1 2
#351751
Berny
Except that there is no evidence that dinosaurs are anything but several tens of millions of years old.
No flaws have been exposed in radiometric dating and the only ones calling such dating methods into question are retarded fundies insisting on a literal interpretation of their creation fairy tale.
12/4/2007 4:05:17 PM
#351760
David B.
But if the computers were powered by cheese then all the other so-called 'electronic devices' might not be powered by electricity at all? This means any and all local electric suppliers are mis-selling you something you really don't need while denying the dairy produce sector a much needed source of revenue!
The fiends! Stealing our money and leaving those poor cows to starve! Why I ought to... *whisper* just a minute...
*whisper* *whisper*
Ummhmm....
*whisper* *whisper* *whisper*
Ummhmm... got it.
Okay, forget what I said. Apparently, if I just make shit up, that doesn't automatically make it true, sorry!
12/4/2007 4:27:42 PM
#351780
Blackvoice
Except your first statement is false. So no.
12/4/2007 4:52:59 PM
#351781
YOU said that those dinosaurs are a few thousand years old. I stick to 65 million and counting.
12/4/2007 4:54:09 PM
#351784
Rufus
And if my aunt had balls then she'd be my uncle.
12/4/2007 4:56:43 PM
#351791
GigaGuess
Occam's Razor, bitch.
Either every single method of dating the Earth, and all things in it are wrong, or...brace yourself...your book, written LONG before any of this ever existed, could be mistaken. Before you answer that, how do you reconcile 2 people turning into 4 billion in a mere 6000 years...without even accommodating for the flood, plagues, Crusades, etc. Even if every offspring survived in every generation (and we all know that even a hundred years ago, a child had little better than a 50/50 shot of living past 3,) it is a physical impossibility to reach those numbers.
12/4/2007 5:10:19 PM
#351794
Old Viking
The inimitable supersport.
12/4/2007 5:14:40 PM
#351798
Freboy
Naaaa... CARM?
It was so cute when Supersport tried to make his case on the RichardDawkins forum.
12/4/2007 5:20:25 PM
#351814
Papabear
I guess ol' supersport would be the one to know, I mean, CARM is THE gold-standard of intellectual toilets.
12/4/2007 5:32:43 PM
#351816
12/4/2007 5:39:08 PM
#351820
davros
Supersport opens his mouth and out falls a big pile of steaming bull crap
as his creditability Slides down the pipes of the intellectual toilet where it belongs with all the other excrement.
12/4/2007 5:46:48 PM
#351824
Caustic Gnostic
If supersport had any sort of intellectual integrity, he wouldn't spew this ignorant bullshit.
12/4/2007 5:52:35 PM
#351827
Osiris
False assumption.
Flawed premise.
Fallacious conclusion.
We have a wiener.
12/4/2007 5:54:17 PM
#351829
Horsefeathers
"...but if these dinos are only a few thousand years old, then any and all other so-called "old" creatures must not be old at all."
Uh, why exactly is that?
"This means any and all radiometric dating must be flawed and the whole old-earth paradigm slides down the pipes of the intellectual toilet where it belongs with all the other excrement."
You seem completely oblivious to the fact that the same methods used to calculate half lives for dating methods are also used in nuclear medicine. Mind explaining why it works just fine when your doctor applies it for your treatment but not when a paleontologist uses it to date a fossil?
12/4/2007 6:02:31 PM
#351830
Mudflappus
So Carbon Dating is flawed because . . you said so? Supersport, I've seen the caliber of your thought process and I must say that I'm less than impressed. You sir are an absolute dumbass.
12/4/2007 6:05:27 PM
#351835
Mike
Or you're just really stupid.
12/4/2007 6:14:05 PM
#351843
Yasa
I love this! Essentially they're saying "So if young earth creationism is true, then young earth creationism is true! Evolution loses again!"
12/4/2007 6:25:59 PM
#351855
Jake Steel
thank you capt'n imbecile...
..but logic doesn't work that way.
12/4/2007 6:41:45 PM
#351911
Classic
The problem with this idea becomes then... That if creatures that we measure as being millions of years old are actually only a few thousand years old. Then why do we not apply the same "miscalculation" the earliest hominid fossils and see what that means for these people through history? Hmmm.
12/4/2007 7:13:59 PM
#351958
cui bono
eat shit and die.
a suitable wish from All for supersport
12/4/2007 7:49:40 PM
#352027
Brian X
"And supersport tries an argument from adverse consequences from the top rope... and slips and lands hard on the ring support, then falls forward onto the mat. Nick, I do believe he's just been knocked out."
"No, not unconscious, he's getting up, but he's not a happy camper. I think he's going to need a little ice for that one, Johnny."
"Yeah, Nick, that one will definitely leave a mark. Okay, as Referee Mills Lane checks on supersport, let's go to the locker room, where Stacey Kornbread is interviewing Kirk Cameron and Brian Sapient for the next match. Stac...ey?"
"Johnny, are you okay?"
"Sorry, Stacey, just checking out the rack on Mr. Sapient's girlfriend Kelly. Over to you."
12/4/2007 8:49:21 PM
#352194
Maggie
It's worth noting also that the video in the link is awesome.
12/4/2007 11:55:29 PM
#352325
Prager
Whenever I read something from SS about how scientific theory X has been disproved or scientific principle Y is wrong, I can immediately assume that neither idea is in jeopardy and, in fact, they are probably doing very well.
12/5/2007 5:47:15 AM
#352329
szena
Is this a variation on the "the Loch Ness monster is a dinosaur, therefore there could not have been any dinosaurs 100,000,000 years ago" argument?
12/5/2007 6:05:45 AM
#352360
Mister Spak
"...but if these dinos are many millions of years old, then any and all other so-called "young" creatures must not be young at all. This means any and all fundie blithering must be flawed and the whole genesis paradigm slides down the pipes of the intellectual toilet where it belongs with all the other excrement."
Fixed.
12/5/2007 7:02:13 AM
1 2