to me. Let's go back to the original language [of the constitution] where YOU would not to be allowed to vote, or have any personal freedom, really.I miss those American laws where a woman was a man's property. You know, like it is in Muslim countries today. Fine by me. I'm a white male who owns property.( I've clowned around in the past, but this is the truth). One for all and all for ONE!")Boldface mine:

The point I was making jerk, is that judges aren't supposed to be making laws. I guess by your logic Dred Scott should have been upheld.

Roe v Wade is unconstitutional. I'm sick of irresponsible sluts who kill their unwanted babies.

lel817, Realabortiondebate 5 Comments [7/11/2018 8:01:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom

The Crimson Ghost

What a compelling argument there, lel. You've done a wonderful job of getting your point across, in that you convinced absolutely no one. It is a constitutional amendment, which makes it constitutional. Just because you do not personally like it does not make it any less legal. The last bit about "irresponsible sluts" has been done to death, but we all know that the only moral abortion is that of a good christian white girl who was raped by a non white man. And even, the dainty little buttercup will have to be taken 3 counties over where no one will recognize her, so mommy & daddy don't lose their social or political standing, & then when they go back home she'll be shamed every single day of her life.

I'm fairly certain that this poster is of the male persuasion. If not, then she's most likely a typical brain dead bible zombie; one that no guy would want to fuck anyway. Ever notice how the most vocal of abortion opponents are some of the ugliest bastards to have ever lived?

7/11/2018 11:10:50 AM

Kanna

How many children have you aborted, personally? None? See, that's your right. Now let's discuss the limitations of your rights; that would be when you try to apply them to OTHER PEOPLE. It's not up to you.

7/11/2018 11:29:34 AM

pyro

Dred Scott wasn't overturned by another judge, and didn't constitute "legislation from the bench." It was Constitutional. All perfectly legal.

Of course, Dred Scott was overturned by the fourteenth Constitutional amendment. Which is also nice and legal.


I'm fairly certain that this poster is of the male persuasion. If not, then she's most likely a typical brain dead bible zombie; one that no guy would want to fuck anyway. Ever notice how the most vocal of abortion opponents are some of the ugliest bastards to have ever lived?


Don't engage in ad hom. It doesn't suit you.

7/11/2018 3:08:51 PM

Anon-e-moose

Hosea 13:16.

Your 'God' is unconstitutional. We're sick of irresponsible deities who kill innocent babies.

And that's why the words 'God', 'Jesus' and 'Creator' don't appear in the very document which allows your religion to exist.

Have so much as an 'Opinion' outside the doors of your churches, the IRS will enforce an American law where a deity is the government's property.

7/11/2018 3:19:07 PM

Malingspann

lel817: "If I like it, it's constitutional! How many times must I repeat that????"

7/12/2018 1:57:59 AM

1 | top: comments page