Quote# 141922

China’s ambassador accuses Canada of ‘white supremacy’ in Huawei CFO arrest

Ambassador Lu Shaye wrote in an op-ed for an Ottawa-based paper that western countries are employing a ‘double standard’

China’s ambassador to Canada has accused the country of “white supremacy” in calling for the release of two Canadians detained in China last month.

The arrests were in apparent retaliation for the arrest of a top Chinese tech executive in Canada.

But Ambassador Lu Shaye said in an op-ed in the Ottawa-based Hill Times on Wednesday that western countries are employing a “double standard” in demanding the immediate release of the Canadians.

“The reason why some people are used to arrogantly adopting double standards is due to western egotism and white supremacy,” Lu wrote.

“What they have been doing is not showing respect for the rule of law, but mocking and trampling the rule of law.”

China detained Canadian ex-diplomat Michael Kovrig and entrepreneur Michael Spavor on 10 December 2018 on vague allegations of “engaging in activities that endanger the national security” of China.

The arrests came 10 days after Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Canada at the request of the US, which wants her extradited to face charges that she misled banks about the company’s business dealings in Iran. A Canadian judge granted Meng bail while she awaits extradition proceedings.

Le wrote that “elites” in Canada are completely dismissing China’s law by demanding the immediate release of the Canadians.

“It seems that, to some people, only Canadian citizens shall be treated in a humanitarian manner and their freedom deemed valuable, while Chinese people do not deserve that,” Lu said.

Lu also wrote that Meng was arrested without violating any Canadian law, suggesting that Canada should never detain someone for extradition.

Roland Paris, a former foreign policy adviser to Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau, called Lu’s claims “hogwash”.

“I don’t know what the ambassador was trying to accomplish but his article won’t help China’s cause,” Paris said.

Paris noted Canada is following extradition law while the Canadians were seized in China under suspicious circumstances and China has held them without charge.

Julian Ku, the senior associate dean for academic affairs at Hofstra Law, noted China has still not revealed any specific information about what Kovrig and Spavor are charged with and have not given them a judicial hearing and thus Canada is not wrong with calling the arrests arbitrary.

“I am struck by how brazen they are being by making this appeal,” Ku said. “He says: ‘You are being racist by not respecting our law.’ That’s an easy card to play.”

Lu also seemed to admit detaining the Canadians was in retaliation for the Meng arrest.

“I have recently heard a word repeatedly pronounced by some Canadians: bullying. They said that by arresting two Canadian citizens as retaliation for Canada’s detention of Meng, China was bullying Canada. To those people, China’s self-defence is an offence to Canada,” Lu wrote.

Alex Lawrence, a spokesman for Canadian foreign minister Chrystia Freeland, did not address Lu’s claims.

Huawei, whose billionaire founder Ren Zhengfei has long had ties with both the People’s Liberation Army and the Communist party, has faced national security concerns in multiple countries.

Huawei has been banned from involvement in the installation of 5G mobile networks in India, New Zealand and Australia, blocked from making acquisitions in the US and banned from selling phones on military bases by the Pentagon.

But, in his column, Lu dismissed such concerns and instead pointed to monitoring and spying programs carried out by the US National Security Agency and the Five Eyes alliance countries (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US).

“Something is considered as ‘safeguarding national security’ when it is done by western countries. But it is termed ‘conducting espionage’ when done by China. What’s the logic?” he wrote.

Lu Shaye, The Guardian 5 Comments [1/10/2019 10:02:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom


Some repost-worthy tweets from Julian Ku's twitter thread on this statement:

This is so ridiculous, where to start. The CN govt's official position seems to be that Canada could never detain someone for extradition, even tho Canada has in the past detained people for extradition to China? Why shd any country ever extradite people to China?

China still has not revealed any specific info abt what Kovrig and Spavor are charged with, given them a judicial hearing or a lawyer. What is presumptuous abt criticizing this as "arbitrary."?

Meanwhile, Meng had a judicial hearing in open court, with a lawyer, and with the evidence revealed agt her. She is free on bail and living at home, but it is Canada (Canada!?) that is violating her human rights because of racism?

I also still can't believe the Chinese Ambassador to Canada is charging Canadians with racism for handcuffing someone. As if the Chinese govt would never dare handcuff a Canadian in China? You have got to be kidding me!

At the very least, no country should ever agree to extradite anyone upon China's request. This would, in the Chinese govt's own terms, violate intl law. Australia, please take note!

Yep, you don't like extraditions CPC? Cool, I don't think many Chinese dissidents hiding in western countries do either. At least you agree with those people on this issue * insert a crapload of laughing emojis*.

Also, nice message you are sending to the people in the rest of the world with those guys' arrests. "You can come to China, but if your country pisses us off, even if they'll have a good reason, we'll detain you in a black site somewhere". Because if there's one thing a rapidly ageing country fighting to break through the middle-income trap at the time of a coming worldwide economic slowdown should be doing, it's to send hostile messages to potential highly-skilled immigrants.

1/10/2019 11:22:10 AM


Huawei has been banned from involvement in the installation of 5G mobile networks in India, New Zealand and Australia, blocked from making acquisitions in the US and banned from selling phones on military bases by the Pentagon

South Korea already have 5G.

Can't be 'white supremacists' when those countries - and more besides - decide to get involved with Samsung.

Watched the latest video by Lewis Hilsenteger (on his 'Unbox Therapy' channel) on YouTube today about Samsung's newest smartphone range - the Galaxy M - which'll retail for $200: to go along with the Xiaomi, Pocophone & Oppo ones with similar specs & prices. Ol' Uncle Lew is Canadian. His channel is one of the top tech review ones: thus the power he wields with consumers: and therefore their power over the companies as to what they spend the money they need for their profits on. This new range by the Apple-beating Samsung reflects that new emerging/cost-conscious market: especially with the market for iPhone 10 & Galaxy S9 stagnating.

Think you can have things as you say they should be? No way, Huawei.

1/10/2019 2:15:59 PM


It's generally seen as part of the governments' job to spy, not a random company that has ties to a foreign country.

1/10/2019 6:02:37 PM

Step 3: Arrest some random Chinese billionaires children on spy charges and put them in gitmo without trial.

Your turn China.

1/11/2019 6:37:02 AM


Well, someone here has got to be a racist. Not sure whether it's China holding a couple of white guys on trumped-up charges, or maybe this article is hiding the fact that they actually were planning to leak something that was secret and now it's the Canadians assuming the worst for no good reason.

Either way, international relations are nasty business.

1/11/2019 6:48:31 AM

1 | top: comments page