1 2 3
Bring it on!
Go ahead and make an ALSTST.
11/30/2005 9:21:37 AM
Now that thread was an entertaining read, especially when Yahweh smote them with reason and civility. and quotes. I can't wait til they respond.
11/30/2005 9:27:02 AM
And just who is going to invent this \"separate internet\"??? That's the main flaw with this post: there's nothing outlined as to who is in charge of this \"separate internet\" after it is built.
11/30/2005 4:14:09 PM
Wow, did they get their knickers in a bunch over this! Charity is spitting nails & ready to sue. Oh MY! Whatever shall we do?
This reaction is so much more vitriolic than other sites when they discover FSTDT; where's their Christian charity?
11/30/2005 5:10:11 PM
Um, I believe the actual Homer quote is, \"Kiss my big curvy white ass\".
If you're gonna quote the H-man, get it right! Doh!
11/30/2005 5:24:22 PM
HAHA, charity is threatening to sue yahweh for internet stalking, LOLOLOL---idiocy at its most humorous!
11/30/2005 5:24:54 PM
Doctor Doom, it's been done.
It was called Village Athiests Say the Darndest Things and it's been defunct since early 2004. So much for needing a separate Internet.
But hey, if you want, bring it on. I look forward to the rampant success of ALSTDT!
11/30/2005 6:42:17 PM
Words fail me...So I decided to steal some from internet humourist Seanbaby:
\"Internet forums bring out the worst of humanity: stupid irrational egomaniacs telling each other how much they hate everything. Getting bothered by it is like reading 'FUCK YOU' on a bathroom wall and saying, 'Fuck ME!? H-how DARE they!!'\"
11/30/2005 11:57:44 PM
I really just can't get over the, \"it would require a separate Internet to handle the volume\" part.
One, just simply because this guy thinks that there is a limit to how much the internet can hold. And two, because of how ironic it is that if they did create another internet, no one would be able to get to it.
12/1/2005 12:58:07 AM
That thread is just great. Especially how they reacted to the polite post - you can really see the \"respect\" that everyone has there for everyone. I have the feeling that that thread will serve as a source for new entries for a LOOOONG time ;-)
*goes to take a political compass test as he was just reminded of it*
12/1/2005 1:14:55 AM
So wait, they didn't know about the site until now?
12/1/2005 2:03:58 AM
>>So wait, they didn't know about the site until now?<<
Yea, they are a little slow. It is funny that Charity links everyone to some stalking state law sites, but obviously didn't read them, because all the ones i looked at required a threat of bodily harm/death.
12/1/2005 2:54:00 AM
That young gal Charity reminds me of the little girl who doesn't get her way ends up saying, \"I'm taking my Barbies and going home!\" I really wonder how old she is...it saddens me to think that a grown woman would act like that
12/1/2005 4:31:59 AM
Charity is right. This is a hate filled site. After all it quotes her.
12/1/2005 4:41:57 AM
It makes me sad - my membership on that board still hasn't been approved yet. They'd love me. I'm a vet, I'm a registered Republican who has -always- voted a straight ticket since I was old enough to vote. I'm socially and fiscally conservative.
However, I take a very dim view of the way that most of my fellow Republicans and conservatives are acting, these days.
12/1/2005 4:42:01 AM
Strange...he gives the appearance of eloquence without actually making sense. \"Inasmuch as the one or two libs at that Web liberaloony asylum who can actually read surf conservative BBs looking for things to post, here's my response to their useless site.\"
12/1/2005 5:45:58 AM
The bit about requiring a \"separate Internet\" just shows his total ignorance of technology. Shouldn't be surprised, really, as he's ignorant of just about everything else too.
Besides, it's been tried. It just doesn't work that well, because there's very little self-evidently stupid material you'll get out of atheists. Yeah, you'll get some from the way-far-out nutcases, but even then, they're generally not as amusing (or disturbing, as the case may be) as the stuff you'll find here.
<<< Charity is right. This is a hate filled site. After all it quotes her. >>>
Touche. If you count the posts quoted on here, there's plenty of hate. Then again, since they're being held up to ridicule, they probably shouldn't count against us. (Yeah, there's the occasional nutcase who's just as bad as they are - Francois, for one. But I think they still \"win\" on both quantity and quality.)
12/1/2005 5:51:13 AM
Wow, they are really working themselves up into a lather over at Free Conservatives! I'd like to know how many of them have actually read any quotes posted here. That Charity guy is tickling my funny bone the most---he is whining that posting his comments here is a breach of \"intellectual property\", and he demands all of his original material be removed, OR ELSE, LOLOL. HAHA. It really is a pitiful spectacle what is going on in that thread.
12/1/2005 6:02:39 AM
I'd like to purchase the Free Conservatives website and ban that DoctorDoom.
And it's not like his comments will stop appearing here, so he seems to be quite obsessed with his bigotry being exposed.
12/1/2005 6:06:34 AM
Yea, basically, anything posted on completly public domains, is not subject to copyright laws. So, I guess we have another subject matter in which most fundies are ignorant: law. Hrm... that seems kind of scary.
I am glad that there are people arguing for us in there, other than Yahweh. Nice D&D reference on that thread btw, but, I think you should have summoned a UFO.
12/1/2005 6:09:44 AM
What a bunch of wusses. It seems that they moved the thread into another forum where you have to log in.
12/1/2005 6:19:44 AM
What amuses me most is that ALL namecalling (girlfriend, sweetie don't qualify, at least in my book; and \"bastards\" was directed at \"we\", though ironically) came from them, but \"we\" started a flamewar? *chuckle*
That reaction to that little card/fight game was quite telling.As well as the posts Apollo5600 just made. They should start to act their age.
12/1/2005 6:22:51 AM
D&D? Huh, did the 1st Edition have something like that? Cause it didn't ring a bell in my 2nd AD&D and 3rd D&D knowledge... Or maybe I just forgot another sourcebook *chuckle*
12/1/2005 6:26:14 AM
<<< That Charity guy is tickling my funny bone the most---he is whining that posting his comments here is a breach of \"intellectual property\", and he demands all of his original material be removed, OR ELSE, LOLOL. HAHA >>>
Wow, in just two words he manages to be wrong twice. There's nothing \"intellectual\" about any material that got quoted here, and as for it being his \"property\", it technically is, but we are well within our fair use rights to quote it here.
12/1/2005 6:29:22 AM
Someone should point out to them that even the people at Theology Web laugh at them, since a few of their posts were nominated for \"Screwball of the month\" in the Tektonics forum over there. (I think that it was in Oct?)
On a more serious note, is it possible that the reason that the FreeConservatives people moved their forum to a Members only sectino is so that they can try to claim that their statements are no longer public property?
12/1/2005 8:15:46 AM
1 2 3