Quote# 140912

Alfred Kinsey was a pervert and a sex criminal

He is known as “The Father of the Sexual Revolution,” and if you’ve ever taken a university course on 20th century history, you’ll have heard his name: Alfred Kinsey.

Kinsey was not only the “father” of the Sexual Revolution, he set the stage for the massive social and cultural upheaval of the ‘60s, ‘70s and ‘80s with his 1948 Sexual Behavior in the Human Maleand his 1953 Sexual Behavior in the Human Female.

These books revealed to a shocked and somewhat titillated population things they had never known about themselves: That between 30-45% of men had affairs, 85% of men had had sex prior to marriage, that a staggering 70% of men had slept with prostitutes, and that between 10 and 37% of men had engaged in homosexual behavior.

Much less talked about were his other disturbing “findings”—an in-depth study on the “sexual behavior” of children, as well as claims that nearly 10% of men had performed sex acts with animals (as well as 3.6% of women), and that this number rose to between 40-50% based on proximity to farms

Kinsey’s research portrayed people as amoral and sex-driven, and is credited as fundamentally changing the way our culture views sex.

But was he right?

To begin with, the integrity of much of his work has long since been called into question: among his questionable practices, Kinsey encouraged those he was working with to engage in all types of sexual activity as a form of research, misrepresented single people as married, and hugely over represented incarcerated sex criminals and prostitutes in his data.

But beyond this is the simple fact that Kinsey himself was a pervert and a sex criminal.

For example, where did he get all of his data on the “sexual behavior of children”? The answer is nothing short of chilling. Dr. Judith Reisman (whose research has since been confirmed time and time again) explained in her ground-breaking work Sex, Lies and Kinsey that Kinsey facilitated brutal sexual abuse to get his so-called research: "Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged data on normal “child sexuality.” Many of the crimes against children (oral and anal sodomy, genital intercourse and manual abuse) committed for Kinsey’s research are quantified in his own graphs and charts. For example, “Table 34” on page 180 of Kinsey’s “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” claims to be a “scientific” record of “multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males.” Here, infants as young as five months were timed with a stopwatch for “orgasm” by Kinsey’s “technically trained” aides, with one four-year-old tested 24 consecutive hours for an alleged 26 “orgasms.” Sex educators, pedophiles and their advocates commonly quote these child “data” to prove children’s need for homosexual, heterosexual and bisexual satisfaction via “safe-sex” education. These data are also regularly used to “prove” children are sexual from birth."

The man heralded with enthusiasm by mainstream publications such as Timeand Life Magazine was nothing less than a monstrous facilitator of child-rape. In fact, he even went so far as to record children shrieking and thrashing in pain, passing out and convulsing as the result of the hellish abuse he was putting them through, as evidence of “orgasm”—especially for children who could not yet speak.

Kinsey’s so-called research was simply a quest to justify the fact that he himself was a deeply disturbed man. Dr. Reisman writes, “Both of Kinsey’s most recent admiring biographers confessed he was a sadistic bi/homosexual, who seduced his male students and coerced his wife, his staff and the staff’s wives to perform for and with him in illegal pornographic films made in the family attic. Kinsey and his mates, Wardell Pomeroy, Clyde Martin and Paul Gebhard, had ‘front’ Marriages that concealed their strategies to supplant what they say as a narrow pro-creational Judeo-Christian era with a promiscuous ‘anything goes’ bi/gay pedophile paradise.”

Got that? The Father of the Sexual Revolution was a sado-masochistic bi-sexual sex criminal who facilitated the sexual torture of infants and children. His goal was not just to engage in scientific research in order to see where the data took him, but rather, as one of his prominent biographers Michael Jones notes, to launch a crusade to undermine traditional sexual morality. He did so to wild success—Kinsey’s influence on sex education and law in the Western world is absolutely staggering.

Some have claimed that even though Kinsey may have been disturbed and engaged in immoral behavior, his fundamental conclusions and his data still remain accurate. This, too, proves blatantly false. According to Dr. Reisman:

1. [Dr. Kinsey’s team] ‘forced’ subjects to give the desired answers to their sex questions, 2. Secretly trashed three quarters of their research data, and 3. Based their claims about normal males on a roughly 86 percent aberrant male population including 200 sexual psychopaths, 1,400 sex offenders and hundreds each of prisoners, male prostitutes and promiscuous homosexuals. Moreover, so few normal women would talk to them that the Kinsey team labeled women who lived over a year with a man ‘married,’ reclassifying data on prostitutes and other unconventional women as “Susie Homemaker.”
It is crucially important that people become aware of the truth behind the Kinsey Reports.

