Many evolutionists misinterpet the scientific evidence for creationism because it doesn't fit their faith-based assumptions. I would also point out that the fossil record demonstrates a catastrophic global flood which buried millions of plants and animals, but that is discussion for another thread.
34 comments
Just because Kent Hovind worked as a science teacher doesn't mean he should have.
Please go to the library. Look up science resources online. With luck, it's not too late to save your brain.
Actually, no, the fossil record indicates no such thing, you fucking moron. Trust me, many scientists, even evolutionary scientists, are Christian or otherwise religious. If they could actually prove that a global flood happened, it would be a Noble Prize winning discovery. Yet not a single piece of evidence exists to support that such a thing ever happened.
"Many evolutionists misinterpret the 'scientific' evidence for creationism because it only fits our faith-based assumptions. I would also point out that the fossil record demonstrates a catastrophic global flood which buried millions of plants and animals, but that is a discussion for another thread, because I just pulled that 'fact' out of my ass and have no evidence to support it."
Uber-fix'd!
Many Creationists misinterpret the scientific evidence for evolution because it doesn't fit their faith-based assumptions. They would also mix together real mass extinction events (like the CretaceousTertiary extinction) with evidences for local floods, despite the fact that they happened millions of years aparts, to construct together some "evidence" for a global flood like described in the bible or even resort to outright forgeries, to construct evidence for huzmans and dinosaurs alking together.
@LOLWUT: Kent Hovind never worked as a science teacher.
As you may know, he is a liar.
And a thief. And is having gay sex right this very minute. Prison will do that to you...
scientific evidence for creationism
I couldn't care less. I know Creationism is real. Creation, on the other hand...
"Many evolutionists misinterpet the scientific evidence for creationism because it doesn't fit their faith-based assumptions."
You seem to have confused "evolutionists" and "creationists".
"I would also point out that the fossil record demonstrates a catastrophic global flood which buried millions of plants and animals, but that is discussion for another thread."
Care to explain why we always find the same creatures in the same layers without exception if a flood did it?
And don't use that lame ass "hydrological sorting" bullshit either. It's been refuted far too often to go resorting to it.
Yes, yes of course. Evolution is faith-based, but the water needed to cover the entire Earth just spontaneously appears and disappears when it's convenient.
Considering that you gave no evidence or citation for the first sentence of your comment, you may as well discuss that huge flood on the same thread. Starting with citation.
Many evolutionists misinterpet the scientific evidence for creationism because it doesn't fit their faith-based assumptions.
There isn't any scientific evidence for creationism. Evidence for creationism requires evidence of a creator - something no one has ever been able to come up with, despite 2,500 years of trying. It also requires a scientific explanation of the method by which the the creation was accomplished. Creationists don't offer any positive evidence for creationism. Instead, they simply attack evolution. Creationism relies on what the courts have called a "contrived dualism" - that arguments against evolution are automatically arguments for creationism.
"I would also point out that the fossil record demonstrates a catastrophic global flood"
No, it doesn't. In fact, there's at least one article I've read that described what we'd see if there had been such a flood, and it's completely different from what we do see...
misinterpet the scientific evidence for creationism
And that evidence is what exactly?
I would also point out that the fossil record demonstrates a catastrophic global flood
No. No it doesn't.
Many creationists misinterpret the scientific evidence for evolution because it doesn't fit their faith-based assumptions.
There, fixed content AND spelling.
Now it makes sense.
"the fossil record demonstrates a catastrophic global flood"
...that somehow allowed layers in the middle to dry out, allowing creatures time to leave footprints and dig burrows, all during this single catastrophic global flood. Right.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.