Evolutionists love to omit details in order to make their alternative theory work. There is no evidence for the claimed tranisitional process. It is all read into by unbelievers who do not want God to exist.
Oh and I am still waiting for the scripture that says it is okay to use science over God's word.
37 comments
" There is no evidence for the claimed tranisitional process."
We have the transitional species fossils. We win.
"Oh and I am still waiting for the scripture that says it is okay to use science over God's word."
Oh and I am still waiting for the scripture that tells you how to build an internet where you posted this bilge.
There is no evidence for the claimed tranisitional process
image
It is all read into by unbelievers who do not want God to exist.
image
Ken Miller: Evolutionary Biologist, Catholic
Oh and I am still waiting for the scripture that says it is okay to use science over God's word.
Isn't that kind of like waiting for a medium to tell you that you can't talk to the dead?
Knobbled. I always omit the dirt and the Hocus Pocus bits.
Doctor Tee is not reading this because he is still waiting for the scripture that says people use computers and internets that contain Skeptics Annotated Bible.
Therefore, sky beast droolathon.
>Claims scripture overrides scientific findings of the educated populace.
>Uses circular reasoning logical fallacy to justify scripture.
>Molests, spits and pisses on the word 'doctor' in the process.
There is a kind of scripture that essentially says we should follow science, or at least secularism, rather than the Buybull. It's call the Constitution of the United States of America. You should read it sometime, Dave.
> Evolutionists love to omit details in order to make their alternative theory work.
What's your problem with that, exactly? Creationists refuse to tell us why their theory is supposed to work in the first place. Some detail is better than no detail at all, right?
1. Every detail of evolution is available for you to examine yourself.
2.Every species is transitional.
3.There is a reason unbelievers don't believe in your deity(or any). Lack of evidence and lack of reason/logic for such a particular being.
4.The scriptures would say nothing about science because the scientific method hadn't been created yet and bronze age people knew nothing of the concept.
Yet, no creationist has even proposed a testable hypothesis.
Scripture does say it's OK to own slaves.Where can I get my slaves? I would like a half dozen skinny female virgins, please.
You have my permission TEE to use science. I notice you already have by being on the devils interwebs , but I will let that pass.. for now.
*ominous rumbling*
I love those science fair things , like pop rocks and coke, I didnt see that coming when I made them both.
and Tee, tell me off for not calling you Dr and I will smite thee, I made you and I can take you out .
have a nice Godly day - remember fornication may be fun, but its FORBIDDEN !!!!
*smite smitey smite *
New textbook on evolution out -
Evolution: Making Sense of Life
Carl Zimmer (Author), Douglas Emlen (Author)
Please do tell us where you find details omitted.
Doctors of Mumbo-Jumbo Ph.D. have no credentials to comment on science in an official capacity.
"The study of theology, as it stands in the Christian churches, is the study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it rests on no principles; it proceeds by no authority; it has no data; it can demonstrate nothing; and it admits of no conclusion." -- Thomas Paine
image
image
image
It is all read into by unbelievers who do not want God to exist.
I wonder why there are so many Christians who don't want God to exist then? There are many Christians who understand and believe evolutionary theory.
Oh and I am still waiting for the scripture that says it is okay to use science over God's word.
It's pretty sad if you can't do anything that's not written in your holy book. If that's truly how you believe, though, you should get off the internet, stop driving your car, and go live with the Amish.
To state this is to state that animal populations do not change over time, which is ludicrous. It also doesn't preclude the existence of God.
The scripture isn't going to say it's OK to use science over God's word, because it was written at a time when the concept "science" in its modern sense didn't exist.
Well, creationism doesn't even qualify as a theory; at best, it's only a notion.
Now, when we're talking creationism, there's quite a few omitted details here. "Poof from dirt; there it is!" needs a few fucking details.
And if God exists and "did" everything, then science is just the observation on "how" you fucktard. Now fuck off with your false attribution errors.
That transitional process is called evolution. Actually, I have evidence, because I am a tansitional form, just like you are.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.