Today’s pornified sex educators, legal experts, academics, and more disturbingly, pedophile groups such as NAMBLA pushing “inter-generational intimacy,” all use Kinsey’s work to justify their agendas and lend their causes scientific credibility.

Most people have no idea who Alfred Kinsey really was and how his so-called research was actually performed. I myself first heard of Alfred Kinsey in the first year of my history degree at university, where my professor announced that there “was no Sexual Revolution at all”—because the Kinsey Reports proved that people had been engaging in all sorts of bizarre and criminal sexual behaviors all along.

The real story is horrifying. It is stomach-churning. But it is also crucial that we know how, exactly, we got to this place in our culture of such sexual nihilism.

Jonathan Van Maren, LifeSite News 9 Comments [10/14/2018 10:41:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 0

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom


Jonathan Van Maren: "Don't read this!! Trust me!"

10/14/2018 12:05:22 PM


he set the stage for the massive social and cultural upheaval of the ‘60s, ‘70s and ‘80s

Hardly. Confusing symptoms and causes are we?

10/14/2018 2:10:30 PM


"if you’ve ever taken a university course on 20th century history"

You're not a Fundy Christian. You never studied ANYTHING ever.

10/14/2018 3:33:41 PM


It's a huge leap from "his results weren't entirely accurate and his methods were questionable" to "because all modern work on sexuality is in some sense inspired by him, it must all be completely wrong".

10/14/2018 5:25:46 PM


I'll bet that stuff about the children that the frums repeat ad-nauseum is either from a misunderstanding or outright made-up libel.

10/14/2018 5:28:20 PM


our culture of such sexual nihilism

Johnnie-boy here will never get any. Which is why he's in a certain river in Egypt about Kinsey.

Krafft-Ebing. Masters & Johnson. Havelock Ellis. Comes from studying more than you, OP.

10/14/2018 6:52:13 PM

Doubting Thomas

This looks like an attempt at "If you can't dispute their findings, then assassinate their character." Even if you could prove that he was a pervert and sex criminal (which is just your opinion), it doesn't mean that the scientific findings are invalid because of it.

But let me guess... you're just upset that Kinsey brought to light things you'd rather keep hidden.

10/15/2018 6:50:04 AM


Don’t speak ill of the dead, dearie. I hope you have evidence for your libel.

According to Wikipedia, when his successor redid the research without the prison-interns and the male prostitutes, the figures were pretty similar than before.
If 85 percent of men had premarital sex, they ought to have known about it…

Kinsey’s research portrays people as sexual beings. Period.

"misrepresented single people as married"
No, he represented people who lived in steady relationships longer than a year as "married". That’s the way we more or less do it in Sweden today.

I need more citations for the child sexuality data problem. Children are sexual from birth, but it’s a personal sexuality; masturbation rather than intercourse. Researchers of sexuality ought to know the difference between shrieking in pain and orgasms…

According to Wikipedia, Judith Reisman is an author and has a PhD in communications, and is affiliated with Liberty U. They say that Southern Poverty Law Center calls her a "conspiracy theorist" and a promoter of "sexual pseudoscience".

Is it just me, or is Jonte-boy getting more and more far-out and conspiracy-nutty…?

Got what? That you hate sexual freedom and blames it all on Kinsey?
Do you have any more sources for all this, other than a communications doctor who was "ostracized by mainstream academia"?
Does NAMBLA exist anymore?

What rock were you living under, Jonte? I probably read Kinsey’s name the first time when I was 9-12 years old, maybe in the book A Child Is Born, by Swedish photojournalist Lennart Nilsson, or in school during sex-ed around that age.

And yes, people have probably been engaging in all sorts of bizarre sexual behavior all along.
Exhibit 1A, Edward VII’s "siege d'amour":

Exhibit 1B, The Secret Museum with erotica from ancient Pompeii and Herculaneum.


10/16/2018 4:25:14 AM


Judith Reisman?
The woman with no scientific background (just a communications Ph.D.), who was debunked and discredited about 20 years ago?

The one who tried to sue the Kinsey Institute because they refuted her claims, and had her case "summarily dismissed with prejudice" because it was revealed to the judge that she was full of shit?

That's who you're using as your source?


10/18/2018 9:32:21 PM

1 | top: comments page