“If you believe that light travels that means you start at the assumption of the intromission theory.”
Or maybe a little after the assumption.
We bounce light off of mirrors on the moon, left by the astronauts, to measure the distance from Earth to the moon. This requires light to travel. If it did not, we’d get the same results every single time, with no variation.
So, it’s at least a little validated, what?
“Starting at assumptions is not scientific.”
No, it’s very scientific. I mean, we have to assume that the universe is real and not a programmed simulation, in order to do ANY science.
“And saying Einsteins theories are empirical is ignorant.”
All science theories are attempts to explain observations that were made empirically. Relativity, evolution, four-color map, all the theories.
“A theory = something not proven scientifically.”
Well, nothing is PROVEN scientifically, so that includes theories, hypothesis, laws, guesses, fantasies, and whatever thefuck you’re posting.
“Definition of theory:
An assumption based on information or knowledge; a conjecture.”
That’s what House does based on the differential. He’s usually wrong until the fourth commercial break.
Science theories: a well-substantiated, comprehensive explanation of an aspect of the natural world, incorporating facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses
“If that's what you think science is, then no wonder you believe in evolution.”
Take this unsupported non sequitur and shove it up your guess-hole.
