[Regarding Madonna's adoption.]
A woman who has sex outside of marriage and does not repent and change is immoral and a bad example. Ditto for a woman who degrades herself with her photos in obscene videos and books and does not repent and change. No court should inflict that kind of unfit parent upon a child. There are far too many wonderful, moral couples (one man and one woman) ready and willing and eager to adopt! And they will do no harm to their children.
God's curse rests upon those who contribute to the harm of children in my opinion. That includes politicians and judges who help make this harm possible. And God is not mocked. The Bible says that the mills of God grind slow but sure.
38 comments
Ah yes, the "But there are so many good people adopting" arugment.
If there are so many, why are there so many kids left to adopt? It can't be us liberals, we kill the ones we don't want, right?
Where the hell are all these willing, good couples? More people report such a thing than bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster, and chupacabra combined... but there's just as much proof of the existence of each.
Couples almost never adopt. They either have their own children, or if they do adopt they want babies they can raise as near from birth as they can. That's why so many older children remain in orphanages and such till they turn 18.
I'd love to see you prove that wrong though, LovesTruth. Provide some verifiable evidence that there are "far too many wonderful, moral couples" who want to adopt. Especially with your qualifier of one man, one woman, since there are quite a few gay couples who'd love to adopt and CAN'T because people like you think their immoral somehow.
She's trying to get a child out of poverty. How can anyone honestly have a problem with that?
Who cares who she has slept with and what she does for a career, as long as Madonna provides for the child with love and the necessities of life, why is this anyone else's business?
There are far too many wonderful, moral couples (one man and one woman) ready and willing and eager to adopt a lily white, perfectly healthy, younger than 6 months old, baby!
There are many "one man, one woman" homes that are terrible and abusive
And many single parent homes or homosexual parent homes that are very loving and very good
And there's not enough one man one woman couples willing to adopt, and those that are willing usually only want babies.
...people like this guy need a reality check
If there are so many wonderful, moral couples ready and willing and, dare I say, eager to adopt, why are there so many kids in foster homes and placements?
Madonna is MARRIED to Guy Ritchie, heterosexual and has already two kids of her own. What´s the point?, another alternative bizarro universe?. Besides, my mother´s best friend adopted a poor boy who had a heart-illness, a very serious one. Now it´s ok because he has undergone surgical operation. I wonder, where are all those wonderful couples one man one woman(like Madonna) to adopt him?, and I agree with the guy who said this: they want healthy, white and baby kids.
Well, if God wants to curse Madonna for what she did to American Pie , I'm right behind him, but otherwise, fuck off.
There are far too many wonderful, moral couples (one man and one woman) ready and willing and eager to adopt!
That must be why there are so many kids still waiting to be adopted.
Put up or shut up.
And God is not mocked.
That sounds like a challenge to me.
(madonna)degrades herself with her photos in obscene videos and books and does not repent and change.
are you kidding me?
Red, blonde, brunnette hair, 'boy toy', short hair, voguing, bondage outfits, suits, boas, hairy armpits, you name it she's worn the look at one time.
God is not mocked? He is. And is it because he doesn't exist or because he is impotent?
Well, you know that there has never been a child molested, beaten, or otherwise abused when they are raised by one man and one woman.
I'm pretty sure that little David is better off living at Madonna's 1,200 acre $18 million estate in the English countryside than he was living in that orphanage in AIDS and poverty-striken Malawi.
And notice how they don't mention that she is spending $3 million of her OWN MONEY on building an orphanage in Malawi that will house, school, and feed 4,000 kids. Construction has already began. She also gave another $1 million to fund a documentary about the plight of the people in Malawi, which is now in production. She also co-founded the organization Raising Malawi and vows to keep up her work there.
Is that to be attacked?
1) The notion that a (Christian) fundie couple will "Do no harm to their children" is patently absurd.
2) As other posters have pointed out, the willingness of "moral" childless couples to adopt children who are not 'just like them' is virtually nonexistant.
3) The total number of "moral" couples willing to adopt an AMERICAN, WHITE baby is far too few for the forced birth proponents to keep up with.
4) The forced-birthers claim something like 14 million aborted babies since Roe V Wade was decided - just where are all the Christian couples who would have adopted 1/10 of those babies, especially considering that a sizeable percentage would have been of *other* racial heritage?
5) "The Bible says that the mills of God grind slow but sure." Chapter and verse, or you're full of guess what.
No couple (one man and one woman) has ever harmed their children. Ever.
An American woman recently sent her adoptive 7-year-old son back to his native Russia, like a parcel with a return-policy. Russia has temporarily frozen all adoptions to the US of A, while investigating this one.
And yet ...we still have children who do not have parents, so I'm gonna call bullshit on that "...far too many wonderful, moral couples (one man and one woman) ready and willing and eager to adopt". Obviously those "many" are handily outnumbered by the children who need adoptive parents.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.