Quote# 142801

Shaden_Freud_e:
ITT i shall argue that an atheistic society destroys social darwinism and eugenics by; Promoting low birth rates trough supporting birth control and gay rights Opposing any form of warfare Allowing the poor to thrive and seeking to limit the power of the rich All this amounts to a dysgenic society.

Atheism doesn't require any of that.
Promoting low birth rates trough supporting birth control and gay rights

Pro-eugenics groups have historically been in favor of low birth rates for undesirable demographics, so that's a bit simplistic. They sterilized a number of black people, Hispanics, Native Americans, and poorer white women in the US, while also demanding that middle- and upper-class women bear many children to prevent "race suicide".
By the way, it's not like we need more people on this planet right now.
Opposing any form of warfare

Warfare right now is no longer as reliant on genetics. You don't need to be physically healthy to launch a missile or call in a drone strike. I also don't see how generally being averse to war is a bad thing, as long as you can get involved when it's necessary. Your genetics also can't save you from getting hit by an IED in some hellhole.
Allowing the poor to thrive and seeking to limit the power of the rich

Oh, no, not equality! If you're looking for the best to rise, then fucking over most people in favor of the guys with some cash isn't the way to go. You think the rich are limited right now when they can bribe their way into top schools and get a born advantage to everyone?
This argument is pretty trash, and I fear for a society that you desire.

Robertredgreen:
I STAND by no inequality. The rich havebeen denied their due status and villified all across the media. I notice you said"hellhole" Is the great nation of afghanistan,who teaches usa how to treat women,a "hellhole"? Is DETROIT a hellhole? I stand by the third world. The first world is anti eugeni

Shaden_Freud_e:
I STAND by no inequality. The rich havebeen denied their due status and villified all across the media. I notice you said"hellhole" Is the great nation of afghanistan,who teaches usa how to treat women,a "hellhole"? Is DETROIT a hellhole? I stand by the third world. The first world is anti eugeni

Funny, isn't it, that you decided not to address the majority of the argument. The rich have their status and they can get away with literal murder. Don't you deserve to be vilified if you can cheat your way into Yale on Daddy's dime? And are you trolling by saying Afghanistan is the best exemplar of how to treat women, or are you a misogynistic asshole?

We should be extremely wary of eugenics, given its track record, unless you're really into involuntary sterilization, pressuring other women to bear kids, and Nazism. Wouldn't surprise me if you were, but.

Robertredgreen:
No,you do not. Learn to accept others good luck. I Embrace afgaghnistan. Take the black pill. You call me an asshole but im defending you from thots who will cheat on you for another man I dont have any hard words for nazism. Sterilization is bad because even the poor must breed.

Robertredgreen, r/DebateAnAtheist 2 Comments [3/14/2019 5:29:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom

pyro

Eugenics, sexism, and classism. That's one breed of fundie that seems to be aiming to maximize the awfulness while minimizing the entertaining weirdness.

I'm dutifully clicking the WTF button, because this is fucked up, but this quote is boring.

3/15/2019 6:15:32 PM

Anon-e-moose

Meanwhile, here in Britain...:



...the fact that this LGBT group's pink Abbot Self-propelled Gun - to make it legal - with firing pin removed & barrel welded up don't need to fire a single shot to obliterate your entire 'argument' have something harder than mere words.

Indeed: because of the inequality of those with 'Chelsea Tanks' having to pay a Congestion Charge in London: whereas Ken Livingstone ensured that military vehicles - even those owned by the public - don't need to, the above crush your 'Privilege' under their tracks.

Especially when their 'Love Gun' is openly wielded: and the rich - since 1996 - no longer have the right to own guns: and you have a Conservative government at the time to thank for that.

3/15/2019 8:40:45 PM

1 | top: comments page