1 2
#975191
Cole Ford
'They will say that the bible is not the infallible word of God'. . .
'None of those beliefs can be backed up by scripture so they are false teachings'
Circular argument anyone?
6/22/2009 7:27:58 AM
#975192
pfft
tau·tol·o·gy (tô-tl-j)
n. pl. tau·tol·o·gies
1.
a. Needless repetition of the same sense in different words; redundancy.
b. An instance of such repetition.
2. Logic An empty or vacuous statement composed of simpler statements in a fashion that makes it logically true whether the simpler statements are factually true or false; for example, the statement Either it will rain tomorrow or it will not rain tomorrow.
6/22/2009 7:29:29 AM
#975200
Thundersqueaks
If the bible doesn't say the bible contains errors, then the bible is inerrant? Flawless fundie logic of heads I win, tails you lose.
6/22/2009 7:37:49 AM
#975201
emau99
So you can't argue against scripture, because...it goes against scripture?
Moving on...
6/22/2009 7:39:37 AM
#975206
Scooby71
So despite the two creation accounts in the first two chapters of Genesis, recorded in scripture, there is no error in the bible?
6/22/2009 7:52:42 AM
#975212
David B.
Well my bible does say those things, and since you believe the bible is inerrent...
6/22/2009 7:59:35 AM
#975213
Horsefeathers
"None of those beliefs can be backed up by scripture so they are false teachings."
If something can't be backed up by reality it's "false teachings". This pretty much describes all of your precious scripture by the way.
6/22/2009 7:59:38 AM
#975214
Caustic Gnostic
OK, the bible is the infallible word of god.
god is a fucking schizo.
QED.
6/22/2009 8:00:10 AM
#975220
Berny
Why does the "Infallible Word of God" contain four differing accounts of Jesus' resurrection (a supposedly eye-witnessed event).
For what it's worth, reality disagrees with scripture, so I guess reality is false teachings.
Retard.
6/22/2009 8:04:58 AM
#975222
nutbunny
So the bible IS the infallible word of god because it can be verified by scripture. Which particular scripture would that be? Could you mean the bible by any chance? This conjures up a few Escher pictures in my head right about now.
6/22/2009 8:06:54 AM
#975231
Mr. Creazil
Colleagues, I think this calls for the wheel of power.
6/22/2009 8:23:10 AM
#975233
D Laurier.
"They will say that the bible is not the infallible word of God,"
And they will be right.
6/22/2009 8:25:53 AM
#975234
Anon-e-moose
"None of those beliefs can be backed up by scripture"
Better sit down peace4ever, and prepare to have your 'faith' completely shattered:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html
Read 'em & weep. So much for the INERRANT word of God eh, fundies? Proof, if there ever was, that the Bible was written by flawed, ERRANT humans - most of whom were Bronze Age goatfuckers who had ideas above their stations.
'Did God create man, or did Man create God?' I think the above weblink answers that question beyond reasonable doubt. Ergo, Atheism.
QED.
6/22/2009 8:27:43 AM
#975247
(cue Billy Preston)
Will it go 'round in circles? Will it fly high like a bird up in the sky?
6/22/2009 9:01:08 AM
#975255
mockeldritch
'They will say that the bible is not the infallible word of God...None of those beliefs can be backed up by scripture'
By definition, really. YOUR definition anyway. Otherwise the Bible would be one seriously paradoxical publication!
6/22/2009 9:11:57 AM
#975258
Bible is infallible because the bible says it is infallible.
The Bible must be right because it is infallible.
Bible is infallible because the bible says it is infallible.
The Bible must be right because it is infallible.
Bible is infallible because the bible says it is infallible.
The Bible must be right because it is infallible...
6/22/2009 9:15:13 AM
#975269
michael1384
Circular.
6/22/2009 9:26:09 AM
#975276
Well, first of all, we should look out at the "credentials" of Scriptures. Nobody is so stupid as to discredit himself or herself in their own autobiography.
6/22/2009 9:36:28 AM
#975298
Thammuz
You Spin Me Round Round Baby, Round Round...
6/22/2009 9:57:56 AM
#975307
aaa
And they call us ignorant.
6/22/2009 10:02:03 AM
#975314
Clown
No, my bible came with disclaimer. You lose.
6/22/2009 10:06:39 AM
#975324
smartz
Which is more believeable: 2000+ year old scriptures of power-hungry men, or modern day scientists (of both genders) with top of the line technology and references?
If you said the former, you really are a hypocrite because you use the internet, the ULTIMATE source of information but don't use it to your benefit. Now sit down and shut up.
6/22/2009 10:19:13 AM
#975328
Drax
So let's get this straight: because the Bible doesn't say that it contains errors, it cannot contain any errors?
6/22/2009 10:25:19 AM
#975330
Table Rock
Round and round it goes, where the argument stops, nobody knows....
6/22/2009 10:26:59 AM
#975341
Thinking Allowed
I'm still looking for a 4 legged insect. Oh wait, I found one.
6/22/2009 10:40:46 AM
1 2