There must be a Talking Points manual somewhere for atheists. They repeat the same dreary "arguments" over and over with only nominal rewording.
54 comments
Do you know what? I agree with DoctorDoom...we do have to go over the same dreary arguments over and over again.
And the reason for that is Fundie nutcases are such stupid, uneducated, close-minded f**ktards that we have to resort to saying the same thing over and over just on the off chance that they might understand.
One can but hope.
Tell you what; you come up with a new argument against science, the Theory of Evolution, or athiesm, and we'll come up with new ways to make you look like an asshat. Chicken and the egg, buddy.
Gee, maybe if people like DoctorDoom actually listened to us instead of posting childish crap to get the other idiots who post at FC to kiss his ass, we wouldn't have to keep repeating ourselves. This is exactly the type of person that needs to get the shit flamed out of them.
I just love the way he put the word arguments in quotes, like it invalidates anything we have to say.
The problem with idiots like DoctorDoom is no argument, no matter how concise, will ever penetrate the thick wall of stupidity erected around his brain.
this from the fuck wit whose idea of inteligent debate is to cut and past the same tired creations graphics over and over again? *sigh* Still, interesting to note that he WILL make unexpected and quite original homosexual passes at people in private message when you aren't watching... but then ban you from his personal playground if you offer to show said posts to other members.
As soon as Fundies prove there's a God, I'll stop asking for proof there's a God.
As soon as Fundies stop asking "If man evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys," I'll stop explaining why there are still monkeys.
Etc., etc., etc..
I don't find rationality particularly dreary, though being forced to repeat every single argument to respond to you repetitive fundie fuckwits certainly does get that way! Fundies *should* have a manual (aside from the Babble) where they cross out their arguments as they are refuted. That way, we won't have to listen to a million "clever" cretins asking why there are still monkeys and clinging to their incorrect definition of the term "theory," and we won't have to repeat the same dreary responses over and over.
Argh.
DoctorDumb
There, now I'm using your favourite flavour of bullshit, the DoctorDumb specialty, ad hominem attacks on any one who is aware of reality.
has anybody ever realized that the only people who seem to really hate atheists are conservative, fundamentalist, and bigoted. no wonder nobody likes these people. and no, this doesn't apply to republicans, just certain members who vote for them.
There are lots of different translations from the original languages. Each translation is offered in several versions. Each version is published in several editions. So there are hundreds of different manuals each with a different number of pages.
That's why it's broken up into books, chapters, and verses. If you know the system, you can easily find anything in it without a page number. If ever something is found to be wrong or misleading or contradictory in it we steadfastly deny, deny, deny that it could be so, rather than correct our stance.
Oh, wait...that’s another book, entirely. What was I thinking?
Never mind.
Mirror, mirror, on the wall....
And our arguments are actually correct. If they work, nothing's wrong with repeating 'em.
Too bad you can't say the same.
That's because we are almost always forced to argue against the same shitty "arguments." We actually would enjoy some intelligent debate, but we're certainly not going to get it from you idiots.
Oh, and you owe me a new irony meter.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.