Obama constantly referenced his father, so naturally I was interested. I searched and found "Problems Facing Our Socialism" and after reading that, I realized that Obama was just not your typical leftist Chicago moonbat but a Marxist with a Marxist agenda that would do and say whatever it took to place him self in the position of the POTUS. I knew he was going to fundamentally attempt to change this nation for the worse and I have been saying exactly what the quoted author of the OP is saying....
Obama is a dangerous Marxist that will do everything in his power to destroy this country. He has already set numerous amounts of precedent for future Marxist leaders to pick up where he left off, Hes appointed his agenda to the Supreme Court.... Hes achieved exactly what he wanted to achieve -- to him and those that share his agenda his presidency has been 100% successful.
Of course he can only do so much because hes still bound by the Constitution but to him Marxism is a progressive process.
The guy is very dangerous -- hes not stupid either, hes doing what he set out to do and thats destroy The United States of America.
25 comments
Come on...is this "try to use Marxist as frequently and incorrectly as possible within a short post"? Because, if so, I give this post 10/10.
A Marxist with a Marxist agenda?! Good heavens, no!
Because it's obvious that this fool has no idea what the hell Marxism is (or isn't), you could safely replace each use of it with, say, 'Christian'. Or 'Muslim'. Or pretty much your inflammatory noun-of-choice.
Plus, just as a fact-check...if Obama was yanked from American politics and thrust into European politics...he'd be kind of hanging around the just-left-of-center crowd. Not the super-radical-leftist guys. Because, uh, he isn't. At all.
And he isn't a Marxist. And there aren't a whole ton of Marxists out there anymore (not as politicians, anyway). You have communists of various stripes, but I think Marxism is pretty passe this days.
Obama is a Marxist?
Marx was the one that said that Communism would only be achieved by a mass uprising of the proletariat, right?
Obama, as president, seems to be attempting to institute change from above, rather than rallying the working class to take up arms and overthrow the ruling class. So, even is he is a socialist/communist, he's nowhere close to being a Marxist.
By the way- he's not a socialist or communist, either.
It's the new "Scary Obama Post" game! You can make Obama sound like the most scary person ever just by filling in the blanks with one of the following scare words:
Marxist
I realized that Obama was just not your typical leftist Chicago moonbat but a _______ with a ________ agenda that would do and say whatever it took to place him self in the position of the POTUS. I knew he was going to fundamentally attempt to change this nation for the worse and I have been saying exactly what the quoted author of the OP is saying....
Obama is a dangerous ________ that will do everything in his power to destroy this country. He has already set numerous amounts of precedent for future _________ leaders to pick up where he left off, Hes appointed his agenda to the Supreme Court.... Hes achieved exactly what he wanted to achieve -- to him and those that share his agenda his presidency has been 100% successful.
The guy is very dangerous -- hes not stupid either, hes doing what he set out to do and thats destroy The United States of America.
Obama's father left when he was two, so unless he got some colorful Marx for Toddlers flash cards before then, I can't see how his alleged political views are a factor in Obama's.
Even if his father had raised him, he would not have inevitably believed what his father did- my father is a Catholic who thinks Republicans aren't conservative enough, and I'm an atheist leftist.
Obama constantly referenced his father
Oh? When? Give me some examples.
The man abandoned his family when his son was two years old. Can you remember anything from when you were two? I can't.
I've seen desperate tactics before, and this is a good example.
And way to misuse the term "Marxist." Not everyone to the left of Karl Rove is a Marxist.
It is clear that you know not of what you speak.
So, here is a pic of Trig Palin and his illegal nanny.
image
I've always wondered about rightists and that word "moonbat". Where the f*ck did that term come from and how the f*ck is it associated with left-wing views? The only sense I've ever been able to make out of it is maybe it's some illiterate, backwoods mispronunciation of "Monbiot" as in famous lefty George Monbiot's name.
At least the origins of "wingnut" is clear.
One of the comments on the site:
"If you're done calling us stupid assholes, shut up and learn something.
Bush: Progressive Lite.
Obama: Progressive Deluxe"
So can't you morons make up your minds about Obama? Is he a Marxist or a Nazi? And exactly what has he done to deserve being called either?
Truth is, he's not even a Social Democrat.
Look, Obama's been in office for more than a year and a half now, and no "Marxist programs" have been initiated.
And please learn to use an apostrophe.
@vaiyt
-------Gay Atheist Muslims are under your bed planning to turn you gay, convert, kill, and make you have an abortion!!11!!! *scare chord*
The first thing he would have in his agenda, LOGICALLY, is the fall of the Soviet Union and how it's not fashionable any longer, did you think about that?. Oh wait, you haven't a clue of what marxism means.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
