According to a little known expert, Professor God, these fossils were all made during the universal flood which happened about 6,000 years ago in Noah's day.
The bible makes no reference of fossils. That is a creationist argument based on person opinion. There are plenty of creationists who also disagree with the idea that fossils were created during the flood.
The bible also never said the flood happened 6,000 years ago. That again, is something you people invented. However, generally I've heard you people claim the flood happened 4,000 years ago where as Adam and Eve existed 6,000 years ago so Professor God (aka you) seems to be rather ignorant of your own nonsense.
He laughs when the subject of missing links is brought up.
Unless you have a direct line of communication with him, you can't know that. It's you who are laughing and in the grand fashion of Humanity making gods in their image you assume he must be doing what you are doing.
He says he didn't use them {missing links} so they won't find them.
No mention of missing links were made in the bible. Lying for Jesus yet again?
He says that man and dinosaurs lived at the same time.
Again, no mention of dinosaurs or them living side by side with Humans was ever made. The idea that a couple of mythical creatures mentioned in the bible or that a reference to dragons is god discussing dinosaurs is simply one interpretation of the text.
He wrote a lot of what he knows in a book called the Bible.
Really now? An all powerful, all knowing god wrote a lot of what he knows in a tiny Human text? Nevermind that it was Humans who wrote the book as I'm too busy laughing at the first part.
It's really hard to argue with him about things, because he keeps saying, "Were you there when all of this happened? I was."
No, you say god says that. Unfortunately you have provided no source for one of your many blatant lies. Isn't that a sin btw?
And to date, no man has proven his book wrong.
Actually it's easy to prove the bible wrong. All you have to do is read it as it contradicts itself repeatedly. If you want to go a little further learn your history, learn how one evaluates the credibility of sources, and learn science. With that knowledge the idea that the bible is anywhere near a literal piece of work becomes laughable.
He hasn't had it peer reviewed, because he has no peers.
You make it sound like he would have it peer reviewed if he did have peers. In that case are you saying that an all powerful being isn't powerful enough to create peers?
Anyway, we know that the writers of the bible were Human. Your own book claims that they were inspired by the word of god, not that god sat down and wrote it for them. Therefore their claims can be peer reviewed. Unfortunately we don't give peer review to wackos who claim to know what god is thinking these days. We just lock them up, so why the biblical writers would deserve the same, is unknown to me.
