Well, it could be argued that for pedophiles and people into beastiality, those feelings are natural for them. The only problem is, acting on it would hurt other beings. While homosexuals (I assume that's what you're ranting about) don't hurt anyone.
As for the rest of your "sex is for procreating" argument, I'll let the other members tear you apart on that one.
8/18/2008 10:28:25 PM
sex should only be between a man & a woman, as it is natural.
8/19/2008 12:28:50 AM
So, if the only sex that is natural is that for procreation that means no sex with a woman who is pregnant, lactating, or past menopause. You should also only have sex during ovulation. Otherwise that's not natural. Only once per cycle, you might have conceived the first time (if God wills it) so further sex would be unnatural.
The thing that is wrong with beastiality and paedophilia is the issue of consent!
8/19/2008 4:28:47 AM
I wonder, if there is something wrong with pleasure, the humankind would have ended long ago. Not to mention that people over 55 and sterile individuals should not have sex because it´s not "natural"
8/8/2009 12:48:14 PM
As I understand, sex is naturally ordained both for pleasure and procreation. We would hardly have sex if it was painful, right? Yet, if we didn't have sex for procreation, humanity would die out.
As I see it, there is no problem of having sex for pleasure if procreation is not possible.
8/8/2009 2:42:45 PM
I was actually going to say that it is wrong because the 5 year olds and animals can't consent, but to each their own I suppose
12/22/2010 2:48:13 AM
No, what is wrong with pedophilia is that it harms the kid. As for bestiality, well, just keep it to yourself and I don't give a flying fuck.
12/22/2010 5:42:42 AM
Beastiality does not necessarily hurt the animals involved and I strongly doubt that much of it is non-consensual: For instance, one of the stereotypical subjects of their affection is the horse, a creature that is quite capable of killing a human if provoked; likewise, the dogs they are stereotyped as being interested in are large and capable breeds, eg, Rottweilers and Great Danes, which are not exactly defenceless (IIIRC, they are second only to Dingos and Wolves in fighting prowess). At worst, stereotypical beastiality is no more coercive than statutory rape.
What I believe IS wrong with beastiality is that it can be dangerous to unsuspecting people who come into contact with the animals later: I remember reading about a Rottweiler mauling in California where the prosecution alleged the owners had inadvertently trained the animal to rape young ladies.
2/1/2011 1:22:52 PM
Bzzzz! Wrong! What's wrong with fucking an animal, having sex with children etc, is that neither an animal nor a child can give informed consent.
Is it only NATURAL to have sex during the one day that the egg is impregnable, and the three days before that, which the sperms can survive in the womb?
Can me an my husband never have sex, then, as we don't seem to be able to procreate? Or do you think that my husband should blame it all on me, discard me and get a new heir-incubator? Sorry, I mean wife.
Even though we are fairly satisfied with our life together as it is...
2/1/2011 1:54:43 PM
Well, you see, the thing is: if you aren't both having fun, you're doing it wrong. Everything else you said is wrong, as well.
2/2/2011 12:57:11 PM
If your dick fits, sounds natural to me.
The word you were looking for is "unethical", because a 5 years old or a beast cannot give consent to such recreational sexual activities.
10/10/2011 7:25:04 AM
5 year old girls are not physically equipped for sex with an adult. Its also actually a crime in most of the world.
Sheep however ... hmmm.. why would God make sheep so wooly, so soft , and with sexual organs that fit the human penis ? It is also illegal in many parts of the world.
Human sex is pleasurable or should be. A woman with no orgasm is like a night without stars. I assume you won't have sex after 40 ?
10/20/2011 11:53:52 AM