"I don't see how one can prove evolution, no one was there."
'I don't see*' being the operative words here. Therefore Creation never happened. No human was there. Were you, penis?
@Zipperback
Go to a forest, and search for a tree that's rotting, and creaking in the wind. Place near such a digital audio recorder with auto-record facility & a lithium battery. Then leave area. Return later to now downed tree, retrieve digital audio recorder, and play back sound of tree falling over when there was nobody around to hear it.
Schrodinger never thought of the invention of tiny wireless video cameras (& a light source) or the invention of transparent Perspex, so as to see the cat inside the box while it's locked inside it.
The sound of one hand clapping Simply hit the fingers of that hand onto the palm. Whilst there may not be much volume, the sound is there.
'The Meaning of Life'? It answers it's own question.
'Philosophical Questions'? I piss on 'em! [/smartarse]
*-PROTIP: A rainbow doesn't actually physically exist, but at least it can be seen. I guess that fucks up you fundies having the right to say 'You can't see the wind, but it's there', re. the bad analogy (also to justify the use of the unjustifiable concept of 'faith') of using as an apologetic the reason(s) why God can't show himself in hard, solid, physical form (and no, not 'Jesus', he's not allowed), to prove his existence to the satisfaction of we Atheists. No Babel Fish required. [/Douglas Adams]