[On being given a link saying Hovind is wrong]
I don't beleive they were killed off before Adam! And the site you posted was not a Christian based review. In it the author said "Hovind has just used his conclusion of the Bible being literally correct as the foundation for his use of evidence from the Bible. Circular reasoning is called a logical fallacy for a good reason."
Well of course the bible is literaly correct, we shouldn't have to argue that point.
39 comments
Well of course the bible is literaly correct, we shouldn't have to argue that point. she says as she clings desperately to the most evil artifact known to modern civilization...
[yes, imo, more evil than The Bomb.]
Of course. There is no need to argue that people live 900 years, snakes speak and Caine, firstborn to Adam and Eve married a girl born to some "men"................yes, we should have to argue many points.
"Well of course the bible is literaly correct, we shouldn't have to argue that point."
Ladies and gentlemen, we have isolated the problem.
Hovind has used his ASSUMPTION of the Babble being literally correct as the foundation for his use of "evidence" from the Babble.
There- corrected.
I was once given sage advice about the word ""assume"- it makes an ASS out of U andME.
If you don't want to argue that point, then the only conclusions you can ever possibly draw will be of the form "If the Bible is literally correct, then this holds:..."
Which makes it all completely hypothetical, and having no bearing on anyone's real life.
If that's really what you want, I'm all for it.
Correction: Genesis is literally correct. All that stuff Jesus said about loving your neigbour, and doing good works. That's debatable.
2 acceptances in one day.... I'm so proud... sniff, sniff :)
The Bible is so obviously NOT literally correct, we shouldn't have to agrue that point.
Tip: Anything that comes out of Kent Hovind's mouth (or pen) is either fertilizer or hot air.
"Well of course the bible is literaly correct, we shouldn't have to argue that point."
Closed mind. Out of your own mouth.
Eric wrote:
"Did she mean for her name to be so sexual?" EXECUTIVE: "We just have one question, though. We were looking over some of your lyrics. 'I want to walk hand-in-hand with Jesus on a private beach for two. I want him to nibble on my ear and say "I'm here for you".' It seems you really love Christ.
CARTMAN: "Yes, we sure do!"
EXECUTIVE: "No, but it appears you are actually in love with Christ."
"InChristGirl"
That screenname makes me think she wants to strap one on and fuck Christ. Which wouldn't be that unbelievable, sadly, considering the bizarre love some gals have for Jesus.
See the movie "Drop Dead Gorgeous" for a good example.
You know, the people who come to this site dumb found me. WHY DOESN'T THIS HAVE A PERFECT 5 RATING!
Really, this is the worse I have seen yet.
This is very fundie and why many people have quit debating Creationists, it's the very crux of the problem, the wall against imparting reality to these people.
No matter how large, how proven and how accurate the expert scientific consensus is these people will only accept Biblical interpretation delivered in full preacher style with nothing to stand on but blind belief.
The admission that they only accept sites commited to those beliefs is rare, usually they go all Kirk Cameron on how they've deeply studied the science and find no evidence in it, at least she admits she's in denial of any other option.
Some words you need to look up:
"Circular reasoning is called a logical fallacy" is not a compliment, sweetie.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
