1 2 3
#368886
BreeStar
Wow, you failed math. That adds up to 286%!
12/24/2007 2:50:53 AM
#368887
Jacob
Did the inbred hick who compiled these figures count on his disfigured number of toes or something?
12/24/2007 2:50:56 AM
#368903
dpareja
Pi Is Exactly Three Award?
12/24/2007 3:07:52 AM
#368916
Thundersqueaks
Your statistics are 100% bullshit.
12/24/2007 3:15:56 AM
#368924
Happymealungen
Pi is Exactly Three Award seconded!
12/24/2007 3:23:44 AM
#368927
agentCDE
Pi Is Exactly Three is exactly thirded.
12/24/2007 3:26:07 AM
#368931
HeathenAngel
Umm... someone doesn't know how to do math.
12/24/2007 3:33:24 AM
#368933
Big Chicken Dinner
Most of those categories are not mutually exclusive.
12/24/2007 3:36:45 AM
#368957
Sideshow Bob
Edit: nevermind. BCD may have a point here.
12/24/2007 4:04:48 AM
#368975
Mike
87% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
12/24/2007 4:21:17 AM
#368982
BreeStar
I considered that they aren't all mutually exclusive, but even THAT can't account for the discrepancy. Those are just stupid figures.
12/24/2007 4:36:07 AM
#368988
D.R.
These people think that women are just having abortions the way they have haircuts. Oh, I'll go in and have one while there's a special. (Vomit)
Ever heard of an ectopic pregnancy, assholes?
12/24/2007 4:47:00 AM
#368999
While I am pretty sure these percentages are completely taken out of this person's ass, they are possible - that is to say, just because that 75% of the people say that the child would interfere with their life doesn't mean that they weren't raped, their fetus doesn't have abnormalities, they don't have problems in their relationship, etc. The real problem here? That this person thinks that not being able to afford a child is a bad reason to have an abortion. Your right, its much better to be born to a poor mother who has no job and has to give it up to an orphanage where it lives off of taxes and leads a crappy life because it has no money and it won't get a good (if any) education.
12/24/2007 4:58:18 AM
#369003
Big Chicken Dinner
Whoops - didn't mean to have my serious voice on.
12/24/2007 5:03:39 AM
#369014
JD
When making up percentages, one may ensure they at the very least add up to no more than 100%.
That being said, Pi=3 award fifthed
12/24/2007 5:14:33 AM
#369017
Hollio
This happens to be the sanest thing on that website, although that's not saying much.
12/24/2007 5:19:54 AM
#369030
Euclid
OK, so *some* categories *could* overlap, but... the first three add to 6% and are not "reasons of convenience", so that's at least 101% right there.
So I'm gonna call Lying For Jeezus on this one. If you're making up crap, at least do it convincingly. (And Mike beat me to the "made up stats" punchline.)
12/24/2007 5:40:27 AM
#369040
cyborgtroy
Usually percentages are mutually exclusive.
12/24/2007 5:48:26 AM
#369043
Lunalelle
Even if those other reasons were not valid to you, will you punish those with a "valid" reason by removing all abortions?
12/24/2007 5:50:17 AM
#369126
Osiris
Lets see that's............286%. Do you morons even bother to double check your bullshit statistics to at least make them look plausible before you post them? Also a blastyocyte or an embryo or a fetus is not a child.
12/24/2007 7:24:58 AM
#369132
anti-nonsense
You fail at basic mathematics. Go take elementary school math over again.
12/24/2007 7:27:50 AM
#369180
That's sums 286%, are you sure you know how to interpret statitistics(or make them, for that matter?)
12/24/2007 8:46:14 AM
#369206
Patashu
Even if you allow for overlap...yeah, I cannot make it overlap right. 'child would interfere with lives' is a reason of convenience?
12/24/2007 9:19:57 AM
#369235
Whydontyou.org.uk
Oh my Toutatis, what a great example of homeschooled mathematics.
12/24/2007 11:34:19 AM
#369239
Tomby Stone
Wow, we joke around and all but I had no idea the abortion rate was 286%. That's pretty damn high, I can't even imagine how they're doing it.
12/24/2007 11:42:21 AM
1 2 3