1 2 3 4
Sure, and that whole thing where he was married to a female woman-type wife in an Anglican ceremony in England during a time where homosexuality was illegal and heavily frowned upon and managed to father ten children with said female woman-type wife, that's all just a beard. A very committed beard.
2/22/2011 7:47:17 AM
"Sure, and that whole thing where he was married to a female woman-type wife in an Anglican ceremony in England during a time where homosexuality was illegal and heavily frowned upon and managed to father ten children with said female woman-type wife, that's all just a beard. A very committed beard."
That, and him being one of only five
non-royalty persons buried in the Church of England's central place of worship, Westminster Abbey (and he became an agnostic, post-Evolution discovery). When C(unt) David Parsons the closet case himself can have a state funeral and a memorial that makes Lord Nelson's in Trafalgar Square look like a chipped & mouldy gravestone in a forgotten cemetery, then he can consider himself superior to Darwin. Oh, and as for you, Davey-boy, I don't see your face on a banknote:
Here endeth the lesson.
Never was a truer word said.
2/22/2011 8:24:16 AM
Apart from the gay-bashing, this is also a fucking ad hominem attack which makes no sense at all.
It's a bit like some people in Germany criticizing we still have some laws from Hitler's days in use. The fact that the Nazis invented them doesn't make them bad by itself.
And while there's nothing wrong with being gay anyway, Darwin being one of "teh homesecksuals" (btw, citation needed) has fuck all to do with his theory.
2/23/2011 7:11:52 AM
Is that why he married a woman?
2/23/2011 10:20:06 PM
Darwin's personal life and opinions are irrelevant to the area of science to which he is credited. He could have been a transvestite from Rhodesia; it wouldn't make a blind bit of difference to reality.
Einstein was a brilliant man, and yet he was wrong about things, most notably quantum mechanics. ("God does not play dice", anyone?)
Alternatively, I could object to the Bible on the grounds that it talks about "women grinding" and "two men in one bed" and "lusting after their genitals"...
7/31/2012 11:44:28 AM
I thought that Darwin had wild monkey sex with apes during the voyage of the beagle and then went home and had sex with Mrs Darwin and had many children ?
nothing gay in that at all.
we are all HOMOS as in Homo Sapiens.
*ceiling cat says Hi *
7/31/2012 11:54:19 AM
no more computer technology for you, in Alan Turing's name.
10/28/2012 9:02:01 AM
ANOTHER LEGALIST!!!! JUST DROP THE CREATION VS EVOLUTION NONSENSE DEBATE ALREADY!!!!! If God created humans and apes by evolving from a common ancestor SO BE IT!!
JESUS SAVES NOT CREATIONISM!
11/4/2012 1:43:14 PM
That explains the ten kids.
11/4/2012 1:45:28 PM
"In addition, Alan Turing was a FLAMING HOMOSEXUAL. Do you want your kids to use the inventions of a raging HOMO? Fags want to insert there penises into other mens anuses. Is that what you want taught in public schools? Sounds like it to me. Have fun in hell."
i.e. stop using computers you hypocritical fuck.
To answer your question, I don't really care what two consenting adults do.
By the way, 
1/19/2013 4:48:30 PM
since Darwin was training to be a minister, was maried and had a bunch of kids, I say you are wrong.
Some homosexuals prefer to have a penis inserted in their anus. Now you know more than you did, congratulations on being better informed.
By the way, some heterosexual women like anal sex , and some even like doing their husbands up-the-butt with a strapon.
No public schools to high school level should not in my opinion be teaaching sexual techniques. They should teach, this goes in there , that breaks and then the guy ejaculates and the girl may get pregnant , however condoms and birth control pills prevent some nasty diseases and may prevent pregnancy.
1/19/2013 9:54:49 PM
The computer was invented by an actual homosexual. Get off it NOW, or you might get infected.
1/20/2013 12:39:19 AM
Says he, using a computer invented by a homosexual.
I have to say, I giggled at the thought that Darwin's sexual orientation would have the slightest impact on the accuracy of his scientific work. If it turned out that Newton was gay would Parsons step out of a 20th floor window to check if gravity had suddenly been discredited?
1/20/2013 1:43:31 AM
4/8/2013 11:28:09 AM
Poisoned Well Fallacy.
It matters not a fig whether Charles Darwin was a homosexual or not. What matters is the evidence and reasoning behind his Theory of Evolution, as brought up to date by Gregor Mendel, Thomas Hunt Morgan, Theodosius Dobzhansky , and others.
Evidence and reasoning are the foundations of Science, NOT bigotry.
By the way, nobody who knows anything about Charles Darwin believe him to have been a homosexual. Not that that would affect his conclusions at all.
4/8/2013 12:43:25 PM
What can't the fundies blame on teh ghey?
4/8/2013 4:39:52 PM
1 2 3 4