Quote# 80339

since evolution does not exist we will not be allowing any discussion about that false theory in this forum or website.

that does not mean that science cannot be discussed but it does mean that any mentioning of evolution is out. when scientists see reactions in their experiemnts, they are NOT seeing evolution in action but the result of God's creative work under the influence of the sin and corruption that entered the world at adam's sin.

that also means that there is no such thing as evolutionary biology, there is simply biology and this idea applies to all fields related to science.

do not bring evolutionary ideas into the forum, bring the truth and evolution, the process, the thinking is NOT the truth.

archaeologist, Dakota's Christian Forum 48 Comments [3/31/2011 3:28:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 85

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 | bottom

Jack Bauer

It's so nice to see such an open mind expressing itself...

3/31/2011 4:12:49 AM

Any other science you don't like, archaeologist? What happens if you find an artefact more than 6,000 years old?

3/31/2011 4:43:06 AM

Raised by Horses

3/31/2011 4:58:12 AM


So we can just declare things to be untrue and that's that, no further discussion? Fine, in that case I declare that the Bible is completely false from the first word to the last. This means that Christians can no longer quote any scripture.

3/31/2011 4:59:39 AM

Mister Spak

Also there will be no discussion about the round earth theory. This is a Satanic deception that started in 1492. Rand McNalley has been promoting it ever since.

3/31/2011 5:09:05 AM


Since he calls himself archaeologist I'm guessing he's one of those armchair "flood theory" archaeologists who have studied a few creationists "theories". You know Hovind, Ham and that lot.

He can't handle the truth so he dismisses it immediateley as a forum rule. Probably cutting archaeology rebuttles too, especially facts and links to real findings.

3/31/2011 5:20:27 AM


Discussing biology without any reverences to the theory of evolution?

Makes totally sense...

3/31/2011 5:29:46 AM

Doubting Thomas

So... I guess there won't be any discussion of science on your forum then?

Funny when I was reading this I kept thinking of Dr. Zaius from Planet of the Apes talking about heresy. This is just some "if we ignore it than it doesn't exist" burying your head in the sand.

3/31/2011 6:21:18 AM


If you can't dispute the other side, censor the shit out of them.

3/31/2011 6:21:28 AM


"since evolution does not exist we will not be allowing any discussion about that false theory in this forum or website"

What colour is the sky in your dimension? Funny then, that the Conservative Christian Judge John E. Jones III did allow discussion about 'that false theory' in the forum that was the Federal Court in the case of Kitzmiller vs. Dover in 2005. And not in a 'Funny-ha-ha' way, neither.

The rest is legal, and therefore Constitutional history.

And mayhaps that's precisely the reason why you're not allowing discussion of Evolution in your forum, 'archaeologist' (oh, the irony!)

As far as the Constitution - and thus the law of the land that is the US - is concerned, Evolution is fact. Creationism is lies.

The law says so.

Therefore as far as the whole country (apart from the domestic Madrassas that is 'hoemskuling'), nay the rest of Planet Earth is concerned, the whole Evolution vs. Creation debate is over.

Must be cold in that river in Egypt eh archaeologist, and every other fundie in that forum?

Short of taking over the White House, Capitol Building, and Supreme Court (lol, US armed forces), that's what the law says, which - according to what Romans 13:1-5 states - you must obey.

That's how things roll here on Planet Reality. Deal with it.


I hereby nominate this quote for the 'Denial: It's Not Just A River In Egypt' Award.

3/31/2011 6:23:03 AM


'since Christianity does not exist we will not be allowing any element of it to permeate the government, or to grant freedom from taxation'


3/31/2011 6:26:47 AM


Dumb. Just dumb. If I may be allowed an Americanism this once.

@ Mister Spak

In the light of what you say, I reckon then that the US is just a figment my imagination.

3/31/2011 6:29:07 AM

Doctor Whom

Since my belief system is so true, the only way to deal with any reality that contradicts it is the Argumentum ad Banhammerum.

3/31/2011 6:29:09 AM

Jack Bauer

That forum is worth a visit.

I feel sorry for John the Atheist, who got his ass edited out of it (for breaking forum rules!) a number of times.

3/31/2011 6:44:29 AM


Wow. Just, wow.

3/31/2011 6:55:14 AM

Godless heathen

Words escape me. That's just too ridiculous for words

3/31/2011 7:01:42 AM


Something not existing is not sufficient grounds for banning discussion of it. Who ever heard of any forum banning discussion of unicorns, griffons, wookiees or Belgium?

Even if we pretend evolution doesn't exist, your argument still makes no sense.

3/31/2011 7:25:54 AM


'Denial its not just a river in Egypt award' seconded and might I add freedom of speech anyone? or are fundies against the constitution......oh wait never mind

*note I am not American so please correct me if I am wrong

seriously how can they call it a forum if not all views are allowed to be expressed from credible sources no less?

3/31/2011 7:29:26 AM


We can discuss science, as long as it's not evolution.

And geology.

And astronomy.

And ancient history.


3/31/2011 7:44:02 AM


Good job proving that you have no idea how shit works.

3/31/2011 7:50:18 AM


And the word Revolution shall become R.

3/31/2011 8:14:16 AM


Dakota's Christian Forum will BROOK NO DISSENT!

3/31/2011 8:19:54 AM


"do not bring evolutionary ideas into the forum"

So even discussion of the latest models (and thus the new technical innovations therein) of the cars made by Mitsubishi is out, then?


3/31/2011 8:21:51 AM

Brendan Rizzo

Wow. Utterly silencing all debate. How very theocratic and totalitarian of you. You're the lowest of the low, "archaeologist".

3/31/2011 8:56:41 AM


Isn't this technically known as "Argumentum ad 'La-la-la-la-la-I-can't-hear-you'"?

3/31/2011 9:00:54 AM

1 2 | top: comments page