1 2
#888251
wackadoodle
"Choke to death on a penis while giving oral sex? Thats about the only (ever so slightly) plausible way that sodomy could cause death that i can think of. "
Ron Jeremy is a public health hazard!
2/8/2009 7:58:38 PM
#888262
stoat100
And Islam is different?
2/8/2009 8:03:36 PM
#888370
freako104
"We are not tolerant of behaviors that destroy individuals, families, and our culture"
Such as the behaviour of many religious people?
"Individuals may be free to pursue such behaviors as sodomy, but we will not and cannot tolerate these behaviors. They frequently lead to death"
So does living. And while at it, many people were killed in the name of god. Or gods too.
2/8/2009 8:51:04 PM
#888564
John
"We believe in "discrimination" in the good sense: choosing between what we and our 2,000 year old book say is good and evil, right and wrong, the better and the best."
There. Fixed.
2/8/2009 11:09:15 PM
#888592
Kinderklein
@IanC
Unless you include laceration sex, where you slice new cavities for penetration.
2/8/2009 11:23:52 PM
#888650
The L
I can't help but get this horrible idea for a YouTube video: DEATH BY SODOMY!! In which likable gay guys are bludgeoned with hammers, burned alive, etc., with the perpetrators repeatedly insisting that it wasn't their hate crimes that killed the homos, it was SODOMY that did them in.
2/9/2009 12:02:41 AM
#888732
Reverend Jeremiah
Its kind of funny how everything, you know, frequently leads to DEATH!
2/9/2009 12:38:40 AM
#888737
avatar
okay, someone should teach this idiot that consistency is mandatory in a system of thought, not optional.
On second thought... Someone should teach the entire lot just what "consistency" is.
2/9/2009 12:41:09 AM
#888743
Old Viking
... we will not and cannot tolerate these behaviors.
Coalitioners, if everyone in the world were as tough as you guys, I'd never walk on the ground, I'd just walk on people. Boo!
2/9/2009 12:44:18 AM
#889052
a mind far far away
Discrimination And Tolerance: We are not tolerant of behaviors that destroy individuals, families, and our culture
Then eradicate fundamentalism and conservative xtianity, now.
They frequently lead to death
[citation needed]
A person with “discriminating taste” is one who uses wisdom in making choices
That's just funny.
In short, we believe in intolerance to those things that are evil
Me too, so get rid of conservative and fundamentalist xtianity.
and we believe that we should discriminate against those behaviors which are dangerous to individuals and to society.
Me too, which is why we should, you guessed it, discriminate against conservative and fundamentalist xtianity.
2/9/2009 3:56:32 AM
#889170
This is not from RR? Well I'm stuned.
2/9/2009 4:54:34 AM
#889442
Zimmer
Not bad, I agree that individuals should be discriminating and possibly intolerant of things that are detrimental to society.
Now the next step is for you to prove that 'sodomy' between consenting adults is so destructive to civilization as you claim.
2/9/2009 9:20:38 AM
#890155
Poisoned Rationality
Gawd. These people make it sound like a small child explodes whenever two people have sex in a way they don't like. If you'd stop focusing on it all the time, it'd stop bothering you! They're not waving it in your faces, for God's sake!
2/9/2009 8:04:21 PM
#890843
My discriminating taste discriminates against your discriminating taste.
2/10/2009 4:06:55 AM
#890845
My discriminating taste discriminates against your discriminating taste.
2/10/2009 4:07:00 AM
#890888
Clown
"choosing between right and wrong, good and evil"
"Only the Sith talks in absolutes."
2/10/2009 5:01:34 AM
#892930
G. Fieendish
This reminds me about moral crusaders in the U.K, who go on about a return to "Victorian Family Values"...
Needless to say, I ask them just when they plan to decriminalise Incest (It was made a criminal offence in 1905), legalise all A, B,& C Drugs (this was largely due to the DORA 40B emergency legislation introduced in 1917, to prevent munitions workers from turning up drunk to work), & depending on just when in Victoria's reign, they're referring to, the dropping of the sexual age of concent to 13 (this was done in the 1870's).
They don't often reply to my humble questions, or at worst, go on the attack, as a distraction to cover their incompentence, as they havent bothered to research the reality, as opposed to their mythical, & idealised version of "Victorian Values"...
2/11/2009 4:05:40 AM
#1431660
Equivocation
8/6/2012 7:14:29 PM
1 2