1 2
#576707
Jay-Sus
Citation needed.
7/8/2008 4:15:09 AM
#576711
Pokey
Is this fundie at all?
Wikipedia is unreliable because anyone can edit it, even people with poor understanding, hell i can edit the wiki page of the moon & say it is made out of cheese
7/8/2008 4:20:23 AM
#576723
fmitchell
Wikipedia may be unreliable, but it's not due to a "bias" ... except maybe towards
geek culture.
7/8/2008 4:25:02 AM
#576724
The Jamo
I really want this guy to define the word "bias" for us now. That alone could be worth a laugh and a half.
7/8/2008 4:26:42 AM
#576735
Dredknot
Wikipedia isnt entirely reliable, but its a good place to start reaserching a subject. Conservapedia on the other hand...
7/8/2008 4:29:12 AM
#576737
Dark_Lord_Prime
Wait, there's bias on Conservapedia? Seriously?!
O_o
7/8/2008 4:29:14 AM
#576743
Little Miss
*snorts* Conservapedia was born biased.
Though I have to agree that Wikipedia isn't something I'd use as a reliable research source. I never use it in school projects.
7/8/2008 4:30:32 AM
#576745
Mattural Selection
Conservapedia biased? Never.
7/8/2008 4:31:24 AM
#576777
moose
I'd be more likely to cite Uncyclopedia as a source for my information than Conservapedia.
7/8/2008 4:40:41 AM
#576781
Antichrist
Wikipedias a quick source when you need one, I wouldn't base a term paper on it.
Conservapedia is
starting to become biased?
7/8/2008 4:42:32 AM
#576791
ID82
Uh Conservapedia is extremely biased jackass.
7/8/2008 4:44:52 AM
#576793
JESUS PLEASE COME SOON!
Beginning... ahahahahaha. This HAS to be a poe.
7/8/2008 4:44:55 AM
#576796
nfp
From the Conservapedia entry on Evolution:
"The fossil record is often used as evidence in the creation versus evolution controversy. The fossil record does not support the theory of evolution and is one of the many flaws in the theory of evolution."
7/8/2008 4:46:05 AM
#576805
Headache
Conservapedia. must be a parody, nobody can be that stupid...
7/8/2008 4:48:33 AM
#576807
approximate
No shit, Sherlock!
7/8/2008 4:49:10 AM
#576821
Thinking Allowed
<sarcasm>Ya think?</sarcasm>
7/8/2008 4:53:27 AM
#576840
Allegory for Jesus
Obviously, he is talking about that filthy liberal bias. Conservative bias is just telling like it is...
7/8/2008 5:00:04 AM
#576859
Fanatic-Templar
Bias at Conservapedia?
Surely you jest.
7/8/2008 5:06:31 AM
#576931
One Trick Pony
How the hell is this fundie? It makes no mention of religion at all.
7/8/2008 5:30:24 AM
#576968
anonymous_troy
Bias?
On CONSERV - apedia?
You know, I think there's some soda in this Mountain Dew can, too!
And my telephone can transmit audio over long distances!
And wouldn't you know it, my car can DRIVE!
!!! XD
7/8/2008 5:56:31 AM
#577201
IanC
Conservapedia is just one big joke.
7/8/2008 9:41:41 AM
#577246
aaa
Dr. Watson, i think they are seeing the obvious.
7/8/2008 10:28:28 AM
#577272
Brain_In_A_Jar
Is it even possible to have bias in something anyone in the entire world can edit? The only undeniable bias in wikipedia is against people who don't have internet access, which really cannot be blamed on anything.
7/8/2008 10:50:46 AM
#577496
Chinger
I think, he means that Conservapedia is starting to get the LIBERAL bias
7/8/2008 1:41:22 PM
#577530
Michael
Well the Bible was (and still is being) editted by those who want to it to read as they want it to be read.
That's been going on for 1600 years at least.
Biggest pack of lies ever compiled.
7/8/2008 2:02:46 PM
1 2