This is obviously a complete fossil.
You have an amazing grasp of the obvious.
What Evolution has to show us is fossils of transtional forms with incomplete organs.
No, that's what you claim it has to show. Evolutionary theory however predicts no such thing. Your claim lies exposed as a straw man to anybody who knows the slightest thing about evolutionary biology.
Half fish half reptile, half reptile half bird. Montrous creatures.
These are not things described by evolutionary theory, they are things which do not exist outside of fairy tales and the delusions of religious fundamentalist science deniers.
And the transitional forms must outnumber the stable species.
Transitionals forms are stable species in and of themselves, not radical jumps over a generation or two, but the result of numerous small changes compounded over countless generations. Face the facts, either you are willfully ignorant of the claims and predictios of evolutionary theory, tragically uneducated and uninformed on the matter, or you are just plain lying about it in order to advance your own religious and/or ideological agenda.
we must have trillions of hem if evolution is a fact. But we dont have any.
Evolutionary theory doesn't predict that there will be "trillions" of "transitional fossils", You assert that it says we should. Just ask any of people in the relative scientific fields and you will learn that it fossilization only occurs in certain circumstances and enviroments. Not everything that has ever lived is fossilized because it's a fairly rare occurence, but it is one that is very well understood.
We have 100 million fossils today belonging to complete stable species. we dont have even single transitional form.
Once again... Transitional. Forms. Are. Stable. Species. Themselves. You. Idiot.
That scientific fact refutes all the claims of Darwinism.
Really now? Just what are these "scientific facts"?
Scientific fact disproves the theory of evolution.
Just because you make a claim and then say that it is "scientific fact" doesn't make it so. If science so easily refutes evolutionary theory then why does the ToE have such wide range of evidence backing it up? Why is the ToE accepted in most of the relavent fields of science?
Are you suggesting that there is some kind of world wide conspiricy involving a large majority of the worlds scientific community to hide the evidence that flat out refutes evolution? And if so, then why? What would they gain from such a thing? And how would you even know in the first place?
Species appear abruptly, complete and perfectly formed.
If that's so then you should should be able to prove that new species such as nylon eating bacteria or citrate absorbing E. coli are in fact a result of special creation that happened so recently that there should surely be evidence of that act of special creation. Even more so because one of those species evolved into it's current form in controlled laboratory enviroment.
This fact poves us an exalted Creation by Allah.
It seems that the only difference between fundamentalist of various religions is what they choose to name their fairy tale skydaddy.
