1 2
#1327476
Extraintrovert
Science. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Also, it's good to see some more Muslim lunatics on this site. Some variety to add some spice.
8/31/2011 3:34:00 AM
#1327487
Percy Q. Shunn
Scientific fact #1:
Idiocy does not differentiate between religions.
8/31/2011 3:50:40 AM
#1327489
Raised by Horses
And zero knowledge of it makes one a creationist, apparently.
This isn't really worth picking apart. There are so many non-sequiturs packed into that last sentence you'd need a blue steel diamond cutter just to get started.
8/31/2011 3:52:48 AM
#1327495
Radaghast
...and lack of understanding makes you a Christian.
Allah be praised!
8/31/2011 4:03:32 AM
#1327514
dionysus
Right, that's why Iran, Pakistan, Somalia, and Tunisia are just bastions of space age technology compared to, say, Japan.
8/31/2011 5:13:57 AM
#1327516
Mister Spak
He [Zaynub Zafar] claims to be a theist yet he fails to find God through his theism, which is so obvious to see, what with the Koran and failure of Islam and all. That is because incomplete knowledge of theism makes one a muslim and complete knowledge of it makes one a christian.
8/31/2011 5:16:21 AM
#1327521
SpukiKitty
...That is because incomplete knowledge of Tacos makes one Ishkabibble and complete knowledge of it makes one Sunglasses.....I dunno....Had to write a Non Sequitur.
8/31/2011 5:29:03 AM
#1327526
Zeus Almighty
@ SpukiKitty
Mmmmm. Tacos.
I can think of worse things to worship.
8/31/2011 5:39:35 AM
#1327530
Anon2
Oh, so "complete knowledge of science" makes one a Muslim?
I'm quite sure that there is NO Muslim on earth who has complete knowledge of quantum chromodynamics, solid-state physics, organic chemistry, oceanography, molecular biology, ... (and more than thousand other scientific fields)
Btw, "Allahdidit" is not sufficient.
8/31/2011 5:47:08 AM
#1327541
SpukiKitty
@Anon2
"Oh, so 'complete knowledge of science' makes one a Muslim?"
If we're talking Medieval/Ren-era Muslim societies, yes....But most present-era Muslim societies, no.
Not bashing Muslims...I'm bashing Fundie weirdos like The Taliban, Iran's Govt., The Saudis, Ugandan Dictators, etc. and the poor souls under their thumb.
8/31/2011 6:24:29 AM
#1327542
Doubting Thomas
Not being able to find God through science is not a fault of science.
8/31/2011 6:26:38 AM
#1327557
Brendan Rizzo
Oh, LOL.
8/31/2011 6:48:05 AM
#1327564
Jezebel's Evil Sister
Since no one has "complete knowledge of science," True Muslims® must be just as rare (i.e., non-existent) as True Christians™.
8/31/2011 6:59:53 AM
#1327572
LDM
Oh great, now you all got me wanting tacos for lunch.
8/31/2011 7:09:28 AM
#1327602
Anon-e-moose
Thus spake the one on Facebook. Via the WWW. Via a computer. Via telecommunications. Via electronics. Via electricity. All products of
science.
I don't see 'Made by Allah' on any of such, pal.
Q: Wny do you never see Muslims on "Star Trek"?
A: Because "Star Trek" is set in the
future.
There's a reason why that joke exists. Even "Babylon 5" has a regular character who is Jewish (Susan Ivanova).
So if Allah created the universe, this world & all the life on it,
who created the creator?
The phrase 'Enquiring minds
need to know' exists for a reason. Ergo, science. Q. E. and D., bitch.
@SpukiKitty
Tacos are good, but I can recommend the British equivalent:
Cornish Pasties:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pasty
As yummy as
you are, m'dear. :9
8/31/2011 8:17:10 AM
#1327636
Noneofyourbusiness
Please enlighten us on this "failure of evolution".
8/31/2011 9:31:49 AM
#1327637
Berny
I think the best thing to say about this comment is:
Science flies us to the moon.
Religion flies us into buildings.
8/31/2011 9:33:40 AM
#1327640
\m/>_<\m/
@noneofyourbusiness:
obvious, isn't it? he's living proof!
at least, of ideological evolution.... he's still stuck in the XIVth century, idea-wise
8/31/2011 9:37:33 AM
#1327651
Science doesn't mean what you think it means.
8/31/2011 10:04:52 AM
#1327652
Osiris
@Anon-e-moose
He's not anti-science. He's anti-science that specifically contradicts his religion. Most creationists are okay with science if it doesn't contradict their religion, or if it does but provides them with nice convinces like technology, in which case they are able to look the other way.
8/31/2011 10:05:15 AM
#1327655
When I "do science" I don't see God. I see hopping sand grains and turbulent eddies, I see dinoflagellates and fossilised protists, I see billions of snowflakes being incorporated into the body of a glacier. I see so many things within the limited scope of my chosen field that it becomes impossible to believe that one entity is responsible for it all. I started my studies as an atheist; as I near the end of them (formally, we never stop learning of course) my position remains unchanged. Except that I have rather more contempt for those that think science supports their religion. Science is about the real, not the imaginary. And the real is so amazing I can't comprehend why people spend so much time ignoring it in favour of their chosen deity.
8/31/2011 10:10:10 AM
#1327662
Papabear
So, failing to find God through science means that on is not a scientist? You should wear an "I'M AN IDIOT" sign on your forehead so no one accidently wastes time talking to you.
8/31/2011 10:40:32 AM
#1327676
Ah, a Muslim. I love the added variety. Apparently Muslim and Christian fundies are equally stupid, but I guess that could said about all of them.
8/31/2011 11:44:16 AM
#1327695
Old Viking
Thanks for taking the time to clue us in.
8/31/2011 12:27:56 PM
#1327696
I Read About The Afterlife
Oh shit, backwards day again already?
8/31/2011 12:29:51 PM
1 2